Anisotropic nature of plant fiber and various plant fiber-correlated porosities are the major setbacks in evaluating the elastic constants of plant fiber-reinforced polymer composites theoretically. An attempt is made here to get rid of those setbacks and focuses toward the evaluation of accurate elastic constants of composites. In this work, mechanical characteristics such as tensile, flexure, and shear characteristics of woven jute/epoxy and woven aloe/epoxy composites are determined. The experimentally measured elastic constants of composites are further used to find the elastic anisotropy of the jute and aloe fibers using the proposed model which is a combined model of Halpin–Tsai equations and laminate analogy approach with the inclusion of porosity correction factor. Using the theoretically predicted elastic properties of fiber, the elastic constants of the tapered laminated woven jute/epoxy and woven aloe/epoxy composites are evaluated using the proposed model.
ShahDUSchubelPJCliffordMJet al.The tensile behavior of off-axis loaded plant fibre composites: as insight on the non-linear stress strain response. Polym Compos2012; 33: 1464–1504.
2.
ChakravartyACHearleJW. 45 − Observations on the tensile properties of ultimate cells of some plant fibres. J Text I1967; 58: 651–656.
3.
Madsen B. Properties of plant fiber yarn polymer composites: an experimental study. PhD Thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark, 2004.
4.
MiaoMFinnN. Conversion of natural fibres into structural composites. J Textil Eng2008; 54: 165–77.
5.
Palani KumarKJeya SekaranAS. Some natural fibers used in polymer composites and their extraction processes: a review. J Reinf Plast Compos2014; 33: 1879–1892.
6.
GowdaTMNaiduACChhayaR. Some mechanical properties of untreated jute fabric-reinforced polyester composites. Compos A1999; 30: 277–284.
7.
AhmedKSVijayaranganS. Tensile, flexural and interlaminar shear properties of woven jute and jute-glass fabric reinforced polyester composites. J Mater Process Technol2008; 207: 330–335.
8.
Jeya SekaranASPalani KumarKPitchandiK. Evaluation on mechanical properties of woven aloevera and sisal fibre hybrid reinforced epoxy composites. Bull Mater Sci2015; 38: 1183–1193.
9.
HeKHoaSVGanesanR. The study of tapered laminated composite structures: a review. Compos Sci Technol2000; 60: 2643–2657.
10.
MukherjeeABVarugheseB. Design guidelines for ply drop-off in laminated composite structures. Compos B2001; 32: 153–164.
11.
VidyashankarBRMurtyAK. Analysis of laminates with ply drops. Compos Sci Technol2001; 61: 749–758.
12.
TruongMZhongWBoykoSet al.A comparative study on natural fibre density measurement. J Text I2009; 100: 525–529.
13.
ShahDUSchubelPJLicencePet al.Hydroxyethylcellulose surface treatment of natural fibres: the new ‘twist’ in yarn preparation and optimization for composites applicability. J Mater Sci2012; 47: 2700–2711.
14.
MadsenBLilholtH. Physical and mechanical properties of unidirectional plant fibre composites - an evaluation of the influence of porosity. Compos Sci Technol2003; 63: 1265–1272.
El MessiryM. Theoretical analysis of natural fiber volume fraction of reinforced composites. AEJ2013; 52: 301–306.
18.
BeckermannGWPickeringKL. Engineering and evaluation of hemp fibre reinforced polypropylene composites: Micro-mechanics and strength prediction modelling. Compos Part2009; 40: 210–217.
19.
IhuezeCCOkaforCEOkoyeCI. Natural fiber composite design and characterization for limit stress prediction in multiaxial stress state. J King Saud Univ Sci2015; 27: 193–206.
20.
ShahDUNagRKCliffordMJ. Why do we observe significant differences between measured and ‘back-calculated’ properties of natural fibres?Cellulose2016; 23: 1481–1490.
21.
AhmedKSVijayaragavanS. Elastic property evaluation of jute-glass fibre hybrid composite using experimental and CLT approach. Indian J Eng Mater Sci2006; 13: 435–442.
22.
SunZZhaoXWangXet al.Predicting the elastic properties of sisal fiber reinforced polypropylene composites by a new method based on generalized method of cells and laminate analogy approach. Compos Sci Technol2014; 91: 45–49.
23.
FaccaAGKortschotMTYanN. Predicting the elastic modulus of natural fibre reinforced thermoplastics. Compos A2006; 37: 1660–1671.
VirkASHallWSummerscalesJ. Modulus and strength prediction for natural fibre composites. Mater Sci Technol2012; 28: 864–871.
26.
XueYVeazieDRGlinseyCet al.Environmental effects on the mechanical and thermomechanical properties of aspen fiber–polypropylene composites. Compos B2007; 38: 152–158.
27.
TuckerCLIIILiangE. Stiffness predictions for unidirectional short-fiber composites: review and evaluation. Compos Sci Technol1999; 59: 655–671.
28.
GassanJChateABledzkiAK. Calculation of elastic properties of natural fibers. J Mater Sci2001; 36: 3715–3720.
29.
CichockiFRJrThomasonJL. Thermoelastic anisotropy of a natural fiber. Compos Sci Technol2002; 62: 669–678.
30.
MadsenBHoffmeyerPLilholtH. Hemp yarn reinforced composites – II. Tensile properties. Compos Part A2007; 38: 2204–2215.
31.
Gentles F, Anderson J and Thomason JL. Characterisation of the transverse thermoelastic properties of natural fibres used in composites. In: 14th European conference on composite materials, Budapest, Hungary, 7–10 June 2010, paper no. 873-ECCM14, pp.1–10.
32.
AndreNGAriawanDIshakZAM. Elastic anisotropy of kenaf fibre and micromechanical modeling of nonwoven kenaf fibre/epoxy composites. J Reinf Plast Compos2016; 35: 1424–1433.
33.
NeaguRCGamstedtEKBertholdF. Stiffness contribution of various wood fibers to composite materials. J Compos Mater2006; 40: 663–699.
34.
LiuXYDaiGC. Surface modification and micromechanical properties of jute fiber mat reinforced polypropylene composites. eXPRESS Polym Lett2007; 1: 299–307.
35.
YanLChouwNYuanX. Improving the mechanical properties of natural fibre fabric reinforced epoxy composites by alkali treatment. J Reinf Plast Compos2012; 31: 425–437.
36.
YanL. Effect of alkali treatment on vibration characteristics and mechanical properties of natural fabric reinforced composites. J Reinf Plast Compos2013; 31: 887–896.
37.
Halpin AffdlJCKardosJL. The Halpin–Tsai equations: a review. Polym Eng Sci1976; 16: 344–352.
38.
Kobari L. The effect of fibre orientation on the modulus of natural fibre reinforced composites. Master’s Thesis, University of Toronto, Canada, 2008.
39.
BerthelotJM. Effect of the stacking sequence. Mat and cloth reinforced materials. In: Composite materials – mechanical behavior and structural analysis, New York: Springer Verlag, 2012, pp. 312–345.
40.
FidelisMEPereiraTVGomesODet al.The effect of fiber morphology on the tensile strength of natural fibers. J Mater Res Technol2013; 2: 149–157.
41.
ChakravartyAC. Swelling behavior and comparative porosity of some vegetable textile fibers at different moisture regains. Text Res J1971; 41: 318–321.
42.
SinhaMK. Rope-making with banana-plant fibre. J Text I1974; 65: 612–615.
43.
SenKRBoseSK. Some observations on the rigidity of jute, ramie, and sisal. Text Res J1954; 24: 754–755.
44.
BerthelotJM. Composite materials – mechanical behavior and structural analysis, Newyork: Springer Verlag, 2012, pp. 179–179.
45.
PickeringKL. Properties and performance of natural-fibre composites, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2008, pp. 16–16.
