Based on our prior study on uniaxial tearing tests, the influences of slit parameters, off-axis angles, and loading speeds on the tearing behaviors and strengths were discussed further. Results show that the tearing behaviors and strengths of the studied material are affected by above factors significantly, and typical tearing stress-displacement curves could be defined as four characteristic regions: a co-deformation region, a yarn extension region (or shear deformation region), a plateau region, and a post peak region. There is a W-shaped relationship between tearing strength and off-axis angle, with a small peak at 45°, and a new tearing strength criterion consisting of two parts, i.e., an inverted V-shaped part and a U-shaped part, was proposed for this laminated fabric. Comparisons between the experimental and the calculated results for the laminated fabric were performed, and the strong agreements demonstrate that the proposed criterion is feasible and accurate.
Nayler A. Airship activity and development world-wide-2003. In: AIAA’s 3rd Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations (ATIO) Technical Forum, Denver, 17–19 November 2003, pp.6727–6737. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
2.
GanXGuoY. Introduction to airship technology, Beijing (China): National Defense Industry Press, 2005.
3.
WangguKYoungwookSKyeongsikW. Mechanical property characterization of film-fabric laminate for stratospheric airship envelope. Compos Struct2006; 75: 151–155.
4.
StockbridgeCCerutiAMarzoccaP. Airship research and development in the areas of design, structures, dynamics and energy systems. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci2012; 13: 170–187.
5.
Komatsu K, Sano MA and Kakuta Y. Development of high-specific-strength envelope materials. In: AIAA’s 3rd Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations (ATIO) Technical Forum, Denver, 17–19 November 2003. pp.6765–6777. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
6.
SeidelM. Tensile surface structures: A practical guide to cable and membrane construction, Berlin: John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
7.
KrookCMFoxKR. Study of the tongue-tear test. Text Res1945; 15: 389–396.
8.
HagerOBGagliardiDDWalkerHB. Analysis of tear strength. Text Res1947; 17: 376–381.
9.
TurlLH. The measurement of tearing strength of textile fabrics. Text Res1956; 26: 169–176.
10.
ChuCDhingraRPostleR. Study of tearing properties of membrane coated fabrics. J Dong Hua Univ1991; 8: 1–9.
11.
WangPSunBGuB. Comparisons of trapezoid tearing behaviors of uncoated and coated woven fabrics from experimental and finite element analysis. Int J Damage Mech2012; 22: 464–489.
12.
WangS. Analytical modeling on mechanical responses and damage morphology of flexible woven composites under trapezoid tearing. Text Res J2013; 83: 1297–1309.
13.
MaekawaSShibasakiKKuroseT. Tear propagation of a high-performance airship envelope material. J Aircraft2008; 45: 1546–1553.
14.
GodfreyTARossettosJN. The onset of tear propagation at slits in stressed uncoated plain weave fabrics. J Appl Mech1999; 66: 926–933.
15.
GodfreyTARossettosJNBosselmanSE. The onset of tearing at slits in stressed coated plain weave fabrics. J Appl Mech2004; 71: 879–886.
16.
BigaudDSzostkiewiczCHamelinP. Tearing analysis for textile reinforced soft composites under mono-axial and bi-axial tensile stresses. Compos Struct2003; 62: 129–137.
17.
LiuLLvMXiaoH. Tear strength characteristics of laminated envelope composites based on single edge notched film experiment. Eng Fract Mech2014; 127: 21–30.
18.
WitkowskaBFrydrychI. A comparative analysis of tear strength methods. Fibres Text East Eur2004; 12: 42–47.
19.
WitkowskaBFrydrychI. Static tearing, part II: analysis of stages of static tearing in cotton fabrics for wing-shaped test specimens. Text Res J2008; 78: 977–987.
20.
TeixeiraNAPlattMMHamburgerWJ. Mechanics of elastic performance of textile materials: part XII: relation of certain geometric factors to the tear strength of woven fabrics. Text Res1955; 25: 838–861.
21.
ScelzoWABackerSBoyceMC. Mechanistic role of yarn and fabric structure in determining tear resistance of woven cloth: part II: modeling tongue tear. Text Res J1994; 64: 321–329.
22.
ZhongWPanNLukasD. Stochastic modelling of tear behaviour of coated fabrics. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng2004; 12: 293–309.
23.
WangPMaQSunBZ. Finite element modeling of woven fabric tearing damage. Text Res J2011; 81: 1273–1286.
24.
Airship Design Criteria. Report No. FAA-P-8110-2-1995, 1995. Federal Aviation Administration of USA, Washington, DC, 1995.
25.
ForsterBMollaertM. European design guide for tensile surface structures, Germany: Tensinet, 2004.
26.
EnnouriTPatriciaDToanVK. Tear resistance of woven textiles-criterion and mechanisms. Compos Part B-Eng2011; 42: 1851–1859.
27.
HuntingtonCG. Tensile fabric structures, Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineers-ASCE, 2010.
28.
ChenJWChenWJZhaoB. Mechanical responses and damage morphology of laminated fabrics with a central slit under uniaxial tension: a comparison between analytical and experimental results. Constr Build Mater2015; 101: 488–502.
29.
Chen JW and Chen WJ. Central crack tearing testing of laminated fabrics Uretek3216LV under uni- and bi- axial static tensile loads. J Mater Civ Eng 2016; 28. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE) MT.1943-5533.0001537.
30.
ToppingAD. The critical slit length of pressurized coated fabric cylinders. J Ind Text1973; 3: 96–110.
31.
BaiJXiongJChengX. Tear resistance of orthogonal Kevlar-PWF-reinforced TPU film. Chinese J Aeronaut2011; 24: 113–118.
ZhangYYSongXGZhagnQL. Fracture failure analysis and strength criterion for PTFE-coated woven fabrics. J Compos Mater2015; 49: 1409–1421.
34.
BridgensBGoslingPJouGT. Inter-laboratory comparison of biaxial tests for architectural textiles. J Text I2012; 103: 706–718.
35.
Testing method for membrane materials (coated fabrics)-qualities and performances. Report No. MSAJ/M-03-2003. Membrane Structures Association of Japan, Tokyo, Japan, 2003.
36.
Textiles- Standard atmospheres for conditioning and testing. Report No. BS EN ISO 139-2005. British Standard Institution (BSI), London, 2005.
37.
RossettosJNOliaM. On the hybrid effect and matrix yielding at fibre breaks in hybrid composite sheets. Mech Comp Mater Struct1995; 2: 275–280.
38.
RossettosJNShishesazM. Stress concentration in fiber composite sheets including matrix extension. J Appl Mech1987; 54: 723–724.
39.
AmbroziakA. Mechanical properties of PVDF-coated fabric under tensile tests. J Polym Eng2015; 35: 377–390.
40.
ChenJWChenWJZhangDX. Experimental study on uniaxial and biaxial tensile properties of coated fabric for airship envelopes. J Reinf Plast Comp2013; 33: 630–647.
41.
ChenSDingXYiH. On the anisotropic tensile behaviors of flexible polyvinyl chloride-coated fabrics. Text Res J2009; 77: 369–374.
42.
KirkwoodKMKirkwoodJELeeYS. Yarn pull-out as a mechanism for dissipating ballistic impact energy in Kevlar® KM-2 fabric part i: quasi-static characterization of yarn pull-out. Text Res J2004; 74: 920–928.
43.
ValizadehMRavandiSAHSalimiM. Determination of internal mechanical characteristics of woven fabrics using the force-balance analysis of yarn pullout test. J Text I2008; 99: 47–55.
44.
BridgensBNGoslingPD. Direct stress-strain representation for coated woven fabrics. Comput Struct2004; 82: 1913–1927.
