Thermoplastic polyurethan-based nanowebs with various strengths and moduli were electrospun by adding multi-walled nanotubes. The obtained webs were impregnated with epoxy resin to form a reinforced composite. The tensile properties of the nanoweb-reinforced composites were determined to demonstrate the effect of the nanowebs on the properties of the epoxy resin. A significant increase in the mechanical response is observed, up to 29% in tensile strength, 4% in elastic modulus and 19% in tensile strain, compared with neat epoxy, when the weight fraction of multi-walled nanotubes is 3 wt% within the webs. To further understand the mechanical behavior of the nanoweb-reinforced composites, a micromechanical theory, bridging model, is employed and the in situ properties of the epoxy matrix and nanofibers is studied. The effect of incorporation of nanofibers and multi-walled nanotubes is indicated in the micromechanical analysis, which is helpful for the optimization design of nanofibers-reinforced epoxy composites.
PugliaDValentiniLKennyJM. Analysis of the cure reaction of carbon nanotubes/epoxy resin composites through thermal analysis and Ramanspectroscopy. J Appl Polym Sci2003; 88(2): 452–458.
2.
BalS. Experimental study of mechanical and electrical properties of carbon nanofiber/epoxy composites. Mater Des2010; 31(5): 2406–2413.
3.
ReyLPoissonNMaazouzA. Toughening of a brittle thermosetting polymer: effects of reinforcement particle size and volume fraction. J Mater Sci2002; 37(4): 781–788.
4.
UnnikrishnanKPThachil-EbyT. Toughening of epoxy resins. Des Monomers Polym2006; 9(2): 129–152.
5.
AnnaCBToddEThomasPR. Nanoparticle polymer composites: where two small worlds meet. Science2006; 314(5802): 1107–1110.
6.
BalSSamalSS. Carbon nanotube reinforced polymer composites-a state of the art. Bull Mater Sci2007; 30(4): 379–386.
7.
YuMFLourieODyerMJ. Strength and breaking mechanism of multiwalled carbon nanotubes under tensile load. Science2000; 287(5453): 637–640.
8.
YuMFFilesBSArepalliS. Tensile loading of ropes of single wall carbon nanotubes and their mechanical properties. Phys Rev Lett2000; 84(24): 5552–5555.
9.
ColemanJNKhanUBlauWJ. Small but strong: a review of the mechanical properties of carbon nanotube-polymer composites. Carbon2006; 44(9): 1624–1652.
10.
WangZLiangZYWangB. Processing and property investigation of single-walled carbon nanotube (SWNT) buckypaper/epoxy resin matrix nanocomposites. Compos Part A: Appl Sci2004; 35(10): 1225–1232.
11.
GouJH. Single-walled nanotube bucky paper and nanocomposite. Polym Int2006; 55(11): 1283–1298.
12.
ColemanJNBlauWJDaltonAB. Improving the mechanical properties of single-walled carbon nanotube sheets by intercalation of polymeric adhesives. Appl Phys Lett2003; 82(11): 1682–1684.
13.
MaWJLiuLQZhangZ. High-strength composite fibers: realizing true potential of carbon nanotubes in polymer matrix through continuous reticulate architecture and molecular level couplings. Nano Lett 2009, 9(8): 2855–2861.
ParkCOunaiesZKentAW. Dispersion of single wall carbon nanotubes by in situ polymerization under sonication. Chem Phys Lett2002; 364(3–4): 303–308.
16.
BelaP. Interfaces and interphases in multicomponent materials: past, present, future. Eur Polym J2005; 41(4): 645–662.
17.
KanafchianMValizadehMHaghiA-K. Electrospun nanofibers with application in nanocomposites. Kor J Chem Eng2011; 28(2): 428–439.
18.
ZucchelliAFocareteM-LGualandiC. Electrospun nanofibers for enhancing structural performance of composite materials. Polym Adv Technol2011; 22(3): 339–349.
19.
Ozden-YenigünEMencelogluYZPapilaM. Engineering chemistry of electrospun nanofibers and interfaces in nanocomposites for superior mechanical properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfac2010; 2(7): 1788–1793.
20.
KimJSRenekerDH. Mechanical properties of composites using ultrafine electrosun fibers. Polym Compos1999; 20(1): 124–131.
Lee JR, Park SJ, Seo MK, et al. Preparation and characterization of electrospun poly (ethylene oxide) (PEO) nanofibers-reinforced epoxy matrix composites. MRS Proceedings 2004; 851. DOI: 10.1557/PROC-851-NN5.11.
23.
Ozden-YenigünEMencelogluYZPapilaM. Engineering chemistry of electrospun nanofibers and interfaces in nanocomposites for superior mechanical properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfac2010; 2(7): 1788–1793.
24.
Ozden-YenigünEMencelogluYZPapilaM. MWCNTs/P(St-co-GMA) composite nanofibers of engineered interface chemistry for epoxy matrix nanocomposites. ACS Appl Mater Interfac2012; 4(2): 777–784.
25.
PalazzettiRZucchelliAGualandiC. Influence of electrospun nylon 6,6 nanofibrous mats on the interlaminar properties of Gr-epoxy composite laminates. Compos Struct2012; 94(2): 571–579.
26.
SenRZhaoBPereaD. Preparation of single-walled carbon nanotube reinforced polystyrene and polyurethane nanofibers and membranes by electrospinning. Nano Lett2004; 4(3): 459–464.
27.
SethDMDerrickRSWesleyAR. Morphological, electrical, and mechanical characterization of electrospun nanofibers mats containing multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Macromolecules2007; 40(4): 997–1003.
TimothyJLBhowmickRGuC. Core-shell interactions in coaxial electrospinning and impact on electrospun multiwall carbon nanotube core, poly(methyl methacrylate) shell fibers. J Phys Chem C2011; 115(26): 12742–12750.
30.
Sun LH, Ounaies Z, Gao XL, et al. Preparation, characterization, and modeling of carbon nanofiber/epoxy nanocomposites. J Nanomater. 2011, ID 307589. DOI: 10.1155/2011/307589.
HuangZM. Simulation of the mechanical properties of fibrous composites by the bridging micromechanics model. Compos Part A Appl Sci2001; 32(2): 143–172.
33.
HuangZMZhouYX. Strength of fibrous composites-advanced topics in science & technology in China, Hangzhou and Heidelberg: Zhejiang University Press and Springer, 2011.
34.
Liu L and Pan SQ. Comparative study of the comprehensive properties of multi-walled nanotubes/polyurethane nanofibrous membranes with and without thermal threatment. J Nanomater. 2012. 2011, ID 610781. DOI: 10.1155/2012/610781.
35.
HuangZM. A bridging model prediction of the ultimate strength of composite laminates subjected to biaxial loads. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64(3–4): 395–448.
