Women are underrepresented in U.S. tenure-track faculty positions, and institutional interventions are key to creating greater gender equality and accessing women’s potential. This study examines the effectiveness of one “transformational” intervention, the ADVANCE Institutional Transformation initiative, implemented at the University of California, Irvine (UCI), in 2001. We compare data on women’s representation in faculty positions before and during the UCI ADVANCE Program (1993–2009) to that of seven other campuses in the University of California system, where no initiatives of this scale were implemented. Using descriptive figures, T tests, and regression analyses, we find that UCI had a higher percentage of women faculty and hired a greater percentage of women during ADVANCE years, but did not retain women at a greater rate. We describe the UCI ADVANCE program and its structure, including its “Equity Advisors,” who we suggest have been important in improving women’s representation among faculty at UCI.
BaronJames N.MittmanBrian S.NewmanAndrew E.1991. “Targets of Opportunity: Organizational and Environmental Determinants of Gender Integration within the California Civil Service, 1979-1985.” American Journal of Sociology96(6):1362–401.
2.
BeckerGary S.1964. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
3.
BilimoriaDianaLiangXiangfen. 2012. Gender Equity in Science and Engineering: Advancing Change in Higher Education. New York: Routledge.
4.
CastillaEmilio J.2008. “Gender, Race, and Meritocracy in Organizational Careers.” American Journal of Sociology113(6):1479–526.
5.
CharlesMariaGruskyDavid. 2004. Occupational Ghettos: The Worldwide Segregation of Women and Men. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6.
EnglandPaula. 1992. Comparable Worth: Theories and Evidence. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
7.
EnglandPaula. 2010. “The Gender Revolution: Uneven and Stalled.” Gender & Society24(2):149–66.
8.
FoxMary Frank. 2008. “Institutional Transformation and the Advancement of Women Faculty: The Case of Academic Science and Engineering” Pp. 73–203 in Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, edited by SmartJ. C.New York: Springer.
9.
FoxMary FrankSonnertGerhardNikiforovaIrina. 2011. “Programs for Undergraduate Women in Science and Engineering: Issues, Problems, and Solutions.” Gender & Society25(5):589–615.
10.
GaucherDanielleFriesenJustonKayAaron C.2011. “Evidence That Gendered Wording in Job Advertisements Exists and Sustains Gender Inequality.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology101(1):109–28.
11.
GormanElizabeth H.2005. “Gender Stereotypes, Same-gender Preferences, and Organizational Variation in Hiring Women.” American Sociological Review70(4):702–28.
12.
HargensLowell L.LongJ. Scott. 2002. “Demographic Inertia and Women’s Representation among Faculty in Higher Education.” The Journal of Higher Education73(4):494–517.
KalevAlexandraDobbinFrankKellyErin. 2006. “Best Practices or Best Guesses? Assessing the Efficacy of Corporate Affirmative Action and Diversity Policies.” American Sociological Review71(4):589–617.
15.
MaasCora J. M.HoxJoop J.2005. “Sufficient Sample Sizes for Multilevel Modeling.” Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences1(3):86–92.
16.
MalleyJanet E.RainwaterKeithStewartAbigail. 2005. “Summary of Analyses of the Survey of the Climate for Women Scientists and Engineers in 2001 and 2005.” UM NSF ADVANCE Project. Retrieved July20, 2009 (http://www.advance.rackham.umich.edu/climate2005.pdf).
17.
MarschkeRobynLaursenSandraNielsenJoyce McCarlDunn-RankinPatricia. 2007. “Demographic Inertia Revisited: An Important Proposal to Achieve Equitable Gender Representation among Faculty in Higher Education.” The Journal of Higher Education78(1):1–26.
18.
MeyersonDebraTompkinsMegan. 2007. “Tempered Radicals as Institutional Change Agents: The Case of Advancing Gender Equity at the University of Michigan.” Harvard Journal of Law & Gender30:303–22.
19.
MonroeKristenOzyurtSabaWrigleyTedAlexanderAmy. 2008. “Gender Equity in Academia: Bad News from the Trenches, and Some Possible Solutions.” Perspectives on Politics6(2):215–33.
20.
NielsenJoyce M.MarschkeRobynSheffElisabethRankinPatricia. 2005. “Vital Variables and Gender Equity in Academe: Confessions from a Feminist Empiricist Project.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society31(1):1–28.
21.
PerryElissaDavis-BlakeAlisonKulikCarol. 1994. “Explaining Gender-based Selection Decisions: A Synthesis of Contextual and Cognitive Approaches.” Academy of Management Review19(4):786–820.
22.
RaudenbushStephen W.BrykAnthony S.2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
23.
ReesTeresa. 2005. “Reflections on the Uneven Development of Gender Mainstreaming in Europe.” International Feminist Journal of Politics7(4):555–74.
24.
ReskinBarbara. 1993. “Sex Segregation in the Workplace.” Annual Review of Sociology19:241–70.
25.
ReskinBarbara. 2003. “Motives and Mechanisms in Modeling Inequality.” American Sociological Review68:1–21.
26.
ReskinBarbaraPadavicIrene. 2002. Women and Men at Work. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
27.
RidgewayCecilia L.CorrellShelley J.2004. “Unpacking the Gender System.” Gender & Society18(4):510–31.
28.
SmithD. RandallDiTomasoNancyFarrisGeorge F.CorderoRene. 2002. “Favoritism, Bias, and Error in Performance Ratings of Scientists and Engineers: The Effects of Power, Status, and Number.” Sex Roles45(5–6):337–57.
29.
SnijdersTom A. B.2005. “Power and Sample Size in Multilevel Linear Modeling.” Pp. 1570–73 in Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science. Vol. 3, edited by EverittB. S.HowellD. C.New York: John Wiley.
30.
StainbackKevinTomaskovic-DeveyDonalSkaggsSheryl. 2010. “Organizational Approaches to Inequality: Inertia, Relative Power, and Environments.” Annual Review of Sociology36(1):225–47.
31.
SteinpreisRhea E.AndersKatie A.RitzkeDawn. 1999. “The Impact of Gender on the Review of the Curricula Vitae of Job Applicants and Tenure Candidates: A National Empirical Study.” Sex Roles41(7–8): 509–28.
StinchcombeArthur L.1965. “Social Structure and Organizations.” Pp. 142–93 in Handbook of Organizations, edited by MarchJ. G.Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
34.
SturmSusan. 2001. “Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach.” Columbia Law Review101(3):458–568.
35.
SturmSusan. 2006. “The Architecture of Inclusion: Advancing Workplace Equity in Higher Education.” Harvard Journal of Law & Gender29:247–334.
36.
TolbertPamela S.OberfieldAlice A.1991. “Sources of Organizational Demography: Faculty Sex Ratios in Colleges and Universities.” Sociology of Education64(4):305–15.
37.
Tomaskovic-DeveyDonaldSkaggsSheryl. 1999. “Workplace Gender and Racial Composition and Productivity: An Establishment Level Test of the Statistical Discrimination Hypothesis.” Work and Occupations26(4):422–45.
VoltiRudi. 2008. An Introduction to the Sociology of Work and Occupations. LosAngeles: Pine Forge Press.
42.
WilliamsLindaHoHsiu-ZuLevineAmy. 2010. UC Report of Systemwide Advisory Committee on the Status of Women. Retrieved July20, 2009 (www.uci.advance.edu/).
