Military policies and culture evolve based on generational attitudes. This study investigated the research questions: How do Generation X and Millennial women with military experience differ in their perceptions of gender equality, considering the unique institutional culture and history of the armed forces; and how do these differences affect their views on leadership and promotion opportunities; and what are the key differences between Generation X and Millennial women currently serving in the military in their views on the effectiveness of the military’s policies and programs aimed at promoting a fully integrated and equitable environment for women? A quantitative survey of 148 current and former U.S. military women measured views toward gender equality and social justice. Analysis revealed comparable views that women deserve equal treatment and opportunities regardless of rank or role. Findings suggest the military could expand diversity training, emphasizing equitable standards instead of gendered expectations for competency. Understanding cross-generational accord on these issues of social justice can guide continued military reforms, fostering fairness for all.
BaraltL.CarianE. K.JohnsonA. L.LimS.YoonS. Y. (2020). Millennials and gender in an era of growing inequality. Sociological Perspectives, 63(3), 452–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121420915870
2.
BawaS. (2018). “Feminists make too much noise!” Generational differences and ambivalence in feminist development politics in Ghana. Canadian Journal of African Studies, 52(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00083968.2018.1462720
3.
BittermanA.HessD. B. (2021). Understanding generation gaps in LGBTQ+ communities: Perspectives about gay neighborhoods among heteronormative and homonormative generational cohorts. In The life and afterlife of gay neighborhoods: Renaissance and resurgence (pp. 307–338). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66073-4
4.
CarrA. (2020). An exploration of gender and national security through the integration of women into military roles. Pepperdine Policy Review, 12. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3641881
5.
ChuaJ. L. (2022). Bloody war: Menstruation, soldiering, and the “gender-integrated” United States military. Critical Military Studies, 8(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2020.1750260
6.
CohenD. K.KarimS. M. (2022). Does more equality for women mean less war? Rethinking sex and gender inequality and political violence. International Organization, 76(2), 414–444. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818321000333
DavisK. D. (2022). Socio-cultural dynamics in gender and military contexts: Seeking and understanding change. Journal of Military, Veteran and Family Health, 8(s1), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.3138/jmvfh-2021-0088
9.
DoJ. J.SamuelsS. M. (2021). I am a warrior: An analysis of the military masculine-warrior narrative among US Air Force officer candidates. Armed Forces & Society, 47(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X20931561
10.
DuranA.DahlL. S.StipeckC.MayhewM. J. (2020). A critical quantitative analysis of students’ sense of belonging: Perspectives on race, generation status, and collegiate environments. Journal of College Student Development, 61(2), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2020.0014
11.
DuxburyL.OrmsbeeF. (2020). Does studying the past help us understand the future? An examination of the expectations of Gen X knowledge workers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(7), 935–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1393835
12.
EdenJ. (2015). Women in combat. Military Review, 95(2), 39–47.
HillK. A.SamuelsE. A.GrossC. P.DesaiM. M.ZelinN. S.LatimoreD.BoatrightD. (2020). Assessment of the prevalence of medical student mistreatment by sex, race/ethnicity, and sexual orientation. JAMA Internal Medicine, 180(5), 653–665. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0030
15.
JaggarA. M. (1983). Feminist politics and human nature. Rowman & Littlefield.
16.
JungH.YangY. (2022). Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the social justice scale in nursing students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 14443. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114443
17.
KavanaghJ.WengerJ. W. (2020). Integrating women into the Marine Corps infantry: Costs, representation, and lessons from earlier integration efforts. Defence and Peace Economics, 31(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2018.1465675
18.
KingstoneH. (2021). Generational identities: Historical and literary perspectives. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(10), e12641. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12641
19.
LaurenceJ. H.MilavecB. L.RohallD. E.EnderM. G.MatthewsM. D. (2016). Predictors of support for women in military roles: Military status, gender, and political ideology. Military Psychology, 28(6), 488–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/mil0000142
20.
LeslieB.AndersonC.BickhamC.HormanJ.OverlyA.GentryC.KingJ. (2021). Generation Z perceptions of a positive workplace environment. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 33, 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-021-09366-2
21.
LimY. J.LemanskiJ. (2020). A generational war is launched with the birth of Ok Boomer in the digital age. The Journal of Society and Media, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.26740/jsm.v4n1.p1-15
22.
Martin-CaugheyA. (2021). What’s in an occupation? Investigating within-occupation variation and gender segregation using job titles and task descriptions. American Sociological Review, 86(5), 960–999. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031224211042053
23.
McNamaraK. A.LucasC. L.GoldbachJ. T.CastroC. A.HollowayI. W. (2021). “Even if the policy changes, the culture remains the same”: A mixed methods analysis of LGBT service members’ outness patterns. Armed Forces & Society, 47(3), 505–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X20952136
24.
McWhirterE. H.McWha-HermannI. (2021). Social justice and career development: Progress, problems, and possibilities. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 126, 103492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103492
25.
MontgomeryS.JacobsonZ.WakarB.CodyS. (2021). Millennial veteran entrepreneurship: Research on the next generation of veteran entrepreneurs. Insight Policy Research. https://shorturl.at/WE4rZ
MoroniS. (2020). The just city. Three background issues: Institutional justice and spatial justice, social justice and distributive justice, concept of justice and conceptions of justice. Planning Theory, 19(3), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219877670
28.
NewbyV. F.SebagC. (2021). Gender sidestreaming? Analysing gender mainstreaming in national militaries and international peacekeeping. European Journal of International Security, 6(2), 148–170. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2020.20
29.
NilssonJ. E.MarszalekJ. M.LinnemeyerR. M.BahnerA. D.MisialekL. H. (2011). Development and assessment of the social issues advocacy scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71(1), 258–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410391581
30.
PendleburyJ. L. (2020). “This is a man’s job”: Challenging the masculine “warrior culture” at the U.S. Air Force Academy. Armed Forces & Society, 46, 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X18806524
31.
PonterottoJ. G.BurkardA.RiegerB. P.GriegerI.D’OnofrioA.DubuissonA.HeenehanM.MillsteinB.ParisiM.RathJ. F.SaxG. (1995). Development and initial validation of the quick discrimination index (QDI). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(6), 1016–1031. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164495055006011
32.
RazaviN. (2021). NatSec feminism: Women security experts and the US counterterror state. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 46(2), 361–386. https://doi.org/10.1086/710808
33.
ReisJ.MenezesS. (2020). Gender inequalities in the military service: A systematic literature review. Sexuality & Culture, 24(3), 1004–1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-019-09662-y
34.
RichardK.MolloyS. (2020). An examination of emerging adult military men: Masculinity and U.S. military climate. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 21. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000303
35.
SchailléeH.DeromI.SolenesO.StraumeS.BurgessB.JonesV.RenfreeG. (2021). Gender inequality in sport: Perceptions and experiences of generation Z. Sport, Education and Society, 26(9), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2021.1932454
36.
SerranoL. F. (2014). Why women do not belong in the U.S. infantry; Marine infantry isn’t broken; it doesn’t need to be “fixed” [Military Magazine]. Marine Corps Gazette, 98(9).
37.
SmaliukieneR.BekesieneS. (2020). Towards sustainable human resources: How generational differences impact subjective wellbeing in the military?Sustainability, 12(23), 10016. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310016
TaherdoostH. (2022). What are different research approaches? Comprehensive Review of Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method research, their applications, types, and limitations. Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research, 5(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.30564/jmser.v5i1.4538
43.
Tait-SignalV.FebbraroA. R. (2024). Integrating gender expertise into the Canadian Armed Forces: Challenges for change agents and culture change. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1356620. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1356620
44.
TecleL.KisamoreJ. L. (2020). Naïve narcissists or affable altruists? A comparison of millennial and GenX values. The Journal of Business Diversity, 20(3), 44–50.
45.
TyagiN.TyagiN. (2021). Stumbling blocks in battered women access to justice: Gender inequities, violence, and economic marginalization. In Women, matrimonial litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) transforming Indian justice delivery system for achieving gender justice (pp. 167–216). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1015-8_5
Van HyattB. (2021). Definitions of meaningful work for Generation X and Millennial cuspers. Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.11648/J.JHRM.20210901.11
48.
WilliamsJ.YatesS.ConnorJ. (2024). Creating a new pathway for change in the military using gender as process. Gender, Work & Organization, 31(1), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.13049
49.
XiaoS.OladyshkinS.NowakW. (2020). Reliability analysis with stratified importance sampling based on adaptive Kriging. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 197, 106852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.106852
50.
YoungL. M.NautaM. M. (2013). Sexism as a predictor of attitudes toward women in the military and in combat. Military Psychology, 25(2), 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0094958
51.
ZedlacherE.KoeszegiS. T. (2021). Workplace bullying in military organizations: Bullying Inc?In Special topics and particular occupations, professions and sectors (pp. 435–464). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5308-5_18
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
