Amin, S. 1974 Accumulation on a world scale. 2 vols. New York, NY, Monthly Review.
2.
Amin, S. 1976 Unequal development. New York, NY, Monthly Review.
3.
Bach, R. L. 1982 “On the holism of a world-system perspective” in: T.K. Hopkins and I. Wallerstein (eds) World-systems analysis: Theory and methodology. Beverly Hills, Calif., Sage.
4.
Bath, C.R. ; James, D.D.1976“Dependency analysis of Latin America: Some criticisms, some suggestions”, Latin America Research Review11: 3-54.
5.
Bauer, P.T.1976“Western guilt and Third World poverty” , Commentary61 (Jan.): 31-38.
6.
Berger, P.L. 1974 Pyramids of sacrifice: Political ethics and social change. New York, NY, Basic Books.
7.
Bernstein, R.J. 1976 The restructuring of social and political theory. New York, NY, Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
8.
Biersteker, T. 1981 Distortion or development? Contending perspectives on the multinational corporation. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
9.
Bodenheimer, S.J. 1971 The ideology of developmentalism: The American paradigm-surrogate for Latin American studies. Beverly Hills, Calif., Sage.
10.
Braybrooke, D. ; Rosenberg, A.1972“Getting the war news straight: The actual situation in the philosophy of science”, American Political Science Review66 (Sept.): 818-826.
11.
Caporaso, J.A.1976“The external consequences of regional integration for Pan-European relations: Inequality, dependence, polarization and symmetry” , International Studies Quarterly20 (Sept.): 341-392.
12.
Caporaso, J.A.1978a Introduction to the special issue on “Dependence and dependency in the global system”, International Organization32 (Winter): 1-12.
13.
Caporaso, J.A.1978b“Dependence, dependency and power in the global system: A structural and behavioral analysis” , International Organization32 (Winter): 13-43.
14.
Cardoso, F.H.1977“The consumption of dependency theory in the United States” , Latin America Research Review12(3): 7-24.
15.
Cardoso, F.H. ; Faletto, E. 1969 Dependencia y desarrollo en America Latina. Mexico City, Siglo XXI.
16.
Chase-Dunn1975“The effects of international economic dependence on development and inequality: A cross-national study” , American Sociological Review40 (Dec.): 720-738.
17.
Churchman, C.W. 1968 Challenge to reason. New York, NY, McGraw-Hill.
18.
Churchman, C.W. 1971 The design of inquiring systems. New York, NY, Basic Books.
19.
Cueva, A.1976“A summary of problems and perspectives of dependency theory” , Latin American Perspectives3 (Fall): 12-16.
20.
Deutsch, K.W. 1974 “Imperialism and neo-colonialism”, in: Papers of the Peace Science Society (International) vol. 23: Fifth Cambridge Conference.
21.
Diesing, P. 1971 Patterns of discovery in the social sciences. Chicago, Ill., Aldine.
22.
Dos Santos, T. 1971 “The structure of dependence” in: K.T. Fann and D. Hodges (eds) Readings in U.S. imperialism. Boston, Mass., Porter-Sargent.
23.
Dos Santos, T.1973“The contradictions of contemporary imperialism” , Social Praxis1(3): 209-240.
24.
Duvall, R.D.1978“Dependence and dependencia theory: Notes toward precision of concept and argument” , International Organization32 (Winter): 51-78.
25.
Duvall, R.D. ; Russett, B.M.1976“Some proposals to guide empirical research on contemporary imperialism”, Jerusalem Journal of International Relations2 (Fall): 1-27.
26.
Duvall, R.D. ; Jackson, S.; Russett, B.M.; Snidal, D.; Sylvan, D. 1977 A formal model of `dependencia' theory: Structure and measurement. Yale University (mimeo).
27.
Fagen, R.R.1977“Studying Latin American politics: Some implications of a `dependencia' approach” , Latin America Research Review12: 3-26.
28.
Fernandez, R.A. ; Ocampo, J.F.1974“The Latin American revolution: A theory of imperialism, not dependence”, Latin American Perspectives1 (Spring): 30-61.
29.
Feyerabend, P.K. 1963 “How to be a good empiricist — A plea for tolerance in matters epistemological”, in: B. Baumrin (ed.) Philosophy of science: The Delaware Seminar. Vol. 2. New York, Wiley.
30.
Feyerabend, P.K. 1965 “Problems of empiricism”, in: R. Colodny (ed.) Beyond the edge of certainty. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.
31.
Feyerabend, P.K. 1970 “Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge”, in: M. Radner and S. Winokur (eds) Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Vol. 4. Minneapolis, Minn., University of Minnesota Press.
32.
Frank, A.G. 1967 Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America. New York, NY, Monthly Review.
33.
Furtado, C. 1970 Economic development of Latin America: A survey from colonial times to the Cuban Revolution. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
34.
Galtung, J.1971“A structural theory of imperialism” , Journal of Peace Research8: 81-117.
35.
Gilpin, R.1975“Three models of the future” , International Organization29 (Winter): 37-60.
36.
Habermas, J. 1971 Knowledge and human interests (Translated by J.J. Shapiro). Boston, Mass., Beacon.
37.
Habermas, J. 1973 Theory and practice (Translated by J. Viertel). Boston, Mass., Beacon.
38.
Hanson, N.R. 1958 Patterns of discovery. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
39.
Hempel, C. 1965 Aspects of scientific explanation. New York, NY, Free Press.
40.
Hirsch, A.1976“The `a posteriori' method and the creation of new theory: W.C. Mitchell as a case study” , History of Political Economy8 (Summer): 195-206.
41.
Hook, S. 1951 Reason, social myths and democracy. New York, NY, Humanities.
42.
Hopkins, T.K. 1982 “World-systems analysis-methodological issues”, in: T.K. Hopkins and I. Wallerstein (eds) World-systems analysis: Theory and methodology. Beverly Hills, Calif., Sage.
43.
Jackman, R.W. 1975 Politics and social equality: A comparative analysis. New York, NY, Wiley.
44.
Kaplan, A. 1964 The conduct of inquiry. San Francisco, Calif., Chandler.
45.
Kaufman, R.R. ; Chernotsky, H.I.; Geller, D.S.1975“A preliminary test of the theory of dependency”, Comparative Politics7 (Apr.): 303-330.
46.
Kordig, C.R.1971“The comparability of scientific theories” , Philosophy of Science38 (Dec.): 467-485.
47.
Kosok, M.1966“The formalization of Hegel's dialectical logic” , International Philosophical Quarterly6 (Dec.): 596-631.
48.
Kuhn, T.S. 1970 The structure of scientific revolutions. 2nd edition. Chicago, Ill., University of Chicago Press.
49.
Lakatos, I. 1970 “Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes”, in: I. Lakatos and A. Musgrove (eds) Criticism and the growth of knowledge. London, Cambridge University Press.
50.
Lall, S.1975“Is `dependence' a useful concept in analyzing underdevelopment?” , World Development3: 799-810.
51.
McDaniel, T.1976/77“Class and dependency in Latin America” , Berkeley Journal of Sociology11: 51-88.
52.
McGowan, P.J.1976“Economic dependence and economic performance in Black Africa” , Journal of Modern African Studies14 (March): 25-40.
53.
McGowan, P.J. ; Smith, D.L.1978“Economic dependency in Black Africa: An analysis of competing theories”, International Organization32 (Winter): 179-235.
54.
McMullin, E. 1976 “The fertility of theory and the unit for appraisal in science”, in: R.S. Cohen; P.K. Feyerabend; M.W. Wartofsky (eds) Essays in memory of Imre Lakatos — Boston studies in the philosophy of science. Vol. 39. Dordrecht, D. Reidel.
Marini, R.M. 1973 Dialecta de la dependencia. Mexico City, Ediciones ERA.
57.
Martin, M.1971“Referential variance and scientific objectivity” , British Journal for the Philosophy of Science22: 17-26.
58.
Martin, M.1972“Ontological variance and scientific objectivity” , British Journal for the Philosophy of Science23: 252-256.
59.
Meier, G.M. 1970 Leading issues in economic development. New York, NY, Oxford University Press.
60.
Mitroff, I. ; Betz, F.1972“Dialectic decision theory: A metatheory of decision making”, Management Science19: 11-24.
61.
Moon, J.D. 1975 “The logic of political inquiry: A synthesis of opposed perspectives”, in: F. Greenstein; N. Polsby (eds) Handbook of political science. Vol. 1. Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley.
62.
Moran, T.H.1978“Multinational corporations and dependency: A dialogue for dependentistas and non-dependentistas” , International Organization32 (Winter): 79-100.
63.
Nafziger, E.W.1976“A critique of development economics in the U.S.” , Journal of Development Studies13 (Oct.): 18-34.
64.
Noble, J.B. 1977 “Theoretical commensurability and the problem of Mannheim's paradox”, Paper delivered at the 1977 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C. (Sept.).
65.
Nove, A.1974“On reading André Gunder Frank” , Journal of Development Studies10 (Apr./July): 445-455.
66.
O'Brien, P. 1974 A critique of Latin American theories of dependency. Glasgow, Institute of American Studies, Occasional Paper No. 12.
67.
Packenham, R.A. 1973 Liberal America and the Third World. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
68.
Polanyi, M. 1964 Personal knowledge. New York, NY, Harper and Row.
69.
Popper, K.R. 1959 The logic of scientific discovery. New York, NY, Basic Books.
70.
Popper, K.R. 1963 Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York, NY, Harper and Row.
71.
Quinn, P.1969“The status of the D-thesis” , Philosophy of Science36 (Dec.): 381-399.
72.
Radnitzky, G. 1970 Contemporary schools of metascience. Goteberg, Akademiforlaget.
73.
Radnitzky, G. 1976 “Popperian philosophy of science as an antidote against relativism”, in: R.S. Cohen; P.K. Feyerabend; M.W. Wartofsky (eds) Essays in memory of Imre Lakatos — Boston studies in the philosophy of science. Vol. 39. Dordrecht, D. Reidel.
74.
Ray, D.1973“The dependency model of Latin American underdevelopment: Three basic fallacies” , Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs15 (Feb.): 4-20.
75.
Roberts, M.J.1974“On the nature and condition of social science” , Daedalus103 (Summer): 47-64.
76.
Rudner, R.S.1972“Comment: On evolving standard views in philosophy of science” , American Political Science Review66 (Sept.): 827-845.
77.
Scheffler, I. 1967 Science and subjectivity. New York, NY, Bobbs-Merrill.
78.
Sherman, H.1976“Dialectics as a method” , Insurgent Sociologist6: 57-64.
79.
Sloan, J.W.1977“Dependency theory and Latin American development: Another key fails to open the door” , Inter-American Economic Affairs31 (Winter): 21-40.
80.
Smith, T.1980“The underdevelopment of development literature: The case of dependency theory” , World Politics31 (Autumn): 247-288.
81.
Sunkel, O.1973“Transnational capitalism and national disintegration in Latin America” , Social and Economic Studies22 (Mar.): 132-176.
82.
Sunkel, O. ; Fuenzalida, E.R. 1977 “The transnationalization of capitalism and national development”. Brighton, Institute of Development Studies (mimeo).
83.
Fuenzalida, E.R. ; Fuenzalida, E.R. 1979 “Transnational capitalism and national development”, in: J.J. Villami (ed.) Transnational capitalism and national development. Sussex, Harvester.
84.
Toulmin, S. 1961 Foresight and understanding. New York, NY, Harper and Row.
85.
Toulmin, S. 1972 Human understanding. Vol. 1. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
86.
Tyler, W.G. ; Wogart, J.P.1973“Economic dependence and marginalization: Some empirical evidence”, Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs15 (Feb.): 36-45.
87.
Vengroff, R.1975“Neo-colonialism and policy outputs in Africa” , Comparative Political Studies8 (July): 234-249.
88.
Vernon, R. 1972 The economic and political consequences of multinational enterprises: An anthology. Boston, Mass., Harvard Business School.
89.
Vernon, R. 1975 Multinational enterprises in developing countries: An analysis of national policies. New York, NY, United Nations Industrial Development Organization.
90.
Waltz, K.N. 1979 Theory of international politics. Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley.
91.
Weinstein, M.A. 1977 The tragic sense of political life. Columbia, SC, University of South Carolina Press.
92.
Zinnes, D.A. 1976 Contemporary research in international relations. New York, NY, Free Press.
93.
Zivian, M.T.1977“Dialectics: Paradigm for the social sciences” , Human Development20: 249-252.