Sexist Ideology and Endorsement of Men’s Control Over Women’s Decisions in Reproductive Health

Abstract

Feminist scholars have argued that men’s control over women’s reproductive autonomy is a central feature of male dominance. Building on recent research that shows sexist ideology informs support for restricting women’s reproductive autonomy, we examined the relation of sexism and the belief that men should be able to restrict the behavior of women. Study 1 (N = 366 undergraduate psychology students in the United Kingdom) and Study 2 (N = 281 Amazon Mechanical Turk workers in the United States) showed that controlling for various demographics and ideological measures (e.g., right-wing authoritarianism, support for abortion rights), hostile sexism was related to support for men having the right to prevent their pregnant partner from having an abortion. Further, hostile sexism was related to the endorsement of men’s right to withdraw financial support for the child if a woman chooses not to terminate her pregnancy. Hostile sexism was also uniquely related to support for men’s right to veto their female partner’s decisions during pregnancy and childbirth. The present studies show that hostile sexism is associated with perceptions that men have the right to constrain women’s reproductive choices. Our findings highlight the adverse pressures on women’s reproductive autonomy, including sexist ideology, and may suggest that practitioners should be mindful of this when assisting women in discussing reproductive questions. Further, by creating awareness about the different factors that shape the perception of men’s role in reproductive decisions, sexual health educators could potentially help affirm women’s autonomy in reproductive health. Additional online materials for this article (measures used in this study) are available on PWQ’s website at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/0361684317744531. Data files, together with syntax detailing the statistical analyses, are available at https://osf.io/vwjus/. Online slides for instructors who want to use this article for teaching are available on PWQ's website at http://journals.sagepub.com/page/pwq/suppl/index

Keywords

sexism reproductive health pregnancy abortion

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abortion case goes on with court confusion. (1997, 5 23). The Herald. Retrieved from http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/12323635.Abortion_case_goes_on_with_court_confusion/

Altemeyer

(1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.

Begun

Walls

N. E.

(2015). Pedestal or gutter: Exploring ambivalent sexism’s relationship with abortion attitudes. Affilia: Journal of Women & Social Work, 30, 200–215. doi:10.1177/0886109914555216

Brake

(2005). Fatherhood and child support: Do men have a right to choose? Journal of Applied Philosophy, 22, 55–73. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5930.2005.00292.x

British Broadcasting Corporation. (2001, 3 26). Abortion for court fight woman. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/1242952.stm

Burn

S. M.

Busso

(2005). Ambivalent sexism, scriptural literalism, and religiosity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 412–418. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00241.x

Center for Reproductive Rights. (2017). Interactive map of the world’s abortion laws. World Abortion Laws 2017. Retrieved from http://worldabortionlaws.com/map/

Deveny

(2016, 3 18). Financial abortion: Should men be able to “opt out” of parenthood? ABC News. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-12-04/financial-abortion-men-opt-out-parenthood/8049576

Duckitt

Sibley

C. G.

(2007). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21, 113–130. doi:10.1002/per.614

10.

Dudgeon

M. R.

Inhorn

M. C.

(2004). Men’s influences on women’s reproductive health: Medical anthropological perspectives. Social Science & Medicine, 59, 1379–1395. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.11.035

11.

Duerksen

K. N.

Lawson

K. L

. (2017). “Not brain-washed, but heart-washed”: A qualitative analysis of benevolent sexism in the anti-choice stance. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s12529-017-9633-8

12.

Fetterolf

J. C.

Rudman

L. A.

(2017). Exposure to sexual economics theory promotes a hostile view of heterosexual relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41, 77–88. doi:10.1177/0361684316669697

13.

Garland

(1991). The mid-point on a rating scale: Is it desirable? Marketing Bulletin, 2, 66–70. Retrieved from http://marketing-bulletin.massey.ac.nz/V2/MB_V2_N3_Garland.pdf

14.

Gibbs

. (2006, 3 15). A man’s right to choose? TIME. Retrieved from http://content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1173414,00.html

15.

Glick

Fiske

S. T.

(1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491

16.

Glick

Fiske

S. T.

(2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.56.2.109

17.

Guttmacher Institute. (2017, 1 5). An overview of abortion laws. Retrieved from https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/overview-abortion-laws

18.

Hodson

MacInnis

C. C.

(2017). Can left-right differences in abortion support be explained by sexism? Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 118–121. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.044

19.

Huang

Davies

P. G.

Sibley

C. G.

Osborne

(2016). Benevolent sexism, attitudes toward motherhood, and reproductive rights: A multi-study longitudinal examination of abortion attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 970–984. doi:10.1177/0146167216649607

20.

Huang

Osborne

Sibley

C. G.

Davies

P. G.

(2014). The precious vessel: Ambivalent sexism and opposition to elective and traumatic abortion. Sex Roles, 71, 436–449. doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0423-3

21.

Johnston

G. F.

(2003). Abortion from the religious and moral perspective: An annotated bibliography. Westwood, CT: Praeger.

22.

Kirschen

(2017, 1 26). Meet the French feminists behind a viral meme about a male ejaculation ban. BuzzFeed News. Retrieved from https://www.buzzfeed.com/mariekirschen/this-response-to-the-photograph-of-trump-signing-a?%20utm_term=.uad3vEXJ1#.wy26X8zxl

23.

Leving

J. M.

(2016). New abortion legislation: Fathers will have final say [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://dadsrights.com/index.php/new-abortion-legislation/

24.

Maximova

(2002, 3 20). Chinese man sues wife over abortion. BBC News. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/1883709.stm

25.

Maxwell

S. E.

Cole

D. A.

(2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12, 23–44. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.12.1.23

26.

McCulley

M. G.

(1998). The male abortion: The putative father’s right to terminate his interests in and obligations to the unborn child. Journal of Law and Policy, 7, 1–55. Retrieved from http://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1394&context=jlp

27.

Miller

Decker

M. R.

McCauley

H. L.

Tancredi

D. J.

Levenson

R. R.

Waldman

… Silverman

J. G.

(2010). Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy. Contraception, 81, 316–322.

28.

Miller

Tancredi

D. J.

Decker

M. R.

McCauley

H. L.

Jones

K. A.

Anderson

… Silverman

J. G.

(2016). A family planning clinic-based intervention to address reproductive coercion: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Contraception, 94, 58–67. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2016.02.009

29.

Moya

Glick

Expósito

de Lemus

Hart

(2007). It’s for your own good: Benevolent sexism and women’s reactions to protectively justified restrictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1421–1434. doi:10.1177/0146167207304790

30.

Murphy

(2013). Ambivalent sexism, health beliefs and paternalism towards pregnant women (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kent, Canterbury.

31.

Murphy

A. O.

Sutton

R. M.

Douglas

K. M.

McClellan

L. M.

(2011). Ambivalent sexism and the ‘do’s and ‘don’t’s of pregnancy: Examining attitudes toward proscriptions and the women who flout them. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 812–816. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.031

32.

Osamor

Grady

(2017). Factors associated with women’s health care decision-making autonomy: Empirical evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Biosocial Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/S0021932017000037

33.

Osborne

Davies

P. G.

(2009). Social dominance orientation, ambivalent sexism, and abortion: Explaining pro-choice and prolife attitudes. In Palcroft

L. B.

Lopez

M. V.

(Eds.), Personality assessment: New research (pp. 309–320). New York, NY: Nova Science.

34.

Osborne

Davies

P. G.

(2012). When benevolence backfires: Benevolent sexists’ opposition to elective and traumatic abortion. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 291–307. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00890.x

35.

Rothman

B. K.

(1994). Beyond mothers and fathers: Ideology in a patriarchal society. In Nakano Glenn

Chang

Forcey

L. R.

(Eds.), Mothering: Ideology, experience, and agency (pp. 139–157). Abingdon, NY: Routledge.

36.

Rudman

L. A.

Fetterolf

J. C.

Sanchez

D. T.

(2013). What motivates the sexual double standard? More support for male versus female control theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 250–263. doi:10.1177/0146167212472375

37.

Saad

(2016, 5 25). Americans’ attitudes toward abortion unchanged. Gallup. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/191834/americans-attitudes-toward-abortion-unchanged.aspx

38.

Schmitz

R. M.

Kazyak

(2016). Masculinities in cyberspace: An analysis of portrayals of manhood in men’s rights activist websites. Social Sciences, 5, 1–16. doi:10.3390/socsci5020018

39.

Schönbrodt

F. D.

Perugini

(2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 609–612. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009

40.

Sheldon

(1993). “Who is the mother to make the judgment?”: The constructions of woman in English Abortion law. Feminist Legal Studies, 1, 3–22. doi:10.1007/bf01191522

41.

Sheldon

(2003). Unwilling fathers and abortion: Terminating men’s child support obligations?. The Modern Law Review, 66, 175–194. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.6602001

42.

Sibley

C. G.

Wilson

M. S.

Duckitt

(2007). Antecedents of men’s hostile and benevolent sexism: The dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 160–172.

43.

Smith

T. W.

Marsden

P. V.

Hout

(2011). General Social Survey, 1972-2010 [Cumulative File]. ICPSR31521-v1. Storrs, CT: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributors], 08–05.

44.

Sullivan

K. T.

(2001). Understanding the relationship between religiosity and marriage: An investigation of the immediate and longitudinal effects of religiosity on newlywed couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 610–626. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.15.4.610

45.

Sutton

R. M.

Douglas

K. M.

McClellan

L. M.

(2011). Benevolent sexism, perceived health risks, and the inclination to restrict pregnant women’s freedoms. Sex Roles, 65, 596–605. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9869-0

46.

Taylor

(2016, 3 8). Men should have the right to “abort” responsibility of an unborn child, Swedish political group says. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/03/08/men-should-have-the-right-to-abort-responsibility-for-an-unborn-child-swedish-political-group-says/?%20utm_term=.c6748d5c7f3e

47.

Testa

M. R.

Cavalli

Rosina

(2012). The decision of whether to have a child: Does couple disagreement matter? Vienna Institute of Demography Working Papers (No. 7/2012). Retrieved from https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/96990/1/756762987.pdf

48.

The Abortion Act, United Kingdom Statutes. (1967). Retrieved from https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1967/87/section/1

49.

Viki

G. T.

Abrams

(2002). But she was unfaithful: Benevolent sexism and reactions to rape victims who violate traditional gender role expectations. Sex Roles, 47, 289–293. doi:10.1023/a:1021342912248

50.

Yargawa

Leonardi-Bee

(2015). Male involvement and maternal health outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 69, 604–612. doi:10.1136/jech-2014-204784

51.

Zakrisson

(2005). Construction of a short version of the Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 863–872. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.02

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

58.08 MB

0.02 MB