Reproductive Justice in the Post-Roe v. Wade Era: Examining Reactions to Dobbs v. Jackson and Psychological Distress Among Cisgender Women and People Assigned Female at Birth

Abstract

In the present study, we examined relations among reactions to the Dobbs v. Jackson court ruling (heretofore adverse reactions), psychological distress, collective action, and abortion history among cisgender women and people assigned female at birth. Specifically, we examined the ways in which the relation between adverse reactions to the Dobbs v. Jackson decision and psychological distress may vary according to involvement in reproductive justice and antiabortion collective action and abortion history. Results (n = 894) revealed that adverse reactions were significantly positively related to psychological distress. Furthermore, involvement in reproductive justice collective action was significantly positive to psychological distress whereas the relation between antiabortion collective action and psychological distress was nonsignificant. The positive relation between adverse reactions and psychological distress was exacerbated by high levels of involvement in reproductive justice and weakened by low levels of involvement in antiabortion collective action, and these relations did not vary according to abortion history. In addition, the relation between involvement in antiabortion collective action and psychological distress was significant and positive among those who had had an abortion and nonsignificant for those who had not. These findings reveal the importance of mental health providers attending to their clients’ abortion-related beliefs and histories, involvement in collective action, and psychological distress. Additional online materials for this article are available on PWQ's website at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843231210219.

Keywords

abortion reproductive health reproductive justice collective action psychological distress

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott

D. M.

Nguyen

Bohmer

Myers

M. L.

Boyles

J. A.

Mercier

C. M.

(2023). The US in uterus: A collaborative autoethnography of psychologists advocating for reproductive justice. Psychology of Women Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843231166375

Biggs

M. A.

Brown

Foster

D. G.

(2020). Perceived abortion stigma and psychological well-being over five years after receiving or being denied an abortion. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226417

Biggs

M. A.

Gould

Barar

R. E.

Foster

D. G.

(2018). Five-year suicidal ideation trajectories among women receiving or being denied an abortion. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 175(9), 845–852. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18010091

Biggs

M. A.

Rowland

McCulloch

C. E.

Foster

D. G.

(2016). Does abortion increase women’s risk for post-traumatic stress? Findings from a prospective longitudinal cohort study. BMJ Open, 6(2), e009698. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009698

Biggs

M. A.

Upadhyay

McCulloch

C. E.

Foster

D. G.

(2017). Women’s mental health and well-being five years after receiving or being denied an abortion: A prospective, longitudinal cohort study. JAMA Psychology, 74(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3478

Blazina

(2022, July 15). Key facts about the abortion debate in America. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/07/15/key-facts-about-the-abortion-debate-in-america/

Breslow

A. S.

Brewster

M. E.

Velez

B. L.

Wong

Geiger

Soderstrom

(2015). Resilience and collective action: Exploring buffers against minority stress for transgender individuals. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 2(3), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000117

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2018). User guide to the 2016 period linked birth/infant death public use file. National Center for Health Statistics, Division of Vital Statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/infantmortality.htm#chart

Cohen

(1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

10.

Crenshaw

(1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=uclf

11.

Dadlez

E. M.

Andrews

E. L.

(2009). Post-abortion syndrome: Creating an affliction. Bioethics, 24(9), 445–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01739.x

12.

DeBlaere

Brewster

M. E.

Bertsch

K. N.

DeCarlo

A. L.

Kegel

K. A.

Presseau

C. D.

(2014). The protective power of collective action for sexual minority women of color: An investigation of multiple discrimination experiences and psychological distress. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313493252

13.

Diamant

Mohamed

(2023, January 11). What the data says about abortion in the U.S. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2023/01/11/what-the-data-says-about-abortion-in-the-u-s-2/

14.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, F. 3d. 265 (2022). No. 19-1392.

15.

Duckitt

Sibley

C. G.

(2017). The dual process motivational model of ideology and prejudice. In Sibley

C. G.

Barlow

F. K.

(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 188–221). Cambridge University Press.

16.

Festinger

(1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.

17.

Field

A. P.

(2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics: And sex and drugs and rock’n’roll (4th ed.). Sage.

18.

Fikslin

R. A.

(2021). Toward an intersectional psychological science of reproductive norms: Generating research across the natalism spectrum. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(3), 308–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211011716

19.

Fitzpatrick

K. M.

Wilson

(2005). Exposure to violence and posttraumatic stress symptomology among abortion clinic workers. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 12(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024768207850

20.

Flores Randelman

M. J.

Watson

L. B.

(2023). The relations among microaggressions, collective action, and psychological outcomes among sexual minority Latinx people. Journal of Latinx Psychology, 11(3), 240–257. https://doi.org/10.1037/lat0000225

21.

Foster

D. G.

Ralph

L. J.

Biggs

M. A.

Gerdts

Roberts

S. C. M.

Glymour

M. A.

(2018). Socioeconomic outcomes of women who receive and women who are denied wanted abortions. American Journal of Public Health, 108(3), 407–413. https://doi.org/10.2105%2FAJPH.2017.304247

22.

Foster

D. G.

Roberts

Steinberg

Neuhaus

Biggs

M. A.

(2015). A comparison of depression and anxiety symptom trajectories between women who had an abortion and women denied one. Psychological Medicine, 45(10), 2073–2082. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291714003213

23.

Friedman

Leaper

(2010). Sexual-minority college women's experiences with discrimination: Relations with identity and collective action. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(2), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01558.x

24.

Garcia

(2020, September, 19). ICE’s forced sterilizations are a crime against humanity. Union of Concerned Scientists , https://blog.ucsusa.org/paula-garcia/ices-forced-sterilizations-are-a-crime-against-humanity

25.

Gerdts

Dobkin

Foster

D. G.

Schwarz

E. B.

(2015). Side effects, physical health consequences, and mortality associated with abortion and birth after an unwanted pregnancy. Women’s Health Issues, 26(1), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2015.10.001

26.

Grzanka

P. R.

Frantell

K. A.

(2017). Counseling psychology and reproductive justice: A call to action. The Counseling Psychologist, 45(3), 326–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000017699871

27.

Hanschmidt

Linde

Hilbert

Riedel-Heller

S. G.

Kersting

(2016). Abortion stigma: A systematic review. Perspectives in Sexual Reproductive Health, 48(4), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1363/48e8516

28.

Hayes

A. F.

(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. Sage.

29.

Hayes

A. F.

Cai

(2007). Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: An introduction and software implementation. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 709–722. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03192961

30.

Hess

J. A.

Rueb

J. D.

(2005). Attitudes toward abortion, religion, and party affiliation among college students. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 24(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-005-1002-0

31.

Kaufman

Brown

Martínez Coral

Jacob

Onyango

Thomasen

(2022). Global impacts of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization and abortion regression in the United States. Sexual Reproductive Health Matters, 30(1), 2135574. https://doi.org/10.1080%2F26410397.2022.2135574

32.

Kumar

Hessini

Mitchell

E. M. H.

(2009). Conceptualising abortion stigma. Culture, Health, & Sexuality, 11(6), 625–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050902842741

33.

Lepage

Bèque

Zerhouni

Dambrun

Vezirian

Besson

Bonneterre

Mermillod

(2022). Authoritarian attitudes are associated with higher autonomic reactivity to stress and lower recovery. Emotion, 22(3), 526–544. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000775

34.

Loder

C. M.

Minadeo

Jimenez

Luna

Ross

Rosenbloom

Stalburg

C. M.

Harris

L. H.

(2020). Bridging the expertise of advocates and academics to identify reproductive justice learning outcomes. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 32(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2019.1631168

35.

Lovibond

P. F.

Lovibond

S. H.

(1995b). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(3), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U

36.

Lovibond

S. H.

Lovibond

P. F.

(1995a). Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales (2nd ed.). Psychology Foundation.

37.

Major

Gramzow

R. H.

(1999). Abortion as stigma: Cognitive and emotional implications of concealment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(4), 735–745. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.735

38.

Miller

R. L.

Pallant

J. F.

Negri

L. M.

(2006). Anxiety and stress in the postpartum: Is there more to postnatal distress than depression? BMC Psychiatry, 6(12), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-6-12

39.

Mollen

Hargons

Klann

E. M.

Mosley

D. V.

(2018). Abortion knowledge and attitudes among psychologists and graduate students. The Counseling Psychologist, 46(6), 738–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000018795296

40.

Moradi

Subich

L. M.

(2003). A concomitant examination of the relations of perceived racist and the sexist events to psychological distress for African American women. The Counseling Psychologist, 31(4), 451–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000003031004007

41.

Moseson

Fix

Ragosta

Forsberg

Hastings

Stoeffler

Lunn

M. R.

Flentje

Capriotti

M. R.

Lubensky

M. E.

Obedin-Maliver

(2021). Abortion experiences and preferences of transgender, nonbinary, and gender-expansive people in the United States. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 224(4), 376.e1–376.e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.035

42.

O’Connor

B. P.

(2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 32, 396–402. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200807

43.

O’Donnell

Goldberg

Lieberman

Betancourt

(2018). “I wouldn’t even know where to start”: Unwanted pregnancy and abortion decision-making in Central Appalachia. Reproductive Health Matters, 26(54), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1513270

44.

Parent

M. C.

(2013). Handling item-level missing data: Simpler is just as good. The Counseling Psychologist, 41(4), 568–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000012445176

45.

Petersen

E. E.

Davis

N. L.

Goodman

Cox

Syverson

Seed

Shapiro-Mendoza

Callaghan

W. M.

Barfield

(2019). Racial/ethnic disparities in pregnancy-related deaths—United States, 2007–2016. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 68(35), 762–765. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6835a3

46.

Ralph

L. J.

Mauldon

Biggs

M. A.

Foster

D. G.

(2019). A prospective cohort study of the effect of receiving versus being denied an abortion on educational attainment. Womens Health Issues, 29(6), 455–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2019.09.004

47.

Ralph

L. J.

Schwarz

E. B.

Grossman

Foster

D. G.

(2019). Self-reported physical health of women who did and did not terminate pregnancy after seeking abortion services: A cohort study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 171(4), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.7326/m18-1666

48.

Roberti

(2021). “Women deserve better:” The use of the pro-woman frame in anti-abortion policies in U.S. States. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 42(3), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2021.1925478

49.

Roberts

S. C. M.

Biggs

M. A.

Chibber

K. S.

Gould

Rocca

C. H.

Foster

D. G.

(2014). Risk of violence from the man involved in the pregnancy after receiving or being denied an abortion. Biomed Central Medicine, 12(144), https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-014-0144-z#citeas

50.

Roe v. Wade, 410 US 113 (1973). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us

51.

Ross

Solinger

(2017). Reproductive justice: An introduction. University of California Press.

52.

Roth

Ainsworth

S. A.

(2015). “If they hand you a paper, you sign it”: A call to end the sterilization of women in prison. Hastings Journal on Gender and the Law, 26(1), https://repository.uclawsf.edu/hwlj/vol26/iss1/3

53.

Rye

B. J.

Underhill

(2020). Pro-choice and pro-life are not enough: An investigation of abortion attitudes as a function of abortion prototypes. Sexuality & Culture: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 24(6), 1829–1851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09723-7

54.

SisterSong: Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective (n.d.). Reproductive justice. https://www.sistersong.net/reproductive-justice

55.

Solazzo

A. L.

(2019). Different and not equal: The uneven association of race, poverty, and abortion laws on abortion timing. Social Problems, 66(4), 519–547. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spy015

56.

Szymanski

D. M.

(2004). Relations among dimensions of feminism and internalized heterosexism in lesbians and bisexual women. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 51(3–4), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000037759.33014.55

57.

Szymanski

D. M.

Henrichs-Beck

(2014). Exploring sexual minority women’s experiences of external and internalized heterosexism and sexism and their links to coping and distress. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 70(1–2), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0329-5

58.

Szymanski

D. M.

Owens

G. P.

(2009). Group-level coping as a moderator between heterosexism and sexism and psychological distress in sexual minority women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(2), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01489.x

59.

Thomas

R. G.

Norris

A. H.

Gallo

M. F.

(2017). Anti-legal attitudes toward abortion among abortion patients in the United States. Contraception, 96(5), 357–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.07.166

60.

Vasby Anderson

(2022). Rhetoric of reproductive justice and injustice in the aftermath of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 108(4), 418–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2022.2131215

61.

Vedam

Stoll

Taiwo

T. K.

Rubashkin

Cheyney

Strauss

McLemore

Cadena

Nethery

Rushton

Schummers

E. D.

(2019). The giving voice to mothers study: Inequity and mistreatment during pregnancy and childbirth in the United States. Reproductive Health, 16, article 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0729-2

62.

Velez

B. L.

Moradi

(2016). A moderated mediation test of minority stress: The role of collective action. The Counseling Psychologist, 44(8), 1132–1157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000016665467

63.

Walters

M. L.

Chen

Breiding

M. J.

(2013). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010 findings on victimization by sexual orientation. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_sofindings.pdf

64.

Watson

(2022). The ethics of access: Reframing the need for abortion care as a health disparity. The American Journal of Bioethics, 22(8), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2022.2075976

65.

Watson

L. B.

Hargons

C. N.

Mollen

(2023). Rising up, pushing forward: Standing our ground in the face of injustice. Psychology of Women Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843231197674

66.

Watson

L. B.

Morgan

S. K.

Craney

(2018). Bisexual women’s discrimination and mental health outcomes: The roles of resilience and collective action. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 5(2), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000272

67.

Weston

Gore

P. A.

(2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 719–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345

68.

Woodruff

Biggs

M. A.

Gould

Foster

D. G.

(2018). Attitudes toward abortion after receiving vs. being denied an abortion in the USA. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 15(4), 452–463. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs13178-018-0325-1

69.

Wright

S. C.

Taylor

D. M.

Moghaddam

F. M.

(1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 994–1003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.994

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB