Women-centered anti-abortion rhetoric, grounded in ostensibly positive beliefs that pregnant people are precious objects who must be protected from having abortions, has proliferated anti-abortion activism and legislation. However, abortion stigma, marked by negative perceptions of people who terminate pregnancies, is the most widely used theoretical tool for understanding the social and psychological implications of abortion. In this article, we first integrate these two seemingly contradictory perspectives on abortion through the lens of ambivalent sexism theory. We then argue that ambivalent sexism paves the way for objectifying perceptions and treatment of pregnant people; specifically, our typology of reproductive objectification provides a tool for exploring how the abortion decision-making of pregnant people is undermined. Through this lens, abortion decisions can represent a subversion of these portrayals and treatment by affirming people who seek and have abortions as whole human beings. Throughout, we aim to counter White supremacy and cisheteropatriarchy, which have marked public discourse and psychological research on abortion. Finally, using this reproductive objectification framework, recommendations for clinicians and researchers are provided.
AbbottD. M.MollenD.AnayaE. J.BurnesT. R.JonesM. M.RukusV. A. (2021). Providing sexuality training for psychologists: The role of predoctoral internship sites. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 16(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2021.1892555
AgénorM.MurchisonG. R.NajarroJ.GrimshawA.CottrillA. A.JaniakE.GordonA. R.CharltonB. M. (2021). Mapping the scientific literature on reproductive health among transgender and gender diverse people: A scoping review. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 29(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2021.1886395
AveryL. R.StantonA. G. (2020). Subverting the mandates of our methods: Tensions and considerations for incorporating reproductive justice frameworks into psychological science. Journal of Social Issues, 76(2), 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12386
BartkyS. L. (Ed.) (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. Routledge.
9.
BearakJ. M.JonesR. K. (2017). Did contraceptive use patterns change after the Affordable Care Act? A descriptive analysis. Women’s Health Issues, 27(3), 316–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2017.01.006
BeckerA.HannL. R. (2021). It makes it more real”: Examining ambiguous fetal meanings in abortion care. Social Science & Medicine, 272, Article e113736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113736
12.
BeckerJ. C.WrightS. C. (2011). Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 622–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022615
13.
BenshoofJ. (1993). Planned Parenthood v. Casey. The impact of the news undue burden standard on reproductive health care. Journal of the American Medical Association, 269(17), 2249–2257. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.269.17.2249
14.
BerryD. R. (ed) (2017). The price for their pound of flesh: The value of the enslaved from womb to grave in the building of a nation. Beacon Press.
15.
BiggsM. A.BrownK.FosterD. G. (2020). Perceived abortion stigma and psychological well-being over five years after receiving or being denied an abortion. PloS One, 15(1), Article e0226417. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226417
16.
BiggsM. A.UpadhyayU. D.McCullochC. E.FosterD. G. (2017). Women’s mental health and well-being 5 years after receiving or being denied an abortion: A prospective, longitudinal cohort study. JAMA Psychiatry, 74(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3478
17.
BommarajuA.KavanaughM. L.HouM. Y.BessettD. (2016). Situating stigma in stratified reproduction: Abortion stigma and miscarriage stigma as barriers to reproductive healthcare. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 10, 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2016.10.008
18.
BrockR. L.RamsdellE. L.SáezG.GervaisS. J. (2020). Perceived humanization by intimate partners during pregnancy is associated with fewer depressive symptoms, less body dissatisfaction, and greater sexual satisfaction through reduced self-objectification. Sex Roles, 84(5–6), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01166-6
19.
BrownK.LaverdeR.Barr-WalkerJ.SteinauerJ. (2022). Understanding the role of race in abortion stigma in the United States: A systematic scoping review. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 30(1), Article e214972. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2022.2141972
BurnesT. R.SinghA. A.WitherspoonR. G. (2017). Graduate counseling psychology training in sex and sexuality: An exploratory analysis. The Counseling Psychologist, 45(4), 504–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000017714765
22.
CalogeroR. M. (2013). Objects don’t object: Evidence that self-objectification disrupts women’s social activism. Psychological Science, 24(3), 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612452574
23.
CalogeroR. M.JostJ. T. (2011). Self-subjugation among women: Exposure to sexist ideology, self-objectification, and the protective function of the need to avoid closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021864
CockrillK.NackA. (2013). I'm not that type of person”: Managing the stigma of having an abortion. Deviant Behavior, 34(12), 973–990. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2013.800423
26.
CollinsP. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). Routledge.
CrawfordB. L.LaRocheK. J.JozkowskiK. N. (2022). Examining abortion attitudes in the context of gestational age. Social Science Quarterly, 103(4), 855–867. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13157
29.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. In BartlettK. T.KennedyR. (Eds.), Feminist legal theory: Readings in law and gender (pp. 57–80). Routledge.
CrockerJ.MajorB.SteeleC. (1998). Social stigma. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed, Vol. 2, pp. 504–553). Academic Press.
CutlerA. S.LundsbergL. S.WhiteM. A.StanwoodN. L.GariepyA. M. (2021). Characterizing community-level abortion stigma in the United States. Contraception, 104(3), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2021.03.021
34.
DavisA. (ed) (1981). Women, race, & class (1st ed.). Random House.
35.
DavisD. (2019). Radical Black birth workers. In DavisD. (Ed.), Reproductive injustice: Racism, pregnancy, and premature birth (pp. 57–80). New York University Press.
36.
DavisK. C. (2019). Stealthing”: Factors associated with young men’s nonconsensual condom removal. Health Psychology, 38(11), 997–1000. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000779
37.
DietzE. (2021). Normal parents: Trans pregnancy and the production of reproducers. International Journal of Transgender Health, 22(1-2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2020.1834483
DuerksenK. N.LawsonK. L. (2017). Not brain-washed, but heart-washed”: A qualitative analysis of benevolent sexism in the anti-choice stance. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 24(6), 864–870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-017-9633-8
EvansD. P.NarasimhanS. (2020). A narrative analysis of anti-abortion testimony and legislative debate related to Georgia’s fetal “heartbeat” abortion ban. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 28(1), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2019.1686201
42.
FinerL. B.FrohwirthL. F.DauphineeL. A.SinghS.MooreA. M. (2005). Reasons U.S. women have abortions: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 37(3), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1363/3711005
43.
FlynnA. W.DomínguezS.JrJordanR.DyerR. L.YoungE. I. (2021). When the political is professional: Civil disobedience in psychology. American Psychologist, 76(8), 1217–1231. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000867
44.
FosterD. G. (ed) (2020). The Turnaway Study. Scribner.
45.
FosterD. G.BiggsM. A.RalphL.GerdtsC.RobertsS.GlymourM. M. (2022). Socioeconomic outcomes of women who receive and women who are denied wanted abortions in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 112(9), 1290–1296. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304247
46.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT.-A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
47.
FurediA. (ed) (2021). The moral case for abortion: A defence of reproductive choice (2nd ed.). Springer Nature Limited.
48.
GervaisS. J.DiLilloD.McChargueD. (2014). Understanding the link between men’s alcohol use and sexual violence perpetration: The mediating role of sexual objectification. Psychology of Violence, 4(2), 156–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033840
49.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
50.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109
51.
GoffmanE. (ed) (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall.
52.
GoldenbergJ. L. (2013). Immortal objects: The objectification of women as terror management. In GervaisS. J. (Ed.), Objectification and (de)humanization: 60th Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 73–95). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6959-9_4
53.
GoldenbergJ. L.RobertsT.-A. (2011). The birthmark: An existential account of the objectification of women. In CalogeroR. M.Tantleff-DunnS.ThompsonJ. K. (Eds.), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 77–99). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12304-004
GotlibA. (2016). But you would be the best mother”: Unwoman, counterstories, and the motherhood mandate. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 13, 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-016-9699-z
57.
GouldH.FosterD. G.PerrucciA. C.BararR. E.RobertsS. C. M. (2013). Predictors of abortion counseling and receipt and helpfulness in the United States. Women’s Health Issues, 23(4), e249–e255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2013.05.003
58.
GraceK. T.AndersonJ. C. (2018). Reproductive coercion: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 19(4), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016663935
59.
GrossmanD.VermaN. (2022). Self-managed abortion in the US. Journal of the American Medical Association, 328(17), 1693–1694. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.19057
60.
GrzankaP. R.FrantellK. A. (2017). Counseling psychology and reproductive justice: A call to action. The Counseling Psychologist, 45(3), 326–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000017699871
61.
GussC. E.Katz-WiseS. L.MarteyE. B.GoldbergA. E. (2021). Family building desires among a sample of transgender and nonbinary students. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 17(5), 470–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2021.1911013
HanschmidtF.LindeK.HilbertA.Riedel-HellerS. G.KerstingA. (2016). Abortion stigma: A systematic review. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 48(4), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1363/48e8516
64.
HarrisL. F.RobertsS.BiggsM. A.RoccaC. H.FosterD. G. (2014). Perceived stress and emotional social support among women who are denied or receive abortions in the United States: A prospective cohort study. BMC Women's Health, 14, Article e76. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-14-76
HoffmanK. M.TrawalterS.AxtJ. R.OliverM. N. (2016). Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 113(16), 4296–4301. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113
67.
HonkasaloJ. (2018). Unfit for parenthood? Compulsory sterilization and transgender reproductive justice in Finland. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 20(1), 40–52. https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol20/iss1/4
68.
HoobermanL.OzoguzS. (2022). Abortion, mental health and epistemologies of psychological knowledge and ignorance. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 16(9), Article e12703. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12703
69.
HuangY.DaviesP. G.SibleyC. G.OsborneD. (2016). Benevolent sexism, attitudes toward motherhood, and reproductive rights: A multi-study longitudinal examination of abortion attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(7), 970–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216649607
70.
HuangY.OsborneD.SibleyC. G.DaviesP. G. (2014). The precious vessel: Ambivalent sexism and opposition to elective and traumatic abortion. Sex Roles, 71(11), 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0423-3
71.
HughesJ. L.CamdenA. A.YangchenT.SmithG. P. A.RodríguezM. M. D.RouseS. V.McDonaldC. P.LopezS. (2022). Guidance for researchers when using inclusive demographic questions for surveys: Improved and updated questions. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 27(4), 232–255. https://doi.org/10.24839/2325-7342.JN27.4.232
72.
JackmanM. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. University of California Press.
JermanJ.FrohwirthL.KavanaughM. L.BladesN. (2017). Barriers to abortion care and their consequences for patients traveling for services: Qualitative findings from two states. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 49(2), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12024
75.
Johnston-RobledoI.SheffieldK.VoigtJ.Wilcox-ConstantineJ. (2007). Reproductive shame: Self-objectification and young women's attitudes toward their reproductive functioning. Women & Health, 46(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1300/J013v46n01_03
76.
Johnston-RobledoI.WaresS.FrickerJ.PasekL. (2007). Indecent exposure: Self-objectification and young women’s attitudes toward breastfeeding. Sex Roles, 56(7), 429–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9194-4
77.
JozkowskiK. N.CrawfordB. L.HuntM. E. (2018). Complexity in attitudes toward abortion: Results from two studies. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 15, 464–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-018-0322-4
78.
KatzI.HassR. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(6), 893–905. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.6.893
KortsmitK.JatlaouiT. C.MandelM. G.ReevesJ. A.OduyeboT.PetersenE.WhitemanM. K. (2020). Abortion surveillance – United States, 2018. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 69(7), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6907a1
82.
KroehleK.SheltonJ.ClarkE.SeelmanK. (2020). Mainstreaming dissidence: Confronting binary gender in social work’s grand challenges. Social Work, 65(4), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swaa037
LangtonR. (2009). Autonomy-denial in objectification. In LangtonR. (Ed.), Sexual solipsism: Philosophical essays on pornography and objectification (pp. 223–240). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199247066.003.0011
86.
LeeS. J.RalstonH. J. P.DreyA. E.PartridgeJ. C.RosenM. A. (2005). Fetal pain: A systematic multidisciplinary review of the evidence. Journal of the American Medical Association, 294, 947–954. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.8.947
LordeA. (ed) (1984). Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Crossing Press.
89.
LowikA. (2019). Trans-inclusive abortion care: A manual for operationalizing trans-inclusive policies and practices in an abortion setting, United States. FQPN, National Abortion Federation.https://www.ajlowik.com/publications#/transinclusive-abortion
90.
LowikA. J. (2017). Reproducing eugenics, reproducing while trans: The state sterilization of trans people. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 14(5), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2017.1393361
91.
MacDonaldT. K.WalksM.BienerM.KibbeA. (2021). Disrupting the norms: Reproduction, gender identity, gender dysphoria, and intersectionality. International Journal of Transgender Health, 22(1–2), 18–29. https://doi.org/0.1080/26895269.2020.1848692
92.
MacLeodC.SigcauN.LuwacaP. (2011). Culture as a discursive resource opposing legal abortion. Critical Public Health, 21(2), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2010.492211
93.
MajorB.AppelbaumM.BeckmanL.DuttonM. A.RussoN. F.WestC. (2009). Abortion and mental health: Evaluating the evidence. American Psychologist, 64(9), 863–890. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017497
94.
MajorB.GramzowR. H. (1999). Abortion as stigma: Cognitive and emotional implications of concealment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(4), 735–745. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.735
McMahonJ. M.KahnK. B. (2016). Benevolent racism? The impact of target race on ambivalent sexism. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215583153
97.
MessingA. J.FabiR. E.RosenJ. D. (2020). Reproductive injustice at the US border. American Journal of Public Health, 110(3), 339–344. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305466
MohrJ. J.WeinerJ. L.ChoppR. M.WongS. J. (2009). Effects of client bisexuality on clinical judgment: When is bias most likely to occur?Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56(1), 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012816
100.
MollenD.AbbottD. M. (2022). Sexuality as a competency: Advancing training to serve the public. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 16(3), 280–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000378
101.
MollenD.BurnesT.LeeS.AbbottD. M. (2018). Sexuality training in counseling psychology. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 33(3), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2018.1553146
102.
MollenD.HargonsC.KlannE. M.MosleyD. V. (2018). Abortion knowledge and attitudes among psychologists and graduate students. The Counseling Psychologist, 46(6), 738–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000018795296
103.
MontoyaM. N.Judge-GoldenC.SwartzJ. J. (2022). The problems with crisis pregnancy centers: Reviewing the literature and identifying new directions for future research. International Journal of Women’s Health, 14, 757–763. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S288861
104.
MooreI. (2019). Indignity in unwanted pregnancy: Denial of abortion as cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment. The International Journal of Human Rights, 23(6), 1010–1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2019.1592160
105.
MorrisonJ. C. (2019). Resuscitating the Black body: Reproductive justice as resistance to the state's property interest in Black women's reproductive capacity. Yale Journal of Law & Feminism, 31(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/https://openyls.law.yale.edu/handle/20.500.13051/7124
106.
MosesonH.FixL.HastingsJ.StoefflerA.LunnM. R.FlentjeA.LubenskyM. E.CapriottiM. R.RagostaS.ForsbergH.Obedin-MaliverJ. (2021). Pregnancy intentions and outcomes among transgender, nonbinary, and gender-expansive people assigned female or intersex at birth in the United States: Results from a national, quantitative survey. International Journal of Transgender Health, 22(1-2), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2020.1841058
107.
MosesonH.FixL.RagostaS.ForsbergH.HastingsJ.StoefflerA.LunnM. R.FlentjeA.CapriottiM. R.LubenskyM. E.Obedin-MaliverJ. (2021). Abortion experiences and preferences of transgender, nonbinary, and gender-expansive people in the United States. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 224(4), Article e376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.035
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2018). The safety and quality of abortion care in the United States. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24950
National Association of Social Workers Delegate Assembly (2017). Reproductive justice. In National association of social workers delegate assembly, social work speaks, 11th edition: NASW policy statement- 2018-2020 (11th ed., pp. 265–277). NASW Press.
112.
NixonL. (2013). The right to (trans) parent: A reproductive justice approach to reproductive rights, fertility, and family-building issues facing transgender people. William and Mary Journal of Women and the Law, 20(1), 73–103. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl/vol20/iss1/5
113.
NorrisA.BessettD.SteinbergJ. R.KavanaughM. L.De ZordoS.BeckerD. (2011). Abortion stigma: A reconceptualization of constituents, causes, and consequences [Supplement]. Women's Health Issues, 21(3), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2011.02.010
OsborneD.DaviesP. G. (2012). When benevolence backfires: Benevolent sexists’ opposition to elective and traumatic abortion. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(2), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00890.x
117.
OsborneD.HuangY.OverallN. C.SuttonR. M.PettersonA.DouglasK. M.DaviesP. G.SibleyC. G. (2022). Abortion attitudes: An overview of demographic and ideological differences. Political Psychology, 43(S1), 29–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12803
PezaroS.CrowtherR.PearceG.JowettA.Godfrey-IsaacsL.SamuelsI.ValentineV. (2023). Perinatal care for trans and nonbinary people birthing in heteronormative “maternity” services: Experiences and educational needs of professionals. Gender & Society, 37(1), 124–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432221138086
QuinnD. M.EarnshawV. A. (2013). Concealable stigmatized identities and psychological well-being. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12005
RalphL. J.SchwarzE. B.GrossmanD.FosterD. G. (2019). Self-reported physical health of women who did and did not terminate pregnancy after seeking abortion services: A cohort study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 171(4), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.7326/m18-1666
126.
RiggsD. W.BartholomaeusC. (2020). Toward trans reproductive justice: A qualitative analysis of views on fertility preservation for Australian transgender and non-binary people. Journal of Social Issues, 76(2), 314–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12364
127.
RobertiA. (2021). Women deserve better:” The use of the pro-woman frame in anti-abortion policies in US states. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 42(3), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2021.1925478
RobertsD. (ed) (2017). Killing the Black body (2nd ed.). Vintage Books.
130.
RobertsS.BiggsM. A.ChibberK. S.GouldH.RoccaC. H.FosterD. G. (2014). Risk of violence from the man involved in the pregnancy after receiving or being denied an abortion. BMC Medicine, 12, Article e144. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0144-z
131.
RobertsT. A.CalogeroR. M.GervaisS. J. (2018). Objectification theory: Continuing contributions to feminist psychology. In TravisC. B.WhiteJ. W.RutherfordA.WilliamsW. S.CookS. L.WycheK. F. (Eds.), APA handbook of the psychology of women: History, theory, and battlegrounds (pp. 249–271). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000059-013
132.
RobertsT.-A.GoldenbergJ. L.PowerC.PyszczynskiT. (2002). Feminine protection”: The effects of menstruation on attitudes towards women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(2), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00051
133.
RoccaC. H.SamariG.FosterD. G.GouldH.KimportK. (2020). Emotions and decision rightness over five years following an abortion: An examination of decision difficulty and abortion stigma. Social Science & Medicine, 248, Article e112704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112704
RossL. (2020). Understanding reproductive justice. In McCannC. R.KimS.-K.ErgunE. (Eds.), Feminist theory reader: Local and global perspectives (5th ed., pp. 77–82). Routledge.
136.
SabolaS.KimJ.SheppardC. C. (2022). Perinatal care for individuals with a history of sexual trauma. Nursing for Women’s Health, 26(5), 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nwh.2022.07.010
SerfatyD. (2019). Update on the contraceptive contraindications. Journal of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Human Reproduction, 48(5), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.02.006
139.
ShellenbergK. M.MooreA. M.BankoleA.JuarezF.OmideyiA. K.PalominoN.SatharZ.SinghS.TsuiA. O. (2011). Social stigma and disclosure about induced abortion: Results from an exploratory study [Supplement]. Global Public Health, 6(1), S111–S125. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2011.594072
SmithW.TuranJ. M.WhiteK.StringerK. L.HelovaA.SimpsonT.CockrillK. (2016). Social norms and stigma regarding unintended pregnancy and pregnancy decisions: A qualitative study of young women in Alabama. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 48(2), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1363/48e9016
143.
SufrinC. B.CreininM. D.ChangJ. C. (2009). Incarcerated women and abortion provision: A survey of correctional health providers. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 41(1), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-2393.2009.4110609.x
TebbeE. A.SimoneM.WilsonE.HunsickerM. (2022). A dangerous visibility: Moderating effects of antitrans legislative efforts on trans and gender-diverse mental health. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 9(3), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000481
147.
TrumpyA. J. (2014). Woman vs. fetus: Frame transformation and intramovement dynamics in the pro-life movement. Sociological Spectrum, 34(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2014.878624
148.
VasquezMJ,T (2007). Cultural difference and the therapeutic alliance: An evidence based analysis. American Psychologist, 62(8), 878–885. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.8.878
149.
VincentB. W. (2018). Studying trans: Recommendations for ethical recruitment and collaboration with transgender participants in academic research. Psychology & Sexuality, 9(2), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2018.1434558
150.
Von HagelA.MansbachD. (2016). Love them both: Pro-life is pro-women. In Von HagelA.MansbachD. (Eds.), Reproductive rights in the age of human rights (pp. 87–140). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53952-6_2
151.
WalkerB. S.SpenglerP. M. (1995). Clinical judgment of major depression in AIDS patients: The effects of clinician complexity and stereotyping. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26(3), 269–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.26.3.269
152.
WaltersK. L.Evans-CampbellT.SimoniJ. M.RonquilloT.BhuyanR. (2006). My spirit in my heart”: Identity experiences and challenges among American Indian two-spirit women. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 10(1-2), 125–149. https://doi.org/10.1300/J155v10n01_07
153.
WesthoffC. L.HeartwellS.EdwardsS.ZiemanM.StuartG.CwiakC.DavisA.RobilottoT.CushmanL.KalmussD., & Quick Start Study Group. (2007). Oral contraceptive discontinuation: Do side effects matter?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 196(4), Article e412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.12.015
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
