Objectification theorists argue that repeated exposure to sexually objectifying media
content leads to higher levels of self-objectification. Although consequences of
self-objectification for women’s sexual health and sexual agency have been proposed,
efforts to test these connections have been infrequent and have yielded inconsistent
results. We used structural equation modeling to test connections between exposure to
three media genres (women’s magazines, lifestyle reality TV, and situation comedies),
self-sexualization, and four dimensions of sexual agency among 754 heterosexual and
bisexual undergraduate women aged 16–23 (M = 18.5). Our assessments of
sexual agency focused on sexual assertiveness, condom use self-efficacy, sexual affect,
and alcohol use to feel sexual. Findings confirmed our expectations. More frequent
consumption of women’s magazines, lifestyle reality TV programs, and situation comedies
each predicted greater self-sexualization, which in turn predicted greater use of alcohol
to feel sexual, less condom use self-efficacy, and more negative sexual affect. We discuss
implications for women’s sexual well-being and for research on media sexualization. We
also offer suggestions for practitioners, parents, and educators to disrupt the
associations among media use, self-sexualization, and diminished sexual agency.
Online slides for instructors who want to use this article for teaching are
available on PWQ’s website athttp://journals.sagepub.com/page/pwq/suppl/index
American Psychological Association.
(2007). Report of the APA task force on the sexualization of
girls. Washington, DC: American
Psychological Association. Retrieved fromhttp://www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/girls/report.aspx.
2.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in
practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.
Psychological Bulletin, 103,
411–423.
doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
3.
AubreyJ. S. (2006). Effects of sexually objectifying media
on self-objectification and body surveillance in undergraduates: Results of a 2-year
panel study. Journal of Communication,
56, 366–386.
doi:10.1111/jcom.2006.56.issue-2
4.
AubreyJ. S. (2007). The impact of sexually objectifying
media exposure on negative body emotions and sexual self-perceptions: Investigating the
mediating role of body self-consciousness. Mass Communication
& Society, 10, 1–23.
doi:10.1080/15205430709337002
5.
AubreyJ. S.GerdingA. (2015). The cognitive tax of
self-objectification: Examining sexually objectifying music videos and female emerging
adults’ cognitive processing of subsequent advertising. Journal
of Media Psychology, 27, 22–32.
doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000128
6.
BerntsonM.HoffmanK.LuffT. (2014). College as context: Influences on
interpersonal sexual scripts. Sexuality & Culture,
18, 149–165.
doi:10.1007/s12119-013-9180-7
7.
BrownS.ChristiansenB.GoldmanM. (1987). The Alcohol Expectancy Questionnaire:
An instrument for the assessment of adolescent and adult alcohol
expectancies. Journal of Studies on Alcohol,
48, 483–491.
doi:10.15288/jsa.1987.48.483
8.
ByersE. S.RehmanU. (2014). Sexual well-being. In
TolmanD. L.DiamondL. M. (Editors-in-Chief), APA Handbook of Sexuality and
Psychology (pp. 317–337).
Washington, DC: American Psychological
Association.
9.
CalogeroR.ThompsonJ. (2009a). Potential implications of the
objectification of women’s bodies for women’s sexual satisfaction.
Body Image, 6, 145–148.
doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.01.001
10.
CalogeroR.ThompsonJ. (2009b). Sexual self-esteem in American and
British college women: Relations with self-objectification and eating
problems. Sex Roles, 60,
160–173. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9517-0
ClaudatK.WarrenC. (2014). Self-objectification, body
self-consciousness during sexual activities, and sexual satisfaction in college
women. Body Image, 11,
509–515.
doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.07.006
13.
CoyneS.Padilla-WalkerL.HowardE. (2013). Emerging in a digital world: A decade
review of media use, effects, and gratifications in emerging adulthood.
Emerging Adulthood, 1,
125–137. doi:10.1177/2167696813479782
14.
CurtinN.WardL.MerriwetherA.CaruthersA. (2011). Femininity ideology and sexual health
in young women: A focus on sexual knowledge, embodiment, and agency.
International Journal of Sexual Health, 23,
48–62. doi:10.1080/19317611.2010.524694
15.
DoveN.WiedermanM. (2000). Cognitive distraction and women’s
sexual functioning. Journal of Sex & Marital
Therapy, 26, 67–78.
doi:10.1080/009262300278650
16.
DurhamM. G. (2007, 5). Sex and spectacle in
Seventeen magazine: A feminist myth analysis.
Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication
Association, Feminist Scholarship Division,
San Francisco, CA.
17.
EgbertN.BelcherJ. D. (2012). Reality bites: An investigation of the
genre of reality television and its relationship to viewers’ body image.
Mass Communication and Society, 15,
407–431.
doi:10.1080/15205436.2011.583545
18.
ErchullM.LissM. (2014). The object of one’s desire: How
perceived sexual empowerment through objectification is related to sexual
outcomes. Sexuality & Culture, 18,
773–788. doi:10.1007/s12119-013-9216-z
19.
FardoulyJ.DiedrichsP.VartanianL.HalliwellE. (2015). The mediating role of appearance
comparisons in the relationship between media usage and self-objectification in young
women. Psychology of Women Quarterly,
39, 447–457.
doi:10.1177/0361684315581841
20.
FerrisA. L.SmithS. W.GreenbergB. S.SmithS. L. (2007). The content of reality dating shows
and viewer perceptions of dating. Journal of
Communication, 57, 490–510.
doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00354.x
21.
FetterolfJ.SanchezD. (2015). The costs and benefits of perceived
sexual agency for men and women. Archives of Sexual
Behavior, 44, 961–970.
doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0408-x
22.
FielderR.CareyM. (2010). Prevalence and characteristics of
sexual hookups among first-semester female college students.
Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 36,
346–359.
doi:10.1080/0092623X.2010.488118
23.
FineM. (1988). Sexuality, schooling, and adolescent
females: The missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational
Review, 58, 29–53.
doi:10.17763/haer.58.1.u0468k1v2n2n8242
24.
FletcherK. D.WardL. M.ThomasK.FoustM.LevinD.TrinhS. (2015). Will it help? Identifying
socialization discourses that promote sexual risk and sexual health among African
American undergraduates. Journal of Sex Research,
52, 199–212.
doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.853724
25.
FlynnM. A.ParkS. Y.MorinD. T.StanaA. (2015). Anything but real: Body idealization
and objectification of MTV docusoap characters. Sex
Roles, 72, 173–182.
doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0464-2
26.
FredricksonB.RobertsT. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward
understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks.
Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21,
173–206.
doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
27.
FroyumC. (2010). Making “good girls”: Sexual agency in
the sexuality education of low-income Black girls. Culture,
Health, & Sexuality, 12,
59–72. doi:10.1080/13691050903272583
28.
GordonM. K.WardL. M. (2000, 3). I’m beautiful, therefore
I’m worthy: Assessing associations between media use and adolescents’
self-worth. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for
Research on Adolescence, Chicago,
IL.
29.
GreeneK.FaulknerS. (2005). Gender, belief in the sexual double
standard, and sexual talk in heterosexual dating relationships.
Sex Roles, 53, 239–251.
doi:10.1007/s11199-005-5682-6
30.
HannaE.WardL. M.SeabrookR.JeraldM.ReedL.GiaccardiS.LippmanJ. (2017). Contributions of social comparison and
self-objectification in mediating associations between Facebook use and emergent adults’
well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social
Networking, 20, 172–179.
doi:10.1089/cyber.2016.0247
31.
HattonE.TrautnerM. N. (2011). Equal opportunity objectification? The
sexualization of men and women on the cover of Rolling Stone. Sexuality & Culture, 15,
256–278. doi:10.1007/s12119-011-9093-2
32.
HorneS.Zimmer-GembeckM. J. (2005). Female sexual subjectivity and
well-being: Comparing late adolescents with different sexual
experiences. Sexuality Research & Social Policy: A Journal of
the NSRC, 2, 25–40.
doi:10.1525/srsp.2005.2.3.25
33.
HorneS.Zimmer-GembeckM. J. (2006). The female sexual subjectivity
inventory: Development and validation of a multidimensional inventory for late
adolescents and emerging adults. Psychology of Women
Quarterly, 30, 125–138.
doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00276.x
34.
HurlbertD. F. (1991). The role of assertiveness in female
sexuality: A comparative study between sexually assertive and sexually nonassertive
women. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy,
17, 183–190.
doi:10.1080/00926239108404342
35.
HurlbertD. F. (1998). Hurlbert Index of Sexual
Assertiveness. In DavisC. M.YarberW. L.BausermanR.ShreerG. E.DavisS. L. (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (p.
78). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
36.
HurlbertD.AptC.RabehlS. (1993). Key variables to understanding female
sexual satisfaction: An examination of women in non-distressed
marriages. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy,
19, 154–165.
doi:10.1080/00926239308404899
37.
ImpettE.SchoolerD.TolmanD. (2006). To be seen and not heard: Femininity
ideology and adolescent girls’ sexual health. Archives of Sexual
Behavior, 35, 129–142.
doi:10.1007/s10508-005-9016-0
38.
KimJ. L.WardL. M. (2012). Striving for pleasure without fear:
Short-term effects of reading a women’s magazine on women’s sexual
attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly,
36, 326–336.
doi:10.1177/0361684312442856
39.
KimJ. L.WellsB. (2017). Assessing alcohol and sexual content
on reality dating programs. Psychology of Popular Media
Culture, 6, 237–254.
doi:10.1037/ppm0000098
40.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practices of structural
equation modeling. New York,
NY:
Guilford.
LaBrieJ.HummerJ.GhaidarovT.LacA.KenneyS. (2014). Hooking up in the college context: The
event-level effects of alcohol use and partner familiarity on hookup behaviors and
contentment. Journal of Sex Research,
51, 62–73.
doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.714010
43.
LampmanC.Rolfe-MaloneyB.DavidE. J.YanM.McDermottN.WintersS.…LathropR. (2002). Messages about sex in the workplace: A
content analysis of primetime television. Sexuality and
Culture, 6, 3–21.
doi:10.1007/BF02719213
44.
LindbergS.HydeJ. S.McKinleyN. (2006). A measure of objectified body
consciousness for preadolescent and adolescent youth. Psychology
of Women Quarterly, 30, 65–76.
doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00263.x
45.
LippmanJ.WardL. M.SeabrookR. (2014). Isn’t it romantic? Differential
associations between romantic screen media genres and romantic beliefs.
Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 3,
128–140. doi:10.1037/ppm0000034
46.
LissM.ErchullM. J.RamseyL. R. (2011). Empowering or oppressing? Development
and exploration of the Enjoyment of Sexualization Scale.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37,
55–68. doi:10.1177/0146167210386119
47.
LittleT. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation
modeling. New York, NY:
Guilford.
48.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring
the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation
Modeling, 9, 151–173.
doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_1
49.
LivingstonJ.Bay-ChengL.HequembourgA.TestaM.DownsJ. (2013). Mixed drinks and mixed messages:
Adolescent girls’ perspectives on alcohol and sexuality.
Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37,
38–50. doi:10.1177/0361684312464202
50.
ManagoA. M.WardL. M.LemmK. M.ReedL.SeabrookR. (2015). Facebook involvement, objectified body
consciousness, body shame, and sexual assertiveness in college women and
men. Sex Roles, 72,
1–14. doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0441 -1
51.
MastersW.JohnsonV. (1970). Human sexual inadequacy.
Boston, MA: Little,
Brown.
52.
MenardA. D.OffmanA. (2009). The interrelationships between sexual
self-esteem, sexual assertiveness, and sexual satisfaction.
Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 18,
35–45.
53.
McKinleyN.HydeJ. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness
scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women
Quarterly, 20, 181–215.
doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x
54.
McNairR. (2005). Risks and prevention of sexually
transmissible infections among women who have sex with women.
Sexual Health, 2,
209–217. doi:10.1071/SH04046
55.
MooreN. B.Davidson SrJ. K. (1997). Guilt about first intercourse: An
antecedent of sexual dissatisfaction among college women.
Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 23,
29–46. doi:10.1080/00926239708404415
56.
MoradiB.HuangY. P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology
of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology
of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398.
doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x
57.
MorryM.StaskaS. (2001). Magazine exposure: Internalization,
self-objectification, eating attitudes, and body satisfaction in male and female
university students. Canadian Journal of Behavioural
Science, 33, 269–279.
doi:10.1037/h0087148
MurnenS. K.SmolakL. (2013). I’d rather be a famous fashion model
than a famous scientist. In ZurbriggenE.RobertsT. (Eds.), The sexualization of girls and girlhood (pp.
235–253). New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
60.
NelsonA.PurdonC. (2011). Non-erotic thoughts, attentional
focus, and sexual problems in a community sample. Archives of
Sexual Behavior, 40, 395–406.
doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9693-1
61.
NollS.FredricksonB. (1998). A meditational model linking
self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating.
Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22,
623–636.
doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00181.x
62.
NowatzkiJ.MorryM. (2009). Women’s intentions regarding, and
acceptance of, self-sexualizing behavior. Psychology of Women
Quarterly, 33, 95–107.
doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.01477.x.
63.
PurdonC.HoldawayL. (2006). Non-erotic thoughts: Content and
relation to sexual functioning and sex satisfaction. Journal of
Sex Research, 43, 154–162.
doi:10.1080/00224490609552310
64.
RamseyL.HoytT. (2015). The object of desire: How being
objectified creates sexual pressure for women in heterosexual
relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly,
39, 151–170.
doi:10.1177/0361684314544679
RosenthalD.MooreS.FlynnI. (1991). Adolescent self-efficacy, self-esteem
and sexual risk-taking. Journal of Community & Applied
Social Psychology, 1, 77–88.
doi:10.1002/casp.2450010203
67.
SchickV.ZuckerA.Bay-ChengL. (2008). Safer, better sex through feminism:
The role of feminist ideology in women’s sexual well-being.
Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32,
225–232.
doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00431.x
68.
SchoolerD.WardL.M.MerriwetherA.CaruthersA.. (2005). Cycles of shame: Menstrual shame,
body shame, and sexual decision-making. Journal of Sex
Research, 42, 324–334.
doi:10.1080/00224490509552288
69.
SeabrookR.WardL. M.CortinaL.GiaccardiS.LippmanJ. (2017). Girl power or powerless girl?
Television, sexual scripts, and sexual agency in sexually active young
women. Psychology of Women Quarterly,
41, 240–253.
doi:10.1177/0361684316677028
70.
SeabrookR.WardL. M.ReedL.ManagoA.GiaccardiS.LippmanJ. (2016). Our scripted sexuality: The
development and validation of a measure of the heterosexual script and its relation to
television consumption. Emerging Adulthood,
4, 338–355.
doi:10.1177/2167696815623686
71.
SlaterM. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual
influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior
and social identity. Communication Theory,
17, 281–303.
doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x
72.
SmolakL.MurnenS.MyersT. (2014). Sexualizing the self: What college
women and men think about and do to be “sexy.”Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38,
379–397. doi:10.1177/
0361684314524168.
73.
StankiewiczJ. M.RosselliF. (2008). Women as sex objects and victims in
print advertisements. Sex Roles, 58,
579–589. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9359 -1
74.
SteerA.TiggemannM. (2008). The role of self-objectification in
women’s sexual functioning. Journal of Social and Clinical
Psychology, 27, 205–225.
doi:10.1521/jscp.2008.27.3.205
75.
TaylorL.AlexopoulosC.GhaznaviJ. (2016). Touchy subject: Sex in the workplace
on broadcast, cable, and Internet television. Sex
Roles, 75, 476–489.
doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0642-x
76.
TiggemannM.WilliamsE. (2012). The role of self-objectification in
disordered eating, depressed mood, and sexual functioning among women: A comprehensive
test of objectification theory. Psychology of Women
Quarterly, 36, 66–75.
doi:10.1177/0361684311420250
77.
TolmanD. (1999). Female adolescent sexuality in
relational context: Beyond sexual decision making. In JohnsonN.RobertsM.WorellJ. (Eds.), Beyond appearance: A new look at adolescent girls
(pp. 227–246). Washington,
DC: American Psychological
Association.
78.
TolmanD. L. (2002). Female adolescent sexuality: An
argument for a developmental perspective on the new view of women’s sexual
problems. Women & Therapy, 24,
195–209. doi:10.1300/j015v24n01_21
79.
TolmanD. L.KimJ. LSchoolerDSorsoliC. L. (2007). Rethinking the associations between
television viewing and adolescent sexuality development: Bringing gender into
focus. Journal of Adolescent Health,
40, 84e9–84e16. doi:10.1016/j.
jadohealth.2006.08.002
80.
VandenboschL.EggermontS. (2012). Understanding sexual objectification:
A comprehensive approach toward media exposure and girls’ internalization of beauty
ideals, self-objectification, and body surveillance. Journal of
Communication, 62, 869–887.
doi:10.1111/ jcom.2012.62.issue-5
81.
VandenboschL.EggermontS. (2014). The three-step process of
self-objectification: Potential implications for adolescents’ body consciousness during
sexual activity. Body Image, 11,
77–80. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.10.005
82.
VencillJ.TebbeE.GarosS. (2015). It’s not the size of the boat or the
motion of the ocean: The role of self-objectification, appearance anxiety, and
depression in female sexual functioning. Psychology of Women
Quarterly, 39, 471–483.
doi:10.1177/0361684315587703
83.
WardL. M. (2016). Media and sexualization: State of
empirical research from 1995-2015. Journal of Sex
Research, 53, 560–577.
doi:10.1080/00224499.2016.1142496
84.
WardL. M.SeabrookR.ManagoA.ReedL. (2016). Contributions of diverse media to
self-sexualization among undergraduate women and men. Sex
Roles, 74, 12–23.
doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0548-z
85.
WaymentH. A.AronsonB. (2002). Risky sexual behavior in American
white college women: The role of sex guilt and sexual abuse.
Journal of Health Psychology, 7,
723–733.
doi:10.1177/1359105302007006876
86.
WiedermanM. W. (2000). Women’s body image self-consciousness
during physical intimacy with a partner. Journal of Sex
Research, 37, 60–68.
doi:10.1080/00224490009552021
87.
WiedermanM. W. (2001). “Don’t look now”: The role of
self-focus in sexual dysfunction. The Family Journal: Counseling
and Therapy for Couples and Families, 9,
210–214.
88.
WinterV. (2017). Toward a relational understanding of
objectification, body image, and preventive sexual health.
Journal of Sex Research, 54,
341–350.
doi:10.1080/00224499.2016.1190807
89.
WoertmanL.van den BrinkF. (2012). Body image and female sexual
functioning and behavior: A review. Journal of Sex
Research, 49, 184–211.
doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.658586
90.
World Health Organization (2006).
Defining sexual health: Report of a technical consultation on sexual
health, January2002, Geneva, Switzerland.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
