Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-9
Pathways to Pleasure and Protection: Exploring Embodiment,Desire,and Entitlement to Pleasure as Predictors of Black and White Young Women’s Sexual Agency
Sexual agency is a fundamental dimension of sexual subjectivity and well-being. Research and theory suggest that it functions in the service of both protection from harm and enabling sexual pleasure. However, sexual agency can be difficult for women to navigate in a social landscape in which femininity ideologies remain powerful social forces, operating in racialized ways. We examined how embodiment, sexual desire, and entitlement to sexual pleasure were associated with sexual agency in the service of protection (i.e., condom use and refusing unwanted sex) and pleasure (i.e., asking for what one wants from a sexual partner) for Black and White heterosexual college women using path analysis and path invariance testing. We found that across race, women’s embodiment was associated with greater comfort with their sexual desire, which in turn was associated with greater entitlement to sexual pleasure and sexual agency in service of both pleasure and protection. While Black and White women evidenced similar levels of both forms of agency, Black participants’ agency in the service of protection was unrelated to their entitlement to sexual pleasure. We discuss these findings in light of racialized discourses of women’s sexuality and the importance of understanding sexual desire as anchored in the body and enabling young women’s sexual agency.
ArmstrongE. A.EnglandP.FogartyA. C. K. (2012). Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review, 77(3), 435–462.https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412445802
2.
ArmstrongE. A.HamiltonL. T.ArmstrongE. M.SeeleyJ. L. (2014). “Good Girls:” Gender, social class, and slut discourse on campus. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77(2), 100–122.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272514521220
3.
Bay-ChengL. Y. (2015a). The agency line: A neoliberal metric for appraising young women’s sexuality. Sex Roles, 73(7-8), 279–291.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0452-6
4.
Bay-ChengL. Y. (2015b). Living in metaphors, trapped in a matrix: The ramifications of neoliberal ideology for young women’s sexuality. Sex Roles, 73(7-8), 332–339.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0541-6
5.
Bay-ChengL. Y.Eliseo-ArrasR. K. (2008). The making of unwanted sex: Gendered and neoliberal norms in college women’s unwanted sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 45(4), 386–397.https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490802398381
6.
BrownL. M. (2001). White working-class girls, femininities, and the paradox of resistance. InTolmanD. L.Brydon-MillerM. (Eds.), From subjects to subjectivities: A handbook of interpretive and participatory methods (pp.95–110). New York University Press.
7.
BurkettM.HamiltonK. (2012). Postfeminist sexual agency: Young women’s negotiations of sexual consent. Sexualities, 15(7), 815–833.https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460712454076
8.
ByrneB. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Erlbaum.
9.
CarawayN. (1991). Segregated sisterhood: Racism and the politics of American feminism. University of Tennessee Press.
10.
CheeseboroughT.OverstreetN.WardL. M. (2020). Interpersonal sexual objectification, Jezebel stereotype endorsement, and justification of intimate partner violence toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly. Advance online publication.https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319896345
11.
ChengS.HamiltonL.MissariS.MaJ. (2014). Sexual subjectivity among adolescent girls: Social disadvantage and young adult outcomes. Social Forces, 93(2), 515–544.https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sou084
12.
CherkasskayaE.RosarioM. (2019). The relational and bodily experiences theory of sexual desire in women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(6), 1659–1681.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1212-9
13.
ChmielewskiJ. F. (2017). A listening guide analysis of lesbian and bisexual young women of color’s experiences of sexual objectification. Sex Roles, 77(7-8), 533–549.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0740-4
14.
ChmielewskiJ. F.TolmanD. L.KincaidH. (2017). Constructing risk and responsibility: A gender, race, and class analysis of news representations of adolescent sexuality. Feminist Media Studies, 17(3), 412–425.https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1283348
15.
CoakleyT. M.RandolphS.ShearsJ.BeamonE. R.CollinsP.SidesT. (2017). Parent-Youth communication to reduce at-risk sexual behavior: A systematic literature review. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 27(6), 609–624.https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2017.1313149
16.
CollinsP. H. (2004). Black sexual politics: African-Americans, gender and the new racism. Routledge.
CurtinN.WardL. M.MerriwetherA.CaruthersA. (2011). Femininity ideology and sexual health in young women: A focus on sexual knowledge, embodiment, and agency. International Journal of Sexual Health, 23(1), 48–62.https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2010.524694
19.
FahsB. (2011). Performing sex: The making and unmaking of women’s erotic lives. SUNY Press.
FahsB.McClellandS. (2016). When sex and power collide: An argument for critical sexuality studies. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(4-5), 392–416.https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1152454
22.
FasulaA. M.CarryM.MillerK. S. (2014). A multidimensional framework for the meanings of the sexual double standard and its application for the sexual health of young Black women in the U.S. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(2), 170–183.https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.716874
FineM.McClellandS. (2013). Over-sexed and under surveillance: Adolescent sexualities, cultural anxieties, and thick desire. InAllenL.RasmussenM. L.QuinlivanK. (Eds.), The politics of pleasure in sexuality education: Pleasure bound (pp.28–50). Routledge.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT.-A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
27.
FrenchB. H. (2013). More than Jezebels and freaks: Exploring how Black girls navigate sexual coercion and sexual scripts. Journal of African American Studies, 17(1), 35–50.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-012-9218-1
28.
FrieR. (2008). Fundamentally embodied: The experience of psychological agency. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 44(3), 367–376.
29.
FroyumC. M. (2010). Making ‘good girls’: Sexual agency in the sexuality education of low-income black girls. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 12(1), 59–72.https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050903272583
GaveyN.McPhillipsK. (1999). Subject to romance: Heterosexual passivity as an obstacle to women initiating condom use. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(2), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00366.x
32.
GillR. (2008). Empowerment/sexism: Figuring female sexual agency in contemporary advertising. Feminism & Psychology, 18(1), 35–60.https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353507084950
33.
GrahamC. A.SandersS. A.MilhausenR. R.McBrideK. R. (2004). Turning on and turning off: A focus group study of the factors that affect women’s sexual arousal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33(6), 527–538.https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASEB.0000044737.62561.fd
34.
HollandJ.RamazanogluC.SharpeS.ThomsonR. (1998). The male in the head: Young people, heterosexuality and power. Tuffnell Press.
35.
hooksb. (1992). Black looks: Race and representation. South End Press.
36.
HorneS.Zimmer-GembeckM. J. (2005). Female sexual subjectivity and well-being: Comparing late adolescents with different sexual experiences. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 2(3), 25–40.https://doi.org/10.1525/srsp.2005.2.3.25
37.
HorneS.Zimmer-GembeckM. J. (2006). The female sexual subjectivity inventory: Development and validation of a multidimensional inventory for late adolescents and emerging adults. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(2), 125–138.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00276.x
38.
ImpettE. A.SchoolerD.TolmanD. L. (2006). To be seen and not heard: Femininity ideology and adolescent girls’ sexual health. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35(2), 129–142.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-005-9016-0
39.
KellyM.InoueK.BarrattA.BatesonD.RutherfordA.RichtersJ. (2017). Performing (heterosexual) femininity: Female agency and role in sexual life and contraceptive use – A qualitative study in Australia. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 19(2), 240–255.https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2016.1214872
40.
KettreyH. H. (2018). “Bad girls” say no and “good girls” say yes: Sexual subjectivity and participation in undesired sex during heterosexual college hookups. Sexuality & Culture, 22(3), 685–705.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9498-2
KleinV.BeckerI.ŠtulhoferA. (2018). Parenting, communication about sexuality, and the development of adolescent women’s sexual agency: A longitudinal assessment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(7), 1486–1498.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0873-y
43.
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
44.
LambS.RobertsT.PlochaA.. (Eds.). (2016). Girls of color, sexuality and sex education. Palgrave Macmillan.
45.
LittleR. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198–1202.https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722
46.
LittleR. J. A.RubinD. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). John Wiley and Sons.
47.
LongJ. S. (1983). Confirmatory factor analysis: A preface to LISREL. Sage Publications.
48.
LópezV.Chesney-LindM. (2014). Latina girls speak out: Stereotypes, gender and relationship dynamics. Latino Studies, 12(4), 527–549.https://doi.org/10.1057/lst.2014.54
49.
LordeA. (1984). Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. The Crossing Press.
50.
ManagoA. M.WardL. M.LemmK. M.ReedL.SeabrookR. (2015). Facebook involvement, objectified body consciousness, body shame, and sexual assertiveness in college women and men. Sex Roles, 72(1-2), 1–14.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0441-1
51.
MarksM. J.WosickK. (2017). Exploring college men’s and women’s attitudes about women’s sexuality and pleasure via their perceptions of female novelty party attendees. Sex Roles, 77(7-8), 550–561.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0737-z
52.
MartinK. A. (1996). Puberty, sexuality, and the self: Boys and girls at adolescence. Routledge.
53.
MaxwellC.AggletonP. (2012). Bodies and agentic practice in young women’s sexual and intimate relationships. Sociology, 46(2), 306–321.https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511419192
54.
McClellandS. I.FineM. (2008). Rescuing a theory of adolescent sexual excess: Young women and wanting. InHarrisA. (Ed.), Next wave cultures: Feminism, subcultures, activism (pp.83–102). Routledge.
55.
McClellandS. I. (2010). Intimate justice: A critical analysis of sexual satisfaction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(9), 663–680.
56.
McClellandS. I.FrostD. M. (2014). Sexuality and social policy. InTolmanD. L.DiamondL. M. (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality and psychology (pp.311–337). American Psychological Association.
57.
McRobbieA. (2009). The aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture and social change. Sage.
58.
MénardA. D.OffmanA. (2009). The interrelationships between sexual self-esteem, sexual assertiveness and sexual satisfaction. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 18(1/2), 35–45.
59.
Merleau-PontyM. (1945). Phenomenology of perception. Gallimard.
PetersonZ. D.MuehlenhardC. L. (2007). Conceptualizing the “wantedness” of women’s consensual and nonconsensual sexual experiences: Implications for how women label their experiences with rape. Journal of Sex Research, 44(1), 72–88.https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490709336794
62.
PhillipsL. (2000). Flirting with danger: Young women’s reflections on sexuality and domination. NYU Press.
63.
PiranN. (2016a, June). Capturing the quality of embodied lives among girls, younger, and older women: Core emergent dimensions, measurement, developmental pathways, and clinical implications[Paper presentation]. Appearance Matters 7 International Conference, Centre for Appearance Research of the University of the West of England, London, England.
64.
PiranN. (2016b). Embodied possibilities and disruptions: The emergence of the Experience of Embodiment construct from qualitative studies with girls and women. Body Image, 18, 43–60.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.04.007
65.
PiranN. (2019). The experience of embodiment construct: Reflecting the quality of embodied lives. InTylkaT.PiranN. (Eds.), Handbook of positive body image and embodiment. Oxford University Press.
66.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316
67.
RamseyL. R.HoytT. (2015). The object of desire: How being objectified creates sexual pressure for women in heterosexual relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684314544679
68.
Ramseyer WinterV.RuhrL.PevehouseD.PilgrimS. (2018). Exploring body image, contraceptive use, and sexual health outcomes among an ethnically diverse sample of women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(3), 715–723.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1121-3
69.
RosenkrantzD. E.MarkK. P. (2018). The sociocultural context of sexually diverse women’s sexual desire. Sexuality & Culture, 22(1), 220–242.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9462-6
70.
RosenthalD.MooreS.FlynnI. (1991). Adolescent self-efficacy, self-esteem and sexual risk-taking. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 1(2), 77–88.https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2450010203
71.
SalazarL. F.DiClementeR. J.WingoodG. M.CrosbyR. A.HarringtonK.DaviesS.Hook IIIE. W.OhM. K. (2004). Self-concept and adolescents’ refusal of unprotected sex: A test of mediating mechanisms among African American girls. Prevention Science, 5(3), 137–149.https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PREV.0000037638.20810.01
72.
SatinskyS.ReeceM.DennisB.SandersS.BardzellS. (2012). An assessment of body appreciation and its relationship to sexual function in women. Body Image, 9(1), 137–144.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2011.09.007
73.
SchickV. R.ZuckerA. N.Bay-ChengL. Y. (2008). Safer, better sex through feminism: The role of feminist ideology in women’s sexual well-being. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(3), 225–232.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00431.x
SkafteI.SilberschmidtM. (2014). Female gratification, sexual power and safer sex: Female sexuality as an empowering resource among women in Rwanda. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 16(1), 1–13.https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2013.815368
76.
TeallT. L. (2015). A quantitative study of the developmental theory of embodiment: Implications to health and well being [Unpublished doctoral dissertation], University of Toronto.
77.
TolmanD. L. (1999). Femininity as a barrier to positive sexual health for adolescent girls. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association, 54(3), 133–138. https://doi.org/10441919
78.
TolmanD. L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Harvard University Press.
79.
TolmanD. L.AndersonS. M.BelmonteK. (2015). Mobilizing metaphor: Considering complexities, contradictions, and contexts in adolescent girls’ and young women’s sexual agency. Sex Roles, 73(7-8), 298–310.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0510-0
80.
TolmanD. L.BowmanC. P.FahsB. (2014). Sexuality and embodiment. InTolmanD. L.DiamondL. M. (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology (pp.759–804). American Psychological Association.
81.
TolmanD. L.ChmielewskiJ. F. (2018). From tightrope to minefield: How the sexual double standard lives in adolescent girls’ and young women’s lives. InLambS.GilbertJ. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sexual development: Childhood and adolescence (pp.198–220). Cambridge University Press.
82.
TolmanD. L.DavisB. R.BowmanC. P. (2016). “That’s just how it is”: A gendered analysis of masculinity and femininity ideologies in adolescent girls’ and boys’ heterosexual relationships. Journal of Adolescent Research, 31(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558415587325
83.
TolmanD. L.ImpettE. A.TracyA. J.MichaelA. (2006). Looking good, sounding good: Femininity ideology and adolescent girls’ mental health. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(1), 85–95.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00265.x
84.
TolmanD. L.McClellandS. (2011). Normative sexuality development in adolescence: A decade in review, 2000-2009. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 242–255.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00726.x
85.
TolmanD. L.SzalachaL. A. (1999). Dimensions of desire: Bridging qualitative and quantitative methods in a study of female adolescent sexuality. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(1), 7–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00338.x
86.
UssherJ. M. (2005). The meaning of sexual desire: Experiences of heterosexual and lesbian girls. Feminism & Psychology, 15(1), 27–32.https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353505049700
87.
VanceC. S. (1984). Pleasure and danger: Exploring female sexuality. Routledge and Kegan Paul Books.
88.
WalkerS. J. (1997). When “no” becomes “yes”: Why girls and women consent to unwanted sex. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 6(3), 157–166.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-1849(97)80003-0
89.
WardL. M.JeraldM.AveryL.ColeE. R. (2020). Following their lead? Connecting mainstream media use to black women’s gender beliefs and sexual agency. The Journal of Sex Research, 57(2), 200–212.https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2018.1554741
90.
WardL. M.SeabrookR. C.GrowerP.GiaccardiS.LippmanJ. R. (2018). Sexual object or sexual subject? Media use, self-sexualization, and sexual agency among undergraduate women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(1), 29–43.https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317737940
91.
WinterV. R.SatinskyS. (2014). Body appreciation, sexual relationship status, and protective sexual behaviors in women. Body Image, 11(1), 36–42.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.08.004
92.
WoernerJ.AbbeyA. (2017). Positive feelings after casual sex: The role of gender and traditional gender-role beliefs. The Journal of Sex Research, 54(6), 717–727.https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1208801
93.
YoderJ. D.PerryR. L.SaalE. I. (2007). What good is a feminist identity?: Women’s feminist identification and role expectations for intimate and sexual relationships. Sex Roles, 57(5-6), 365–372.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9269-2
94.
Zimmer-GembeckM. J.SeeL.O’SullivanL. (2015). Young women’s satisfaction with sex and romance, and emotional reactions to sex: Associations with sexual entitlement, efficacy, and situational factors. Emerging Adulthood, 3(2),113–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696814548060
95.
ZuckerA. N.FitzC. C.Bay-ChengL. Y. (2016). Reverberations of racism and sexism through the subjective sexualities of undergraduate women of color. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(2), 265–272.https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.1002557
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
