Although the objectification of women is widespread, there is relatively little research on objectification in romantic relationships. The purpose of our research was to explore how partner-objectification might be related to sexual pressure and coercion in heterosexual relationships. Two studies were conducted, one with heterosexual men and one with heterosexual women as participants. An online survey of 119 heterosexual men in the United States demonstrated that men who frequently survey their partners’ bodies are more likely to sexually pressure and coerce their partners—primarily because partner-surveillance is related to feelings of shame regarding one’s partner’s body, which in turn is related to increased sexual pressure and coercion. An online survey of 162 heterosexual women in the United States demonstrated feeling objectified by a partner is related to several (but not all) measures of sexual pressure and coercion. Furthermore, women who felt that their partners frequently surveyed their bodies were more likely to experience self-surveillance, which in turn predicted increased body shame and lowered sexual agency. Our research can inform interventions aimed at reducing sexual coercion and spark future research on the distinction between physical attraction and objectification in the context of romantic relationships.
AubreyJ.FrisbyC. M. (2011). Sexual objectification in music videos: A content analysis comparing gender and genre. Mass Communication & Society, 14, 475–501.
3.
BailesS.CretiL.FichtenC. S.LibmanE.BrenderW.AmselR. (1989). Sexual Self-efficacy Scale for Female Functioning. In DavisC. M.YarberW. L.BausermanR.ShreerG.DavisS. L. (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 531–533). London, England: Sage.
4.
BanduraA. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31, 101–119.
5.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
6.
BartkyS. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
BartkyS. L. (2003). Foucault, femininity, and the modernization of patriarchal power. In WeitzR. (Ed.), The politics of women’s bodies (pp. 25–45). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8.
BasileK. C. (2002). Prevalence of wife rape and other intimate partner sexual coercion in a nationally representative sample of women. Violence and Victims, 17, 511–522.
9.
BeckV.BoysS.RoseC.BeckE. (2012). Violence against women in video games: A prequel or sequel to rape myth acceptance?Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 3016–3031.
10.
BernardP.GervaisS. J.AllenJ.CampomizziS.KleinO. (2012). Integrating sexual objectification with object versus person recognition: The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis. Psychological Science, 23, 469–471.
11.
BrooksG. R. (1995). The centerfold syndrome: How men can overcome objectification and achieve intimacy with women. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12.
BuhrmesterM. D.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.
13.
BussD. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate selection: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.
14.
CalhounK. S.BernatJ. A.ClumG. A.FrameC. L. (1997). Sexual coercion and attraction to sexual aggression in a community sample of young men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 392–406.
15.
CalogeroR. M. (2013). Objects don’t object: Evidence that self-objectification disrupts women’s social activism. Psychological Science, 24, 312–318.
16.
CarneyM.BarnerJ. R. (2012). Prevalence of partner abuse: Rates of emotional abuse and control. Partner Abuse, 3, 286–335.
17.
CentersR.RavenB. H.RodriguesA. (1971). Conjugal power structure: A reexamination. American Psychological Review, 36, 264–278.
18.
ConleyT. D.RamseyL. R. (2011). Killing us softly? Investigating portrayals of women and men in contemporary magazine advertisements. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 469–478.
19.
CurtinN.WardL.MerriwetherA.CaruthersA. (2011). Femininity ideology and sexual health in young women: A focus on sexual knowledge, embodiment, and agency. International Journal of Sexual Health, 23, 48–62.
20.
DavidsonM. MGervaisS. J.CanivezG. L.ColeB. P. (2013). A psychometric examination of the Interpersonal Sexual Objectification Scale among college men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60, 239–250.
21.
DeGueS.DiLilloD. (2004). Understanding perpetrators of sexual coercion: Characteristics of those who cross the line. Violence and Victims, 19, 673–688.
22.
DonnersteinE. (1980). Aggressive erotica and violence against women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 269–277.
23.
ElderW. B.BrooksG. R.MorrowS. L. (2012). Sexual self-schemas of heterosexual men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 13, 166–179.
24.
FeingoldA. (1990). Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 981–993.
25.
FredricksonB.NollS.RobertsT.TwengeJ.QuinnD. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284.
26.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.
27.
GaldiS.MaassA.CadinuM. (2014). Objectifying media: Their effect on gender role norms and sexual harassment of women. Psychology of Women Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0361684313515185
28.
GervaisS. J.DavidsonM. M. (2013). Objectification among college women in the context of intimate partner violence. Violence and Victims, 28, 36–49.
29.
GervaisS. J.VescioT. K.AllenJ. (2011). When what you see is what you get: The consequences of the objectifying gaze for women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 5–17.
30.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.
31.
GrayK.KnobeJ.SheskinM.BloomP.BarrettL. F. (2011). More than a body: Mind and perception and the nature of objectification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1207–1220.
32.
GruenfeldD. H.InesiM. E.MageeJ. C.GalinskyA. D. (2008). Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 111–127.
33.
HarrisonK.FredricksonB. L. (2003). Women's sport media, self-objectification, and mental health in Black and White adolescent females. Journal of Communication, 53, 216–232.
34.
HattonE.TrautnerM. (2011). Equal opportunity objectification? The sexualization of men and women on the cover of Rolling Stone. Sexuality & Culture: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 15, 256–278.
35.
HeblM. R.KingE. B.LinJ. (2004). The swimsuit becomes us all: Ethnicity, gender, and vulnerability to self-objectification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1322–1331.
36.
HeflickN. A.GoldenbergJ. L. (2009). Objectifying Sarah Palin: Evidence that objectification causes women to be perceived as less competent and less fully human. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 598–601.
37.
HeflickN. A.GoldenbergJ. L.CooperD. P.PuviaE. (2011). From women to objects: Appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality and competence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 572–581.
38.
HirschmanC.ImpettE. A.SchoolerD. (2006). Dis/Embodied voices: What late-adolescent girls can teach us about objectification and sexuality. Sexuality Research & Social Policy: A Journal of the NSRC, 3, 8–20.
39.
HurtM. M.NelsonJ. A.TurnerD. L.HainesM. E.RamseyL. R.ErchullM. J. (2007). Feminism: What is it good for? Feminine norms and objectification as the link between feminist identity and clinically relevant outcomes. Sex Roles, 57, 355–363.
40.
ImpettE. A.SchoolerD.TolmanD. L. (2006). To be seen and not hear: Femininity ideology and adolescent girls’ sexual health. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 129–142.
41.
JohnsonP.McCrearyD. R.MillsJ. S. (2007). Effects of exposure to objectified male and female media images on men's psychological well-being. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 8, 95–102.
42.
JonesR.GulickE. (2009). Reliability and validity of the Sexual Pressure Scale for Women-Revised. Research in Nursing and Health, 32, 71–85.
43.
KozakM.FrankenhauserH.RobertsT. (2009). Objects of desire: Objectification as a function of male sexual orientation. Psychology Of Men & Masculinity, 10, 225–230.
44.
KozeeH. B.TylkaT. L. (2006). A test of objectification theory with lesbian women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 176–189.
45.
LavineH.SweeneyD.WagnerS. H. (1999). Depicting women as sex objects in television advertising: Effects on body dissatisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1049–1058.
46.
LindbergS. M.GrabeS.HydeJ. S. (2007). Gender, pubertal development, and peer sexual harassment predict objectified body consciousness in early adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 723–742.
47.
LinzD. G.DonnersteinE.PenrodS. (1988). Effects of long-term exposure to violent and sexual degrading depictions of women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 758–768.
48.
LissM.ErchullM. J.RamseyL. R. (2011). Empowering or oppressing? Development and exploration of the Enjoyment of Sexualization Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 55–68.
49.
LoughnanS.PinaA.VasquezE. A.PuviaE. (2013). Sexual objectification increases rape victim blame and decreases perceived suffering. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 455–461.
50.
LyndonA. E.WhiteJ. W.KadlecK. M. (2007). Manipulation and force as sexual coercion tactics: Conceptual and empirical differences. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 291–303.
51.
MahalikJ. R.MorrayE.Coonerty-FemianoA.LudlowL. H.SlatteryS. M.SmilerA. (2005). Development of the conformity to feminine norms inventory. Sex Roles, 52, 417–435.
52.
McKinleyN. M.HydeJ. S. (1996). The Objectified Body Consciousness Scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215.
53.
MilburnM. A.MatherR.ConradS. D. (2000). The effects of viewing R-rated movie scenes that objectify women on perceptions of date rape. Sex Roles, 43, 645–664.
54.
MoradiB.HuangY. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398.
55.
MurrayS. L. (1999). The quest for conviction: Motivated cognition in romantic relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 23–34.
56.
MursteinB. I.AlderE. (1995). Gender differences in power and self-disclosure in dating and married couples. Personal Relationships, 2, 199–209.
57.
NewheiserA.LaFranceM.DovidioJ. F. (2010). Others as objects: How women and men perceive the consequences of self-objectification. Sex Roles, 63, 657–671.
58.
NussbaumM. C. (1999). Sex and social justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
59.
PappasN. T.McKenryP. C.CatlettB. (2004). Athlete aggression on the rink and off the ice: Athlete violence and aggression in hockey and interpersonal relationships. Men and Masculinities, 6, 291–312.
60.
ParentM. C. (2013). Handling item-level missing data: Simpler is just as good. The Counseling Psychologist, 41, 568–600.
61.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
62.
PuviaE.VaesJ. (2013). Being a body: Women’s appearance related self-views and their dehumanization of sexually objectified female targets. Sex Roles, 68, 484–495.
63.
QuinnD. M.KallenR. W.CatheyC. (2006). Body on my mind: The lingering effect of state self-objectification. Sex Roles, 55, 869–874.
64.
RohlingerD. A. (2002). Eroticizing men: Cultural influences on advertising and male objectification. Sex Roles, 46, 61–74.
65.
RostoskyS.DekhtyarO.CuppP. K.AndermanE. M. (2008). ‘Sexual self-concept and sexual self-efficacy in adolescence: A possible clue to promoting sexual health?’: Erratum. Journal of Sex Research, 45, 277–286.
66.
RuckerD. D.PreacherK. J.TormalaZ. L.PettyR. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5/6, 359–371.
67.
RudmanL. A.MescherK. (2012). Of animals and objects: Men’s implicit dehumanization of women and likelihood of sexual aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 734–746.
68.
SaguyT.QuinnD. M.DovidioJ. F.PrattoF. (2010). Interacting like a body: Objectification can lead women to narrow their presence in social interactions. Psychological Science, 21, 178–182.
69.
SanchezD. T.BroccoliT. L. (2008). The romance of self-objectification: Does priming romantic relationships induce states of self-objectification among women?Sex Roles, 59, 545–554.
70.
SanchezD. T.KieferA. K. (2007). Body concerns in and out of the bedroom: Implications for sexual pleasure and problems. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 808–820.
71.
SennC.DesmaraisS.VerbergN.WoodE. (2000). Predicting coercive sexual behavior across the lifespan in a random sample of Canadian men. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 95–113.
72.
ShackelfordT. K.GoetzA. T. (2004). Men’s sexual coercion in intimate relationships: Development and initial validation of the Sexual Coercion in Intimate Relationships Scale. Violence and Victims, 19, 541–556.
73.
StrelanP.HargreavesD. (2005). Women who objectify other women: The vicious circle of objectification?Sex Roles, 52, 707–712. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-3737-3
74.
SteerA.TiggemannM. (2008). The role of self-objectification in women’s sexual functioning. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27, 205–225.
75.
Struckman-JohnsonC.Struckman-JohnsonD.AndersonP. B. (2003). Tactics of sexual coercion: When men and women won’t take no for an answer. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 76–86.
76.
SwamiV.VoracekM. (2013). Associations among men's sexist attitudes, objectification of women, and their own drive for muscularity. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14, 168–174.
77.
SwimJ. K.HyersL.CohenL. L.FergusonM. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31–53.
78.
SzymanskiD. M.HenningS. L. (2007). The role of self-objectification in women's depression: A test of objectification theory. Sex Roles, 56, 45–53.
79.
TaylorL. D. (2006). College men, their magazines, and sex. Sex Roles, 55, 693–702.
80.
TestaM.LivingstonJ. A. (1999). Qualitative analysis of women’s experiences of sexual aggression. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 573–589.
81.
TiggemannM.WilliamsE. (2012). The role of self-objectification in disordered eating, depressed mood, and sexual functioning among women: A comprehensive test of objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 66–75.
82.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (2001). Coworker violence and gender: Findings from the National Violence Against Women survey. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20, 85–89.
83.
TolmanD. L.ImpettE. A.TracyA. J.MichaelA. (2006). Looking good, sounding good: Femininity ideology and adolescent girls’ mental health. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 85–95.
84.
TylkaT. L.HillM. S. (2004). Objectification theory as it relates to disordered eating among college women. Sex Roles, 51, 719–730.
85.
TylkaT. L.Kroon Van DiestA. M. (2014). You looking at her “hot” body may not be “cool” for me: Integrating male partners’ pornography use into objectification theory for women. Psychology of Women Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0361684314521784
86.
WolfN. (1990). The beauty myth. Toronto, Canada: Random House of Canada.
87.
WrightP. J. (2012). Show me the data! Empirical support for the “centerfold syndrome.”Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 13, 180–198.
88.
WrightP. J.FunkM. (2014). Pornography consumption and opposition to affirmative action for women: A prospective study. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38, 208–221. doi:10.1177/0361684313498853
89.
ZurbriggenE.RamseyL. R.JaworskiB. K. (2011). Self and partner-objectification in romantic relationships: Associations with media consumption and relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles, 64, 449–446.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
