The purpose of our study was to examine the relationships between experiences of working in sexually objectifying environments (SOEs) and psychological and job-related outcomes in a sample of 253 waitresses working in U.S. restaurants. Supporting our hypotheses, results indicated that SOEs were significantly positively correlated with waitresses’ experiences of interpersonal sexual objectification at work, internalization of cultural standards of beauty, and depression as well as negatively correlated with job satisfaction. Contrary to our hypotheses, SOEs were not directly related to self-objectification, body shame, self-esteem, or health habits. Furthermore, our findings revealed support for a theorized five-chain serial mediation model in which SOEs were related to job satisfaction both directly and indirectly via classic objectification theory processes (i.e., interpersonal experiences of sexual objectification in the restaurant environment, self-objectification, body shame, and depression). Finally, a direct positive link was found between interpersonal experiences of sexual objectification and depression. Our findings underscore the need to implement both individual- and system-level interventions to combat the existence of SOEs and the negative effects they may have on women.
American Psychological Association, Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. (2007). Report of the APA task force on the sexualization of girls. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Retrieved fromwww.apa.org/pi/wpo/sexualization.html
2.
BartonB. (2002). Dancing on the Mobius Strip: Challenging the sex war paradigm. Gender & Society, 16, 585–602. doi:10.1177/089124302236987
3.
BrayfieldA. H.RotheH. F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, 307–311. doi:10.1037/h0055617
BreinesJ. G.CrockerJ.GarciaJ. A. (2008). Self-objectification and well-being in women’s daily lives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 583–598. doi:10.1177/0146167207313727
6.
CalogeroR. M. (2004). A test of objectification theory: The effect of the male gaze on appearance concerns in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 16–21. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00118.x
7.
CalogeroR. M.PinaA. (2011). Body guilt: Preliminary evidence for a further subjective experience of self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 428–440. doi:10.1177/0361684311408564
8.
CarrE. R.SzymanskiD. M. (2011). Sexual objectification and substance use in young adult women. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 39–66. doi:10.1177/ 0011000010378449
9.
ChanD. K. S.LamC. B.ChowS. Y.CheungS. F. (2008). Examining the job-related, psychological, and physical outcomes of workplace sexual harassment: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 362–376. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00451.x
10.
CohenJ.CohenP. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
DownsD. M.JamesS.CowanG. (2006). Body objectification, self-esteem, and relationship satisfaction: A comparison of exotic dancers and college women. Sex Roles, 54, 745–752. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9042-y
12.
DuffyR. D.AllanB. A.AutinK. L.BottE. M. (2013). Calling and life satisfaction: It’s not about having it, it’s about living it. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60, 42–52. doi:10.1037/a0030635
13.
FaragherE. B.CassM.CooperC. L. (2005). The relationship between job satisfaction and health: A meta-analysis. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 62, 105–112. doi:10.1136/oem.2002.006734
14.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
15.
GuéguenN.JacobC. (2013). Waitresses’ hair color and customers’ tipping behavior: Blondes receive more tips from men but not from women. Journal of Tourism Research & Hospitality, 4, 3. doi:10.4172/2324-8807.1000125
16.
HeinbergL. J.ThompsonJ. K.StormerS. (1995). Development and validation of the Sociocultural Attitudes Toward Appearance Questionnaire. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 17, 81–89.
17.
JacobC.GuéguenN.BoulbryG.ArdiccioniR. (2010). Waitresses’ facial cosmetics and tipping: A field experiment. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29, 188–190. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.04.003
18.
JohnsonA. (2005). The gender knot: Unraveling our patriarchal legacy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
19.
JudgeT. A.LockeE. A.DurhamC. C.KlugerA. N. (1998). Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: The role of core evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 17–34. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.1.17
20.
KahnJ. H. (2006). Factor analysis in counseling psychology research, training, and practice: Principles, advances, and applications. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 684–718. doi:10.1177/0011000006286347
21.
KaschakE. (1992). Engendered lives: A new psychology of women’s experience. New York, NY: Basic Books.
22.
KozeeH. B.TylkaT. L.Augustus-HorvathC. L.DenchikA. (2007). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Interpersonal Sexual Objectification Scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 176–189. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00351.x
23.
LerumK.DworkinS. L. (2009). Feminist commentary on the report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 250–263. doi:10.1080/00224490903079542
24.
LissM.ErchullM. J.RamseyL. R. (2011). Empowering or oppressing? Development and exploration of the Enjoyment of Sexualization Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 55–68. doi:10.1177/0146167210386119
25.
LynnM. (2009). Determinants and consequences of female attractiveness and sexiness: Realistic tests with restaurant waitresses. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 737–745. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9379-0
MallinckrodtB.AbrahamW. T.WeiM.RussellW. (2006). Advances in testing the statistical significance of mediation effects. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 372–378. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.53.3.372
28.
MayJ. M. (1980). Looking for tips: An empirical perspective on restaurant tipping. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 20, 6–8.
29.
McKinleyN. M.HydeJ. S. (1996). The Objectified Body Consciousness Scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x
30.
Miles-McLeanH.LissM.ErchullM. J.RobertsonC. M.HagermanC.GnolebaM. A.PappL. J. (2015). “Stop looking at me!” Interpersonal sexual objectification as a source of insidious trauma. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(3), 363–374.
31.
MoffittL. B.SzymanskiD. M. (2011). Experiencing sexually objectifying environments: A qualitative study. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 67–106. doi:10.1177/0011000010364551
32.
MoradiB.DirksD.MattesonA. V. (2005). Roles of sexual objectification experiences and internalization of standards of beauty in eating disorder symptomology: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 420–428. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.420
33.
MoradiB.HuangY. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x
34.
MorryM. M.StaskaS. L. (2001). Magazine exposure: Internalization, self-objectification, eating attitudes, and body satisfaction in male and female university students. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 33, 269–279. doi:10.1037/h0087148
35.
NollS. M.FredricksonB. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00181.x
36.
O’ConnorB. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 32, 396–402. doi:10.3758/BF03200807
37.
ParentM. C. (2013). Handling item-level missing data: Simpler is just as good. The Counseling Psychologist, 41, 568–600. doi:10.1177/0011000012445176
38.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
39.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM,40.3.879
40.
PrichardI.TiggemannM. (2005). Objectification in fitness centers: Self-objectification, body dissatisfaction, and disordered eating in aerobic instructors and aerobic participants. Sex Roles, 53, 19–28. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-4270-0
41.
RadloffL. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401. doi:10.1177/014662167700100306
42.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
SweetN.TewksburyR. (2000). “What’s a nice girl like you doing in a place like this?”: Pathways to a career in stripping. Sociological Spectrum, 20, 325–344.
44.
SwimJ. K.HyersL. L.CohenL. L.FergusonM. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31–53. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00200
45.
SzymanskiD. M.CarrE. R.MoffittL. B. (2011). Sexual objectification of women: Clinical implications and training considerations. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 107–126. doi:10.1177/1534765609358464
46.
SzymanskiD. M.FeltmanC. E. (2014). Experiencing and coping with sexually objectifying treatment: Internalization and resilience. Sex Roles, 71, 159–170. doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0392-6
47.
SzymanskiD. M.MoffittL. B.CarrE. R. (2011). Sexual objectification of women: Advances to theory and research. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 6–38. doi:10.1177/0011000010378402
48.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
49.
TiggemannM.SlaterA. (2001). A test of objectification theory in former dancers and non-dancers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 57–64. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00007
50.
TylkaT. L.Kroon Van DiestA. M. (2013). The Intuitive Eating Scale–2: Item refinement and psychometric evaluation with college women and men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60, 137–153. doi:10.1037/a0030893
51.
WestonR.GoreP. A. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 719–751. doi:10.1177/0011000006286345
52.
WisemanM. C.MoradiB. (2010). Body image and eating disorder symptoms in sexual minority men: A test and extension of objectfication theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 154–166. doi:10.1037/a0018937
53.
WorthingtonR. L.WhittakerT. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 806–838. doi:10.1177/0011000006288127
