The purpose of our study was to use select constructs from objectification theory to investigate how society’s sexual objectification of female athletes is related to differences in body esteem and self-objectification among collegiate female athletes and non-athletes. Using a cross-sectional survey, we sampled three groups at a Division I National Collegiate Athletic Association university: 322 non-athletes, 58 athletes participating in sports that are considered more objectified, and 27 athletes participating in sports that are considered less objectified. Participants completed survey measures assessing body esteem (sexual attractiveness, weight concern, and physical condition), body surveillance, thin-ideal internalization, and body shame. As predicted, all athletes experienced better body esteem than non-athletes. Surprisingly, both more and less objectified athletes also reported lower rates of body surveillance than non-athletes. Other findings varied by grouping. Overall, study findings suggested that athletes in more objectified sports experience greater thin-ideal internalization, thereby enhancing body shame without increasing body surveillance or body image concerns. Researchers and interventionists should put more focus on sexual- and self-objectification of collegiate female athletes participating in the more objectified sports because their psychological and mental health risks appear to be associated with objectification and not necessarily poor body image.
BoicheJ.PlazaM.ChalabaevA.Guillet-DescasE.SerrazinP. (2014). Social antecedents and consequences of gender-sport stereotypes during adolescence. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38, 259–274. doi:10.1177/0361684313505844
3.
CafriG.YamamiyaY.BrannickM.ThompsonJ. K. (2005). The influence of sociocultural factors on body image: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 12, 421–433.
4.
CarrE. R.SzymanskiD. M. (2010). Sexual objectification and substance abuse in young adult women. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 39–66.
5.
CashT. F.SzymanskiM. L. (1995). The development and validation of the body-image ideals questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 466–477.
6.
ClavioG.EaglemanA. N. (2011). Gender and sexually suggestive images in sports blogs. Journal of Sport Management, 7, 295–304.
7.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
CrissyS. R.HoneaJ. C. (2006). The relationship between athletic participation and perceptions of body size and weight control in adolescent girls: The role of sport type. Sociology of Sport Journal, 23, 248–272.
9.
DillmanD. A.SmythJ. D.ChristianL. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
10.
EngelS. G.JohnsonC.PowersP. S.CrosbyR. D.WonderlichS. A.WittrockD. A.…MitchellJ. E. (2003). Predictors of disordered eating in a sample of elite Division I college athletes. Eating Behaviors, 4, 333–343.
11.
FinkJ. S.KensickiL. J. (2002). An imperceptible difference: Visual and textual constructions of femininity in sports illustrated and sports illustrated for women. Mass Communication and Society, 5, 317–339.
12.
Fitzsimmons-CraftE. E. (2011). Social psychological theories of disordered eating in college women: Review and integration. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 1224–1237.
13.
FranzoiS. L. (1994). Further evidence of the reliability and validity of the Body Esteem Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50, 237–239.
14.
FranzoiS. L.HerzogM. E. (1986). The Body Esteem Scale: A convergent and discriminant validity study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 24–31.
15.
FranzoiS. L.ShieldsS. A. (1984). The Body Esteem Scale: Multidimensional structure and sex differences in a college population. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 173–178.
16.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.
17.
GarnerD. M. (2004). EDI-3 professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment.
18.
GrabeS.WardL. M.HydeJ. S. (2008). The role of the media in body image concerns among women: A meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 460–476.
19.
HaaseR. F.EllisM. V. (1987). Multivariate analysis of variance. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 404–413.
20.
HardinM.GreerJ. D. (2009). The influence of gender-role socialization, media use, and sports participation on perceptions of gender-appropriate sports. Journal of Sport Behavior, 32, 207–226.
21.
HardinM.LynnS.WalsdorfK. (2005). Challenge and conformity on “contested terrain”: Images of women in four women’s sport/fitness magazines. Sex Roles, 53, 105–117.
22.
HarrisonK.FredricksonB. L. (2003). Women’s sports media, self-objectification, and mental health in Black and White adolescent females. Journal of Communication, 53, 216–232.
23.
HausenblasH. A.CarronA. V. (2002, Winter). Assessing eating disorder symptoms in sport groups: A critique with recommendations for future research. International Sports Journal, 6, 65–74.
24.
HoagM. M. (2012). Body image in female collegiate volleyball players: Are athletics detrimental or beneficial?(Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI Number: 3502536)
25.
HubertyC. J.OlejnikS. (2006). Applied MANOVA and discriminant analysis (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
26.
KaneM. J. (1988). Media coverage of the female athlete before, during, and after Title IX: Sports Illustrated revisited. Journal of Sport Management, 2, 87–99.
27.
KimK.SagasM.WalkerN. A. (2010). Replacing athleticism with sexuality: Athlete models in Sports Illustrated swimsuit issues. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3, 148–162.
28.
KraneV.ChoiP. Y. Y.BairdS. M.AimarC. M.KauerK. J. (2004). Living the paradox: Female athletes negotiate femininity and muscularity. Sex Roles, 50, 315–329.
29.
KraneV.Stiles-ShipleyJ. A.WaldronJ.MichalenokJ. (2002). Relationships among body satisfaction, social physique anxiety, and eating behaviors in female athletes and exercisers. Journal of Sport Behavior, 24, 247–264.
30.
LarabeeA. (2011). Negotiating the female-athlete paradox: Examining gender identity and body image(Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI Number: 3453929)
31.
LenartE. B.GoldbergJ. P.BaileyS. M.DallalG. E.KoffE. (1995). Current and ideal physique choices in exercising and nonexercising college women from a pilot athletic image scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81, 831–848.
32.
McKinleyN. M.HydeJ. S. (1996). The Objectified Body Consciousness Scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215.
33.
MoradiB. (2010). Addressing gender and cultural diversity in body image: Objectification theory as a framework for integrating theories and grounding research. Sex Roles, 63, 138–148.
34.
MoradiB. (2011). Objectification theory: Areas of promise and refinement. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 153–163.
35.
MoradiB.DirksD.MattesonA. V. (2005). Roles of sexual objectification experiences and internalization of standards of beauty in eating disorder symptomatology: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 420–428.
36.
MoradiB.HuangY. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398.
37.
MuscatA. C.LongB. C. (2008). Critical comments about body shape and weight: Disordered eating of female athletes and sport participants. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 20, 1–24.
38.
MyersJ. L.WellA. D.LorchR. F. (2010). Research design and statistical analysis (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
39.
National Collegiate Athletic Association. (2012). Who we are. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ncaa.org
40.
NollS. M.FredricksonB. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 632–636.
41.
ParsonsE. M.BetzN. E. (2001). The relationship of participation in sports and physical activity to body objectification, instrumentality, and locus of control among young women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 209–222.
42.
PetrieT. A.GreenleafC. (2012). Body image and sport/athletics. In CashT. F. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of body image and human appearance (pp. 160–165). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
43.
ReelJ. J.SoohooS.PetrieT. A.GreenleafC.CarterJ. E. (2010). Slimming down for sport: Developing a weight pressures in sport measure for female athletes. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 4, 99–111.
44.
ReinkingM. F.AlexanderL. E. (2005). Prevalence of disordered-eating behaviors in undergraduate female collegiate athletes and nonathletes. Journal of Athletic Training, 40, 47–51.
45.
RobertsA.CashT. F.FeingoldA.JohnsonB. T. (2006). Are Black-White differences in females’ body dissatisfaction decreasing? A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 1121–1131.
46.
SaxL. J.GilmartinS. K.BryantA. N. (2003). Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education, 44, 409–432.
47.
SmolakL.MurnenS. K.RubleA. E. (2000). Female athletes and eating problems: A meta-analysis. International Journal on Eating Disorders, 27, 371–380.
48.
SteinfeldtJ. A.ZakrajsekR.CarterH.SteinfeldtM. C. (2011). Conformity to gender norms among female student-athletes: Implications for body image. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 4, 401–416.
49.
SzymanskiD. M.HenningS. L. (2007). The role of self-objectification in women’s depression: A test of objectification theory. Sex Roles, 56, 45–53.
50.
SzymanskiD. M.MoffittL. B.CarrE. R. (2010). Sexual objectification of women: Advances to theory and research. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 6–38.
51.
ThomasC. D.FreemanR. J. (1990). The Body Esteem Scale: Construct validity of the female subscales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54, 204–212.
52.
ThompsonJ. K.van den BergP.RoehrigM.GuardaA. S.HeinbergL. J. (2003). The Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Scale-3 (SATAQ-3): Development and validation. International Journal on Eating Disorders, 35, 293–304.
53.
TylkaT. L.HillM. S. (2004). Objectification theory as it relates to disordered eating among college women. Sex Roles, 51, 719–730.
54.
TylkaT. L.SabikN. J. (2010). Integrating social comparison theory and self-esteem with objectification theory to predict women’s disordered eating. Sex Roles, 63, 18–31.
55.
VarnesJ. R.StellefsonM. L.JanelleC. M.DormanS. M.DoddV.MillerD. M. (2013). A systematic review of studies comparing body image concerns among female college athletes and non-athletes, 1997-2012. Body Image, 10, 421–432.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
