The low strength and large void ratio of alluvial soil (silty) represent a poor quality of subgrade that shows early distress, causing the premature failure of pavement. To enhance the performance of the soil in this context, a mixture of additives such as ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) and rice husk ash (RHA) was applied. Researchers are now very interested in the optimal dosage of stabilizers for increased strength and cost-effectiveness in construction. The dosages analyzed were 5%–12.5% GGBS and 0%–7.5% RHA by weight of dry soil. The following response values were considered: optimum moisture content (OMC), elastic modulus (EM), California bearing ratio (CBR), and unconfined compressive strength (UCS). EM was derived using a novel method of light weight deflectometer testing on the CBR mold. To find the optimal dosage of RHA and GGBS to be added simultaneously for soil stabilization and to examine how these substances affect the soil, response surface methodology models were generated, giving the optimal RHA and GGBS dosages as 2.05% and 7.18%, respectively, to meet desired soil performance. According to the findings, adding GGBS and RHA increased the soil’s strength because of the production of cementitious compounds by pozzolanic reactions, as demonstrated by the mineralogical and morphological examinations of soil specimens. The stabilization resulting from optimal dosages improved the soil UCS by 177%, EM by 47%, and CBR by 242%, and reduced OMC by 4%. This study can provide a strong foundation for effective soil use in road building.
MalikzadaA.ArslanE.DeveliogluI.PulatH. F.Determination of Strength Characteristics of Natural and Stabilized Alluvial Subgrades. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, Vol. 15, 2022, p. 535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-09829-2.
2.
GhadirP.RanjbarN.Clayey Soil Stabilization Using Geopolymer and Portland Cement. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 188, 2018, pp. 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2018.07.207.
3.
GautamK. K. GuptaBhowmikD.DeyS.Probing the Stochastic Unconfined Compressive Strength of Lime–RHA Mix Treated Clayey Soil. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 35, 2022, p. 04022469. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004638.
4.
BarmanD.DashS. K.Stabilization of Expansive Soils Using Chemical Additives: A Review. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 14, 2022, pp. 1319–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.02.011.
5.
KumarB. R. P.SharmaR. S.Effect of Fly Ash on Engineering Properties of Expansive Soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 130, 2004, pp. 764–767. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:7(764).
6.
HigginsD. D.Soil Stabilisation with Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag. UK Cementitious Slag Makers Association (CSMA), London, 2005.
7.
PaulA.HussainM.Sustainable Use of GGBS and RHA as a Partial Replacement of Cement in the Stabilization of Indian Peat. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2020, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-020-0185-7.
8.
YadavA. K.GauravK.KishorR.SumanS. K.Stabilization of Alluvial Soil for Subgrade Using Rice Husk Ash, Sugarcane Bagasse Ash and Cow Dung Ash for Rural Roads _ Elsevier Enhanced Reader. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, Vol. 10, 2017, pp. 254–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.02.001.
9.
BrooksR.UdoeyoF. F.TakkalapelliK. V.Geotechnical Properties of Problem Soils Stabilized with Fly Ash and Limestone Dust in Philadelphia. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 23, 2010, pp. 711–716. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000214.
10.
WangL.Cementitious Stabilization of Soils in the Presence of Sulfate. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 2002.
YadavJ. K. N.PaulM.SinghH.SinghA.KunduS.KumarY.RayA.Composition, Application, and Recycling of RHA to Value-Added Products: A Review. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results, Vol. 14, 2023, pp. 3772–3787.
14.
PandhareS. J.GeethaM.JayarajK.Properties of High Volume GGBFS and High Volume Fly Ash Concrete: A Brief Review. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET), Vol. 11, 2023, pp. 2321–9653. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2023.49435.
15.
Narsi. Rice Husk in India – Availability, Supply Chain, Prices, Surplus – BioBiz. BioBiz, 2024. https://biobiz.in/s/bring/in/13.
16.
DomphoeunR.EisazadehA.NishimuraS.Strength Properties of Laterite Soil Stabilized with Rice Husk Ash and Lime as Road Material. Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, Vol. 12, 2025, p. 32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-024-00495-3.
17.
GuptaD.KumarA.Performance Evaluation of Cement-Stabilized Pond Ash-Rice Husk Ash-Clay Mixture as a Highway Construction Material. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 9, 2017, pp. 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2016.05.010.
18.
BashaE. A.HashimR.MahmudH. B.MuntoharA. S.Stabilization of Residual Soil with Rice Husk Ash and Cement. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 19, 2005, pp. 448–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.08.001.
19.
WildS.KinuthiaJ. M.JonesG. I.HigginsD. D.Effects of Partial Substitution of Lime with Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS) on the Strength Properties of Lime-Stabilised Sulphate-Bearing Clay Soils. Engineering Geology, Vol. 51, 1998, pp. 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(98)00039-8.
20.
SargentP.HughesP. N.RouainiaM.WhiteM. L.The Use of Alkali Activated Waste Binders in Enhancing the Mechanical Properties and Durability of Soft Alluvial Soils. Engineering Geology, Vol. 152, 2013, pp. 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.10.013.
21.
Al-RawasA. A.Microfabric and Mineralogical Studies on the Stabilization of an Expansive Soil Using Cement by-Pass Dust and Some Types of Slags. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 39, 2002, pp. 1150–1167. https://doi.org/10.1139/t02-046.
22.
LinD. F.LinK. L.HungM. J.LuoH. L.Sludge Ash/Hydrated Lime on the Geotechnical Properties of Soft Soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 145, 2007, pp. 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.10.087.
23.
YarbaşiN.KalkanE.AkbulutS.Modification of the Geotechnical Properties, as Influenced by Freeze–Thaw, of Granular Soils with Waste Additives. Cold Regions Science and Technology, Vol. 48, 2007, pp. 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COLDREGIONS.2006.09.009.
24.
ChenL.LinD. F.Stabilization Treatment of Soft Subgrade Soil by Sewage Sludge Ash and Cement. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 162, 2009, pp. 321–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.060.
25.
PhanikumarB.SharmaR. S.Volume Change Behavior of Fly Ash-Stabilized Clays. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 19, 2007, pp. 67–74.
26.
DwivediS.SumanS. K.Effect of RHA–GGBS Blending on the Engineering Performance and Microstructural Characteristics of Alluvial Soil. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 37, 2025, p. 04025222. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-18891.
27.
PathakA. K.PandeyV.MurariK.SinghJ. P.Soil Stabilisation Using Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, Vol. 4, 2014, pp. 164–171. www.ijera.com.
28.
Geeta RaniT.Sai Rama KrishnaY.ProfessorA.Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag as an Expansive Soil Stabilizer. VFSTR Journal of STEM, Vol. 3, 2017, pp. 2455–2062.
29.
SharmaA. K.SivapullaiahP.Improvement of Strength of Expansive soil with waste Granulated Blast Furnace Slag. In GeoCongress 2012: State of the Art and Practice in Geotechnical Engineering. ASCE, Oakland, 2012, pp. 3920–3928.
30.
PradhanS. S.MishraU.BiswalS. K.PramanikS.JangraP.AslaniF.Effects of Rice Husk Ash on Strength and Durability Performance of Slag-Based Alkali-Activated Concrete. Structural Concrete, Vol. 25, 2023, pp. 2839–2854. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202300173.
31.
ZhaoW.JiC.SunQ.GuQ.Preparation and Microstructure of Alkali-Activated Rice Husk Ash-Granulated Blast Furnace Slag Tailing Composite Cemented Paste Backfill. Materials, Vol. 15, 2022, p. 4397. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134397.
32.
ZhuH.ZhaiM.LiangG.LiH.WuQ.ZhangC.HuaS.Experimental Study on the Freezing Resistance and Microstructure of Alkali-Activated Slag in the Presence of Rice Husk Ash. Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 38, 2021, p. 102173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102173.
33.
KoundinyaV.RahulB. G.Stabilization of Alluvial Soil with Fly Ash and GGBS as a Subgrade for Pavement Construction. In E3S Web of Conferences, Vol. 391, EDP Sciences, 2023, p. 01026.
34.
SharmaA. K.SivapullaiahP. V.Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag Amended Fly Ash as an Expansive Soil Stabilizer. Soils and Foundations, Vol. 56, 2016, pp. 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2016.02.004.
35.
ShahbaziM.RowshanzamirM.AbtahiS. M.HejaziS. M.Optimization of Carpet Waste Fibers and Steel Slag Particles to Reinforce Expansive Soil Using Response Surface Methodology. Applied Clay Science, Vol. 142, 2017, pp. 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2016.11.027.
36.
IkeagwuaniC. C.NwonuD. C.Optimization of Multi-additives for Expansive Soil Improvement Using Response Surface Methodology. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, Vol. 40, 2022, pp. 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-021-01994-7.
37.
SomadasP.SarvadeP. G.NayakD.Advancements in Soft Soil Stabilization by Employing Novel Materials through Response Surface Methodology. Geosciences (Switzerland), Vol. 14, 2024, p. 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14070182.
38.
EmmanuelE.YongL. L.Fogne AppiahN.GawuS. K. Y.Response Surface Methodology: A Tool to Optimise the Contents of Lime and Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Fiber for Stabilising a Residual Soil. Geomechanics and Geoengineering, Vol. 17, 2022, pp. 1516–1535. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2021.1955155.
39.
ChenK.WuD.ZhangZ.PanC.ShenX.XiaL.ZangJ.Modeling and Optimization of Fly Ash–Slag-Based Geopolymer Using Response Surface Method and Its Application in Soft Soil Stabilization. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 315, 2022, p. 125723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125723.
40.
AbdiM. R.GhalandarzadehA.Shafiei-ChafiL.Optimization of Lime and Fiber Content for Improvement of Clays with Different Plasticity Using Response Surface Method (RSM). Transportation Geotechnics, Vol. 32, 2022, p. 100685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100685.
41.
BianH.WanJ.MuhammadT., et al. Computational Study and Optimization Experiment of nZVI Modified by Anionic and Cationic Polymer for Cr(VI) Stabilization in Soil: Kinetics and Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Environmental Pollution, Vol. 276, 2021, pp. 116745 (1–11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116745.
42.
SabourM. R.HamedaniA.NiavolK. P., et al. Impact of Inorganic Components of Leachate on Mechanical Properties of Soil: Experimental Study and Statistical Analysis by Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Arabian Journal of Geosciences, Vol. 15, 2022, pp. 1287 (1–16). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10580-x.
43.
ASTM D2487. Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017.
44.
IS 1498. Classification and Identification of Soils for General Engineering Purposes. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 1970.
45.
IS 2720-3-1. Methods of Test for Soils, Part 3: Determination of Specific Gravity, Section 1: Fine Grained Soils. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 1980.
46.
ASTM D854-14. Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014.
47.
ASTM D4318-10e1. Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2010.
48.
IS 2720-5. Methods of Test for Soils, Part 5: Determination of Liquid and Plastic Limit. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 1985.
49.
IS 2720-4. Methods of Test for Soils, Part 4: Grain Size Analysis. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 1985.
50.
ASTM D7928. Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Fine-Grained Soils Using the Sedimentation (Hydrometer) Analysis. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2021.
51.
ASTM D6913. Standard Test Methods for Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Soils Using Sieve Analysis. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017.
52.
ASTM D698-12e1. Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012.
53.
IS 2720-7. Methods of Test for Soils, Part 7: Determination of Water Content-Dry Density Relation Using Light Compaction. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 1980.
54.
MyersR. H.MontgomeryD. C.Anderson-CookC. M.Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
55.
SinghK. P.GuptaS.SinghA. K.SinhaS.Optimizing Adsorption of Crystal Violet Dye From Water by Magnetic Nanocomposite Using Response Surface Modeling Approach. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 186, 2011, pp. 1462–1473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.032.
56.
SahuJ. N.AcharyaJ.MeikapB. C.Response Surface Modeling and Optimization of Chromium(VI) Removal From Aqueous Solution Using Tamarind Wood Activated Carbon in Batch Process. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 172, 2009, pp. 818–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.075.
57.
GunarajV.MuruganN.Application of Response Surface Methodology for Predicting Weld Bead Quality in Submerged Arc Welding of Pipes. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 88, 1999, pp. 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00405-1.
58.
DevarangadiM.Uma ShankarM.Effect on Engineering Properties of Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag Admixed with Laterite Soil, Cement and Bentonite Mixtures as a Liner in Landfill. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 329, 2021, p. 129757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129757.
59.
ASTM D2166-13. Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013.
60.
IS 2720-10. Methods of Test for Soils, Part 10: Determination of Unconfined Compressive Strength. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 1991.
61.
JibonM.MishraD.Light Weight Deflectometer Testing in Proctor Molds to Establish Resilient Modulus Properties of Fine-Grained Soils. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 33, 2020, p. 06020025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0003582.
62.
SchwartzC. W.AfsharikiaZ.KhosravifarS.Standardizing Lightweight Deflectometer Modulus Measurements for Compaction Quality Assurance. Final Report No MD-17-SHA/UM/3-20. Maryland DOT State Highway Administration, Baltimore, MD, 2017.
63.
FlemingP.FrostM.LambertJ.A Review of the Lightweight Deflectometer (LWD) for Routine in Situ Assessment of Pavement Material Stiffness. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007. 2004: 80–87. https://doi.org/10.3141/2004-09.
64.
VolovskiM.LabiS.SommerK.NoureldinS.WalkerR.Developing Statistical Limits for Using the Light Weight Deflectometer in Pavement Construction Quality Assurance. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 19, 2018, pp. 783–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2016.1274269.
65.
VennapusaP. K. R.WhiteD. J.SiekmeierJ.EmbacherR. A.In Situ Mechanistic Characterisations of Granular Pavement Foundation Layers. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 13, 2012, pp. 52–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2011.564281.
66.
DwivediS.SumanS. K.Quality assessment of road shoulders using Light Weight Deflectometer and Geogauge. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, Vol. 8, 2019, pp. 3107–3115. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B2649.078219.
67.
DwivediS.SumanS. K.A Comprehensive Review on Non-Destructive Testing Using LWD and Geogauge for Quick QC/QA of Pavement Layers. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, Vol. 8, 2023, p. 101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01061-5.
68.
ASTM E2583. Standard Test Method for Measuring Deflections with a Light Weight Deflectometer (LWD). ASTM International, 2015.
69.
SabouriM.KhabiriS.AsgharzadehS. M.AbdollahiS. F.Investigating the Performance of Geogrid Reinforced Unbound Layer Using Light Weight Deflectometer (LWD). International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, Vol. 15, 2021, pp. 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-021-00015-3.
70.
DwivediS.SumanS. K.Estimation of Target Modulus Using LWD Testing on CBR Mould for Compaction Quality Assurance. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of Transportation Research Group of India (CTRG 2023), Volume 1 (P. K.SahuSabooN.MajumdarB. B.PaniA., eds.), vol. 417. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, Surat, 2025, pp. 79–91.
71.
DwivediS.SumanS. K.Micro- and Macrocharacterization of RHA-GGBS–Stabilized Alluvial Silty Soil: Effects of Interactive RHA-GGBS on Engineering Properties. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, Vol. 152, 2025, p. 04025059. https://doi.org/10.1061/JPEODX.PVENG-1826.
72.
DwivediS.SumanS. K.Real-Time Monitoring of the Degree of Compaction of Subgrade Soil Using LWD Testing. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 26, 2025, p. 2595127. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2025.2595127.
73.
IS 2720-16. Methods of Test for Soils, Part 16: Laboratory Determination of CBR. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 1987.
74.
ASTM D1883-21. Standard Test Method for California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of Laboratory-Compacted Soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2021.
75.
ZhangT.CaiG.LiuS.Application of Lignin-Stabilized Silty Soil in Highway Subgrade: A Macroscale Laboratory Study. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 30, 2018, pp. 04018034 (1–16). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0002203.
76.
SharmaN. K.SwainS. K.SahooU. C.Stabilization of a Clayey Soil with Fly Ash and Lime: A Micro Level Investigation. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, Vol. 30, 2012, pp. 1197–1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-012-9532-3.
77.
YaduL.TriwpathiR. K.Effects of Granulated Blast Furnace Slag in the Engineering Behaviour of Stabilized Soft Soil. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 51, 2013, pp. 125–131.
78.
SujathaE. R.DhariniK.BharathiV.Influence of Groundnut Shell Ash on Strength and Durability Properties of Clay. Geomechanics and Geoengineering, Vol. 11, 2016, pp. 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2015.1006265.
79.
KateJ. M.Strength and Volume Change Behavior of Expansive Soils Treated with Fly Ash. Innovations in Grouting and Soil Improvement, GSP 136, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1061/40783(162)19.
KoliasS.Kasselouri-RigopoulouV.KarahaliosA.Stabilisation of Clayey Soils with High Calcium Fly Ash and Cement. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 27, 2005, pp. 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONCOMP.2004.02.019.
