Social need fulfillment is imperative to well-being, leading to a strong motivation to ensure that social needs are met. The social surrogacy hypothesis proposes that individuals may use non-human social targets, including television characters, books, or comfort foods, to address social needs. The current work sought to examine the social surrogacy hypothesis in the domain of music. Utilizing both correlational (Study 1) and experimental (Study 2) methodology, the current research suggests that music can provide social benefits in response to social threats. In addition, it suggests that music may operate via multiple social surrogate pathways (Study 1) and that the benefits of music are social in nature (Study 2).
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
2.
BaumeisterR. F.TwengeJ. M.NussC. K. (2002). Effects of social exclusion on cognitive processes: Anticipated aloneness reduces intellectual thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 817.
3.
BeckA. T.LaudeR.BohnertM. (1974). Ideational components of anxiety neurosis. Archives of General Psychiatry, 31, 319–325.
4.
BrownG. W.HarrisT. (2001). Social origins of depression: A study of psychiatric disorder in women (Vol. 65). Routledge.
5.
CacioppoJ. T.HughesM. E.WaiteL. J.HawkleyL. C.ThistedR. A. (2006). Loneliness as a specific risk factor for depressive symptoms: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Psychology and Aging, 21, 140–151.
6.
ClarkeE.DibbenN.PittsS. (2009). Music and mind in everyday life. Oxford University Press.
7.
CohenJ. (2006). Audience identification with media characters. In BryantJ.VordererP. (Eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 183–197). Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
CoyneS. M.Padilla-WalkerL. M.HowardE. (2013). Emerging in a digital world: A decade review of media use, effects, and gratifications in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 1(2), 125–137.
9.
DeNoraT. (1999). Music as a technology of the self. Poetics, 27(1), 31–56.
10.
DerrickJ. L. (2012). Energized by television: Familiar fictional worlds restore self-control. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(3), 299–307.
11.
DerrickJ. L.GabrielS.HugenbergK. (2009). Social surrogacy: How favored television programs provide the experience of belonging. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(2), 352–362.
12.
FrithS. (1996). Music and identity. Questions of Cultural Identity, 1, 108–128.
13.
GabrielS.ReadJ. P.YoungA. F.BachrachR. L.TroisiJ. D. (2017). Social surrogate use in those exposed to trauma: I get by with a little help from my (fictional) friends. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 36(1), 41–63.
14.
GabrielS.ValentiJ.YoungA. F. (2016). Social surrogates, social motivations, and everyday activities: The case for a strong, subtle, and sneaky social self.In OlsonJ. M.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 53, pp. 189–243). Academic Press.
15.
GabrielS.YoungA. F. (2011). Becoming a vampire without being bitten: The narrative collective-assimilation hypothesis. Psychological Science, 22(8), 990–994.
16.
GardnerW. L.PickettC. L.KnowlesM. (2005). Social snacking and shielding: Using social symbols, selves, and surrogates in the service of belonging needs.In WilliamsK. D.ForgasJ. P.von HippelW. (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 227–241). Psychology Press.
17.
GreenM. C. (2005). Transportation into narrative worlds: Implications for the self. In TesserA.WoodJ.V.StapelD.A. (Eds.), On building, defending and regulating the self: A psychological perspective (pp. 53–75). Psychology Press.
18.
GreenM. C.BrockT. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721.
19.
GreenM. C.BrockT. C.KaufmanG. F. (2004). Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14(4), 311–327.
20.
GreenwoodD. N.LongC. R. (2009). Psychological predictors of media involvement: Solitude experiences and the need to belong. Communication Research, 36(5), 637–654.
21.
HalesA. H.WilliamsK. D. (2018). Marginalized individuals and extremism: The role of ostracism in openness to extreme groups. Journal of Social Issues, 74(1), 75–92.
22.
HargreavesD. J.MiellD.MacDonaldR. A. (2002). What are musical identities, and why are they important?Musical Identities, 2, 1–20.
23.
HargreavesD. J.NorthA. C. (1999). The functions of music in everyday life: Redefining the social in music psychology. Psychology of Music, 27, 71–83.
24.
HartgerinkC. H.Van BeestI.WichertsJ. M.WilliamsK. D. (2015). The ordinal effects of ostracism: A meta-analysis of 120 Cyberball studies. PLOS ONE, 10(5), Article e0127002.
25.
HartmannT. (2016). Parasocial interaction, parasocial relationships, and well-being. In ReineckeL.OliverM. B. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being: International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects (pp. 131–144). Taylor & Francis Group.
26.
HayD. E.BleicherS.AzoulayR.KivityY.Gilboa-SchechtmanE. (2023). Affective and cognitive impact of social overinclusion: A meta-analytic review of Cyberball studies. Cognition and Emotion, 37(3), 412–429.
27.
HortonD.WohlR. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations of intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19, 215–229.
28.
LearyM. R.HauptA. L.StrausserK. S.ChokelJ. T. (1998). Calibrating the sociometer: The relationship between interpersonal appraisals and state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1290–1299.
29.
LearyM. R.TamborE. S.TerdalS. K.DownsD. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 518–530.
30.
LearyM. R.TwengeJ. M.QuinlivanE. (2006). Interpersonal rejection as a determinant of anger and aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(2), 111–132.
31.
LiebermanM. D. (2013). Social: Why our brains are wired to connect. OUP Oxford.
32.
LonsdaleA. J.NorthA. C. (2011). Why do we listen to music? A uses and gratifications analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 102(1), 108–134.
33.
MarR. A.OatleyK. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3.
34.
Mwilambwe-TshiloboL.SprengR. N. (2020). Social exclusion reliably engages the default network: A meta-analysis of Cyberball. NeuroImage, 227, 117666.
35.
MyersD. G. (2000). The funds, friends, and faith of happy people. American Psychologist, 55, 56–67.
36.
NiemyjskaA. (2015). How does love magic work? The regulation of closeness and affect by magical thinking. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32, 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514523552
37.
NorthA. C.HargreavesD. J. (2000). Musical preferences during and after relaxation and exercise. American Journal of Psychology, 113, 43–67.
38.
ParavatiE.NaiduE.GabrielS. (2021). From “love actually” to love, actually: The sociometer takes every kind of fuel. Self and Identity, 20(1), 6–24.
39.
ParavatiE.NaiduE.GabrielS.WiedemannC. (2019). More than just a tweet: The unconscious impact of forming parasocial relationships through social media. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(4), 388–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/cns0000214
40.
QualterP.VanhalstJ.HarrisR.Van RoekelE.LodderG.BangeeM.MaesM.VerhagenM. (2015). Loneliness across the life span. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 250–264.
41.
RentfrowP. J.GoslingS. D. (2003). The do re mi’s of everyday life: The structure and personality correlates of music preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1236–1256.
42.
SaarikallioS.ErkkiläJ. (2007). The role of music in adolescents’ mood regulation. Psychology of Music, 35(1), 88–109.
43.
SchäferK.EerolaT. (2020). How listening to music and engagement with other media provide a sense of belonging: An exploratory study of social surrogacy. Psychology of Music, 48(2), 232–251.
44.
SchäferK.SaarikallioS.EerolaT. (2020). Music may reduce loneliness and act as social surrogate for a friend: Evidence from an experimental listening study. Music & Science, 3, 2059204320935709.
45.
SchrammH.HartmannT. (2008). The PSI-Process Scales. A new measure to assess the intensity and breadth of parasocial processes. Communications, 33(4), 385–401.
46.
SlavichG. M.ThorntonT.TorresL. D.MonroeS. M.GotlibI. H. (2009). Targeted rejection predicts hastened onset of major depression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28(2), 223.
47.
TarrantM.NorthA. C.HargreavesD. J. (2000). English and American adolescents’ reasons for listening to music. Psychology of Music, 28(2), 166–173.
48.
Ter BogtT. F. M.MulderJ.RaaijmakersQ. A. W.Nic GabhainnS. (2010). Moved by music: A typology of music listeners. Psychology of Music, 36(3), 1–17.
49.
TroisiJ. D.GabrielS. (2011). Chicken soup really is good for the soul: “Comfort food” fulfills the need to belong. Psychological Science, 22(6), 747–753.
50.
Van den TolA. J.EdwardsJ. (2013). Exploring a rationale for choosing to listen to sad music when feeling sad. Psychology of Music, 41(4), 440–465.
51.
Van GoethemA.SlobodaJ. A. (2011). The functions of music for affect regulation. Musicae Scientia, 15(2), 208–228.
52.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063.
53.
WilliamsK. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425–452.
54.
WilliamsK. D. (2009). Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 279–314). Academic Press.
55.
WilliamsK. D.CheungK. T.ChoiW. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748–762.
56.
WilliamsK. D.JarvisB. (2006). Cyberball: A program for use in research on interpersonal ostracism and acceptance. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 174–180.
57.
ZadroL.WilliamsK. D.RichardsonR. (2004). How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer lowers belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 560–567.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
