Abstract
Social media offer a digital space for people to connect with online influencers, such as bloggers, YouTubers, and Instagram celebrities. This study aims to investigate the factors affecting consumers’ purchase intention in social media-based influencer marketing context, while simultaneously revealing the underlying mechanisms through an integrated model. An online survey with 335 participants who have followed social media influencers (SMIs) was conducted to empirically test our proposed model. PLS-SEM was employed to analyze the measurement and structural models. The findings indicate that SMIs, when perceived as credible sources exhibiting high levels of expertise, trustworthiness, and homophily, stimulate consumers’ fear of missing out (FOMO) and establish parasocial relationships with these influencers, which in turn enhance purchase intention. Furthermore, when consumers perceived a high level of serendipity, the relationship between FOMO and purchase intention will be strengthened. This study extends the perspective of source credibility and parasocial relationships in the context of influencer marketing by incorporating the impact of smart recommendation algorithms and the emotional anxiety experienced by consumers. It offers a novel approach to analyze why consumers are motivated to purchase products endorsed by SMIs.
Introduction
In recent years, traditional marketing practices have been undergoing a transformation driven by social media influencers (SMIs). An increasing number of consumers are swayed by suggestions and recommendations from these online influencers which in turn shapes brand perceptions and consumption habits (Casaló et al., 2020; Sokolova & Kefi, 2020). Influencer marketing involves companies partnering with SMIs to develop or promote branded content aimed at boosting brand recognition. Its growth is driven by the ability to connect brands with consumers through creators who deeply understand and actively engage with their followers (Saternus et al., 2024). High-quality content from online influencers with large numbers of audiences can drive consumers’ purchase intentions (Park & Lin, 2020; Rungruangjit, 2022), which is a key predictor of actual purchase activity and successful marketing (Dodds et al., 1991; Shin & Biocca, 2017).
In light of this, previous researchers in the influencer marketing field have launched a series of explorations on this issue. Some of them examined the purchase intention by considering source characteristics of online influencers and consumer attitude toward them (Park & Lin, 2020). They have found that product-source fit enhances perceived trustworthiness, while product-content fit boosts hedonic attitude. Both factors significantly influence buying intention. Apart from the evaluations of an SMI, consumers’ psychological ownership related to an influencer is another crucial avenue of exploration (Pick, 2021). E. C.-X. Aw and Chuah (2021) indicated that attractiveness, prestige, and expertise of SMIs perceived from their posted content can positively influence a type of one-sided relationships called parasocial relationships with these influencers. Although the credibility of SMIs does not directly influence their followers’ purchase intention, it exerts influence through parasocial relationships/interactions or identification, both of which have the potential to enhance purchase intention, and consumer stickiness (Melnychuk et al., 2024; Wahab et al., 2022). From these studies, it is not difficult to find that the source credibility of SMIs and the one-sided connections between influencers and consumers called parasocial relationships play significant roles in shaping consumers’ attitudes toward products and their subsequent purchase intentions. Such “source credibility-parasocial relationship” framework can be considered as an important perspective for analyzing the purchase intention in influencer marketing context.
But on the other hand, with the widespread application of AI-based recommendation algorithms, consumers’ shopping experiences are more shaped by smart recommendation systems than search-oriented mechanisms (H. Zhao & Wagner, 2023). During the shopping process, consumers’ judgments regarding product quality are sometimes swayed by exceptional cases. Many beneficial discoveries often occur unexpectedly, fostering a sense of serendipity — defined as the accidental discovery of valuable information (Grange et al., 2019). In addition, the psychological concept of fear of missing out (FOMO) often emerges as a powerful driving force in consumer behavior, closely tied to emotional anxiety influencing purchasing decisions (Dinh & Lee, 2022; Hodkinson, 2019). It results from the feeling of being left out of an appealing experience and a strong desire to continuously remain connected to what others are doing (Buglass et al., 2017). When social media influencers showcase products or experiences on social media and visibly enjoy them, it often triggers a potent sense of FOMO, which in turn motivates consumers to consider trying, or purchasing the endorsed items themselves (Sun & Bao, 2023). However, to the best of our knowledge, while examining factors that affect purchase intention in influencer marketing context, few studies have considered the roles of serendipity and FOMO in the “source credibility-parasocial relationship” framework. The interaction of serendipity and FOMO with the source credibility of SMIs and the parasocial relationships between consumers and SMIs remains largely unexplored.
To fill this gap, this study aims to establish a well-organized framework to give some new insights regarding the purchase intention by integrating source credibility, parasocial relationships, FOMO, and serendipity. We seek to identify the determinants of purchase intention within the realm of influencer marketing campaigns, striving to uncover the underlying mechanisms that drive this process. This investigation is anticipated to yield numerous contributions to the existing body of literature. First, our research extends the “source credibility-parasocial relationship” framework and develops a theory-grounded research model to analyze the purchase intention considering smart recommendation algorithms and emotional anxiety consumers experience during the influencer marketing process. Second, a deeper understanding of FOMO has been provided by elucidating its relationships with source credibility and parasocial relationships. Third, we enrich the current literature on serendipity by assessing its influence on consumers’ purchase intention, taking into account the unique contexts and characteristics of online influencer marketing.
The layout of this paper is structured in the following manner. The subsequent section offers the theoretical foundation of our research, succeeded by the formulated hypotheses and the research framework in Section 3. Sections 4 and 5 outline the study’s approach, data analysis, and findings. The paper is finalized with the conclusions, implications, and constraints of our research in Section 6.
Theoretical Background and Hypotheses
Fear of Missing Out (FOMO)
FOMO is described as an emotional anxiety that other people are doing, in possession of something better, or having more rewarding experiences from which one is absent (Good & Hyman, 2020; Przybylski et al., 2013). People with a high level of FOMO tend to have a desire to stay continually connected with peers’ activities, because they hope to constantly know what others are doing (J. A. Lee et al., 2021; Przybylski et al., 2013). FOMO is also an important and common phenomenon among online consumers, especially in the influencer marketing context. When SMIs display products on their social media platforms, demonstrating their enjoyment, it frequently evokes a strong sense of FOMO. This is because individuals afflicted by FOMO may exhibit a heightened inclination to align with group norms in buying choices, driven by a desire to acquire products trending in their social circles and mitigate the feeling of being left out (Bläse et al., 2024). The potential regret of missing out often acts as a situational motivator for individuals, as it drives them to engage in certain activities to remain up-to-date (Dinh & Lee, 2022; Good & Hyman, 2020). To imitate and compare themselves with ideal images, FOMO occur on the products that influencers endorsed at a deeper level with personalized experiences (Dinh & Lee, 2022). It may amplify consumers’ apprehension about missing out, thereby driving them to make purchases. Accordingly, we propose that:
Serendipity
Unexpectedness is the most obvious feature of serendipity, that is reflected as surprise. Previous studies note that serendipity involves something happens in an unexpected way or unexpected circumstances (Grange et al., 2019; Makri et al., 2014). Aside from unexpectedness, serendipity also requires an element of “insight” rather than just “blind luck” (Makri & Blandford, 2012). An individual’s valuable interaction with ideas, information, objects, or phenomena often trigger it (McCay-Peet et al., 2015). Therefore, serendipity can be defined as a combination of unexpectedness and insight, culminating in a valuable and unforeseen result. Social media affordances cultivate serendipity in online shopping environments. A variety of social features including consumer-generated product tags and endorsed recommenders in social circles foster serendipitous search experiences (Grange et al., 2019).
The feeling of serendipity can evoke positive emotions, thereby amplifying consumer satisfaction. (Ng et al., 2023; Reisenzein et al., 2019). For example, consumers in an unexpected situation with pleasant surprises often have fun browsing and enjoy so-called “Aha! moment” (Chung et al., 2017; McCay-Peet & Toms, 2011). They are more likely to enjoy their shopping experience and engage in information acquisition. Such a situation may encourage consumers to become engrossed in product selection and immerse themselves in this experience, which in turn spur unplanned spending and consequently increase their purchase intention. (Niu et al., 2021; Valenzuela et al., 2010).
On the other hand, serendipity implies additional informational value (Yang et al., 2023). Advertising content in social media that appeals to missing-out anxiety has been found a common phenomenon in social media marketing (J. Li et al., 2021, Bright & Logan, 2018). As perceived serendipity is along with unexpected discoveries that exactly fit latent preferences, consumers may concern more about they miss out products extolled by SMIs, which enhance the effect of FOMO. Such a “Wow!” moment allows consumers to obtain diverse shopping values and then to be more satisfied with their preferences, contributing more to the intention to purchase (Akram et al., 2023; Chung et al., 2017). As a result, this study expects that FOMO tends to be a stronger determinant of purchase intention for consumers who perceive high serendipity within influencer marketing context. According to the above analysis, the following hypotheses are proposed:
Parasocial Relationships
Parasocial relationship refers to unilateral psychological affiliation that audiences form with media celebrities or personalities, which then imitate an imaginary interpersonal relationship (E. C. X. Aw et al., 2023). It describes a form of one-sided relationship that followers perceive to have with an influencer. Individuals are allowed to unilateral feel strong interpersonal connections with their favorite celebrities and even regard these celebrities as their personal friends or alike other associations (Hung et al., 2011). Parasocial relationships have been applied to analyze audiences’ relationships with a variety of media personas from traditional mass media to online environment (Labrecque, 2014). Given that social media platforms enable people to effortlessly connect with peers who share similar and common interests, facilitating regular interactions, the formation of parasocial relationships becomes more probable (Farivar et al., 2021). In influencer marketing, parasocial relationships are widely perceived or developed by consumers, which are manifested by intense intimacy and psychological connections toward some SMIs (E. C.-X. Aw & Chuah, 2021).
Prior research indicates that parasocial relationships serve as a motivating factor for followers. This unique interpersonal bond can foster parasocial identification, and the resulting pleasurable experience significantly shapes consumers’ cognitions and behavioral responses (Gu & Duan, 2024), ultimately influencing their intentions to heed influencers’ recommendations and make purchase choices (e.g., Farivar et al., 2021; J. E. Lee & Watkins, 2016). Owing to strong parasocial relationships, SMIs share purchase assessments on social media platforms can provoke followers to imitate these influencers’ actions or follow their credible recommendations that will possibly lead to buy particular products (Zafar et al., 2020).
Furthermore, as parasocial relationships are imaginary intimate relationships, the stronger parasocial relationships with influencers perceived on social media, the higher followers’ positive emotions (C. Zhao et al., 2022). Prior literature has argued that believing an experience will be favorable and relevant is a necessary condition for FOMO to occur (Good & Hyman, 2020). SMIs typically embody idealized images, inspiring followers to aspire to their lifestyles and engage in upward social comparisons (Dinh & Lee, 2022). This often leads to heightened concern among followers when they are unable to acquire products or services enjoyed by an influencer, instigating feelings of being left out and triggering anxiety related to missing out. Based on the above analysis, the following hypotheses have been proposed:
Source Credibility
The source credibility explains the efficacy of persuasive messages communicated by a brand endorser. To be a credible source with high message efficacy, an endorser’s perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness are three requirements which should be considered (e.g., Amos et al., 2008; Ohanian, 1990). Here, attractiveness can be categorized into physical attractiveness and social attractiveness. Physical attractiveness addresses the degree to which a source is perceived as visually appealing or pleasing to observe (Ki & Kim, 2019; Wiedmann & von Mettenheim, 2021). Social attractiveness implies the extent to which one holds another’s beliefs, values, experiences, lifestyles, and social status to be similar to his or her own, which is also termed homophily (Le & Hancer, 2021). In the context of social media, attractive influencers do not have to be good-looking or esthetically appealing, because the influencer-follower relationship is not necessarily based on instant interactions, or communications. As followers engage with an influencer’s content over time, the sustained nature of this relationship lessens the impact of physical attractiveness as a catalyst for social exchange (Kim & Kim, 2021). Therefore, in this research, we regarded credibility is a general term that mainly focuses on three requirements: homophily, trustworthiness, and expertise.
People prefer to stimulate a positive affective reaction toward others who are similar to them, because the sense of homophily can reduce the uncertainty of a relationship (Hu et al., 2020; Sakib et al., 2020). On social commerce platforms, researchers found that consumers tend to share information with others who possess similar shopping goals, interests, and styles, which can foster the development of parasocial interactions among them (Xiang et al., 2016). As influencer marketing can be viewed as taking place on designated social commerce platforms, the interactions between influencers and consumers tend to be quite similar. The greater the perceived homophily between consumers’ beliefs and those of an SMIs, the stronger their likelihood to sustain their parasocial relationships with the influencer (Hu et al., 2020; Masuda et al., 2022).
On the other hand, people are naturally inclined to connect with some ones who share their interests or find themselves in similar life situations. Homophily-based credibility plays an important role in driving the persuasive process in online discussion groups (Z. Wang et al., 2008). Unlike traditional advertising, SMIs not only seek to inform consumers about new products, but also convey emotions regarding the FOMO (Bläse et al., 2024). The tendency of consumers to align themselves with individuals sharing similar interests or circumstances enhances the potential for homophily to amplify the FOMO experienced in the context of influencer marketing (Y. Li & Peng, 2021). Following these evidences, we hypothesize:
SMIs, through their carefully curated content across various platforms, cultivate a sense of relatability and trust that often surpasses that of traditional celebrities (Koay & Lim, 2025). Their perceived trustworthiness significantly shapes consumer perceptions: when consumers believe an SMI is trustworthy, they are more likely to consider the communicated messages as highly credible. (S. W. Wang et al., 2017). In social commerce, the role of endorsers’ trustworthiness in the strength of parasocial relationships has been indicated by Lou and Kim (2019). Consumers are likely to develop more positive attitudes toward establishing a close relationship with the endorser when they perceive a high level of trustworthiness (Yuan et al., 2021). Besides, trustworthiness will provide a subjective guarantee that a good experience in the future will be obtained as consumers believe that one SMI is dependable and honest to recommend products to them (Gao et al., 2015). In such context, consumers who do not acquire a product endorsed by that SMI are likely to experience emotional responses, leading to feelings of “missing out.” Based on the above analysis, we provide the following two hypotheses:
Expertise is related to the depth of knowledge about products and the particular domain in which the source is making claims (Ismagilova et al., 2020). Since people generally align with the opinions of experts and often modify their attitudes based on expert advice, perceived expertise is a crucial factor in interpersonal interaction. Existing studies regarding influencer marketing have found that an SMI’s expertise in a particular domain can positively influence parasocial relationships with their followers (e.g., Ashraf et al., 2023; E. C.-X. Aw & Chuah, 2021). In addition, expertise, also known as the authority, competence, and qualification a communicator possesses, has significant value in persuasion. Consumers who draw upon information from these experts frequently feel a sense of reward, perceive enhanced value, and subsequently experience an amplified desire to mimic (Ki & Kim, 2019). This heightened value perception can lead to a fear of not acquiring a product highly praised by SMIs who are viewed as experts in certain domains, manifesting the “missing out” sensation (Good & Hyman, 2020), which in turn may give rise to FOMO. Therefore, the following two hypotheses are proposed:
In conclusion, according to the above hypotheses, we proposed a research model by integrating parasocial relationship, source credibility model, FOMO, and serendipity. Specifically, factors such as an SMI’s homophily, trustworthiness, and expertise, derived from the source credibility model, serve as antecedents of parasocial relationship and FOMO which subsequently influence consumers’ purchase intention. Additionally, while serendipity has a direct influence on purchase intention, it also strengthens the relationship between FOMO and purchase intention when perceived serendipity is high. Figure 1 shows the research model of our study.
Research model.
Methodology
Measures
To maintain content validity, we adapted all measures for latent constructs from existing literature, ensuring their relevance and alignment with the context of this study. The construct of parasocial relationship was measured with four items following Farivar et al. (2021). Serendipity was measured with items adapted from Chung et al. (2017). To measure homophily, we adapted four items from Masuda et al. (2022). The items of expertise were modified from Ki and Kim (2019). Besides, measures for trustworthiness and purchase intention were modified from Wiedmann and von Mettenheim (2021). Finally, the scales to measure FOMO were obtained from the study by Dinh and Lee (2022). The Appendix of this paper depicts the measures of each variable in the questionnaire. All the items were rated on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree.
Data Collection
Data collection was conducted via an online survey aimed at subjects who have followed SMIs. The link of our online questionnaire was disseminated through social media platforms. Initially, the link was distributed to the 30 experienced consumers and 7 IS scholars who participated in our pilot study. Subsequently, these participants were encouraged to share the online questionnaire within their social media groups. Initially, a total of 352 questionnaires were collected. During the survey process, a purposive sampling technique was applied in line with prior literature regarding influencer marketing (e.g., E. C. X. Aw et al., 2023; Jacobson & Harrison, 2022), because only a limited population of people can possess the required information. In our survey, eligibility was limited to individuals who possess at least one social media account and have followed SMIs. Initially, participants were asked to identify a specific SMI they follow, as well as the social media platform they use to follow this influencer, serving as a screening question. Data from participants who failed the screening question were removed. Besides, to retrieve more accurate responses from the all participants, a brief definition of SMIs was also explicated in the remainder of the questionnaire. After the data screen, 335 responses were used for analysis. Demographic details are shown in Table 1.
Demographic Characteristics of Respondents.
Data Analysis
Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) approach was employed to conduct data analysis in our research. Compared with covariance-based SEM (CB-SEM), PLS-SEM is deemed more appropriate for exploratory and prediction-oriented research, particularly when dealing with complex models (Gefen et al., 2000; Hair et al., 2011), which a scenario that aligns with our research context. Following a two-step analysis procedure (Anderson & Gerbing, 1988), measurement model and structural model were checked respectively.
In addition, as this study used single-source data based on a self-reported survey method, thus common method bias (CMB) may exist. We performed Harman’s one-factor test to statistically assess the possible impacts from CMB. Using principal component analysis, all the indicators were entered into an exploratory factor analysis with unrotated principal component analysis. The results show that the largest variance explained by individual factors was 32.38% is less than 40%. Therefore, CMB should not be a serious issue for this study.
Results
Measurement Model
We assessed the measurement model based on its reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity (Hair et al., 2017). As shown in Table 2, all item loadings are above the threshold of .7. Cronbach’s α for each construct ranges from .792 to .910. Moreover, all the values of composite reliability (CR) are above .85, which are much larger than the threshold value of .70. According to the criteria recommended by Fornell and Larcker (1981) and Nunnally (1978), we can conclude that the internal consistency (reliability) of the measures for each construct can be confirmed. In addition, all the AVE values are well above the required minimum level of 0.50, showing good convergent validity for all measures (Fornell & Larcker, 1981).
Reliability and Validity.
Note. CA = Cronbach’s alpha; CR = composite reliability; AVE = average variance extracted.
To assess discriminant validity, Fornell and Larcker (1981) criterion was first applied. In Table 3, the values of the square roots of the AVEs of each construct are greater than the inter-construct correlations, suggesting the existence of discriminant validity. Besides, to further confirm discriminant validity, the heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) method was also conducted as suggested by Henseler et al. (2015). The values of HTMT ratio in Table 4 all fall below the criterion of .85 (Henseler et al., 2015), further confirming that there is no discriminant validity issue in our research.
Discriminant Validity.
Note. The bold values represent the square roots of the AVE.
Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio (HTMT).
Structural Model
The quality of the structural model was assessed by path coefficient values, explanatory power (R2) and predictive relevance (Q2). The path coefficients and their statistical significance were tested using the bootstrapping with 5,000 subsamples. All the details of hypotheses testing are shown in Figure 2. FOMO has a positive effect on purchase intention (β = .216, p < .001) Therefore, H1 is supported. Parasocial relationship is positively related to purchase intention (β = .362, p < .001) and FOMO (β = .202, p < .001) supporting H3a and H3b. Besides, homophily is positively associated with parasocial relationship (β = .259, p < .001) and FOMO (β = .141, p < .01), thus supporting H4a and H4b. Trustworthiness is positively related to parasocial relationship (β = .167, p < .01) and FOMO (β = .143, p < .05), showing that H5a and H5b are supported. Additionally, expertise has significant and positive impacts on parasocial relationship (β = .175, p < .01) and FOMO (β = .203, p < .001), providing supports for H6a and H6b. However, purchase intention cannot be significantly influenced by serendipity (β = .088, p > .05). Thus, H2a is not supported. Furthermore, the moderation analysis of serendipity was examined by using the PLS-product indicator approach. To alleviate multicollinearity, we mean-centered each measurement (Aiken & West, 1991), and then the interaction effect (serendipity × FOMO) was calculated. The result demonstrates that the interaction between serendipity and FOMO is significantly and positively related to purchase intention (β = .194, p < .01), supporting H2b.
Results of the research model.
The R2 value for purchase intentions indicates 31.4% of the variance. The results of R2 also shows that the model accounts for 20.2% and 24% of the variances in parasocial relationship and FOMO respectively. Meanwhile, the Q2 value is used to interpret predictive relevance of the model with regard to each endogenous construct. The Q2 values are 0.241 for purchase intention, 0.140 for parasocial relationship, and 0.159 for FOMO. Given that the Q2 of all endogenous constructs are above zero, we can regard this as indicative of good predictive relevance (Hair et al., 2017).
Discussion
Theoretical Implications
This study offers several theoretical implications. First, it presents a theory-based research model by adapting it to the practices prevalent in the influencer marketing campaigns, focusing on the interplay between smart recommendation algorithms and the emotional anxiety. The results of the data analysis demonstrate that the source credibility of SMIs and the parasocial relationships perceived by consumers are important determinants of purchase intention within the influencer marketing context. The homophily, trustworthiness, and expertise of SMIs not only exert a direct positive impact on FOMO, but also play important roles in shaping parasocial relationships with consumers, which in turn influence FOMO. Consequently, these factors ultimately affect purchase intentions.
Second, a deeper comprehension of FOMO in the influencer marketing sphere has been garnered by shedding light on its ties to source credibility and parasocial relationships. When examining purchase intention in influencer marketing context, it is insufficient to solely focus on the information-level interactions between consumers and SMIs. The empirical findings indicate that high source credibility enhances a listener’s positive perception, thereby increasing receptivity. Influencer marketing introduces new products to consumers while simultaneously inducing feelings of FOMO related to potential missed buying opportunities. As an anticipatory emotion, FOMO sheds light on individuals’ decision-making processes and corresponding behaviors. Consequently, this study integrates FOMO into the “source credibility–parasocial relationship” framework, laying the foundation for uncovering novel psychological processes that influence consumers’ purchasing decisions.
Third, this research enriches the understanding of serendipity by examining its influence on consumers’ purchase intentions within the unique context of influencer marketing. Our empirical results delve deeper into the role of serendipity by incorporating the phenomenon of FOMO, highlighting its moderating effect on the relationship between FOMO and purchase intention. Although serendipity—cultivated by social media affordances—does not directly affect consumers’ purchase intention, it strengthens the positive relationship between FOMO and purchase intention. In other words, serendipitous experiences lead consumers to perceive browsed products as having high diagnostic value, reinforcing the belief that these products should not be overlooked. This process elucidates the mechanism through which SMIs persuade consumers. This process elucidates the mechanism through which SMIs persuade consumers.
Practical Implications
The findings of our research also provide some practical implications. First, the significant effects of source credibility on parasocial relationships suggest that the credibility of SMIs is crucial for effective marketing communications, as it not only establishes the authenticity and persuasive power of the message but also directly influences audience acceptance and trust. Consequently, social media marketers should actively explore and implement scientifically grounded strategies to identify and select the most suitable influencers as partners, thereby optimizing their marketing efforts. In this context, our study provides comprehensive evaluation criteria that encompass key dimensions, such as an influencer’s expertise, trustworthiness, and homophily, aiming to offer marketers a well-rounded framework to assess influencer attributes and, in turn, foster stronger emotional connections and enhanced trust between consumers and brands.
Second, the connection between source credibility and FOMO in driving purchase intention offers valuable and actionable insights for marketers who are focused on increasing online sales. FOMO not only amplifies consumers’ concerns about falling behind their peers, but also strengthens the belief that products endorsed by credible sources are more likely to meet their needs and desires. For SMIs looking to enhance the effectiveness of their promotional efforts, leveraging FOMO-driven emotions can be a powerful tool. This can be achieved through strategically designed events or campaigns that highlight their expertise and trustworthiness, which in turn build consumer confidence. Additionally, emphasizing their similarities and shared values with their audience can foster a sense of connection and relatability, further intensifying FOMO and motivating consumers to take action. By tapping into these psychological drivers, marketers can more effectively influence consumer behavior and drive higher engagement levels.
Third, social media platforms, by their very nature, provide open, and dynamic environments that facilitate serendipity, where unexpected discoveries can occur. Given this unique characteristic, marketing practitioners should strategically design and deliver tailored messages to the right consumers based on their individual preferences and behavior patterns. By collaborating closely with SMIs who possess a deep understanding of their followers’ tastes and interests, marketers can refine the presentation and format of product information, ensuring alignment with both the platform’s context, and the consumer’s browsing experience across various pages and scenarios. This personalized approach ensures that the message resonates with the target audience and enhances the potential for serendipitous encounters between consumers and product offerings. As a result, consumers are more likely to develop a sense of receptivity toward endorsements from SMIs, thereby heightening the chances of fostering positive and spontaneous interactions that lead to stronger consumer relationships.
Limitations and Future Research
Some limitations during our research process also exist. First, the context of our study is social media in mainland of China. It is possible that our results are not generalizable to other cultural contexts. Research in the next stage could broaden its scope by acquiring data directly from SMIs and various social media platforms around the world, aiming to derive more comprehensive and diverse conclusions. Second, the data for this study were gathered through self-reported surveys at a single time point, making the study vulnerable to common method bias that may inflate or distort the observed relationships (Podsakoff et al., 2003). Such biases include recall bias and social desirability bias, whereby participants’ responses might not accurately reflect their true behaviors or attitudes. This reliance on a single data collection technique suggests that the findings should be interpreted with caution, underscoring the need for future research to incorporate diverse data sources or adopt longitudinal designs to mitigate these inherent limitations. Therefore, future studies should consider longitudinal investigations from diverse social media platforms to reveal causal relationships empirically and then find out more insights into the effects of parasocial relationship, FOMO, serendipity, and their antecedents on purchase intention within the influencer marketing context.
Footnotes
Appendix. Measurement Items
Ethical Considerations
I certify that this manuscript is original and has not been published. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Funding
The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.