Temporal aspects have been studied extensively within the context of music perception but insufficiently within the context of music preference. In this online questionnaire study, I investigated the impact of chronotype (morningness, eveningness) and time perspective (present, future) on music preferences. Participants (n = 258) completed the Short Test of Music Preferences for 26 music genres, the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory and the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire. Principal component analysis replicated a six-component structure of music preference. Whilst preference scores were highest for intense music for all participants, I found significant effects of chronotype and time perspective on music preferences. In particular, present-oriented evening types and future-oriented morning types differed in their preferences for various music genres. Consistent with a matching hypothesis, present-oriented evening types (fast life histories) showed greater preferences for contemporary (i.e., high rhythmic complexity), sophisticated (i.e., high complexity) and electronic music (i.e., fast tempo) compared to future-oriented morning types (slow life histories; greater difficulties with temporal irregularities). Consistent with a self-regulation hypothesis, present-oriented evening types showed greater preferences than future-oriented morning types for campestral music (i.e., slow tempo and low complexity).
AttaliJ. (1985). Noise: The political economy of music (MassumiB., Trans.). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
4.
BerlyneD. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York, NY: Appleton.
5.
BlockR. A. (1990). Models of psychological time. In BlockR. A. (Ed.), Cognitive models of psychological time (pp. 1–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
DrakeL.DuncanE.SutherlandF.AbernethyC.HenryC. (2008). Time perspective and correlates of wellbeing. Time & Society, 17(1), 47–61.
7.
FigueredoA. J.VásquezG.BrumbachB. H.SchneiderS. M. R.SefcekJ. A.TalI. R.… & JacobsW. J. (2006). Consilience and life history theory: From genes to brain to reproductive strategy. Developmental Review, 26, 243–275.
8.
GibsonJ. J. (1975). Events are perceivable, but time is not. In FraserJ. T.LawrenceN. (Eds.), Study of time II (pp. 295–301). New York, NY: Springer Verlag.
9.
GreenbergD. M.Baron-CohenS.StillwellD. J.KosinskiM.RentfrowP. J. (2015). Musical preferences are linked to cognitive styles. PloS One, 10.
10.
HasherL.GoldsteinD.MayC. (2005). It’s about time: Circadian rhythms, memory and aging. In IzawaC.OhtaN. (Eds.), Human learning and memory: Advances in theory and application: The 4th Tsukuba international conference on memory (pp. 199–217). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11.
HeydukR. G. (1975). Rated preference for musical composition as it relates to complexity and exposure frequency. Perception and Psychophysics, 17, 84–91.
12.
JenningsH.D.IvanovP.C.MartinsA.M.SilvaP.C.ViswanathanG.M. (2004). Variance fluctuations in nonstationary time series: a comparative study of music genres. Physica A, 336, 585–594.
13.
KaiserH. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers in factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151.
14.
KellerJ.FloresB.GomezR. G.SolvasonH. B.KennaH.WilliamsG. H.SchatzbergA.F. (2006). Cortisol circadian rhythm alterations in psychotic major depression. Biological Psychiatry, 60(3), 275–281.
15.
KrimsA. (2000). Rap music and the poetics of identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
MacArthurR. H.WilsonE. O. (1967). The theory of island biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
NowackK.van der MeerE. (2013). Are larks future-oriented and owls present-oriented? Age-and gender-related shifts in chronotype-time perspective associations. Chronobiology International, 30(10), 1240–1250.
18.
NowackK.van der MeerE. (2014). Impact of chronotype and time perspective on the processing of scripts. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 92, 49–58.
19.
NowackK.MilfontT. L.van der MeerE. (2013). Future versus present: Time perspective and pupillary response in a relatedness judgment task investigating temporal event knowledge. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 87(2), 173–182.
20.
OsinE. N.BoniwellI. P.LinleyA.IvanchenkoG. V. (2009). Balanced time perspective in Britain and Russia. Paper presented at the First World Congress of Positive Psychology, Philadelphia, June.
21.
PonziD.HenryA.KubickiK.NickelsN.WilsonM. C.MaestripieriD. (2015). The slow and fast life histories of early birds and night owls: Their future- or present-orientation accounts for their sexually monogamous or promiscuous tendencies. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 36, 117–122.
22.
RandlerC.SaligerL. (2011). Relationship between morningness–eveningness and temperament and character dimensions in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 148–152.
23.
RentfrowP. J.GoslingS. D. (2003). The do re mi’s of everyday life: The structure and personality correlates of music preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1236–1256.
24.
RentfrowP. J.GoslingS. D. (2006). Message in a ballad: The role of music preferences in interpersonal perception. Psychological Science, 17, 236–242.
25.
RentfrowP. J.GoslingS. D. (2011). Listening, watching, and reading: The structure and correlates of entertainment preferences. Journal of Personality, 79(2), 223–258.
26.
RentfrowP. J.GoldbergL. R.LevitinD. J. (2011). The structure of musical preferences: A five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(6), 1139–1157. doi:1.1037/a0022406
27.
RentfrowP. J.GoldbergL. R.StillwellD. J.KosinskiM.GoslingS. D.LevitinD. L. (2012). The song remains the same: A replication and extension of the MUSIC model. Music Perception, 30, 161–185. doi:10.1525/mp.2012.30.2.161
28.
RoennebergT.KumarC. J.MerrowM. (2007). The human circadian clock entrains to sun time. Current Biology, 17, 44–45.
29.
RoennebergT.Wirz-JusticeA.MerrowM. (2003). Life between clocks—daily temporal patterns of human chronotypes. Journal of Biological Rhythms, 18, 80–90.
30.
SallavantiM. I.SzilagyiV. E.CrawleyE. J. (2016). The role of complexity in music uses. Psychology of Music, 44, 757–768.
31.
SchäferT.MehlhornC. (2017). Can personality traits predict musical style preferences? A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 265–273.
32.
SchäferT.SedlmeierP. (2009). From the functions of music to music preference. Psychology of Music, 37, 279–300.
33.
StupacherJ.WoodG.WitteM. (2017). Neural entrainment to polyrhythms: A comparison of musicians and non-musicians. Frontiers Neuroscience, 11, 208.
34.
ThautM. H.TrimarchiP. D.ParsonsL. M. (2014). Human brain basis of musical rhythm perception: Common and distinct neural substrates for meter, tempo, and pattern. Brain Sciences, 4(2), 428–452.
35.
TsaousisI. (2010). Circadian preferences and personality traits: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Personality, 24, 356–373.
36.
WesolowskiB.C.HofmannA. (2016). There’s more to groove than bass in electronic dance music: Why some people won’t dance to techno. PLoS ONE11(10), e0163938.
37.
ZimbardoP. G.BoydJ. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual- differences metric. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288.
