Music self-concept integrates perceptions, beliefs, and self-schemas about a person’s musical abilities and potential. Like other self-concept dimensions, it is multifaceted, hierarchically organized and has implications for motivation toward musical practice. The Music Self-Perception Inventory (MUSPI) is a theoretically-based instrument assessing six specific music self-concept dimensions, as well as global music self-concept. Nonetheless, its applicability is limited by its length (84 items) and by the fact that it does not provide a way to control for consistency biases in the context of repeated measurement. In this study, we developed and validated two parallel versions (A and B) of the MUSPI, and showed that both yielded equivalent psychometric properties to the original, and were fully equivalent to one another. We also tested whether the MUSPI-A and MUSPI-B psychometric properties generalized (were invariant) across gender and grade-differentiated subgroups. Finally, we examined the convergent validity of the MUSPI-A and MUSPI-B. Results highlighted the psychometric soundness, and equivalence, of the various MUSPI versions on all criteria, and showed that they presented patterns of associations with other constructs equivalent to that observed with the original MUSPI.
AsparouhovT.MuthénB. O. (2010). Weighted Least Square estimation with missing data. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
2.
AustinJ. R.VispoelW. P. (1998). How American adolescents interpret success and failure in classroom music: Relationships among attributional beliefs, self-concept and achievement. Psychology of Music, 26, 26–45.
3.
AustinJ. R.VispoelW. P. (2000). Children’s ability self-perceptions and interests: Grade level, gender and race differences in music, reading, and math. In CravenR. G.MarshH. W. (Eds.), Self-concept, theory, research and practice: Advances for the new millennium (pp. 133–142). Sydney, Australia: Self-concept Enhancement and Learning Facilitation Research Centre.
4.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D. (2007). Self-regulation, ego depletion, and motivation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 1–14.
5.
ByrneB. M.ShavelsonR. J. (1996). On the structure of social self-concept for pre-, early, and late adolescents: A test of the Shavelson, Hubner, and Stanton (1976) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 599–613.
6.
BrackenB. A.BunchS.KeithT. Z.KeithP. B. (2000). Child and adolescent multidimensional self-concept: A five-instrument factor analysis. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 483–493.
7.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F. (2000). On the structure of behavioral self-regulation. In BoekaertsM.PintrichP. R.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 42–80). San Diego, CA: Academic.
8.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504.
9.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.
10.
ChinT.-C.RickardN. S. (2012). The Music USE (MUSE) Questionnaire: An instrument to measure engagement in music. Music Perception, 29, 429–446.
11.
ChinT-C.RickardN. S.CoutinhoE.SchererK. R. (2016, July). Music engagement: A psychometrically robust questionnaire for capturing its many voices. International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, San Francisco, CA.
12.
DunkelC.KerpelmanJ. (2006). Possible selves: Theory, research & applications. New York, NY: Nova Science.
13.
EcclesJ. S.WigfieldA. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.
14.
EvansE. M.SchweingruberH.StevensonH. W. (2002). Gender differences in interest and knowledge acquisition: The United States, Taiwan, and Japan. Sex Roles, 47, 153–167.
15.
FanX.SivoS. A. (2009). Using goodness-of-fit indexes in assessing mean structure invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 54–69.
16.
FinneyS. J.DiStephanoC. (2013). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In HancockG. R.MuellerR. O. (Eds.), Structural Equation Modeling: A second course (2nd ed., pp. 439–492). Greenwich, CO: IAP.
17.
ForteE. E.VispoelW. P. (1995, April). Domain importance and involvement: Relations between domain self-concepts and general self-esteem in pre-adolescence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
18.
GrahamJ. W. (2009). Missing data. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576.
19.
HargreavesD. J.ComberC.ColleyA. (1995). Effects of age, gender, and training on musical preferences of British secondary students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43, 242–250.
20.
HarrisonA. C.O’NeillS. A. (2000). Children’s gender-typed preferences for musical instruments: An intervention study. Psychology of Music, 28, 81–97.
21.
HarterS. (2012). The construction of the self. New York, NY: Guilford.
22.
HigginsE. T. (2012). Regulatory focus theory. In Van LangeP.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 483–504). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
24.
JacobsJ. E.LanzaS.OsgoodD. W.EcclesJ. S.WigfieldA. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73, 509–527.
25.
KolenM. J.BrennanR. L. (2014). Test equating, scaling, and linking: Methods and practice (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
26.
LearyM. R.TangneyJ. P. (2012). Handbook of self and identity. New York, NY: Guilford.
MaïanoC.MorinA. J. S.NinotG.Monthuy-BlancJ.StephanY.FlorentJ.-F.ValléeP. (2008). A short and very short form of the physical self-inventory for adolescents: Development and factor validity. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 9, 830–847.
29.
MaidlowS.BruceR. (1999). The role of psychology research in understanding the sex/gender paradox in music – Plus ça change…. Psychology of Music, 27, 147–158. doi: 10.1177/0305735699272006
30.
MarshH. W. (1988). Self-description questionnaire. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
31.
MarshH. W. (1999). Academic Self-Description Questionnaire – I: ASDQ I. Macarthur, Australia: University of Western Sydney, Self-concept Enhancement and Learning Facilitation Research Centre.
32.
MarshH. W. (2007). Self-concept theory, measurement and research into practice: The role of self-concept in Educational Psychology. Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society.
33.
MarshH. W.AbduljabbarA. S.Abu-HilalM.MorinA. J. S.AbdelfattahF.LeungK. C.… ParkerP. (2013). Factor structure, discriminant and convergent validity of TIMSS math and science motivation measures: A comparison of USA and Saudi Arabia. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 108–128.
34.
MarshH. W.ChengJ. H. S. (2012). Physical self-concept. In TenenbaumG.EklundR.KamataA. (Eds.), Handbook of measurement in sport and exercise psychology (pp. 215–226). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
35.
MarshH. W.CravenR. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 133–163.
36.
MarshH. W.EllisL.ParadaR.RichardsG.HeubeckB. (2005). A short version of the Self-Description Questionnaire II: Operationalizing criteria for short-form with new applications of confirmatory factor analyses. Psychological Assessment, 17, 81–102.
37.
MarshH. W.HauK.GraysonD. (2005). Goodness of fit in structural equation models. In Maydeu-OlivaresA.McArdleJ. J. (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics (pp. 275–340). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38.
MarshH. W.ScalasL. F. (2010). Self-concept in learning: Reciprocal effects model between academic self-concept and academic achievement. In PetersonP.BakerE.McGawB. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 6, pp. 660–667). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
39.
MarshH. W.ScalasL. F.NagengastB. (2010). Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles. Psychological Assessment, 22, 366–381.
40.
MacDonaldR. A.HargreavesD. J.MiellD. E. (2009). Musical identities. In HallamS.CrossI.ThautM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music psychology (pp. 462–470). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
41.
McDonaldR. P. (1970). Theoretical foundations of principal factor analysis and alpha factor analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 23, 1–21.
42.
MillsapR. E. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York, NY: Routledge.
MorinA. J. S.ArensA. K.MarshH. W. (2016). A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 116–139.
45.
MorinA. J. S.MoullecG.MaïanoC.LayetL.JustJ.-L.NinotG. (2011). Psychometric properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in French clinical and non-clinical adults. Epidemiology and Public Health, 59, 327–340.
46.
MorinA. J. S.ScalasL. F.VispoelW.MarshH. W.WenZ. (2016). The Music Self-Perception Inventory: Development of a short form. Psychology of Music, 44, 915–934. doi:10.1177/0305735615592690
47.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2014). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
48.
MüllensiefenD.GingrasB.MusilJ.StewartL. (2014). The musicality of non-musicians: An index for assessing musical sophistication in the general population. PloS One, 9, e89642.
49.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
50.
O’NeillS. A.BoultonaM. J. (1996). Boys’ and girls’ preferences for musical instruments: A function of gender?Psychology of Music, 24, 171–183. doi:10.1177/0305735696242009
51.
OysermanD.ElmoreK.SmithG. (2012). Self, self-concept, and identity. In LearyM.TangneyJ. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd ed., pp. 69–104). New York, NY: Guilford.
52.
RobinsR. W.HendinH. M.TrzesniewskiK. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151–161.
53.
SandeneB. A. (1997). An investigation of variables related to student motivation in instrumental music. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 58(10), 3870.
54.
SchmidtC. P. (2005). Relations among motivation, achievement, and music experience variables in secondary instrumental music students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 134–147.
55.
SchnareB.MacIntyreP.DoucetteJ. (2012). Possible selves as a source of motivation for musicians. Psychology of Music, 40, 94–111. doi:10.1177/0305735610391348
56.
ShavelsonR. J.HubnerJ. J.StantonG. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.
57.
SimpkinsS. D.VestA. E.BecnelJ. N. (2010). Participating in sport and music activities in adolescence: The role of activity participation and motivational beliefs during elementary school. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 1368–1386.
58.
SpychigerM.GruberL.OlbertzF. (2009). Musical self-concept: Presentation of a multi-dimensional model and empirical analyses. In LouhivuoriJ.EerolaT.SaarikallioS.HimbergT.EerolaP.-S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Triennial Conference of European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (pp. 505–507). Jyväskylä, Finland: ESCOM.
59.
VispoelW. P. (1993a). The development and validation of the Arts Self-Perception Inventory for adolescents. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 1023–1033.
60.
VispoelW. P. (1993b). The Music Self-Perception Inventory (Adolescent). Iowa City, IA: Author.
61.
VispoelW. P. (1993c). The Music Self-Perception Inventory (Adult/College). Iowa City, IA: Author.
62.
VispoelW. P. (1994). Integrating self-perceptions of music skill into contemporary models of self-concept. Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning, 5, 42–57.
63.
VispoelW. P. (1995). Self-concept in artistic domains: An extension of the Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 134–153.
64.
VispoelW. P. (2003). Measuring and understanding self-perceptions of musical ability. In MarshH. W.CravenR. G.McInerneyD. M. (Eds.), International advances in self research (Vol. 1, pp. 151–180). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
65.
VispoelW. P.ForteE. E. (1994, April). Predicting global self-esteem from domain-specific self-concepts: The role of importance and involvement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
66.
VispoelW. P.ForteE. E. (2000). Response bias and their relation to sex differences in multiple domains of self-concept. Applied Measurement in Education, 13, 79–97.
67.
VispoelW. P.RizzoK. M. (2003). Sex differences in early adolescent music students’ self-concepts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
68.
WelchG.HallamS.LamontA.SwanwickK.GreenL.HennessyS.… FarrellG. (2004). Mapping music education research in the UK. Psychology of Music, 32, 239–290. doi:10.1177/0305735604043257
69.
WestC. (2013). Motivating music students: A review of the literature. Update, 31, 11–19.
70.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.
71.
YuC. Y. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. Los Angeles: University of California.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
