Music self-concept integrates perceptions, beliefs, and self-schemas about a person’s musical abilities and potential. Like other self-concept dimensions, it is multifaceted, hierarchically organized and has implications for motivation toward musical practice. The Music Self-Perception Inventory (MUSPI) is a theoretically based instrument assessing six specific music self-concept dimensions, as well as global music self-concept. Nonetheless, its applicability is limited by its length (84 items). In this study, we developed and validated a 28-item short form of the MUSPI, and showed that the short form yielded equivalent psychometric properties as the original. We validated the original MUSPI on a first sample and used these results to develop a shorter version (MUSPI-S), which we then cross-validated using a new independent sample. We also tested whether the MUSPI-S psychometric properties generalized (were invariant) across gender and grade-differentiated subgroups. Finally, we examined the convergent validity of the MUSPI and MUSPI-S. Results highlighted the psychometric soundness of the MUSPI-S on all criteria, and showed that it presented patterns of associations with other constructs equivalent to those observed with the original MUSPI.
AsparouhovT.MuthénB. O. (2006). Robust chi-square difference testing with mean and variance adjusted test statistics. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
2.
AsparouhovT.MuthénB. O. (2010). Weighted Least Square estimation with missing data. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
3.
AustinJ. R. (1991). Competitive and noncompetitive goal structures: An analysis of motivation and achievement among elementary band students. Psychology of Music, 19, 142–158.
4.
AustinJ. R.VispoelW. P. (1998). How American adolescents interpret success and failure in classroom music: Relationships among attributional beliefs, self-concept and achievement. Psychology of Music, 26, 26–45.
5.
AustinJ. R.VispoelW. P. (2000). Children’s ability self-perceptions and interests: Grade level, gender and race differences in music, reading, and math. In CravenR. G.MarshH. W. (Eds.), Self-concept, theory, research and practice: Advances for the new millennium (pp. 133–142). Sydney, Australia: Self-concept Enhancement and Learning Facilitation Research Centre.
6.
BandalosD. L. (2014). Relative performance of categorical diagonally weighted least squares and robust maximum likelihood estimation. Structural Equation Modeling, 21, 102–116.
7.
ByrneB. M.ShavelsonR. J. (1996). On the structure of social self-concept for pre-, early, and late adolescents: A test of the Shavelson, Hubner, and Stanton (1976) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 599.
8.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504.
9.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.
10.
DeSalvoK. B.FisherW. P.TranK.BloserN.MerrillW.PeabodyJ. (2006). Assessing measurement properties of two single-items general health measures. Quality of Life Research, 15, 191–201.
11.
DiStephanoC.MotlR. W. (2006). Further investigating method effects associated with negatively worded items on self-report surveys. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 440–464.
12.
EcclesJ. S.WigfieldA. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.
13.
EcclesJ. S.WigfieldA.HaroldR. D.BlumenfeldP. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s self- and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830–847.
14.
EvansE. M.SchweingruberH.StevensonH. W. (2002). Gender differences in interest and knowledge acquisition: The United States, Taiwan, and Japan. Sex Roles, 47, 153–167.
15.
FanX.SivoS. A. (2009). Using goodness-of-fit indexes in assessing mean structure invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 54–69.
16.
FinneyS. J.DiStephanoC. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In HancockG. R.MuellerR. O. (Eds), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 269–314). Greenwich, CO: IAP.
17.
FinneyS. J.DiStephanoC. (2013). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In HancockG. R.MuellerR. O. (Eds), Structural equation modeling: A second course, second edition (pp. 439–492). Greenwich, CO: IAP.
18.
ForteE. E.VispoelW. P. (1995, April). Domain importance and involvement: Relations between domain self-concepts and general self-esteem in pre-adolescence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
19.
FoxK. R.CorbinC. B. (1989). The physical self-perception profile: Development and preliminary validation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11, 408–430.
20.
HargreavesD. J.ComberC.ColleyA. (1995). Effects of age, gender, and training on musical preferences of British secondary school students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43, 242–250.
21.
HarrisonA. C.O’NeillS. A. (2000). Children’s gender-typed preferences for musical instruments: An intervention study. Psychology of Music, 28, 81–97.
22.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
23.
JacobsJ. E.LanzaS.OsgoodD. W.EcclesJ. S.WigfieldA. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73, 509–527.
24.
MaïanoC.MorinA. J. S.NinotG.Monthuy-BlancJ.StephanY.FlorentJ.-F.. (2008). A short and very short form of the physical self-inventory for adolescents: Development and factor validity. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 9, 830–847.
25.
MaidlowS.BruceR. (1999). The role of psychology research in understanding the sex/gender paradox in music—Plus ça change …Psychology of Music, 27, 147–158.
26.
MarshH. W. (1990). The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 623–636.
27.
MarshH. W. (1993). Academic self-concept: Theory, measurement and research. In SulsJ. (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 4, pp. 59–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28.
MarshH. W. (2007a). Self-concept theory, measurement and research into practice: The role of self-concept in Educational Psychology. Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society.
29.
MarshH. W. (2007b). Application of confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling in sport/exercise psychology. In TenenbaumG.EklundR. C. (Eds.), Handbook of on sport psychology (3rd ed., pp. 774–798). New York: Wiley.
30.
MarshH. W. (2008). The elusive importance effect: More failure for the Jamesian perspective on the importance of importance in shaping self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 76, 1081–1122.
31.
MarshH. W.AbduljabbarA. S.Abu-HilalM.MorinA. J. S.AbdelfattahF.LeungK. C.. (2013). Factor structure, discriminant and convergent validity of TIMSS math and science motivation measures: A comparison of USA and Saudi Arabia. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 108–128.
32.
MarshH. W.CravenR. G. (2006). What comes first? A reciprocal effects model of the mutually reinforcing effects of academic self-concept and achievement. In MarshH. W.CravenR. G.McInerneyD. M. (Eds.), International advances in self research (pp 15–52). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
33.
MarshH. W.EllisL.ParadaR.RichardsG.HeubeckB. (2005). A short version of the Self-Description Questionnaire II: Operationalizing criteria for short-form with new applications of confirmatory factor analyses. Psychological Assessment, 17, 81–102.
34.
MarshH. W.HauK.GraysonD. (2005). Goodness of fit in structural equation models. In Maydeu-OlivaresA.McArdleJ. J. (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics (pp. 275–340). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35.
MarshH. W.HauK.-T.WenZ. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341.
36.
MarshH. W.RichardsG. E.JohnsonS.RocheL.TremayneP. (1994). Physical self-description questionnaire: Psychometric properties and a multitrait-multimethod analysis of relations to existing instruments. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16, 270–305.
37.
MarshH. W.ScalasL. F. (2010). Self-concept in learning: Reciprocal effects model between academic self-concept and academic achievement. In PetersonP.BakerE.McGawB. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 6, pp. 660–667. Oxford: Elsevier.
38.
MarshH. W.ScalasL. F.NagengastB. (2010). Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles. Psychological Assessment, 22, 366–381.
39.
MarshH. W.ShavelsonR. J. (1985). Self-concept: Its multifaceted, hierarchical structure. Educational Psychologist, 20, 107–125.
40.
McDonaldR. P. (1970). Theoretical foundations of principal factor analysis and alpha factor analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 23, 1–21.
MorinA. J. S.ArensA. K.MarshH. W. (2015). A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Structural Equation Modeling. DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2014.961800
45.
MorinA. J. S.MaïanoC. (2011). Cross-validation of the very short form of the Physical Self-Inventory: Invariance across genders, age, ethnicities, and weight statuses. Body Image, 8, 404–410.
46.
MorinA. J. S.MoullecG.MaïanoC.LayetL.JustJ.-L.NinotG. (2011). Psychometric properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in French clinical and non-clinical adults. Epidemiology and Public Health, 59, 327–340.
47.
MoullecG.MaïanoC.MorinA. J. S.Monthuy-BlancJ.RoselloL.NinotG. (2011). A very short visual analog of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale for the idiographic measurement of depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 128, 220–234.
48.
MuthénB. O. (2004). Mplus technical appendices. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
49.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
50.
MyersM. G.McCarthyD. M.MacPhersonL.BrownS. A. (2003). Constructing a short form of the smoking consequences questionnaire with adolescents and youth adults. Psychological Assessment, 15, 163–172.
51.
O’NeillS. A.BoultonM. J. (1996). Boys’ and girls’ preferences for musical instruments: A function of gender?Psychology of Music, 24, 171–83.
52.
QuiltyL. C.OakmanJ. M.RiskoE. (2006). Correlates of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale method effects. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 99–117.
53.
RaykovT.GraysonD. (2003). A test for change of composite reliability in scale development. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38, 143–159.
54.
SandeneB. A. (1997). An investigation of variables related to student motivation in instrumental music. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 58(10), 3870.
55.
ScalasL. F.MarshH. W.NagengastB.MorinA. J. S. (2013). Latent variable approaches to the Jamesian model of importance-weighted averages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 100–114.
56.
ScalasL. F.MorinA. J. S.MarshH. W.NagengastB. (2014). Importance models of the physical self: Improved methodology supports a normative-cultural importance model but not the individual importance model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 154–174.
57.
SchmidtC. P. (2005). Relations among motivation, achievement, and music experience variables in secondary instrumental music students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 134–147.
58.
SchnareB.MacIntyreP.DoucetteJ. (2012). Possible selves as a source of motivation for musicians. Psychology of Music, 40, 94–111.
59.
ShavelsonR. J.HubnerJ. J.StantonG. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.
60.
SijtsmaK. (2009). On the use, misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha [Introduction to a special issue]. Psychometrika, 74, 107–120.
61.
SimpkinsS. D.VestA. E.BecnelJ. N. (2010). Participating in sport and music activities in adolescence: The role of activity participation and motivational beliefs during elementary school. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 1368–1386.
62.
SmithG.McCarthyD.AndersonK. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12, 102–111.
63.
TomásJ. M.OliverA. (1999). Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale: Two factors or method effects. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 84–98
64.
TomásJ. M.OliverA.GalianaL.SanchoP.LilaM. (2013). Explaining method effects associated with negatively worded items in trait and state global and domain-specific self-esteem scales. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 299–313.
65.
VispoelW. P. (1993a). The development and validation of the Arts Self-Perception Inventory for adolescents. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 1023–1033.
66.
VispoelW. P. (1993b). The Music Self-Perception Inventory (Adolescent Form). Iowa City, IA: Vispoel.
67.
VispoelW. P. (1993c). The Music Self-Perception Inventory (Adult/College Form). Iowa City, IA: Vispoel.
68.
VispoelW. P. (1994). Integrating self-perceptions of music skill into contemporary models of self-concept. The Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning, 5, 42–57.
69.
VispoelW. P. (1995). Self-concept in artistic domains: An extension of the Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 134–153.
70.
VispoelW. P. (2003). Measuring and understanding self-perceptions of musical ability. In MarshH. W.CravenR. G.McInerneyD. M. (Eds.), International advances in self research (Vol. 1, pp. 151–180). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
71.
VispoelW. P.ForteE. E. (1994, April). Predicting global self-esteem from domain-specific self-concepts: The role of importance and involvement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
72.
VispoelW. P.ForteE. E. (2000). Response bias and their relation to sex differences in multiple domains of self-concept. Applied Measurement in Education, 13, 79–97.
73.
VispoelW. P.RizzoK. M. (2003, April). Sex differences in early adolescent music students’ self-concepts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
74.
WelchG.HallamS.LamontA.SwanwickK.GreenL.HennessyS.CoxG.O’NeillS.FarrellG. (2004). Mapping music education research in the UK. Psychology of Music, 32, 239–290.
75.
WestC. (2013). Motivating music students: A review of the literature. Update, 31, 11–19.
76.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.
77.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S.YoonK. S.HaroldR. D.ArbretonA. J. A.Freedman-DoanC.. (1997). Change in children’s competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A 3-year study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 451–469.
78.
YuC. Y. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. Los Angeles, CA: University of California.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
