Comparison of long-labeled pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (ASL) features between young and elderly adults: special reference to parameter selection

Abstract

Background

The signal intensity obtained by arterial spin labeling (ASL) depends not only on perfusion signal, but also on arterial transit time (ATT). Although ATT has a more significant effect on accurate regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) calculations, the multiple post-labeling delay (PLD) approach is difficult to use in routine examinations.

Purpose

To optimize imaging parameters for labeling duration (LD) and PLD and to confirm their validity in long-labeled pseudo-continuous ASL.

Material and Methods

The perfusion signal was simulated in four LDs and theoretical signal-to-noise ratio efficiency (SNR_eff) was calculated. In vivo studies were performed on a 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner and 15 volunteers were categorized into either the young or elderly adult groups. We compared the differences in CBF values with or without ATT correction.

Results

Regarding signal simulation, perfusion signal increased with the length of LD. SNR_eff also improved with LD, but SNR_eff plateaued at an LD of 3.0 s. As for the in vivo study, SNR linearly increased along with the LD. The CBF differences with the correction of ATT were larger in the elderly adult group. This trend was most prominent in the longer ATT area in the occipital cortical region.

Conclusion

A combination of imaging settings of LD = 3.5 s and PLD = 2.0 s were suggested as optimal imaging parameters for allowing acceptable CBF quantification and sufficient SNR in both young and elderly individuals.

Keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)arterial spin labeling (ASL)cerebral blood flow arterial transit time (ATT)perfusion

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Williams

Detre

Leigh

. Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using spin inversion of arterial water. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89: 212–216.

Detre

Leigh

Williams

. Perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 1992, pp. 23:37–45.

Dai

Garcia

de Bazelaire

. Continuous flow-driven inversion for arterial spin labeling using pulsed radio frequency and gradient fields. Magn Reson Med 2008; 60: 1488–1497.

Maleki

Dai

Alsop

. Optimization of background suppression for arterial spin labeling perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Mater Phy 2011; 25: 127–133.

Frank

Weinberger

. Noise reduction in 3D perfusion imaging by attenuating the static signal in arterial spin tagging (ASSIST). Magn Reson Med 2000; 44: 92–100.

Garcia

Duhamel

Alsop

. Efficiency of inversion pulses for background suppressed arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54: 366–372.

Wang

Alsop

. Comparison of quantitative perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling at 1.5 and 4.0 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2002; 48: 242–254.

Buxton

Frank

Wong

. A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 1998; 40: 383–396.

Kimura

Kabasawa

Yonekura

. Cerebral perfusion measurements using continuous arterial spin labeling: accuracy and limits of a quantitative approach. International Congress Series 2004; 1265: 238–247.

10.

Alsop

Detre

. Reduced transit-time sensitivity in noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging of human cerebral blood flow. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996; 16: 1236–1249.

11.

Dai W, Robson PM, Shankaranarayanan A, et al. Benefits of interleaved continuous labeling and background suppression. In: Proceedings of 18th annual meeting of ISMRM 2010:1748.

12.

Ghariq

Teeuwisse

Webb

. Feasibility of pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling at 7 T with whole-brain coverage. Magn Reson Mater Phy 2011; 25: 83–93.

13.

Parkes

Tofts

. Improved accuracy of human cerebral blood perfusion measurements using arterial spin labeling: accounting for capillary water permeability. Magn Reson Med 2002; 48: 27–41.

14.

Dai

Robson

Shankaranarayanan

. Reduced resolution transit delay prescan for quantitative continuous arterial spin labeling perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 2011; 67: 1252–1265.

15.

Clingman

Golay

. Determining the longitudinal relaxation time (T₁) of blood at 3.0 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 679–682.

16.

Wong

Buxton

Frank

. A theoretical and experimental comparison of continuous and pulsed arterial spin labeling techniques for quantitative perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 1998; 40: 348–355.

17.

Mutsaerts

HJMM

Steketee

RME

Heijtel

DFR

. Inter-vendor reproducibility of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling at 3 Tesla. PLoS One 2014; 9: e104108–e104108.

18.

Luh WM, Wong EC, Bandettini PA. How long to tag? Optimal tag duration for arterial spin labeling at 1.5 T, 3T, and 7T. In: Proceedings of 17th annual meeting of ISMRM 2008:186.

19.

Liu

Zhu

Feinberg

. Arterial spin labeling MRI study of age and gender effects on brain perfusion hemodynamics. Magn Reson Med 2012; 68: 912–922.

20.

Alsop

Detre

Golay

. Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: A consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn Reson Med 2014; 73: 102–116.