A unified formulation that accounts for the dynamics of a general class of aquatic multi-body, soft-structured robots is presented. The formulation is based on a Cosserat formalism where the description of the ensemble of geometrical entities, such as shells and beams, gives rise to a multi-soft-body system capable of simulating both manipulation and locomotion. Conceived as an advanced tool for a priori hardware development, n-degree-of-freedom dynamics analysis and control design of underwater, soft, multi-body, vehicles, the model is validated against aquatic locomotion experiments of an octopus-inspired soft unmanned underwater robot. Upon validation, the general applicability of the model is demonstrated by predicting the self-propulsion dynamics of a diverse range of new viable combinations of multi-soft-body aquatic system.
AbbottJJCosentino LagomarsinoMZhangLDongLNelsonBJ (2009) How should microrobots swim?The International Journal of Robotics Research28(11–12): 1434–1447.
2.
AndersonEDeMontM (2000) The mechanics of locomotion in the squid Loligo pealei: locomotory function and unsteady hydrodynamics of the jet and intramantle pressure. Journal of Experimental Biology203(18): 2851–2863.
3.
AndersonEQuinnWDeMontM (2001) Hydrodynamics of locomotion in the squidLoligo pealei. Journal of Fluid Mechanics436: 249–266.
4.
AntmanS (2006) Nonlinear Problems of Elasticity (Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 107). New York: Springer.
5.
BoyerFPorezM (2015) Multibody system dynamics for bio-inspired locomotion: from geometric structures to computational aspects. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics10(2): 025007.
6.
BoyerFPorezMKhalilW (2006) Macro-continuous computed torque algorithm for a three-dimensional eel-like robot. IEEE Transactions on Robotics22(4): 763–775.
7.
BoyerFPorezMLeroyerA (2010) Poincaré cosserat equations for the lighthill three-dimensional large amplitude elongated body theory: Application to robotics. Journal of Nonlinear Science20(1): 47–79.
8.
BoyerFPrimaultD (2005) The Poincaré–Chetayev equations and flexible multibody systems. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics69(6): 925–942.
9.
BoyerFRendaF (2016) Poincaré’s equations for Cosserat media: Application to shells. Journal of Nonlinear Science. DOI: 10.1007/s00332-016-9324-7.
10.
CanavinJLikinsP (1977) Floating reference frames for flexible spacecraft. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets14(12): 724–732.
11.
CandelierFBoyerFLeroyerA (2011) Three-dimensional extension of Lighthill’s large-amplitude elongated-body theory of fish locomotion. Journal of Fluid Mechanics674: 196–226.
12.
CandelierFPorezMBoyerF (2013) Note on the swimming of an elongated body in a non-uniform flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics716: 616–637.
13.
ColgateJLynchK (2004) Mechanics and control of swimming: a review. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering29(3): 660–673.
14.
ConteJModarres-SadeghiYWattsMNHoverFSTriantafyllouMS (2010) A fast-starting mechanical fish that accelerates at 40 m s2. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics5(3): 035004.
15.
DomeniciPStandenEMLevineRP (2004) Escape manoeuvres in the spiny dogfish (squalus acanthias). Journal of Experimental Biology207(13): 2339–2349.
16.
ElvanderJHawkesG (2012) ROVs and AUVs in support of marine renewable technologies. In: Oceans, 2012, pp. 1–6.
17.
FeatherstoneR (2014) Rigid Body Dynamics Algorithms. Springer US.
18.
Giorgio-SerchiFArientiACorucciFGiorelliMLaschiC (2017) Hybrid parameter identification of a multi-modal underwater soft robot. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics. DOI: 10.1088/1748-3190/aa5ccc.
19.
Giorgio-SerchiFArientiALaschiC (2016) Underwater soft-bodied pulsed-jet thrusters: actuator modelling and performance profiling. The International Journal of Robotics Research35: 1308–1329.
20.
Giorgio-SerchiFRendaFCalistiMLaschiC (2015) Thrust depletion at high pulsation frequencies in underactuated, soft-bodied, pulsed-jet vehicles. In: OCEANS 2015, Genova, pp. 1–6.
21.
Giorgio-SerchiFWeymouthGD (2016a) Drag cancellation by added-mass pumping. Journal of Fluid Mechanics798: R3.
22.
Giorgio-SerchiFWeymouthGD (2016b) Underwater soft robotics, the benefit of body-shape variations in aquatic propulsion. Biosystems and Biorobotics17: 37–46.
23.
HoverFSEusticeRMKimAEnglotBJohannssonHKaessMLeonardJJ (2012) Advanced perception, navigation and planning for autonomous in-water ship hull inspection. The International Journal of Robotics Research31(12): 1445–1464.
24.
JohnsonWSodenPDTruemanER (1972) A study in jet propulsion: An analysis of the motion of the squid, Loligo vulgaris. Journal of Experimental Biology56(1): 155–165.
25.
KaramchetiK (1966) Principles of ideal-fluid aerodynamics. Krieger.
26.
KriegMMohseniK (2015) Pressure and work analysis of unsteady, deformable, axisymmetric, jet producing cavity bodies. Journal of Fluid Mechanics769: 337–368.
27.
KriegMSledgeIMohseniK (2015) Design considerations for an underwater soft-robot inspired from marine invertebrates. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics10(6): 065004.
28.
LichtSPolidoroVFloresMHoverFTriantafyllouM (2004) Design and projected performance of a flapping foil auv. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering29(3): 786–794.
29.
LighthillMJ (1970) Aquatic animal propulsion of high hydromechanical efficiency. Journal of Fluid Mechanics44: 265–301.
30.
LinnJLangHTuganovA (2013) Geometrically exact Cosserat rods with Kelvin–Voigt type viscous damping. Mechanical Sciences4(1): 79–96.
31.
LuhJYSWalkerMWPaulRPC (1980) On-line computational scheme for mechanical manipulator. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Dynamical Systems102: 69–76.
32.
MaertensAPTriantafyllouMYueDKP (2015) Efficiency of fish propulsion. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics10: 046013.
33.
MarcheseADOnal CagdasDRusD (2014) Autonomous soft robotic fish capable of escape maneuvers using fluidic elastomer actuators. Soft Robotics1(1): 75–673.
34.
MortlALawitzkyMKucukyilmazASezginMBasdoganCHircheS (2012) The role of roles: Physical cooperation between humans and robots. The International Journal of Robotics Research31(13): 1656–1674.
35.
MurrayRLiZSastrySSastryS (1994) A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation. London: Taylor & Francis.
36.
PoincaréH (1901) Sur une forme nouvelle des equations de la mecanique. Compte Rendu de l’Academie des Sciences de Paris132: 369–371.
37.
ReissnerE (1990) Special issue: Frontiers in computational mechanics on a one-dimensional theory of finite bending and stretching of elastic plates. Computers and Structures35(4): 417–423.
38.
RendaFGiorelliMCalistiMCianchettiMLaschiC (2014) Dynamic model of a multibending soft robot arm driven by cables. IEEE Transactions on Robotics30(5): 1109–1122.
39.
RendaFGiorgio-SerchiFBoyerFLaschiC (2015a) Locomotion and elastodynamics model of an underwater shell-like soft robot. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 1158–1165.
40.
RendaFGiorgio-SerchiFBoyerFLaschiC (2015b) Modelling cephalopod-inspired pulsed-jet locomotion for underwater soft robots. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics10(5): 055005.
41.
RendaFGiorgio-SerchiFBoyerFLaschiC (2015c) Structural dynamics of a pulsed-jet propulsion system for underwater soft robots. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems12(6): 60143.
42.
RendaFGiorgio-SerchiFBoyerFLaschiCDiasJSeneviratneL (2018) A multi-soft-body dynamic model for underwater soft robots. In: Robotics Research. Cham: Springer, pp. 143–160.
43.
SaimekSLiP (2001) Motion planning and control of a swimming machine. In: Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference, vol. 1, pp. 125–130.
44.
SeligJ (2007) Geometric Fundamentals of Robotics (Monographs in Computer Science). New York: Springer.
45.
SfakiotakisMKazakidiAChatzidakiAEvdaimonTTsakirisD (2014) Multi-arm robotic swimming with octopus-inspired compliant web. In: 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2014), pp. 302–308.
46.
SimoJ (1985) A finite strain beam formulation. the three-dimensional dynamic problem. Part I. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering49(1): 55–70.
47.
SimoJCFoxDD (1989) On stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part I: Formulation and optimal parametrization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanical Engineering72(3): 267–304.
48.
VaganayJGurfinkelLElkinsMJankinsDShurnK (2009) Hovering autonomous underwater vehicle-system design improvements and performance evaluation results. In: International Symposium on Unmanned Untethered Submarine Technology.
49.
VasilescuIDetweilerCDoniecM, et al. (2010) AMOUR V: A hovering energy efficient underwater robot capable of dynamic payloads. The International Journal of Robotics Research29(5): 547–570.
50.
WangLIidaF (2015) Deformation in soft-matter robotics: A categorization and quantitative characterization. IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine22(3): 125–139.
51.
WoodmanRWinfieldAHarperCFraserM (2012) Building safer robots: Safety driven control. The International Journal of Robotics Research31(13): 1603–1626.
52.
YuJDingRYangQTanMWangWZhangJ (2012) On a bio-inspired amphibious robot capable of multimodal motion. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics17(5): 847–856.
