This study explores the relationship between DJs’ behaviors, audience positive affect, and perceptions of music and the performer at live electronic dance music (EDM) events. Despite the DJ's central role in creating event atmosphere, little empirical research exists on how their actions impact audience experience. A field study was conducted in various EDM clubs in Belgium, recording DJ performances and collecting real-time audience feedback. Analyzed behaviors included dancing, grooving, eye contact, smiling, moving from the console, and console use. Results showed that DJs’ physical engagement, especially dancing, increased audience positive affect, while moving away from the console decreased it. However, these behaviors did not significantly influence perceptions of the DJ or music. The study highlights the potential of synchrony-facilitating behaviors to enhance audience's affect. This work provides insights into performer-audience interactions and optimizing emotional experiences at live music events.
AdhaM. M.BudimansyahD.SapriyaS.SundawaD. (2018). Enhancing social cohesion where festival as a media, is it possible?Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 251(1), 213–217. https://doi.org/10.2991/acec-18.2018.50
2.
AizenJ.HuttenlocherD.KleinbergJ.NovakA. (2004). Traffic-based feedback on the web. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(1), 5254–5260. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307539100
3.
BamfordJ. S.BurgerB.ToiviainenP. (2023). Turning heads on the dance floor: Synchrony and social interaction using a silent disco paradigm. Music & Science, 6(1), 20592043231155416. https://doi.org/10.1177/20592043231155416
4.
BradleyM. M.LangP. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
5.
BryantG. A. (2020). Rhythm and the body. In DessN. K. (Ed.), A multidisciplinary approach to embodiment (pp. 65–70). Routledge.
6.
ChartrandT. L.BarghJ. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893–910. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893
7.
CheongJ. H.MolaniZ.SadhukhaS.ChangL. J. (2023). Synchronized affect in shared experiences strengthens social connection. Communications Biology, 6(1), 1099. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-05461-2
8.
DeroyO.LonginL.BahramiB. (2024). Co-perceiving: Bringing the social into perception. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 15(5), e1681. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1681
9.
DixonS. (2007). Digital Performance: A History of New Media in Theater, Dance, Performance Art, and Installation. MIT Press.
10.
DjalovskiA.KinreichS.Zagoory-SharonO.FeldmanR. (2021). Social dialogue triggers biobehavioral synchrony of partners’ endocrine response via sex-specific, hormone-specific, attachment-specific mechanisms. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 12421. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91626-0
11.
EhrenreichB. (2007). Dancing in the streets: A history of collective joy. Metropolitan Books.
12.
FelsbergD. T.RheaC. K. (2021). Spontaneous interpersonal synchronization of gait: A systematic review. Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation, 3(1), 100097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100097
13.
FerreiraP. P. (2008). When sound meets movement: Performance in electronic dance music. Leonardo Music Journal, 18(1), 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1162/lmj.2008.18.17
14.
FriardO.GambaM. (2016). BORIS: A free, versatile open-source event-logging software for video/audio coding and live observations. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(11), 1325–1330. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12584
HansenJ.WänkeM. (2009). Liking what’s familiar: The importance of unconscious familiarity in the mere-exposure effect. Social Cognition, 27(2), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.2.161
17.
Harmon-JonesC. K. (2011). Does musical behavior promote affiliation? [Doctoral Dissertation], Texas A&M University.
18.
HatfieldE.BensmanL.ThorntonP. D.RapsonR. L. (2014). New perspectives on emotional contagion: A review of classic and recent research on facial mimicry and contagion. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 8(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v8i2.162
19.
HoveM. J.RisenJ. L. (2009). It’s all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Social Cognition, 27(6), 949–960. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.949
20.
HuttoD. D.MyinE. (2012). Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. MIT Press.
21.
JohnstonL.MilesL.MacraeC. N. (2010). Why are you smiling at me? Social functions of enjoyment and non-enjoyment smiles. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(1), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X412476
22.
JuslinP. N.VästfjällD. (2008). Emotional responses to music: The need to consider underlying mechanisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(5), 559–575. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X08005293
23.
LaunayJ.TarrB.DunbarR. I. (2016). Synchrony as an adaptive mechanism for large-scale human social bonding. Ethology, 122(10), 779–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12528
24.
LinD.ZhuT.WangY. (2024). Emotion contagion and physiological synchrony: The more intimate relationships, the more contagion of positive emotions. Physiology & Behavior, 275(1), 114434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2023.114434
25.
MacCutcheonD.GreasleyA. E.ElliottM. T. (2016). Investigating the value of DJ performance for contemporary music education and sensorimotor synchronisation (SMS) abilities. Dancecult: Journal of Electronic Dance Music Culture, 8(1), 46–72. https://doi.org/10.12801/1947-5403.2016.08.01.03
MoganR.FischerR.BulbuliaJ. A. (2017). To be in synchrony or not? A meta-analysis of synchrony’s effects on behavior, perception, cognition and affect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.03.009
28.
PáezD.RiméB.BasabeN.WlodarczykA.ZumetaL. (2015). Psychosocial effects of perceived emotional synchrony in collective gatherings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(5), 711. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000014
29.
PeaceV.MilesL.JohnstonL. (2006). It doesn’t matter what you wear: The impact of posed and genuine expressions of happiness on product evaluation. Social Cognition, 24(2), 137–168. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2006.24.2.137
30.
RietveldH. C. (2016). Authenticity and liveness in digital DJ performance. In TsioulakisI.Hytönen-NgE. (Eds.), Musicians and their audiences (pp. 139–149). Florence Production Ltd.
31.
SchaapJ.BerghmanM.CalkinsT. (2023). Attractive people make better music? How gender and perceived attractiveness affect the evaluation of electronic dance music artists. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 41(1), 284–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/02762374221118526
32.
SchilbachL.RedcayE. (2024). Synchrony across brains. Annual Review of Psychology, 76(1), 883–911.
33.
SmithR. E.SmollF. L.CummingS. P. (2007). Effects of a motivational climate intervention for coaches on young athletes’ sport performance anxiety. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 29(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.29.1.39
34.
SolbergR. T. (2014). Exploring the club experience: Affective and bodily experiences of electronic dance music. In JakubowskiK.FarrugiaN.FloridouG. A.GagenJ. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of Students of Systematic Musicology (SysMus14)London, UK, 18–20 September 2014, (pp. 1).
35.
SonkeJ.PesataV.Morgan-DanielJ.RodriguezA.Davidson CarrollG.BurchS.AbrahamA.AkramS.MarjaniS.BeldenC.KarimH. (2024). Relationships between arts participation, social cohesion, and wellbeing: An integrative review and conceptual model. medRxiv, 2024-05. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.01.24306077
36.
SunY.GreavesD. A.OrgsG.deC.HamiltonA. F.DayS.WardJ. A. (2023). Using wearable sensors to measure interpersonal synchrony in actors and audience members during a live theatre performance. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 7(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3580781
37.
Tang PoyC.WoolhouseM. H. (2020). The attraction of synchrony: A hip-hop dance study. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(1), 588935. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588935
38.
TarrB.LaunayJ.BensonC.DunbarR. I. (2017). Naltrexone blocks endorphins released when dancing in synchrony. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 3(1), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-017-0067-y
39.
TarrB.LaunayJ.CohenE.DunbarR. (2015). Synchrony and exertion during dance independently raise pain threshold and encourage social bonding. Biology Letters, 11(10), 20150767. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0767
40.
TarrB.LaunayJ.DunbarR. I. (2014). Music and social bonding: “self-other” merging and neurohormonal mechanisms. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1096. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01096
41.
TarrB.LaunayJ.DunbarR. I. (2016). Silent disco: Dancing in synchrony leads to elevated pain thresholds and social closeness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(5), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.02.004
42.
TheorellT. (2014). Psychological health effects of musical experiences: Theories, studies and reflections in music health science. Springer Science & Business.
43.
TheorellT. (2018). How does music translate itself biologically in a public health context? In BondeL. O.TheorellT. (Eds.), Music and public health: A nordic perspective (pp. 71–84), Springer.
44.
TheorellT. (2021). Links between arts and health, examples from quantitative intervention evaluations. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(1), 742032. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.742032
45.
von ZimmermannJ.VicaryS.SperlingM.OrgsG.RichardsonD. C. (2018). The choreography of group affiliation. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(1), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12320
46.
WoodA.RychlowskaM.KorbS.NiedenthalP. (2016). Fashioning the face: Sensorimotor simulation contributes to facial expression recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(3), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.12.010
