Neurovascular 4D-Flow MRI enables non-invasive evaluation of cerebral hemodynamics including measures of cerebral blood flow (CBF), vessel pulsatility index (PI), and cerebral pulse wave velocity (PWV). 4D-Flow measures have been linked to various neurovascular disorders including small vessel disease and Alzheimer’s disease; however, physiological and technical sources of variability are not well established. Here, we characterized sources of diurnal physiological and technical variability in cerebral hemodynamics using 4D-Flow in a retrospective study of cognitively unimpaired older adults (N = 750) and a prospective study of younger adults (N = 10). Younger participants underwent repeated MRI sessions at 7am, 4 pm, and 10 pm. In the older cohort, having an MRI earlier on the day was significantly associated with higher CBF and lower PI. In prospective experiments, time of day significantly explained variability in CBF and PI; however, not in PWV. Test-retest experiments showed high CBF intra-session repeatability (repeatability coefficient (RPC) =7.2%), compared to lower diurnal repeatability (RPC = 40%). PI and PWV displayed similar intra-session and diurnal variability (PI intra-session RPC = 22%, RPC = 24% 7am vs 4 pm; PWV intra-session RPC = 17%, RPC = 21% 7am vs 4 pm). Overall, CBF measures showed low technical variability, supporting diurnal variability is from physiology. PI and PWV showed higher technical variability but less diurnal variability.
ViknerTNybergLHolmgrenM, et al.
Characterizing pulsatility in distal cerebral arteries using 4D flow MRI. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab2019;
40: 2429–2440.
4.
BirnefeldJWåhlinAEklundA, et al.
Cerebral arterial pulsatility is associated with features of small vessel disease in patients with acute stroke and TIA: a 4D flow MRI study. J Neurol2020;
267: 721–730.
5.
BjörnfotCGarpebringAQvarlanderS, et al.
Assessing cerebral arterial pulse wave velocity using 4D flow MRI. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab2021;
41: 2769–2777.
6.
Rivera-RiveraLATurskiPJohnsonKM, et al.
4D flow MRI for intracranial hemodynamics assessment in Alzheimer’s disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab2016;
36: 1718–1730.
7.
Rivera-RiveraLACodyKARutkowskiD, et al.
Intracranial vascular flow oscillations in Alzheimer’s disease from 4D flow MRI. Neuroimage Clin2020;
28: 102379.
8.
SchnellSWuCAnsariSA.Four-dimensional MRI flow examinations in cerebral and extracerebral vessels – ready for clinical routine?Curr Opin Neurol2016;
29: 419–428.
9.
AristovaMValiAAnsariSA, et al.
Standardized evaluation of cerebral arteriovenous malformations using flow distribution network graphs and dual-venc 4D flow MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging2019;
50: 1718–1730.
10.
Rivera-RiveraLACodyKAEisenmengerL, et al.
Assessment of vascular stiffness in the internal carotid artery proximal to the carotid canal in Alzheimer’s disease using pulse wave velocity from low rank reconstructed 4D flow MRI. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab2021;
41: 298–311.
11.
Rivera-RiveraLAEisenmengerLCodyKA, et al.
Cerebrovascular stiffness and flow dynamics in the presence of amyloid and tau biomarkers. Alzheimers Dement (Amst)2021;
13: e12253–e12253.
12.
FicoBGMillerKBRivera-RiveraLA, et al.
Cerebral hemodynamics comparison using transcranial doppler ultrasound and 4D flow MRI. Front Physiol2023;
14: 1198615.
13.
FicoBGMillerKBRivera-RiveraLA, et al.
The impact of aging on the association between aortic stiffness and cerebral pulsatility index. Front Cardiovasc Med2022;
9: 821151.
14.
MillerKBHoweryAJRivera-RiveraLA, et al.
Age-related reductions in cerebrovascular reactivity using 4D flow MRI. Front Aging Neurosci2019;
11: 281–281.
15.
ChenLYangG.Recent advances in circadian rhythms in cardiovascular system. Front Pharmacol2015;
6: 71.
16.
XieLKangHXuQ, et al.
Sleep drives metabolite clearance from the adult brain. Science2013;
342: 373–377.
17.
HablitzLMPláVGiannettoM, et al.
Circadian control of brain glymphatic and lymphatic fluid flow. Nat Commun2020;
11: 4411.
18.
FultzNEBonmassarGSetsompopK, et al.
Coupled electrophysiological, hemodynamic, and cerebrospinal fluid oscillations in human sleep. Science2019;
366: 628–631.
19.
LoEHAlbersGWDichgansM, et al.
Circadian biology and stroke. Stroke2021;
52: 2180–2190.
20.
NedergaardMGoldmanSA.Glymphatic failure as a final common pathway to dementia. Science2020;
370: 50–56.
21.
FodorDMMartaMMPerju-DumbravăL.Implications of circadian rhythm in stroke occurrence: certainties and possibilities. Brain Sci2021;
11: 865.
22.
AbadjievDSToschi-DiasESalinetAS, et al.
Daily rhythm of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in patients after stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab2023;
43: 989–998.
23.
BurmaJSCopelandPMacaulayA, et al.
Comparison of diurnal variation, anatomical location, and biological sex within spontaneous and driven dynamic cerebral autoregulation measures. Physiol Rep2020;
8: e14458.
24.
ShariffiBLloydINCessacME, et al.
Reproducibility and diurnal variation in middle cerebral artery blood velocity in healthy humans. Exp Physiol2023;
108: 692–705.
25.
LabrecqueLBurmaJSRoyM-A, et al.
Reproducibility and diurnal variation of the directional sensitivity of the cerebral pressure-flow relationship in men and women. J Appl Physiol (1985)2022;
132: 154–166.
IsmailiARAVestergaardMBHansenAE, et al.
Components of day-to-day variability of cerebral perfusion measurements – analysis of phase contrast mapping magnetic resonance imaging measurements in healthy volunteers. PLoS One2018;
13: e0197807.
28.
JohnsonSCKoscikRLJonaitisEM, et al.
The Wisconsin registry for Alzheimer’s prevention: a review of findings and current directions. Alzheimers Dement (Amst)2018;
10: 130–142.
29.
RobertsGSPeretAJonaitisEM, et al.
Normative cerebral hemodynamics in middle-aged and older adults using 4D flow MRI: initial analysis of vascular aging. Radiology2023;
307: e222685.
30.
JackCRBennettDABlennowK, Contributorset al.
NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement2018;
14: 535–562.
31.
McKhannGDrachmanDFolsteinM, et al.
Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS‐ADRDA work group* under the auspices of department of health and human services task force on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology1984;
34: 939–944.
32.
McKhannGMKnopmanDSChertkowH, et al.
The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association Workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement2011;
7: 263–269.
33.
AlbertMSDeKoskySTDicksonD, et al.
The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the national institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement2011;
7: 270–279.
34.
SperlingRAAisenPSBeckettLA, et al.
Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association Workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement2011;
7: 280–292.
35.
KoscikRHermannBPAllisonS, et al.
Validity evidence for the research category, “cognitively unimpaired – declining,” as a risk marker for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience2021;
13: 404.
36.
JohnsonKMLumDPTurskiPA, et al.
Improved 3D phase contrast MRI with off-resonance corrected dual echo VIPR. Magn Reson Med2008;
60: 1329–1336.
37.
JohnsonKMMarklM.Improved SNR in phase contrast velocimetry with five-point balanced flow encoding. Magn Reson Med2010;
63: 349–355.
38.
GriswoldMAJakobPMNittkaM, et al.
Partially parallel imaging with localized sensitivities (PILS). Magn Reson Med2000;
44: 602–609.
LoecherMSchraubenEJohnsonKM, et al.
Phase unwrapping in 4D MR flow with a 4D single-step Laplacian algorithm. J Magn Reson Imaging2016;
43: 833–842.
41.
Rivera-RiveraLAKecskemetiSJenM-L, et al.
Motion-corrected 4D-Flow MRI for neurovascular applications. NeuroImage2022;
264: 119711.
42.
SchraubenEWåhlinAAmbarkiK, et al.
Fast 4D flow MRI intracranial segmentation and quantification in tortuous arteries. J Magn Reson Imaging2015;
42: 1458–1464.
43.
RobertsGSHoffmanCARivera-RiveraLA, et al.
Automated hemodynamic assessment for cranial 4D flow MRI. Magn Reson Imaging2023;
97: 46–55.
44.
RoherAEGaramiZTyasSL, et al.
Transcranial doppler ultrasound blood flow velocity and pulsatility index as systemic indicators for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement2011;
7: 445–455.
45.
de RivaNBudohoskiKPSmielewskiP, et al.
Transcranial doppler pulsatility index: what it is and what it isn’t. Neurocrit Care2012;
17: 58–66.
46.
LaurentSCockcroftJVan BortelL, et al.
Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J2006;
27: 2588–2605.
47.
TownsendRRWilkinsonIBSchiffrinEL, et al.
Recommendations for improving and standardizing vascular research on arterial stiffness: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Hypertension2015;
66: 698–722.
48.
Caffeine for the sustainment of mental task performance: formulations for military operations. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Military Nutrition Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US), 2001.
49.
BlandJMAltmanDG.Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res1999;
8: 135–160.
50.
BlandJMAltmanDG.Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet1986;
1: 307–310.
51.
CorrellJMellingerCMcClellandGH, et al.
Avoid Cohen’s ‘small’, ‘medium’, and ‘large’ for power analysis. Trends Cogn Sci2020;
24: 200–207.
52.
CohenJ.Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed.
New York:
Routledge, 1988.
53.
FerdianEMarleviDSchollenbergerJ, et al.
Cerebrovascular super-resolution 4D flow MRI – sequential combination of resolution enhancement by deep learning and physics-informed image processing to non-invasively quantify intracranial velocity, flow, and relative pressure. Med Image Anal2023;
88: 102831.
54.
RutkowskiDRRoldán-AlzateAJohnsonKM.Enhancement of cerebrovascular 4D flow MRI velocity fields using machine learning and computational fluid dynamics simulation data. Sci Rep2021;
11: 10240.
55.
PeperESVan OoijPJungB, et al.
Advances in machine learning applications for cardiovascular 4D flow MRI. Front Cardiovasc Med2022;
9: 1052068.
56.
NilssonCStåhlbergFThomsenC, et al.
Circadian variation in human cerebrospinal fluid production measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Physiol1992;
262: R20–24.
57.
FieldASLaurientiPJYenY-F, et al.
Dietary caffeine consumption and withdrawal: confounding variables in quantitative cerebral perfusion studies?Radiology2003;
227: 129–135.
58.
LieSLHisdalJHøisethLØ.Cerebral blood flow velocity during simultaneous changes in mean arterial pressure and cardiac output in healthy volunteers. Eur J Appl Physiol2021;
121: 2207–2217.
59.
GhorbaniAAhmadiMJShemshakiH.The value of transcranial doppler derived pulsatility index for diagnosing cerebral small-vessel disease. Adv Biomed Res2015;
4: 54.
60.
WilkinsonIBMäki-PetäjäKMMitchellGF.Uses of arterial stiffness in clinical practice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol2020;
40: 1063–1067.
61.
GhoshADharmarajanASwainPK, et al.
Impact of cardiovascular factors on pulse wave velocity and T otal vascular resistance in different age group patients with cardiovascular disorders. Curr Aging Sci2019;
11: 261–268.
62.
TanIButlinMLiuYY, et al.
Heart rate dependence of aortic pulse wave velocity at different arterial pressures in rats. Hypertension2012;
60: 528–533.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
