Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ+) individuals experience discrimination throughout the care continuum, including during serious illness and at end of life. High-quality palliative care requires that health professionals deliver individualized services that reflect the needs, experiences, and preferences of LGBTQ+ persons.
Aim:
To identify and appraise existing evidence related to the needs, experiences, and preferences for palliative and end of life care among LGBTQ+ individuals with serious illness.
Design:
Data-based convergent synthesis design reported per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
Data sources:
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Scopus from January 1, 2010 to November 6, 2020.
Results:
Of 4875 results captured, 69 articles underwent full-text review and 13 were retained for analysis. Most studies were from North America with trans individuals represented in 10 of 13 studies. Needs (n = 6) included increased social support, institutional safety, economic and legal supports, and advocacy to mitigate health barriers.Experiences (n = 12) were driven by fear and worry associated with discrimination/stigma,providers’ hetero-/cisnormative assumptions, homophobia and transphobia, social isolation, and an undignified death. Preferences (n = 6) pertained to inclusion of chosen families in decision-making, disclosure of LGBTQ+ identity based on safety of the clinical environment, and a desire to maintain autonomy.
Conclusions:
The robustness of the science has improved regarding the needs, experiences, and preferences of trans individuals. Actionable, inclusive policies coupled with sustained and integrated cultural sensitivity training for health workers are mandatory. Interventional research is critical to enhance tailored palliative care for LGBTQ+ people and their chosen families.
MendosLR.State-sponsored homophobia 2019: global legislation overview update. Geneva: ILGA World, 2019.
2.
ChiamZDuffySGilMG, et al. Trans legal mapping report 2019: recognition before the law. Geneva: ILGA World, 2020.
3.
SchulerMSPrinceDMCollinsRL.Disparities in social and economic determinants of health by sexual identity, gender, and age: results from the 2015-2018 National Survey on drug use and health. LGBT Health2021; 8: 330–339.
4.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Understanding the well-being of LGBTQI+ populations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2020.
5.
StinchcombeASmallboneJWilsonK, et al. Healthcare and end-of-life needs of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) older adults: a scoping review. Geriatrics2017; 2: 13.
6.
Hudson-SharpNMetcalfH.Inequality among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender groups in the UK: a review of evidence. London: National Institute of Economic and Social Research, 2016.
7.
CaceresBAStreedCG.Cardiovascular health concerns in sexual and gender minority populations. Nat Rev Cardiol2021; 18: 227–228.
8.
RosatiFWilliamsDPJusterR-P, et al. The cardiovascular conundrum in ethnic and sexual minorities: a potential biomarker of constant coping with discrimination. Front Neurosci2021; 15: 619171.
9.
SaundersCLMeadsCAbelGA, et al. Associations between sexual orientation and overall and site-specific diagnosis of cancer: evidence from two national patient surveys in England. J Clin Oncol2017; 35: 3654–3661.
10.
QuinnGPSanchezJASuttonSK, et al. Cancer and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender/transsexual, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ) populations. CA Cancer J Clin2015; 65: 384–400.
11.
FlentjeAHeckNCBrennanJM, et al. The relationship between minority stress and biological outcomes: a systematic review. J Behav Med2020; 43: 673–694.
12.
GiustiANkhomaKPetrusR, et al. The empirical evidence underpinning the concept and practice of person-centred care for serious illness: a systematic review. BMJ Glob Health2020; 5: e003330.
13.
SprikPGentileD.Cultural humility: a way to reduce LGBTQ health disparities at the end of life. Am J Hosp Palliat Med2020; 37: 404–408.
14.
GrieblingTL.Sexuality and aging: a focus on lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) needs in palliative and end of life care. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care2016; 10: 95–101.
15.
ValentiKGJenSParajuliJ, et al. Experiences of palliative and end-of-life care among older LGBTQ women: a review of current literature. J Palliat Med2020; 23: 1532–1539.
16.
KnealeDHenleyJThomasJ, et al. Inequalities in older LGBT people’s health and care needs in the United Kingdom: a systematic scoping review. Ageing Soc2021; 41: 493–515.
17.
KcomtLGoreyKM.End-of-life preparations among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people: integrative review of prevalent behaviors. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care2017; 13: 284–301.
18.
LisyKPetersMDJSchofieldP, et al. Experiences and unmet needs of lesbian, gay, and bisexual people with cancer care: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. Psychooncology2018; 27: 1480–1489.
19.
HardingREpiphaniouEChidgey-ClarkJ.Needs, experiences, and preferences of sexual minorities for end-of-life care and palliative care: a systematic review. J Palliat Med2012; 15: 602–611.
20.
MeadsCHuntRMartinA, et al. A systematic review of sexual minority women’s experiences of health care in the UK. Int J Environ Res Public Health2019; 16: 3032.
21.
PhillipsC.How covid-19 has exacerbated LGBTQ+ health inequalities. BMJ2021; 372: m4828.
22.
RuprechtMMWangXJohnsonAK, et al. Evidence of social and structural COVID-19 disparities by sexual orientation, gender identity, and Race/ethnicity in an urban environment. J Urban Health2021; 98: 27–40.
23.
BuspavanichPLechSLermerE, et al. Well-being during COVID-19 pandemic: a comparison of individuals with minoritized sexual and gender identities and cis-heterosexual individuals. PLoS One2021; 16: e0252356.
24.
CloyesKGHullWDavisA.Palliative and end-of-life care for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) cancer patients and their caregivers. Semin Oncol Nurs2018; 34: 60–71.
25.
HavilandKBurrows WaltersCNewmanS.Barriers to palliative care in sexual and gender minority patients with cancer: a scoping review of the literature. Health Soc Care Community2021; 29: 305–318.
26.
HongQNPluyePBujoldM, et al. Convergent and sequential synthesis designs: implications for conducting and reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence. Syst Rev2017; 6: 61.
27.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al. Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. J Clin Epidemiol2021; 134: 103–112.
28.
HigginsJPEldridgeSLiT.Including variants on randomized trials. In: HigginsJPTThomasJChandlerJ, et al. Oxford, United Kingdom. (eds) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of interventions 2nd edition. Cochrane, 2019; 569-594.
29.
McGowanJSampsonMSalzwedelDM, et al. CADTH methods and guidelines: PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline explanation and elaboration. Ottawa, ON: CADTH, 2016.
30.
Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence systematic review software. Melbourne: Veritas Health Innovation2022.
KelleyASCovinskyKEGorgesRJ, et al. Identifying older adults with serious illness: a critical step toward improving the value of health care. Health Serv Res2017; 52: 113–131.
33.
AtkinsonTMAndreottiCFRobertsKE, et al. The level of association between functional performance status measures and patient-reported outcomes in cancer patients: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer2015; 23: 3645–3652.
34.
RobertsKEWalshLESaracinoRM, et al. A systematic review of treatment options for grieving older adults. Curr Treat Options Psychiatry2019; 6: 422–449.
35.
SingerJRobertsKEMcLeanE, et al. An examination and proposed definitions of family members’ grief prior to the death of individuals with a life-limiting illness: a systematic review. Palliat Med2022; 36: 581–608.
36.
DownsSHBlackN.The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health1998; 52: 377–384.
37.
BergerR.Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qual Res2015; 15: 219–234.
38.
BeringerRGutmanGde VriesB.Developing a web-based platform to foster end-of-life planning among LGBT older adults. Gerotechnology2017; 16: 48–55.
39.
CatalanJRidgeDCheshireA, et al. The changing narratives of Death, dying, and HIV in the United Kingdom. Qual Health Res2020; 30: 1561–1571.
40.
HuntJBristoweKChidyamatareS, et al. ‘So isolation comes in, discrimination and you find many people dying quietly without any family support’: accessing palliative care for key populations - an in-depth qualitative study. Palliat Med2019; 33: 685–692.
41.
de VriesBGutmanGHumble, et al. End-of-life preparations among LGBT older Canadian adults: the missing conversations. Int J Aging Hum Dev2019; 88: 358–379.
42.
Kortes-MillerKBouléJWilsonK, et al. Dying in long-term care: perspectives from sexual and gender minority older adults about their fears and hopes for end of life. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care2018; 14: 209–224.
43.
PangCGutmanGde VriesB.Later life care planning and concerns of transgender older adults in Canada. Int J Aging Hum Dev2019; 89: 39–56.
44.
de VriesBGutmanGSoheilipourS, et al. Advance care planning among older LGBT Canadians: heteronormative influences. Sexualities2022; 25: 79–98.
45.
AlexanderCSRaveisVHKarusD, et al. Early use of the palliative approach to improve patient outcomes in HIV disease: insights and findings from the care and support access (CASA) Study 2013-2019. Am J Hosp Palliat Care2021; 38: 332–339.
46.
SeelmanKLLewinsonTEnglemanL, et al. Coping strategies used by LGB older adults in facing and anticipating health challenges: a narrative analysis. J Gay Lesbian Soc Serv2017; 29: 300–318.
47.
WalkerRVPowersSMWittenTM.Impact of anticipated bias from healthcare professionals on perceived successful aging among transgender and gender nonconforming older adults. LGBT Health2017; 4: 427–433.
48.
WittenTM.End of life, chronic illness, and trans-identities. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care2014; 10: 34–58.
49.
WittenTM.Aging and transgender bisexuals: exploring the intersection of age, bisexual sexual identity, and transgender identity. J Bisex2016; 16: 58–80.
50.
BristoweKHodsonMWeeB, et al. Recommendations to reduce inequalities for LGBT people facing advanced illness: ACCESSCare national qualitative interview study. Palliat Med2018; 32: 23–35.
51.
BristoweKMarshallSHardingR.The bereavement experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual and/or trans* people who have lost a partner: A systematic review, thematic synthesis and modelling of the literature. Palliat Med2016; 30: 730–744.
52.
SteinGLBerkmanCO’MahonyS, et al. Experiences of lesbian, Gay, bisexual, and transgender patients and families in hospice and palliative care: perspectives of the Palliative Care Team. J Palliat Med2020; 23: 817–824.
53.
RosaWEBanerjeeSCMaingiS.Family caregiver inclusion is not a level playing field: toward equity for the chosen families of sexual and gender minority patients. Palliat Care Soc Pract2022; 16: 26323524221092459.
54.
LintottLBeringerRDoA, et al. A rapid review of end-of-life needs in the LGBTQ+ community and recommendations for clinicians. Palliat Med2022; 36: 609–624.
55.
DamaskosPAmayaBGordonR, et al. Intersectionality and the LGBT cancer patient. Semin Oncol Nurs2018; 34: 30–36.
56.
WestwoodSWillisPFishJ, et al. Older LGBT+ health inequalities in the UK: setting a research agenda. J Epidemiol Community Health2020; 74: 408–411.
57.
MatthewsAKBreenEKittiteerasackP.Social determinants of LGBT cancer health inequities. Semin Oncol Nurs2018; 34: 12–20.
58.
McDermottENelsonRWeeksH.The politics of LGBT+ health inequality: conclusions from a UK scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021; 18: 826.
59.
BanerjeeSCWaltersCBStaleyJM, et al. Knowledge, beliefs, and communication behavior of Oncology Health-care Providers (HCPs) regarding lesbian, Gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) patient health care. J Health Commun2018; 23: 329–339.
60.
LecompteMDucharmeJBeauchampJ, et al. Inclusive practices toward LGBT older adults in healthcare and social services: A Scoping Review of quantitative and qualitative evidence. Clin Gerontol2021; 44: 210–221.
61.
BrooksHLlewellynCDNadarzynskiT, et al. Sexual orientation disclosure in health care: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract2018; 68: e187–e96.
62.
BakerK.LGBT protections in affordable care act section 1557. Health Affairs Blog. 2016.
63.
GonzalesGGavulicKA.The Equality Act is needed to advance health equity for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender populations. Am J Public Health2020; 110: 801–802.
64.
MAP. Why we all need the equality act now. Boulder, CO: Movement Advancement Project, 2021.
65.
Equality Act2010 Ch. 15. UK2010. The National Archives on behalf of HM Government.
66.
CommissionJ.Advancing effective communication, cultural competence, and patient- and family centered care for the lesbian, Gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) community: a field guide. Oak Brook, IL: The Joint Commission, 2011.
67.
CQC. A different ending: addressing inequalities in end of life care - lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender people. Newcastle upon Tyne: Care Quality Commission, 2016.
68.
BosseJDJackmanKBHughesTL.NINR funding dedicated to sexual and gender minority health: 1987-2018. Nurs Outlook2020; 68: 293–300.
69.
SmithSDRowanNLArmsTE, et al. An interdisciplinary approach to enhancing health knowledge and cultural awareness with LGBT older adults. Educ Gerontol2021; 47: 79–85.
70.
TollemacheNShrewsburyDLlewellynC.Que(e)rying undergraduate medical curricula: a cross-sectional online survey of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer content inclusion in UK undergraduate medical education. BMC Med Educ2021; 21(1): 12.
71.
McCannEBrownM.The inclusion of LGBT+ health issues within undergraduate healthcare education and professional training programmes: A systematic review. Nurse Educ Today2018; 64: 204–214.
72.
JurčekADownesCKeoghB, et al. Educating health and social care practitioners on the experiences and needs of older LGBT+ adults: findings from a systematic review. J Nurs Manag2021; 29: 43–57.
73.
LindsaySRezaiMKolneK, et al. Outcomes of gender-sensitivity educational interventions for healthcare providers: A systematic review. Health Educ J2019; 78: 958–976.
74.
ArthurSJamiesonACrossH, et al. Medical students’ awareness of health issues, attitudes, and confidence about caring for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender patients: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Med Educ2021; 21(1): 56.
75.
NowaskieDZPatelAUFangRC.A multicenter, multidisciplinary evaluation of 1701 healthcare professional students’ LGBT cultural competency: comparisons between dental, medical, occupational therapy, pharmacy, physical therapy, physician assistant, and social work students. PLoS One2020; 15: e0237670.
76.
CaceresBATraversJPrimianoJE, et al. Provider and LGBT individuals’ perspectives on LGBT issues in long-term care: a systematic review. Gerontologist2020; 60: e169–e83.
77.
MaingiSBagabagAEO’MahonyS.Current best practices for sexual and gender minorities in hospice and palliative care settings. J Pain Symptom Manag2018; 55: 1420–1427.
78.
MaingiSRadixACandrianC, et al. Improving the hospice and palliative care experiences of LGBTQ patients and their caregivers. Prim Care2021; 48: 339–349.
79.
ShepherdBFBrochuPMStriplingAM.Hidden grief is complicated: identity concealment as a minority stressor and relational-cultural barrier among bereaved sexual and gender minoritized elders. Psychol Sex2021; 1–18.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
