Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate the effects of surgical versus non-operative treatment on the physical function and safety of patients with lumbar disc herniation.

Data sources:

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, EBSCO, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database were searched from initiation to 15 May 2017.

Methods:

Randomized controlled trials that evaluated surgical versus non-operative treatment for patients with lumbar disc herniation were selected. The primary outcomes were pain and side-effects. Secondary outcomes were function and health-related quality of life. A random effects model was used to calculate the pooled mean difference with 95% confidence interval.

Results:

A total of 19 articles that involved 2272 participants met the inclusion criteria. Compared with non-operative treatment, surgical treatment was more effective in lowering pain (short term: mean difference = −0.94, 95% confidence interval = −1.87 to −0.00; midterm: mean difference = −1.59, 95% confidence interval = −2.24 to −9.94), improving function (midterm: mean difference = −7.84, 95% confidence interval = −14.00 to −1.68; long term: mean difference = −12.21, 95% confidence interval = −23.90 to −0.52) and quality of life. The 36-item Short-Form Health Survey for physical functions (short term: mean difference = 6.25, 95% confidence interval = 0.43 to 12.08) and bodily pain (short term: mean difference = 5.42, 95% confidence interval = 0.40 to 10.45) was also utilized. No significant difference was observed in adverse events (mean difference = 0.82, 95% confidence interval = 0.28 to 2.38).

Conclusion:

Low-quality evidence suggested that surgical treatment is more effective than non-operative treatment in improving physical functions; no significant difference was observed in adverse events. No firm recommendation can be made due to instability of the summarized data.

Keywords

Surgical treatment non-operative treatment lumbar disc herniation systematic review meta-analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Koes

van Tulder

Peul

. Diagnosis and treatment of sciatica. BMJ 2007; 334: 1313–1317.

Pinto

Maher

Ferreira

et al . Drugs for relief of pain in patients with sciatica: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2012; 344: e497.

Gugliotta

da Costa

Dabis

et al . Surgical versus conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e012938.

Konstantinou

Dunn

. Sciatica: review of epidemiological studies and prevalence estimates. Spine 2008; 33: 2464–2472.

van den Hout

Peul

Koes

et al . Prolonged conservative care versus early surgery in patients with sciatica from lumbar disc herniation: cost utility analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2008; 336: 1351–1354.

Kamper

Ostelo

Rubinstein

et al . Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 2014; 23: 1021–1043.

Latka

Miekisiak

Jarmuzek

et al . Treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy. Clinical practice guidelines endorsed by The Polish Society of Spinal Surgery. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2016; 50: 101–108.

Chiu

Chuang

Chang

et al . The probability of spontaneous regression of lumbar herniated disc: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2015; 29: 184–195.

el Barzouhi

Vleggeert-Lankamp

Lycklama

Nijeholt

et al . Magnetic resonance imaging in follow-up assessment of sciatica. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 999–1007.

10.

Reiman

Sylvain

Loudon

et al . Return to sport after open and microdiscectomy surgery versus conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2016; 50: 221–230.

11.

Jacobs

van Tulder

Arts

et al . Surgery versus conservative management of sciatica due to a lumbar herniated disc: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 2011; 20: 513–522.

12.

Gibson

Waddell

. Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse: updated Cochrane Review. Spine 2007; 32: 1735–1747.

13.

Hahne

Ford

McMeeken

. Conservative management of lumbar disc herniation with associated radiculopathy: a systematic review. Spine 2010; 35: 488–504.

14.

Higgins

Altman

Gøtzsche

et al . The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011; 343: d5928.

15.

Higgins

Thompson

Deeks

et al . Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327: 557–560.

16.

Liu

Cheng

et al . Comparison on treatment of lumber disc hemiation between ozone ablation combined with the radio frequency thermocoagulation and non-surgery. China Med Herald 2012; 9: 74–75.

17.

Wang

Mou

Sun

. Clinical curative effect of low temperature plasma radiofrequency nucleoplasty in the treatment of lumbar intervetebral disc herniation. Chin Med Herald 2014; 11: 48–50.

18.

Liang

Wang

. Analysis of curative effect of posterior approach in patients with intervertebral infection after lumbar disc surgery. Chin Med Phar 2015; 6: 176–179.

19.

Yao

. The surgical treatment of elderly lumbar disc with stenosis disease. World Lat Med Inf 2016; 11: 97–100.

20.

Zhang

. The surgical treatment of elderly lumbar disc and spinal canal stenosis disease. J Hebei Med 2014; 3: 367–369.

21.

Chen

. Clinical observation of minimally invasive treatment lumbar disc herniation compared with conservative treatment. Clin Med Res Prac 2016; 1: 42.

22.

. Analysis on operation treatment effect of lumbar disc herniation combined with spondylolisthesis. Chin Med Phar 2014; 8: 183–184.

23.

Chen

. Clinical analysis of comprehensive conservative treatment for lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion. Clin Med Engin 2015; 22: 612–613.

24.

Wang

. Clinical efficacy of lumbar disc herniation 50 cases conservative treatments. Mod Diagn Treat 2015; 6: 1237–1239.

25.

Burton

Tillotson

Cleary

. Single-blind randomised controlled trial of chemonucleolysis and manipulation in the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. Eur Spine J 2000; 9: 202–207.

26.

Peul

van den Hout

Brand

et al . Prolonged conservative care versus early surgery in patients with sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation: two year results of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2008; 336: 1355–1358.

27.

Erginousakis

Filippiadis

Malagari

et al . Comparative prospective randomized study comparing conservative treatment and percutaneous disk decompression for treatment of intervertebral disk herniation. Radiology 2011; 260: 487–493.

28.

Gerszten

Smuck

Rathmell

et al . Plasma disc decompression compared with fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal epidural steroid injections for symptomatic contained lumbar disc herniation: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Neurosurg Spine 2010; 12: 357–371.

29.

Nikoobakht

Yekanineajd

Pakpour

et al . Plasma disc decompression compared to physiotherapy for symptomatic contained lumbar disc herniation: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2016; 50: 24–30.

30.

Osterman

Seitsalo

Karppinen

et al . Effectiveness of microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a randomized controlled trial with 2 years of follow-up. Spine 2006; 31: 2409–2414.

31.

McMorland

Suter

Casha

et al . Manipulation or microdiskectomy for sciatica? A prospective randomized clinical study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2010; 33: 576–584.

32.

Weinstein

Lurie

Tosteson

et al . Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) observational cohort. JAMA 2006; 296: 2451–2459.

33.

Zou

. Compared with conservative treatment versus minimally access surgery for lumbar disk herniation. Jilin J Traditional Chinese Med 2009; 29: 608–609.

34.

Zhang

Zhou

Chu

et al . Prospective and comparative study of nucleoplasty and conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation. Chinese J Spine Spinal Cord 2005; 15: 722–725.

35.

Sabnis

Diwan

. The timing of surgery in lumbar disc prolapse: a systematic review. Indian J Orthop 2014; 48: 127–135.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.32 MB

0.04 MB

0.16 MB

Surgical versus non-operative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Objective:

Data sources:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusion:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material