During the recent years, the question of whether an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem emerges organically or is man-made has been disputed. This paper explores the case of an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in a developing country. We argue that in the context of lagging industrial development and weak institutions, a lead actor needs to step in to aid the emergence of an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. We argue that only a locally embedded actor who has the resource endowment and the legitimacy to do so can assume such a role. By applying social capital theory, we show that deliberate strategies by this lead actor to densify the social network within the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem will assist in establishing trust and future collaboration, which will result in productive entrepreneurship.
AcsZJStamEAudretschDBet al. (2017)
The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Business Economics49(1): 1–10.
2.
AgrawalACockburnI (2003)
The anchor tenant hypothesis: Exploring the role of large, local, R&D-intensive firms in regional innovation systems. International Journal of Industrial Organization21(9): 1227–1253.
AlvedalenJBoschmaR (2017)
A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: Towards a future research agenda. European Planning Studies25(6): 887–903.
5.
AndersonARJackSL (2002)
The articulation of social capital in entrepreneurial networks: A glue or a lubricant?Entrepreneurship & Regional Development14(3): 193–210.
6.
BansalPCorleyK (2011)
The coming of age for qualitative research: Embracing the diversity of qualitative methods. Academy of Management Journal54(2): 233–237.
7.
Belso-MartínezJAMolina-MoralesFXMartínez-CháferL (2015)
Contributions of brokerage roles to firms’ innovation in a confectionery cluster. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management27(9): 1014–1030.
8.
BhaweNZahraSA (2019)
Inducing heterogeneity in local entrepreneurial ecosystems: The role of MNEs. Small Business Economics52(2): 437–454.
9.
BlancoLRuizI (2013)
The impact of crime and insecurity on trust in democracy and institutions. American Economic Review103(3): 284–288.
10.
BonfattiFMonariPD (2006) Digital Ecosystems of small companies in the enlarged Europe. In: eChallenges 2006, pp. 1–8. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
11.
BoschMLedermanDMaloneyWF (2005) Patenting and Research and Development: A Global View (No. 3739).
12.
Bosch M, Mariano and Lederman, Daniel and Maloney, et al. (2005) Patenting and Research and Development: A Global View. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3739. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=822985
13.
BosmaNKelleyD (2019) 2018/2019 global report. Report, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, Chile.
14.
BrownRMasonC (2017)
Looking inside the spiky bits: A critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics49(1): 11–30.
15.
BurtRS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
16.
CavalloAGhezziABaloccoR (2019) Entrepreneurial ecosystem research: Present debates and future directions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 15(4): 1291–1321.
ClarysseBWrightMBruneelJet al. (2014)
Creating value in ecosystems: Crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems. Research Policy43(7): 1164–1176.
ColombelliAPaolucciEUghettoE (2019)
Hierarchical and relational governance and the life cycle of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics52(2): 505–521.
22.
Colombo MG, Battista DG and Lehmann E (2017) The governance of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics 52(2): 419–428.
23.
CopeM (2005) Coding qualitative data. In: HayI (ed) Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography.
Melbourne:
Oxford University Press, pp. 223–233.
24.
DedehayirOMäkinenSJOrttJR (2018)
Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change136: 18–29.
EesleyCEMillerWF (2018)
Impact: Stanford University’s economic impact via innovation and entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship14(2): 130–278.
27.
EisenhardtKMGraebnerME (2007)
Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal50(1): 25–32.
28.
FeldB (2012) Startup Communities: Building an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in Your City.
Hoboken, NJ:
John Wiley & Sons.
29.
FeldmanMZollerTD (2012)
Dealmakers in place: Social capital connections in regional entrepreneurial economies. Regional Studies46(1): 23–37.
30.
Feldman MS (2003) A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Industrial and corporate change 12(4): 727–752.
31.
Galvis-Aponte, Luis Armando, Pérez-Valbuena, et al. (2017) Informalidad laboral y calidad del empleo. In: Galvis-Aponte and Luis Armando (eds) Estudios sociales del Pacífico colombiano. Banco de la Republica de Colombia, pp. 139–190.
GEM (2019) Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2018/2019 Global Report. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, Chile.
34.
GlaserBStraussA (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.
Chicago, IL:
Aldine.
35.
GoswamiKMitchellJRBhagavatulaS (2018)
Accelerator expertise: Understanding the intermediary role of accelerators in the development of the Bangalore entrepreneurial ecosystem. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal12(1): 117–150.
36.
Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360–1380.
37.
GranovetterM (1983)
The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory1(1): 201–233.
38.
Harper-AndersonE (2018)
Intersections of partnership and leadership in entrepreneurial ecosystems: Comparing three US regions. Economic Development Quarterly32(2): 119–134.
39.
HayterCS (2016)
A trajectory of early-stage spinoff success: The role of knowledge intermediaries within an entrepreneurial university ecosystem. Small Business Economics47(3): 633–656.
40.
HerreraFGuerreroMUrbanoD (2018) Entrepreneurship and innovation ecosystem’s drivers: The role of higher education organizations. In: LeitãoJAlvesHKruegerNet al. (eds) Entrepreneurial, Innovative and Sustainable Ecosystems. Applying Quality of Life Research (Best Practices).
Cham:
Springer, pp. 109–128.
41.
ILO (2018) Women and men in the informal economy: A statistical picture. Report, International Labor Office, Ginebra.
42.
IMF (2019) World economic outlook. Report, International Monetary Fund, USA, April.
InkpenACTsangEW (2005)
Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review30(1): 146–165.
45.
Innpulsa (2017) Mapeo e infografía ecosistemas regionales del emprendimiento en Colombia.
Report, Innpulsa Colombia, Colombia.
46.
IsenbergD (2010)
How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review88(6): 1–11.
47.
Isenberg D (2011) The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Presentation at the Institute of International and European Affairs, 1–13.
48.
Isenberg D (2014) What an entrepreneurship ecosystem actually is. Harvard Business Review 5: 1–7.
49.
JonesCHesterlyWSBorgattiSP (1997)
A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. The Academy of Management Review22(4): 911–945.
50.
JungKEunJHLeeSH (2017)
Exploring competing perspectives on government driven entrepreneurial ecosystems: Lessons from Centres for Creative Economy and Innovation (CCEI) of South Korea. European Planning Studies25(5): 827–847.
51.
KhorsheedMSAl-FawzanMAAl-HarganA (2014)
Promoting techno-entrepreneurship through incubation: An overview at BADIR program for technology incubators. Innovation16(2): 238–249.
52.
Kingstone P (2018) The Political Economy of Latin America: Reflections on Neoliberalism and Development After the Commodity Boom. New York: Routledge.
53.
KnokeD (2001) Changing Organization: Business Networks in the New Political Economy.
New York:
Routledge.
54.
McEvilyBPerroneVZaheerA (2003)
Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science14(1): 91–103.
55.
MackEMayerH (2016)
The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Urban Studies53(10): 2118–2133.
56.
MaleckiEJ (1997) Entrepreneurs, networks, and economic development: A review of recent research. In: KatzJA (ed) Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth.
Greenwich, CT:
JAI Press, pp. 57–118.
57.
ManimalaMJWasdaniKP (eds) (2015) Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Perspectives from Emerging Economies.
New Delhi:
Springer.
58.
MansourDMSeditaSRApaR (2018) Dynamics of entrepreneurship in Egypt: Assessing the entrepreneurial ecosystem. In: FaghihNZaliM (eds) Entrepreneurship Ecosystem in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). Contributions to Management Science.
Cham:
Springer, pp. 519–542.
MarsdenPV (1982) Brokerage behaviour in restricted exchange networks. In: MarsdenPVLinN (eds) Social Structure and Network Analysis.
Beverly Hills, CA:
SAGE, pp. 201–218.
61.
MooreJF (1993)
Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review71(3): 75–86.
62.
MotoyamaYKnowltonK (2017)
Examining the connections within the startup ecosystem: A case study of St. Louis. Entrepreneurship Research Journal7(1): 1–32.
63.
MouthónL (2016) Cámara de Comercio de Barranquilla gana premio mundial de emprendimiento. El Heraldo, 19 November, 16.
64.
NahapietJGhoshalS (1998)
Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review23(2): 242–266.
65.
NeumeyerXCorbettAC (2017) Entrepreneurial ecosystems: Weak metaphor or genuine concept? In: KuratkoDFHoskinsonS (eds) The Great Debates in Entrepreneurship.
Bingley:
Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 35–45.
66.
ObschonkanMStuetzerM (2017)
Integrating psychological approaches to entrepreneurship: The Entrepreneurial Personality System (EPS). Small Business Economics49(1): 203–231.
67.
ObstfeldDBorgattiSPDavisJ (2014)
Brokerage as a process: Decoupling third party action from social network structure. Contemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Networks40: 135–159.
68.
Powell AP (2013) Rethinking reforms: how Latin America and the Caribbean can escape suppressed world growth. Report, Inter-American Development Bank. March.
69.
ProvanKGKenisP (2007)
Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory18(2): 229–252.
70.
QuintaneECarnabuciG (2016)
How do brokers broker? Tertius gaudens, tertius iungens, and the temporality of structural holes. Organization Science27(6): 1343–1360.
71.
RaduMRedien-CollotR (2008)
The social representation of entrepreneurs in the French Press: Desirable and feasible models?International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship26(3): 259–298.
72.
RanganS (2000)
The problem of search and deliberation in economic action: When social networks really matter. The Academy of Management Review25(4): 813–828.
73.
RohrbeckRHölzleKGemündenHG (2009)
Opening up for competitive advantage – How Deutsche Telekom creates an open innovation ecosystem. R&D Management39(4): 420–430.
74.
SaxenianA (1994) Regional Networks: Industrial Adaptation in Silicon Valley and Route 128.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
SineWDLeeBH (2009)
Tilting at windmills? The environmental movement and the emergence of the US wind energy sector. Administrative Science Quarterly54(1): 123–155.
77.
SpigelB (2017)
The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice41(1): 49–72.
78.
SpigelB (2019) Envisioning a new research agenda for entrepreneurial ecosystems: Top-down and bottom-up approaches. In: KatzJACorbettAC (eds) Reflections and Extensions on Key Papers of the First Twenty-Five Years of Advances.
Bingley:
Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 127–147.
79.
SpigelBHarrisonR (2018)
Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal12(1): 151–168.
80.
StamE (2015)
Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies23(9): 1759–1769.
81.
StamESpigelB (2017) Entrepreneurial ecosystems. In: BlackburnRDe ClercqDHeinonenJet al. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
London:
SAGE, pp. 407–422.
82.
StartupBlink (2019) Startup Ecosystem Rankings 2019. Available at: https://report.startupblink.com/ (accessed 25 September 2019).
83.
SullivanDMFordCM (2014)
How entrepreneurs use networks to address changing resource requirements during early venture development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice38(3): 551–574.
84.
SwamyRSinghA (2018) Creating a supportive entrepreneurial ecosystem for street vendors: The case of the National Association of Street Vendors of India (NASVI). In: LeitãoJAlvesHKruegerNet al. (eds) Entrepreneurial, Innovative and Sustainable Ecosystems. Applying Quality of Life Research (Best Practices).
Cham:
Springer, pp. 151–172.
85.
Theodoraki C and Messeghem K (2017) Exploring the entrepreneurial ecosystem in the field of entrepreneurial support: a multi-level approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business 31(1): 47–66.
86.
TheodorakiCMesseghemKRiceMP (2018)
A social capital approach to the development of sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: An explorative study. Small Business Economics51(1): 153–170.
87.
ThompsonTAPurdyJMVentrescaMJ (2018)
How entrepreneurial ecosystems take form: Evidence from social impact initiatives in Seattle. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal12(1): 96–116.
88.
TöttermanHStenJ (2005)
Start-ups: Business incubation and social capital. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship23(5): 487–511.
89.
TsaiWGhoshalS (1998)
Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal41(4): 464–476.
90.
TuftEI (1997) Democracy and violence: The Colombian Paradox. Report, Christian Michelsen, Norway.
91.
UzziB (1997)
Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly42: 35–67.
92.
UzziBSpiroJ (2005)
Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology111(2): 447–504.
93.
ValentineG (2005) Tell me about: Using interviews as a research methodology. In: FlowerdewRMartinD (eds) Methods in Human Geography: A Guide for Students Doing a Research Project.
Harlow:
Prentice Hall, pp. 110–126.
94.
WadeeAAPadayacheeA (2017)
Higher education: Catalysts for the development of an entrepreneurial ecosystem, or … are we the weakest link?.Science, Technology and Society22(2): 284–309.
95.
WelterF (2011)
Contextualizing entrepreneurship – Conceptual challenges and ways forward.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice35(1): 165–184.
96.
WilliamsonOE (1979)
Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. The Journal of Law and Economics22(2): 233–261.
YangSKherRLyonsTS (2018)
Where do accelerators fit in the venture creation pipeline? Different values brought by different types of accelerators. Entrepreneurship Research Journal8(4): 1–13.
99.
YinRK (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th ed.
London:
Sage Publications.
