From fiction to reality: Presidential framing in the Ukrainian comedy Servant of the People

Abstract

This study examines presidential framing in the Ukrainian sitcom Servant of the People, which may have helped Ukrainian comedian and political novice Volodymyr Zelenskyy win the presidency in 2019. Building upon research into fictional framing and political satire verite, this study analyzes the roles and character traits of Vasiliy Goloborodko, a fictional Ukrainian president played by Zelenskyy. The findings expand framing theory to include fictional political leaders in sitcoms.

Keywords

Ukraine fictional framing TV show comedy content analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

24 Lifestyle (2019) Servant of the people 3: The dates of the premiere and the plot of the popular series. Available at: https://24tv.ua/lifestyle/ru/sluga_naroda_3_sezon_data_vyhoda_serij_sluga_naroda_3_sjuzhet_seriala_n1098550

Baumgartner

Morris

(2006) ‘The Daily Show’ effect: Candidate evaluations, efficacy, and American youth. American Politics Research 34(3): 341–367.

Borah

(2011) Conceptual issues in framing: A systematic examination of a decade’s literature. Journal of Communication 61: 246–263.

Cacciatore

Scheufele

Iyengar

(2016) The end of framing as we know it . . . and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society 19(1): 7–23.

Conway

(2016) After politics/after television: Veep, digimodernism, and the running gag of government. Studies in American Humor 2(2): 182–207.

Ecchorights (n.d.) Servant of the People. Available at: http://ecchorights.com/series/servant-of-the-people

Entman

(1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43(4): 51–58.

Fund of Democratic Initiatives (2019) Who voted for who. Available at: https://dif.org.ua/article/khto-za-kogo-progolosuvav-demografiya-natsionalnogo-ekzit-polu2019-drugogo-turu-prezidentskikh-viboriv?fbclid=IwAR0izhwfxsZAwy8z0aWQApfExoOhkxl42ByLQ49kjqDPPXvgNiobShE5cq4

Gamson

(1989) News as framing: Comments on Graber. American Behavioral Scientist 33: 157–161.

10.

Gardner

(2014) Petro Poroshenko: Chocolate president. Politico. Available at: https://www.politico.eu/article/petro-poroshenko-chocolate-president/

11.

Granados (2018) Digital video and social media will drive entertainment industry growth in 2019. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/nelsongranados/2018/12/18/digital-video-and-social-media-will-drive-entertainment-industry-growth-in-2019/#2bf646f14661

12.

Holbert

Pillion

Tschida

, et al. (2003) The West Wing as endorsement of the U. S. presidency: Expanding the bounds of priming in political communication. Journal of Communication 53(3): 427–443.

13.

Holbert

Tschida

Dixon

, et al. (2005) The west wing and depictions of the American presidency: Expanding the domains of framing in political communication. Communication Quarterly 53(4): 505–522.

14.

Jacobsen

(2016) How a fictional president is helping Ukrainians rethink their absurd politics. Foreign Policy. Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/12/13/how-a-fictional-president-is-helping-ukrainians-rethink-their-absurd-politics/

15.

Karatnycky

(2019) The world just witnessed the first entirely virtual presidential campaign. Politico. Available at: https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/04/24/ukraine-president-virtual-campaign-226711

16.

Lichter

Baumgartner

Morris

(2015) Politics Is a Joke: How TV Comedians Are Remaking Political Life. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

17.

Manoliu

Bastien

(2018) Does my favourite political television series make me cynical? Canadian Journal of Communication 43(4): 547–566.

18.

Mulligan

Habel

(2011) An experimental test of the effects of fictional framing on attitudes. Social Science Quarterly 92: 79–99.

19.

Mutz

(2004) Leading Horses to Water: Confessions of a Daily Show Junkie. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator 59(1): 31–35.

20.

Mutz

Nir

(2010) Not necessarily the news: Does fictional television influence real-world policy preferences? Mass Communication & Society 13(2): 196–217.

21.

Pavitt

Johnson

(1999) An examination of the coherence of group discussions. Communication Research 26(3): 303–321.

22.

Peifer

(2013) Palin, saturday night live, and framing: Examining the dynamics of political parody. The Communication Review 16: 155–177.

23.

Peifer

(2015) Parody Humor’s process of influence: The roles of sympathy and enjoyment in shaping political perceptions. Mass Communication & Society 19(2): 173–196.

24.

Pifer

(2019) Five key things to know about Ukraine’s presidential election. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2019/04/15/five-key-things-to-know-about-ukraines-presidential-election/

25.

Rudenko (n.d.) IMDb. Available at: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6235122/plotsummary?ref_=tt_ov_pl

26.

Selenski

(2019) I will tell Putin: Crimea is Ukraine. Bild. Available at: https://www.bild.de/politik/international/bild-international/interview-with-ukraine-president-zelensky-i-will-tell-putin-crimea-is-ukraine-62694806.bild.html

27.

Stebnitskiy (2019) The country is not in a situation for a president to ride a bicycle. Available at: https://hromadske.ua/ru/posts/v-strane-ne-ta-situaciya-chtoby-prezident-ezdil-na-velosipede-zamestitel-glavy-ap

28.

Thompson

(2007) Comedy Vérité? The observational documentary meets the televisual sitcom. The Velvet Light Trap 60(1): 63–72.

29.

Transparency International (2018). Corruption Perceptions Index 2018. Available at: https://ti-ukraine.org/en/research/corruption-perceptions-index-2018/

30.

Tsfati

Tukachinsky

Peri

(2009) Exposure to news, political comedy, and entertainment talk shows, concern about security and political mistrust. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 21: 399–423.