This study examines presidential framing in the Ukrainian sitcom Servant of the People, which may have helped Ukrainian comedian and political novice Volodymyr Zelenskyy win the presidency in 2019. Building upon research into fictional framing and political satire verite, this study analyzes the roles and character traits of Vasiliy Goloborodko, a fictional Ukrainian president played by Zelenskyy. The findings expand framing theory to include fictional political leaders in sitcoms.
BaumgartnerJMorrisJ (2006) ‘The Daily Show’ effect: Candidate evaluations, efficacy, and American youth. American Politics Research34(3): 341–367.
3.
BorahP (2011) Conceptual issues in framing: A systematic examination of a decade’s literature. Journal of Communication61: 246–263.
4.
CacciatoreMAScheufeleDAIyengarS (2016) The end of framing as we know it . . . and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society19(1): 7–23.
5.
ConwayJ (2016) After politics/after television: Veep, digimodernism, and the running gag of government. Studies in American Humor2(2): 182–207.
HolbertRLPillionOTschidaDA, et al. (2003) The West Wing as endorsement of the U. S. presidency: Expanding the bounds of priming in political communication. Journal of Communication53(3): 427–443.
13.
HolbertRLTschidaDDixonM, et al. (2005) The west wing and depictions of the American presidency: Expanding the domains of framing in political communication. Communication Quarterly53(4): 505–522.
LichterSRBaumgartnerJCMorrisJS (2015) Politics Is a Joke: How TV Comedians Are Remaking Political Life. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
17.
ManoliuABastienF (2018) Does my favourite political television series make me cynical?Canadian Journal of Communication43(4): 547–566.
18.
MulliganKHabelP (2011) An experimental test of the effects of fictional framing on attitudes. Social Science Quarterly92: 79–99.
19.
MutzD (2004) Leading Horses to Water: Confessions of a Daily Show Junkie. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator59(1): 31–35.
20.
MutzDNirL (2010) Not necessarily the news: Does fictional television influence real-world policy preferences?Mass Communication & Society13(2): 196–217.
21.
PavittCJohnsonK (1999) An examination of the coherence of group discussions. Communication Research26(3): 303–321.
22.
PeiferJT (2013) Palin, saturday night live, and framing: Examining the dynamics of political parody. The Communication Review16: 155–177.
23.
PeiferJT (2015) Parody Humor’s process of influence: The roles of sympathy and enjoyment in shaping political perceptions. Mass Communication & Society19(2): 173–196.
TsfatiYTukachinskyRPeriY (2009) Exposure to news, political comedy, and entertainment talk shows, concern about security and political mistrust. International Journal of Public Opinion Research21: 399–423.
