In a complex information environment, the Ukraine crisis became a litmus test for the German government’s capacity to legitimate its international crisis management in Ukraine and in confrontations with Russia. This study investigates crisis coverage in the pluralized German television system and how it is shaped by trends of infotainment and globalization. It asks how different TV formats framed the Ukraine crisis and challenged or approved governmental crisis policy. Comparing the framing of the Ukraine crisis between March 2014 and December 2015 in German government communication, public service newscast Tagesschau, Russian foreign broadcaster’s newscast Der Fehlende Part (RT Deutsch) and seven infotainment programs (talk shows and satirical shows), the findings reveal essential limitations for the indexing thesis. All TV formats substantially differed in their depiction of the crisis according to their respective format conventions. Whereas public service news mainly reflected governmental frames, the foreign and infotainment formats challenged the legitimacy of German crisis policy.
AdaySLivingstonSHebertM (2005) Embedding the truth: A cross-cultural analysis of objectivity and television coverage of the Iraq war. International Journal of Press/Politics10(1): 3–21.
2.
AltheideDL (2004) Media logic and political communication. Political Communication21(3): 293–296.
3.
AltheideDLSnowRP (1979) Media Logic. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4.
AltheideDLSnowRP (2018) Media Worlds in the Postjournalism Era. London: Routledge.
5.
AspK (2014) News media logic in a New Institutional perspective. Journalism Studies15(3): 256–270.
6.
BalmasMSheaferTWolfsfeldG (2014) Enemies also get their say: Press performance during political crises. International Journal of Communication9: 154–174.
7.
BaumMA (2003) Soft news and political knowledge: Evidence of absence or absence of evidence?Political Communication20(2): 173–190.
8.
BennettWL (1990) Toward a theory of press-state relations. Journal of Communication40(2): 103–125.
9.
BennettWLManheimJB (1993) Taking the public by storm: Information, cuing, and the democratic process in the gulf conflict. Political Communication10(4): 331–351.
10.
BennettWLPfetschB (2018) Rethinking political communication in a time of disrupted public sphere. Journal of Communication68(2): 243–253.
11.
BennettWLLawrenceRGLivingstonS (2006) None dare call it torture: Indexing and the limits of press independence in the Abu Ghraib scandal. Journal of Communication56(3): 467–485.
BorahP (2011) Conceptual issues in framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade’s literature. Journal of Communication61(2): 246–263.
14.
BorchersNS (2011) Do you really think Russia should pay up for that?Javnost – The Public18(4): 89–106.
15.
BrantsK (1998) Who’s afraid of infotainment?European Journal of Communication13(3): 315–335.
16.
ChalabyJK (2016) Television and globalization: The TV content global value chain. Journal of Communication66(1): 35–59.
17.
CookTE (2006) The news media as a political institution: Looking backward and looking forward. Political Communication23(2): 159–171.
18.
CottleS (2009) Global Crisis Reporting: Journalism in the Global Age. New York: Open University Press.
19.
DaehnhardtP (2018) German foreign policy, the Ukraine crisis and the Euro-Atlantic order: Assessing the dynamics of change. German Politics27(4): 516–538.
20.
De VreeseCH (2005) News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journals + Document Design13(1): 51–62.
21.
EntmanRM (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication43(4): 51–58.
22.
EntmanRM (2003) Cascading activation: Contesting the White House’s frame after 9/11. Political Communication20(4): 415–432.
23.
EntmanRMUsherN (2018) Framing in a fractured democracy: Impacts of digital technology on ideology, power and cascading network activation. Journal of Communication68(2): 298–308.
24.
EsserF (2013) Mediatization as a challenge: Media logic versus political logic. In: KriesiH, et al. (eds) Democracy in the Age of Globalization and Mediatization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 155–176.
25.
FenglerS, et al. (2018) The Ukraine conflict and the European media: A comparative study of newspapers in 13 European countries. Journalism. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1177/1464884918774311.
26.
GroshekJ (2008) Coverage of the pre-Iraq war debate as a case study of frame indexing. Media, War & Conflict1(3): 315–338.
27.
HaighMMBruceM (2017) A comparison of the visual and story frames Al Jazeera English and CNN employed during the 2011 Egyptian revolution. International Communication Gazette79(4): 419–433.
JensenKB (2013) Definitive and sensitizing conceptualizations of mediatization. Communication Theory23(3): 203–222.
31.
KampfZLiebesT (2013) Transforming Media Coverage of Violent Conflicts: The New Face of War. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
32.
KrügerU (2016) Mainstream: Warum wir den Medien nicht mehr trauen (Mainstream: Why we don’t trust the media any more). Munich: CH Beck.
33.
LichtensteinDet al. (2019) Framing the Ukraine crisis: A comparison between talk show debates in Russian and German. International Communication Gazette81(1): 66–88.
34.
MaginM (2015) Shades of mediatization: Components of media logic in German and Austrian elite newspapers (1949–2009). International Journal of Press/Politics20(4): 415–437.
35.
McClennenSMaiselR (2014) Is Satire Saving Our Nation? Mockery and American Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
McNairB (2016) Communication and Political Crisis: Media, Politics and Governance in a Globalized Public Sphere. New York: Peter Lang.
MulherinPEIsakhanB (2019) State–media consensus on going to war? Australian newspapers, political elites, and fighting the Islamic State. International Journal of Press/Politics. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1177/1940161219853514.
40.
NitschCLichtensteinD (2019) Satirizing international crises. The depiction of the Ukraine, Greek debt and migration crises in political satire. Studies in Communication Science (SComS)19(1): 85–103.
41.
NordLWOlssonE-K (2013) Frame, set, match! Towards a model of successful crisis rhetoric. Public Relations Inquiry2(1): 79–94.
42.
OjalaMPanttiMKangasJ (2017) Whose war, whose fault? Visual framing of the Ukraine conflict in Western European newspapers. International Journal of Communication11: 474–498.
43.
O’LoughlinJToalG (2019) The Crimea conundrum: Legitimacy and public opinion after annexation. Eurasian Geography and Economics60(1): 6–27.
44.
OrttungRWNelsonE (2018) Russia Today’s strategy and effectiveness on YouTube. Post-Soviet Affairs35(2): 77–92.
45.
OttoLGloggerIBoukesM (2017) The softening of journalistic political communication: A critical review of sensationalism, soft news, infotainment, and tabloidization and a comprehensive framework model. Communication Theory27(2): 136–155.
46.
PasitselskaO (2017) Ukrainian crisis through the lens of Russian media: Construction of ideological discourse. Discourse and Communication11(6): 591–609.
47.
PerseEMLambeJL (2017) Media Effects and Societies. London: Routledge.
48.
PetroNN (eds) (2017) Ukraine in Crisis. London: Routledge.
49.
RomanNWantaWBuniakI (2017) Information wars: Eastern Ukraine military conflict coverage in the Russian, Ukrainian and U.S. newscasts. International Communication Gazette79(4): 357–378.
ScholzF (2016) When journalists and readers diverge: Contestation to Der Spiegel’s framing of the Russia–Ukraine crisis. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics12(2): 249–256.
52.
SchwarzASeegerMWAuerC (2017) Significance and structure of international risk and crisis communication research: Toward an integrative approach. In: SchwarzA, et al. (eds) The Handbook of International Crisis Communication Research. Malden: Wiley & Sons, 1–10.
53.
SeibelW (2015) Arduous learning or new uncertainties? The emergence of German diplomacy in the Ukrainian crisis. Global Policy6(1): 56–72.
54.
StrongJ (2017) Two-level games beyond the United States: International indexing in Britain during the Wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya. Global Society31(2): 293–313.
55.
SuchmanMC (1995) Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review20(3): 571–610.
56.
SzostekJ (2017) The power and limits of Russia’s strategic narrative in Ukraine: The role of linkage. Perspectives on Politics15(2): 379–395.
57.
SzostokPGłuszek-SzafraniecDGuzekD (2016) Media diplomacy and the coverage of the Ukrainian conflict in German, Polish and Russian Magazines. In: PanttiM (ed.) Media and the Ukraine Conflict: Hybrid Media Practices and Narratives of Conflict. New York: Peter Lang, 157–169.
58.
TeltschikHStützleWVollmerA (2014) Wieder Krieg in Europa? Nicht in unserem Namen! (New war in Europe? Not in our names!). Zeit Online, 5 November. Available at: www.zeit.de/politik/2014-12/aufruf-russland-dialog (accessed 21 February 2020).
59.
ThimmCAnastasiadisMEinspänner-PflockJ (2018) Media logic or media logics? An introduction to the field. In: ThimmC, et al. (eds) Media Logic(s) Revisited: Modelling the Interplay between Media Institutions, Media Technology and Societal Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–8.
60.
ThussuDK (2007) News as Entertainment: The Rise of Global Entertainment. London: Sage.
61.
TsvetkovaN (2020) Russian digital diplomacy: A rising cyber soft power? In: VelikayaAASimonsG (eds) Russia’s Public Diplomacy: Evolution and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 103–117.
62.
Wahl-JorgensenK (2018) Emotions, Media and Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
63.
WesslerH (2018) Habermas and the Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.
64.
WesslerHSchultzT (2007) Can the mass media deliberate? Insights from print media and political talk shows. In: ButschR (ed.) Media and Public Spheres. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 15–27.
65.
WidholmA (2016) Global online news from a Russian point of view: RT and the Conflict in Ukraine. In: PanttiM (ed.) Media and the Ukraine Crisis: Hybrid Media Practices and Narratives of Conflict. New York: Peter Lang, 7–22.
66.
WolfsfeldGSheaferT (2009) Party systems and oppositional voices in the news media: A study of the contest over political waves in the U.S. and Israel. International Journal of Press/Politics14(2): 146–165.
67.
WrightN (2018) No longer the elephant outside the room: Why the Ukraine crisis reflects a deeper shift towards German leadership of European foreign policy. German Politics27(4): 479–497.
68.
YablokovI (2015) Conspiracy theories as a Russian public diplomacy tool: The case of Russia Today (RT). Politics35(3/4): 301–315.
