Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023-11
Explicating the health-related digital divide: A mediation mechanism between education level and online cancer information seeking frequency among Chinese adults
In China, highly educated adults seek online cancer information more frequently than less educated adults. This health-related digital divide may impede the less-educated from effectively preventing cancer. To explicate the divide, we introduce informational subjective norms (ISN) and information sufficiency threshold (IST) as two socio-psychological mediators between education level and online cancer information seeking (OCIS) frequency. ISN represents one's perceived social pressure about seeking cancer information, while IST manifests individual evaluation of the amount of information needed to prevent cancer. An online survey supported a serial mediation effect of ISN and IST. ISN and IST also independently mediated the relationship between education level and OCIS frequency. Besides, the mediation effect of ISN was stronger than that of IST. The findings suggest that increasing ISN among less educated Chinese adults could facilitate their OCIS and to narrow the health-related digital divide. These implications may also inform other developing countries.
AjzenI (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50(2): 179–211.
2.
AmutaAOChenXMkuuR (2017) The effect of cancer information seeking on perceptions of cancer risks, fatalism, and worry Among a U.S. National sample. American Journal of Health Education48(6): 366–373.
3.
AroraNKHesseBWRimerBK, et al. (2008) Frustrated and confused: The American public rates its cancer-related information-seeking experiences. Journal of General Internal Medicine23(3): 223–228.
4.
BaronRMKennyDA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6), US: American Psychological Association: 1173–1182. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
5.
BhandariDOzakiAKobashiY, et al. (2020) Cancer information seeking and scanning behavior among Nepalese migrants in Japan and its association with preventive behavior. PLOS ONE15(6): e0235275.
ChaeJ (2015) A three-factor cancer-related mental condition model and Its relationship With cancer information Use, cancer information avoidance, and screening intention. Journal of Health Communication20(10): 1133–1142.
8.
ChenDChengCUrpelainenJ (2016) Support for renewable energy in China: A survey experiment with internet users. Journal of Cleaner Production112: 3750–3758.
9.
ChenXChenH (2020) Differences in preventive behaviors of COVID-19 between urban and rural residents: Lessons learned from A cross-sectional study in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health17(12): 4437.
10.
China Internet Network Information Center (2017) The 40th China Statistical Report on Internet Development. Available at:http://www.cac.gov.cn/cnnic40/(accessed 25 December 2020).
11.
China Internet Network Information Center (2018) The 42th China Statistical Report on Internet Development. Available at:http://www.cac.gov.cn/2018-08/20/c_1123296882.htm(accessed 25 December 2020).
12.
China Internet Network Information Center (2019) The 44th China Statistical Report on Internet Development. Available at:http://www.cac.gov.cn/2019-08/30/c_1124938750.htm(accessed 25 December 2020).
DellaertBGCSwaitJAdamowiczWLV, et al. (2018) Individuals’ decisions in the presence of multiple goals. Customer Needs and Solutions5(1): 51–64.
16.
EastinMSCicchirilloVMabryA (2015) Extending the digital divide conversation: Examining the knowledge Gap through Media expectancies. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media59(3): 416–437.
17.
FuchsC (2009) The role of income inequality in a multivariate cross-national analysis of the digital divide. Social Science Computer Review27(1): 41–58.
18.
GriffinRJDunwoodySNeuwirthK (1999) Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. Environmental Research80(2): S230–S245.
19.
GriffinRJDunwoodySYangZJ (2013) Linking risk messages to information seeking and processing. Annals of the International Communication Association36(1): 323–362.
20.
GriffinRJNeuwirthKDunwoodyS, et al. (2004) Information sufficiency and risk communication. Media Psychology6(1): 23–61.
21.
HayesAF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis, Second Edition: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
22.
HongYAZhouZ (2018) A profile of eHealth behaviors in China: Results from a national survey show a Low of usage and significant digital divide. Frontiers in Public Health6:274. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00274.
23.
HongYAZhouZFangY, et al. (2017) The digital divide and health disparities in China: Evidence from a national survey and policy implications. Journal of Medical Internet Research19(9): e317.
24.
HornikRParvantaSMelloS, et al. (2013) Effects of scanning—routine health information exposure—on cancer screening and prevention behaviors in the general population. Journal of Health Communication18(12): 1422–1435.
25.
HovickSRKahlorLLiangM-C (2014) Personal cancer knowledge and information seeking through PRISM: The planned risk information seeking model. Journal of Health Communication19(4): 511–527.
26.
HovickSRLiangM-CKahlorL (2014) Predicting cancer risk knowledge and information seeking: The role of social and cognitive factors. Health Communication29(7): 656–668.
27.
HuangQ (2018) Public trust in local governments and environmental risks in China: The effects of media use, perceived dread, and perceived inequality. Chinese Journal of Communication11(1): 88–104.
28.
HwangYJeongS-H (2016) Information insufficiency and information seeking: An experiment. Science Communication38(6): 679–698.
29.
IshikawaYNishiuchiHHayashiH, et al. (2012) Socioeconomic Status and health communication inequalities in Japan: A nationwide cross-sectional survey. PLOS ONE7(7): e40664.
30.
KellyBHornikRRomantanA, et al. (2010) Cancer information scanning and seeking in the general population. Journal of Health Communication15(7): 734–753.
31.
KimHKNiederdeppeJ (2013) The role of emotional response during an H1N1 influenza pandemic on a college campus. Journal of Public Relations Research25(1): 30–50.
32.
KirkpatrickRZangY (2011) The negative influences of exam-oriented education on Chinese high school students: Backwash from classroom to child. Language Testing in Asia1(3): 36.
33.
KontosEZBennettGGViswanathK (2007) Barriers and facilitators to home computer and internet use among urban novice computer users of low socioeconomic position. Journal of Medical Internet Research9(4): 31.
34.
MatsuyamaRKWilson-GendersonMKuhnL, et al. (2011) Education level, not health literacy, associated with information needs for patients with cancer. Patient Education and Counseling85(3): e229–e236.
35.
MehraBMerkelCBishopAP (2004) The internet for empowerment of minority and marginalized users. New Media & Society6(6): 781–802.
OhYSSongNK (2017) Investigating relationships between health-related problems and online health information seeking. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing35(1): 29–35.
39.
PreacherKJHayesAF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods40(3): 879–891.
40.
RigginsFJDewanS (2005) The digital divide: Current and future research directions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems6(12): 4.
41.
ScheerderAvan DeursenAvan DijkJ (2017) Determinants of internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics34(8): 1607–1624.
42.
SelwynN (2004) Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society6(3): 341–362.
43.
ShimMKellyBHornikR (2006) Cancer information scanning and seeking behavior is associated with knowledge, lifestyle choices, and screening. Journal of Health Communication11(sup001): 157–172.
van DeursenAJvan DijkJA (2014) The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society16(3): 507–526.
46.
van DijkJ (2005) The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. Sage: Thousand Oaks, California. DOI:10.4135/9781452229812.
47.
Van SteeSKYangQ (2018) Online cancer information seeking: Applying and extending the comprehensive model of information seeking. Health Communication33(12): 1583–1592.
48.
ViswanathKEmmonsKM (2009) Health communication and communication inequalities in addressing cancer disparities. In: KohHK (eds) Toward the Elimination of Cancer Disparities: Medical and Health Perspectives. New York, NY: Springer. pp. 277–298. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-89443-0_12.
49.
ViswanathKBreenNMeissnerH, et al. (2006) Cancer knowledge and disparities in the information Age. Journal of Health Communication11(sup001), Taylor & Francis: 1–17. DOI: 10.1080/10810730600637426.
50.
VrintenCvan JaarsveldCHMWallerJ, et al. (2014) The structure and demographic correlates of cancer fear. BMC Cancer14(1): 97.
51.
WangMPViswanathKLamTH, et al. (2013) Social determinants of health information seeking among Chinese adults in Hong Kong. PLOS ONE8(8): e73049.
52.
WeiK-KTeoH-HChanHC, et al. (2011) Conceptualizing and testing a social cognitive model of the digital divide. Information Systems Research22(1): 170–187.
53.
WigfallLTFriedmanDB (2016) Cancer information seeking and cancer-related health outcomes: A scoping review of the health information national trends survey literature. Journal of Health Communication21(9), Taylor & Francis: 989–1005. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1184358.
54.
WongNCH (2012) Interaction of comparative cancer risk and cancer efficacy perceptions on cancer-related information seeking and scanning behaviors. Communication Research Reports29(3): 193–203.
YangZJ (2012) Too scared or Too capable? Why Do college students stay away from the H1N1 vaccine?Risk Analysis32(10): 1703–1716.
57.
YangZJAloeAMFeeleyTH (2014) Risk information seeking and processing model: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication64(1): 20–41.
58.
YangZJRickardLNHarrisonTM, et al. (2014) Applying the risk information seeking and processing model to examine support for climate change mitigation policy. Science Communication36(3): 296–324.
59.
ZhangSSunKZhengR, et al. (2021) Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2015. Journal of the National Cancer Center1(1): 2–11.
60.
ZhaoXMaoQKrepsGL, et al. (2015) Cancer information seekers in China: A preliminary profile. Journal of Health Communication20(5): 616–626.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
