Adopting feminist and intersectional perspectives, this study focused on gendered experiences in financial communication, power dynamics, and social sabotage across lower- versus higher-income couples. Three-wave, dyadic data were collected from 1,093 married couples between 2020 and 2022, covering the period before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Employing a random-intercept, actor-partner interdependence cross-lagged panel model (i.e., RI-APIM-CLPM), this study was among the initial ones to investigate bidirectional, longitudinal associations among financial communication, power dynamics, and social sabotage. Across high- and low-income couples, bidirectional associations emerged between financial communication and social sabotage. Yet it was unexpected that financial communication problems and the experiences of being socially sabotaged seem to have depleted (vs. reinforced) each other for wives in the higher-income group. Unidirectional associations emerged such that financial communication predicted power (im)balance in high-income couples. Unidirectional associations emerged among low-income couples such that power (im)balance predicted financial communication problems and social sabotage. Our findings collectively suggested a spiral of financial communication problems, power inequity, and social sabotage. Our findings also demonstrated that wives in higher- and lower-income couples faced challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic, though these challenges manifested in distinct forms. Thus, we remind practitioners and researchers of the necessity of considering the unique needs of men and women across different income statuses when addressing issues of financial communication problems, inequitable power, and social sabotage.
AllenK. R. (2016). Feminist theory in family studies: History, reflection, and critique. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8(2), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12133
2.
AllenK. R. (2023). Feminist theory, method, and praxis: Toward a critical consciousness for family and close relationship scholars. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(3), 899–936. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211065779
3.
AllenK. R.Jaramillo-SierraA. L. (2015). Feminist theory and research on family relationships: Pluralism and complexity. Sex Roles, 73(3–4), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0527-4
BeckerG. S. (1991). A treatise on the family (Enlarged ed.). Harvard University Press.
6.
BrittS. L.HustonS. J.DurbandD. B. (2010). The determinants of money arguments between spouses. Journal of Financial Therapy, 1(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.4148/jft.v1i1.253
CheungD. S. T.TiwariA.ChanK. L.FongD. Y. T.ChauP. H.YuenF. K. H.TolmanR. M. (2020). Validation of the psychological maltreatment of women inventory for Chinese women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(21), 4614–4639. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517715602
9.
ClarkeM.HeatonM.IsraelsenC.EggettD. (2005). The acquisition of family financial roles and responsibilities. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 33(4), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727x04274117
10.
CoyneS. M.NelsonD. A.CarrollJ. S.SmithN. J.YangC.HolmgrenH. G.JohnsonC. (2017). Relational aggression and marital quality: A five-year longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(3), 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000274
11.
CurranM. A.LiX.BarnettM.KopystynskaO.ChandlerA.LeBaronA. (2021). Finances, depressive symptoms, destructive conflict, and coparenting among lower-income, unmarried couples: A two-wave, cross-lagged analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 35(4), 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000821
12.
DaileyA. L.FreyA. J.WalkerH. M. (2015). Relational aggression in school settings: Definition, development, strategies, and implications. Children & Schools, 37(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/cdv003
DinellaL. M.EvansK.LevinsonJ. A.GagnonS. (2023). Women disproportionately shoulder burdens imposed by the global COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Social Issues, 79(3), 1057–1087.
15.
DuH.ChenA.LiY.MaL.XingQ.NieY. (2021). Perceived income inequality increases status seeking among low social class individuals. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 25(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12455
16.
Few-DemoA. L.AllenK. R. (2020). Gender, feminist, and intersectional perspectives on families: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 326–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12638
17.
GadeS. (2022). The household financial management during the covid pandemic: A comparative analysis. ECS Transactions, 107(1), 7131–7141. https://doi.org/10.1149/10701.7131ecst
18.
HamakerE. L.KuiperR. M.GrasmanR. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889
19.
HillE. J.AllsopD. B.LeBaronA. B.BeanR. A. (2017). How do money, sex, and stress influence marital instability?Journal of Financial Therapy, 8(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.4148/1944-9771.1145
20.
JamesS. L.YorgasonJ. B.HolmesE. K.JohnsonD. R.BusbyD. M. (2022). Is it still possible to collect nationally representative marriage data in the United States? A case study from the CREATE project. Family Relations, 71(4), 1428–1443. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12577
21.
JenkinsN. H.StanleyS. M.BaileyW. C.MarkmanH. J. (2002). You paid how much for that: How to win at money without losing at love. Jossey-Bass.
22.
JewkesR.MorrellR.HearnJ.LundqvistE.BlackbeardD.LindeggerG.QuayleM.SikweyiyaY.GottzénL. (2015). Hegemonic masculinity: Combining theory and practice in gender interventions. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(sup2), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2015.1085094
23.
JohnsonM. D.GalovanA. M.HorneR. M.MinJ.WalperS. (2017). Longitudinal associations between adult children’s relations with parents and intimate partners. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(7), 821–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000329
24.
KlineR. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford.
25.
KlontzB. T.BrittS. L.ArchuletaK. L. (Eds.), (2015). Financial therapy: Theory, research, and practice. Springer.
26.
Knudson-MartinC. (2013). Why power matters: Creating a foundation of mutual support in couple relationships. Family Process, 52(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12011
27.
LeBaronA. B.HolmesE. K.YorgasonJ. B.HillE. J.AllsopD. B. (2019). Feminism and couple finance: Power as a mediator between financial processes and relationship outcomes. Sex Roles, 81(3), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0986-5
28.
LeBaron-BlackA. B.DewJ. P.WilmarthM. J.HolmesE. K.SeridoJ.YorgasonJ. B.JamesS. (2024). Pennies and power: Finances, relational power, and marital outcomes. Family Relations, 73(3), 1686–1705. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12989
29.
LeeT. K.WickramaK. A. S.O'NealC. W. (2021). Modeling longitudinal dyadic processes in family research. Journal of Family Psychology, 35(7), 994–1006. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000862
30.
LiX.CaoH.CurranM. A.FangX.ZhouN. (2020). Traditional gender ideology, work-family conflict, marital quality among Chinese dual-earner couples: A moderated mediation model. Sex Roles, 83(9–10), 622–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01125-1
31.
LiX.JinB.KelleyH. H.CaoH.ZhouN.HolmesE. K.YorgasonJ. (2024). Work-family conflicts and perceived fairness of housework division in dual-earner couples during COVID-19. Sex Roles, 90(1), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01422-5
32.
LiX.WheelerB. E.JamesS. L.LeBaron-BlackA. B.HolmesE. K.YorgasonJ. B. (2024). For richer, for poorer: Financial behaviors, power (im)balance, and relational aggression among different‐gender newlyweds in the U.S. Family Process, 63(1), 176–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12886
33.
MalloryA. B.DharnidharkaP.DeitzS. L.Barros-GomesP.CafferkyB.StithS. M.VanK. (2016). A meta-analysis of cross cultural risk markers for intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 31, 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.08.004
34.
MillerR. B.DyerW. J.DayR. D. (2022). Development and initial validation of the perceived power imbalance scale. Contemporary Family Therapy, 44(3), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-021-09618-1
35.
NicholsonJ. S.DeboeckP. R.HowardW. (2017). Attrition in developmental psychology: A review of modern missing data reporting and practices. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41(1), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025415618275
36.
OkaM.BrownC. C.MillerR. B. (2016). Attachment and relational aggression: Power as a mediating variable. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 44(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2015.1105716
37.
PappL. M. (2018). Topics of marital conflict in the everyday lives of empty nest couples and their implications for conflict resolution. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 17(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2017.1302377
38.
PappL. M.CummingsE. M.Goeke-MoreyM. C. (2009). For Richer, for poorer: Money as a topic of marital conflict in the home. Family Relations, 58(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00537.x
39.
PeetzJ.MeloffZ.RoyleC. (2023). When couples fight about money, what do they fight about?Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(11), 3723–3751. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075231187897
40.
RodriguesM.SilvaR.FrancoM. (2023). COVID-19: Financial stress and well-being in families. Journal of Family Issues, 44(5), 1254–1275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X211057009
41.
RomoL. K. (2015). An examination of how people in romantic relationships use communication to manage financial uncertainty. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 43(3), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2015.1052831
42.
RomoL. K.AbetzJ. S. (2016). Money as relational struggle: Communicatively negotiating cultural discourses in romantic relationships. Communication Studies, 67(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2015.1121158
43.
RossJ. M. (2011). Personality and situational correlates of self-reported reasons for intimate partner violence among women versus men referred for batterers’ intervention. Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 29(5), 711–727. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.1004
44.
SeizM. (2021). Equality in confinement: Nonnormative divisions of labor in Spanish dual-earner families during the COVID-19 lockdown. Feminist Economics, 27(1–2), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2020.1829674
ShehanC. L.LeeG. R. (2001). Roles and power. In TouliatosJ.PerlmutterB. F.StrausM. A. (Eds.), Handbook of family measurement techniques (pp. 209–246). Sage Publications Inc.
47.
SmythC.CullenP.BreckenridgeJ.CortisN.ValentineK. (2021). COVID-19 lockdowns, intimate partner violence and coercive control. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.162
48.
ThomasA. S.OsbourneM.AppelhansB. M.RoismanG. I.Booth-LaForceC.BleilM. E. (2022). Disparities in covid-19–related stressful life events in the United States: Understanding who is most impacted. Health & Social Care in the Community, 30(3), 1199–1211. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13671
49.
UsdanskyF. (2011). The gender-equality paradox: Class and incongruity between work-family attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 3(3), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2011.00094.x
WheelerB. E.KerpelmanJ.YorgasonJ. B. (2019). Economic hardship, financial distress, and marital quality: The role of relational aggression. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 40(4), 658–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-019-09632-4
54.
WrightE. M.BensonM. L. (2010). Relational aggression, intimate partner violence, and gender: An exploratory analysis. Victims & Offenders, 5(4), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2010.509649
55.
WrightV. R.ChauM.ArataniY. (2011). Who are America’s poor children? The official story. National Center for Children in Poverty.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
