Living through the pandemic together: Exploring the associations among couples’ communal orientation,self-disclosure,and thriving

Abstract

The present study tested several pathways detailed in the theory of resilience and relational load (TRRL) in the context of urban couples living together during the COVID-19 pandemic. Fifty cohabitating couples completed a baseline assessment and 7 days of daily diaries. Results indicated that, the more an individual or their partner reported being communally oriented within their relationship at baseline, the greater that individual’s relational thriving each day. Results also revealed that, the more an individual reported being communally oriented, the more they viewed their partner as engaging in self-disclosure each day. Two indirect effects emerged, such that one’s own communal orientation positively predicted their perceptions of their partner’s self-disclosure, which in turn predicted greater individual and relational thriving. These findings and their implications for the TRRL, couples’ communication, and coping with pandemic-related stress are discussed.

Keywords

Communal orientation self-disclosure COVID-19 theory of resilience and relational load couples’ communication dyadic analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Afifi

Granger

Ersig

Tsalikian

Shahnazi

Davis

Harrison

K. M.

Acevedo Callejas

Scranton

(2019). Testing the theory of resilience and relational load (TRRL) in families with type I diabetes. Health Communication, 34(10), 1107–1119. http://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1461585

Afifi

T. D.

Harrison

Zamanzadeh

Acevedo Callejas

(2020a). Testing the theory of resilience and relational load in dual career families: Relationship maintenance as stress management. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 48(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2019.1706097

Afifi

T. D.

Haughton

Parrish

(2021). Relational load: Implications for executive functioning, mental health, and feelings of unity in romantic relationships. Communication Monographs, 88(4), 506–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2021.1896015.

Afifi

T.D.

Merrill

A.F.

Davis

(2016). The theory of resilience and relational load. Personal Relationships, 23(4), 663–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12159

Afifi

T. D.

Zamanzadeh

Harrison

Torrez

D. P.

(2020b). Explaining the impact of differences in voting patterns on resilience and relational load in romantic relationships during the transition to the Trump presidency. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519846566

Brisini

K. S. C.

Solomon

D. H.

Nussbaum

(2018). Transitions in marriage: Types, turbulence, and transition processing activities. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(6), 831–853. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517699283

Brownwell

(2020, October). Divorce rates and COVID-19. National Law Review. https://www.natlawreview.com/article/divorce-rates-and-covid-19.

Dhillon

Denes

Crowley

J. P.

Ponivas

Winkler

K. L.

Bennett

(2020). Does testosterone influence young adult romantic partners’ accommodation during conversations about stressors? Human Communication Research, 46(4), 444–469. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaa008

Diamantopoulos

Sarstedt

Fuchs

Wilczynski

Kaiser

(2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 434–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0300-3

10.

Floyd

Morman

M. T.

(1998). The measurement of affectionate communication. Communication Quarterly, 46(2), 144–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379809370092

11.

Fülöp

Bőthe

Gál

É.

Cachia

J. Y. A.

Demetrovics

Orosz

(2020). A two-study validation of a single-item measure of relationship satisfaction: RAS-1. Current Psychology, 41(4), 2109–2121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00727-y

12.

Goodboy

A. K.

Dillow

M. R.

Knoster

K. C.

Howard

H. A.

(2021). Relational turbulence from the COVID-19 pandemic: Within-subjects mediation by romantic partner interdependence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(6), 1800–1818. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211000135

13.

Green

Fernandez

MacPhail

(2021). The social determinants of health and health outcomes among adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Public Health Nursing, 38(6), 942–952. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12959

14.

Günther-Bel

Vilaregut

Carratala

Torras-Garat

Pérez-Testor

(2020). A Mixed-method study of individual, couple, and parental functioning during the state-regulated COVID-19 lockdown in Spain. Family Process, 59(3), 1060–1079. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12585

15.

Guntzviller

L. M.

Wang

(2019). Mother-adolescent communication in low-income, Latino families during language brokering: Examining the theory of resilience and relational load. Journal of Family Communication, 19(3), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2019.1628764

16.

Harms

P. D.

Brady

Wood

Silard

(2018). Resilience and well-being. In Diener

Oishi

Tay

(Eds.), Handbook of well-being. DEF Publishers. nobascholar.com.

17.

Jones

H. E.

Yoon

D. B.

Theiss

J. A.

Austin

J. T.

Lee

L. E.

(2021). Assessing the effects of COVID-19 on romantic relationships and the coping strategies partners use to manage the stress of a pandemic. Journal of Family Communication, 21(3), 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2021.1927040

18.

Kenny

D. A.

Kashy

D. A.

Cook

W. L.

(2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Press.

19.

Knoster

Howard

H. A.

Goodboy

A. K.

Dillow

M. R.

(2020). Spousal interference and relational turbulence during the COVID-19 pandemic. Communication Research Reports, 37(5), 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2020.1841621

20.

Krendl

A. C.

Perry

B. L.

(2021). The impact of sheltering in place during the COVID-19 pandemic on older adults’ social and mental well-being. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76(2), Article e53–e58. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa110

21.

Laurenceau

J. P.

Barrett

L. F.

Rovine

M. J.

(2005). The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.314

22.

B. M.

Impett

E. A.

Kogan

Webster

G. D.

Cheng

(2013). The personal and interpersonal rewards of communal orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(6), 694–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512466227

23.

Ledermann

Macho

Kenny

D. A.

(2011). Assessing mediation in dyadic data using the actor-partner interdependence model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(4), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.607099

24.

Levenson

R. W.

Carstensen

L. L.

Gottman

J. M.

(1993). Long-term marriage: Age, gender, and satisfaction. Psychology and Aging, 8(2), 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.8.2.301

25.

Samp

J. A.

(2021). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on same-sex couples’ conflict avoidance, relational quality, and mental health. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(6), 1819–1843. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211006199

26.

Luetke

Hensel

Herbenick

Rosenberg

(2020). Romantic relationship conflict due to the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in intimate and sexual behaviors in a nationally representative sample of American adults. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 46(8), 747–762. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2020.1810185

27.

MacKinnon

D. P.

Lockwood

C. M.

Hoffman

J. M.

West

S. G.

Sheets

(2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83

28.

Marini

C. M.

Collins

C. L.

MacDermid Wadsworth

S. M.

(2018). Examining multiple rhythms of military and veteran family life. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 10(3), 516–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12275

29.

Mark

K. P.

Herbenick

Fortenberry

J. D.

Sanders

Reece

(2014). A psychometric comparison of three scales and a single-item measure to assess sexual satisfaction. Journal of Sex Research, 51(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.816261

30.

Marroquín

Vine

Morgan

(2020). Mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: Effects of stay-at-home policies, social distancing behavior, and social resources. Psychiatry Research, 293, 113419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113419.

31.

McAninch

K. G.

Basinger

E. D.

Delaney

A. L.

Wehrman

E. C.

(2022). Integrating relational turbulence theory and the theory of resilience and relational load to investigate the relationships of couples with chronic illness. Communication Quarterly, 71(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2022.2100267.

32.

Merolla

A. J.

Otmar

Hernandez

C. R.

(2021). Day-to-day relational life during the COVID-19 pandemic: Linking mental health, daily relational experiences, and end-of-day outlook. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(8), 2350–2375. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211020137

33.

Miller

L. C.

Berg

J. H.

Archer

R. L.

(1983). Openers: Individuals who elicit intimate self-disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(6), 1234–1244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.6.1234

34.

Ogolsky

B. G.

Monk

J. K.

Rice

T. M.

Theisen

J. C.

Maniotes

C. R.

(2017). Relationship maintenance: A review of research on romantic relationships. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 9(3), 275–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12205

35.

Pietromonaco

P. R.

Overall

N. C.

(2020). Applying relationship science to evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic may impact couples’ relationships. American Psychologist, 76(3). https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000714

36.

Rubinsky

(2019). Extending the theory of resilience and relational load into polyamorous relationships. Interpersona, 13(2), 144–170. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v13i2.364

37.

Sprecher

Hendrick

S. S.

(2004). Self-disclosure in intimate relationships: Associations with individual and relationship characteristics over time. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(6), 857–877. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.6.857.54803.

38.

Stafford

Canary

D. J.

(1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8(2), 217–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407591082004

39.

Theiss

J. A.

Knobloch

L. K.

(2009). An actor-partner interdependence model of irritations in romantic relationships. Communication Research, 36(4), 510–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209333033

40.

Waldron

V. R.

Farnworth

M. J.

(2020). Steeling against midlife adversity: Resilience-promoting practices of long-term romantic pairs. Journal of Family Communication, 20(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2020.1729158

41.

West

T. V.

Kenny

D. A.

(2011). The truth and bias model of judgment. Psychological Review, 118(2), 357–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022936

42.

Wheeless

L. R.

Grotz

(1976). Conceptualization and measurement of reported self-disclosure. Human Communication Research, 2(4), 338–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1976.tb00494.x

43.

Zamanzadeh

Afifi

T. D.

(2019). Prosocial relationship maintenance and resilience/thriving. In Muñiz-Velázquez

J.A.

Pulido

C.M.

(Eds.), The Routledge handbook of positive communication (pp. 60–69). Routledge.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.13 MB