The present study tested several pathways detailed in the theory of resilience and relational load (TRRL) in the context of urban couples living together during the COVID-19 pandemic. Fifty cohabitating couples completed a baseline assessment and 7 days of daily diaries. Results indicated that, the more an individual or their partner reported being communally oriented within their relationship at baseline, the greater that individual’s relational thriving each day. Results also revealed that, the more an individual reported being communally oriented, the more they viewed their partner as engaging in self-disclosure each day. Two indirect effects emerged, such that one’s own communal orientation positively predicted their perceptions of their partner’s self-disclosure, which in turn predicted greater individual and relational thriving. These findings and their implications for the TRRL, couples’ communication, and coping with pandemic-related stress are discussed.
AfifiT.GrangerD.ErsigA.TsalikianE.ShahnaziA.DavisS.HarrisonK. M.Acevedo CallejasM.ScrantonA. (2019). Testing the theory of resilience and relational load (TRRL) in families with type I diabetes. Health Communication, 34(10), 1107–1119. http://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1461585
2.
AfifiT. D.HarrisonK.ZamanzadehN.Acevedo CallejasM. (2020a). Testing the theory of resilience and relational load in dual career families: Relationship maintenance as stress management. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 48(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2019.1706097
3.
AfifiT. D.HaughtonC.ParrishC. (2021). Relational load: Implications for executive functioning, mental health, and feelings of unity in romantic relationships. Communication Monographs, 88(4), 506–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2021.1896015.
4.
AfifiT.D.MerrillA.F.DavisS. (2016). The theory of resilience and relational load. Personal Relationships, 23(4), 663–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12159
5.
AfifiT. D.ZamanzadehN.HarrisonK.TorrezD. P. (2020b). Explaining the impact of differences in voting patterns on resilience and relational load in romantic relationships during the transition to the Trump presidency. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519846566
6.
BrisiniK. S. C.SolomonD. H.NussbaumJ. (2018). Transitions in marriage: Types, turbulence, and transition processing activities. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(6), 831–853. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517699283
DhillonA.DenesA.CrowleyJ. P.PonivasA.WinklerK. L.BennettM. (2020). Does testosterone influence young adult romantic partners’ accommodation during conversations about stressors?Human Communication Research, 46(4), 444–469. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaa008
9.
DiamantopoulosA.SarstedtM.FuchsC.WilczynskiP.KaiserS. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 434–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0300-3
FülöpF.BőtheB.GálÉ.CachiaJ. Y. A.DemetrovicsZ.OroszG. (2020). A two-study validation of a single-item measure of relationship satisfaction: RAS-1. Current Psychology, 41(4), 2109–2121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00727-y
12.
GoodboyA. K.DillowM. R.KnosterK. C.HowardH. A. (2021). Relational turbulence from the COVID-19 pandemic: Within-subjects mediation by romantic partner interdependence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(6), 1800–1818. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211000135
13.
GreenH.FernandezR.MacPhailC. (2021). The social determinants of health and health outcomes among adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Public Health Nursing, 38(6), 942–952. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12959
14.
Günther-BelC.VilaregutA.CarratalaE.Torras-GaratS.Pérez-TestorC. (2020). A Mixed-method study of individual, couple, and parental functioning during the state-regulated COVID-19 lockdown in Spain. Family Process, 59(3), 1060–1079. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12585
15.
GuntzvillerL. M.WangN. (2019). Mother-adolescent communication in low-income, Latino families during language brokering: Examining the theory of resilience and relational load. Journal of Family Communication, 19(3), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2019.1628764
16.
HarmsP. D.BradyL.WoodD.SilardA. (2018). Resilience and well-being. In DienerE.OishiS.TayL. (Eds.), Handbook of well-being. DEF Publishers. nobascholar.com.
17.
JonesH. E.YoonD. B.TheissJ. A.AustinJ. T.LeeL. E. (2021). Assessing the effects of COVID-19 on romantic relationships and the coping strategies partners use to manage the stress of a pandemic. Journal of Family Communication, 21(3), 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2021.1927040
18.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Press.
19.
KnosterK.HowardH. A.GoodboyA. K.DillowM. R. (2020). Spousal interference and relational turbulence during the COVID-19 pandemic. Communication Research Reports, 37(5), 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2020.1841621
20.
KrendlA. C.PerryB. L. (2021). The impact of sheltering in place during the COVID-19 pandemic on older adults’ social and mental well-being. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76(2), Article e53–e58. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa110
21.
LaurenceauJ. P.BarrettL. F.RovineM. J. (2005). The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.314
22.
LeB. M.ImpettE. A.KoganA.WebsterG. D.ChengC. (2013). The personal and interpersonal rewards of communal orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(6), 694–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512466227
23.
LedermannT.MachoS.KennyD. A. (2011). Assessing mediation in dyadic data using the actor-partner interdependence model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(4), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.607099
24.
LevensonR. W.CarstensenL. L.GottmanJ. M. (1993). Long-term marriage: Age, gender, and satisfaction. Psychology and Aging, 8(2), 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.8.2.301
25.
LiY.SampJ. A. (2021). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on same-sex couples’ conflict avoidance, relational quality, and mental health. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(6), 1819–1843. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211006199
26.
LuetkeM.HenselD.HerbenickD.RosenbergM. (2020). Romantic relationship conflict due to the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in intimate and sexual behaviors in a nationally representative sample of American adults. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 46(8), 747–762. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2020.1810185
27.
MacKinnonD. P.LockwoodC. M.HoffmanJ. M.WestS. G.SheetsV. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83
28.
MariniC. M.CollinsC. L.MacDermid WadsworthS. M. (2018). Examining multiple rhythms of military and veteran family life. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 10(3), 516–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12275
29.
MarkK. P.HerbenickD.FortenberryJ. D.SandersS.ReeceM. (2014). A psychometric comparison of three scales and a single-item measure to assess sexual satisfaction. Journal of Sex Research, 51(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.816261
30.
MarroquínB.VineV.MorganR. (2020). Mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: Effects of stay-at-home policies, social distancing behavior, and social resources. Psychiatry Research, 293, 113419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113419.
31.
McAninchK. G.BasingerE. D.DelaneyA. L.WehrmanE. C. (2022). Integrating relational turbulence theory and the theory of resilience and relational load to investigate the relationships of couples with chronic illness. Communication Quarterly, 71(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2022.2100267.
32.
MerollaA. J.OtmarC.HernandezC. R. (2021). Day-to-day relational life during the COVID-19 pandemic: Linking mental health, daily relational experiences, and end-of-day outlook. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(8), 2350–2375. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211020137
33.
MillerL. C.BergJ. H.ArcherR. L. (1983). Openers: Individuals who elicit intimate self-disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(6), 1234–1244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.6.1234
34.
OgolskyB. G.MonkJ. K.RiceT. M.TheisenJ. C.ManiotesC. R. (2017). Relationship maintenance: A review of research on romantic relationships. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 9(3), 275–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12205
35.
PietromonacoP. R.OverallN. C. (2020). Applying relationship science to evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic may impact couples’ relationships. American Psychologist, 76(3). https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000714
36.
RubinskyV. (2019). Extending the theory of resilience and relational load into polyamorous relationships. Interpersona, 13(2), 144–170. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v13i2.364
37.
SprecherS.HendrickS. S. (2004). Self-disclosure in intimate relationships: Associations with individual and relationship characteristics over time. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(6), 857–877. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.6.857.54803.
38.
StaffordL.CanaryD. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8(2), 217–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407591082004
39.
TheissJ. A.KnoblochL. K. (2009). An actor-partner interdependence model of irritations in romantic relationships. Communication Research, 36(4), 510–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209333033
40.
WaldronV. R.FarnworthM. J. (2020). Steeling against midlife adversity: Resilience-promoting practices of long-term romantic pairs. Journal of Family Communication, 20(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2020.1729158
41.
WestT. V.KennyD. A. (2011). The truth and bias model of judgment. Psychological Review, 118(2), 357–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022936
ZamanzadehN.AfifiT. D. (2019). Prosocial relationship maintenance and resilience/thriving. In Muñiz-VelázquezJ.A.PulidoC.M. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of positive communication (pp. 60–69). Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
