Two studies examined perceptions of romantic partners, using the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Concept model to conceptualize narcissism. We examined three types of partner perceptions: partner-enhancement (perceiving one’s partner more positively than oneself), mean-level bias (perceiving one’s partner more positively than the partner’s self-perception), and tracking accuracy (accurately perceiving the relative position of one’s partner within a sample). In Study 1, 252 individuals rated themselves and their partners in two agentic domains (attractiveness/vitality, status/resources) and one communal domain (warmth/trustworthiness). Narcissistic admiration was associated with less partner-enhancement, especially for agentic qualities. Study 2 surveyed 75 romantic couples about their self-perceptions and partner perceptions. Analyses with the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model revealed that narcissistic admiration was associated with less partner-enhancement. Study 2 also used the Truth and Bias model to examine mean-level bias and tracking accuracy. Narcissistic rivalry was associated with less mean-level bias and greater tracking accuracy in the domain of attractiveness/vitality.
BackM. D.KüfnerA. C. P.DufnerM.GerlachT. M.RauthmannJ. F.DenissenJ. J. A. (2013). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(6), 1013–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034431
2.
BoyesA. D.FletcherG. J. O. (2007). Metaperceptions of bias in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 286–306. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.286
3.
BrunellA. B.CampbellW. K. (2011). Narcissism and romantic relationships: Understanding the paradox. In CampbellW. K.MillerJ. D. (Eds.), The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder: Theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and treatments (pp. 344–350). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118093108
4.
BusbyD. M.HolmanT. B.NiehuisS. (2009). The association between partner enhancement and self‐enhancement and relationship quality outcomes. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(3), 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00612.x
5.
CampbellL.OverallN. C.RubinH.LackenbauerS. D. (2013). Inferring a partner’s ideal discrepancies: Accuracy, projection, and the communicative role of interpersonal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033009
CampbellW. K.BossonJ. K.GoheenT. W.LakeyC. E.KernisM. H. (2007). Do narcissists dislike themselves “deep down inside”?Psychological Science, 18(3), 227–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01880.x
8.
CampbellW. K.BrunellA. B.FinkelE. J. (2006). Narcissism, interpersonal self-regulation, and romantic relationships: An agency model approach. In FinkelE. J.VohsK. D. (Eds.), Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes (pp. 57–83). Guilford Press.
9.
CampbellW. K.RudichE. A.SedikidesC. (2002). Narcissism, self-esteem, and the positivity of self-views: Two portraits of self-love. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(3), 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202286007
10.
ChmielewskiM.KuckerS. C. (2020). An MTurk crisis? Shifts in data quality and the impact on study results. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619875149
11.
CzarnaA. Z.ŚmiejaM.WiderM.DufnerM.SedikidesC. (2022). Narcissism and partner-enhancement at different relationship stages. Journal of Research in Personality, 98, 104212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2022.104212
12.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
13.
FletcherG. J. O. (2015). Accuracy and bias of judgments in romantic relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(4), 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415571664
14.
FletcherG. J. O.KerrP. S. G. (2010). Through the eyes of love: Reality and illusion in intimate relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 627–658. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019792
15.
FletcherG. J. O.SimpsonJ. A.ThomasG.GilesL. (1999). Ideals in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.72
16.
FosterJ. D.BrunellA. B. (2018). Narcissism and romantic relationships. In HermannA. D.BrunellA. B.FosterJ. D. (Eds.), The handbook of trait narcissism: Key advances, research methods, and controversies (pp. 317–326). Springer.
17.
FunderD. C. (1999). Personality judgment: A realistic approach to person perception. Academic Press.
18.
IBM Corp (2020). IBM SPSS statistics for windows. IBM Corp. Version 27.0 [Computer software].
19.
IidaM.SeidmanG.ShroutP. E. (2018). Models of interdependent individuals versus dyadic processes in relationship research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(1), 59–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517725407
20.
KennyD. A. (1994). interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. Guilford Press.
21.
KennyD. A.AcitelliL. K. (2001). Accuracy and bias in the perception of the partner in a close relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 439–448. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.439
22.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Press.
23.
MorfC. C.RhodewaltF. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1204_1
24.
MorryM. M.KitoM.DunphyL. (2014). How do I see you? Partner-Enhancement in dating couples. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 46(3), 356–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033167
25.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.GriffinD. W. (1996). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.79
NosekB. A.SimonsohnU.MooreD. A.NelsonL. D.SimmonsJ. P.SallansA.LeBelE. P. (2017). Standard reviewer statement for disclosure of sample, conditions, measures, and exclusions. osf.io/hadz3.
28.
OverallN. C.HammondM. D. (2013). Biased and accurate: Depressive symptoms and daily perceptions within intimate relationships. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(5), 636–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213480188
29.
PaolacciG.ChandlerJ.IpeirotisP. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(5), 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500002205
30.
RohrerJ. M. (2018). Thinking clearly about correlations and causation: Graphical causal models for observational data. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917745629
31.
SeidmanG. (2012). Positive and negative: Partner derogation and enhancement differentially related to relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 19(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01337.x
32.
SeidmanG. (2016). Narcissism, intrinsic and extrinsic romantic ideals, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(8), 1018–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515615693
33.
SeidmanG.RobertsA.Zeigler-HillV. (2019). Narcissism and romantic relationship presentation on social media: The role of motivations and partner attractiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 149(15), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.039
34.
SeidmanG.SchlottB. (2022). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry and reactions to romantic breakup. Personality and Individual Differences, 186(Part B), 111342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111342
35.
SeidmanG.ShroutP. E.Zeigler-HillV. (2020). Untangling the associations that narcissistic admiration and narcissistic rivalry have with agency, communion, and romantic commitment. Journal of Research in Personality, 89, 104022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104022
36.
SternC.WestT. V. (2018). Assessing accuracy in close relationships research: A truth and bias approach. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(1), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517712901
37.
TanchotsrinonP.ManeesriK.CampbellW. K. (2007). Narcissism and romantic attraction: Evidence from a collectivistic culture. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(3), 723–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.08.004
38.
WestT. V.KennyD. A. (2011). The truth and bias model of judgment. Psychological Review, 118(2), 357–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022936
39.
WurstS. N.GerlachT. M.DufnerM.RauthmannJ. F.GroszM. P.KüfnerA. C. P.DenissenJ. J. A.BackM. D. (2017). Narcissism and romantic relationships: The differential impact of narcissistic admiration and rivalry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(2), 280–306. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000113
40.
Zeigler-HillV.SeidmanG.TromblyD. R. C.IshaqJ.ShangoR.RobertsA. (2020). Narcissism and romantic commitment: The role of attitudes toward alternative romantic partners. Self and Identity, 19(4), 473–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2019.1635521
41.
Zeigler-HillV.TromblyD. R. C. (2018). Narcissism and mate value: Is beauty in the eye of the narcissistic beholder?Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.021
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
