We examined accuracy and bias in perceptions of one’s instrumentality to and obstruction of daily partner goal pursuit, and associations of mean-level bias with daily relationship outcomes. Daily reports (N = 2,377) from cohabiting couples (N = 106 couples), using multilevel path models, indicated that perceptions of own instrumentality to and obstruction of partner goals contain tracking accuracy and projection and partners were similar in instrumentality and obstruction. Perceptions of goal instrumentality showed mean-level accuracy, but people underestimated their obstruction of partner goals. Underestimation of obstruction was associated with lower closeness for both perceiver and partner and lower relationship satisfaction for the partner. Overestimation of instrumentality was associated with lower relationship satisfaction for both perceiver and partner and lower closeness for the partner. Our results indicate that maintaining overly positive self-perceptions may be costly for the relationship.
ArriagaX. B.KumashiroM.FinkelE. J.VanderDriftL. E.LuchiesL. B. (2013). Filling the void bolstering attachment security in committed relationships. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(4), 398–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613509287
2.
AustinJ. T.VancouverJ. B. (1996). Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. Psychological Bulletin, 120(3), 338–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.338
3.
BerzinsT. L.LaBudaJ. E.GereJ. (2018). An examination of accuracy and bias in perceptions of a partner's motives for health behaviour regulation. British Journal of Health Psychology, 23(4), 872–887. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12321
CappuzzelloA. C.GereJ. (2018). Can you make my goals easier to achieve? Effects of partner instrumentality on goal pursuit and relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 25(2), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12238
6.
CarlsonE. N.VazireS.FurrR. M. (2011). Meta-insight: Do people really know how others see them?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(4), 831–846. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024297
7.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F. (2013). Goals and emotion. In RobinsonM. D.WatkinsE.Harmon-JonesE. (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 176–194). The Guilford Press.
8.
EmmonsR. A. (1986). Personal strivings: An approach to personality and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(5), 1058–1068. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.5.1058
9.
FinkelE. J. (2017). The all-or-nothing marriage: How the best marriages work: Dutton.
10.
FinkelE. J.CampbellW. K.BrunellA. B.DaltonA. N.ScarbeckS. J.ChartrandT. L. (2006). High-maintenance interaction: Inefficient social coordination impairs self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(3), 456–475. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.456
11.
FinkelE. J.EastwickP. W.ReisH. T. (2015). Best research practice in psychology: Illustrating epistemological and pragmatic considerations with the case of relationship science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(2), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000007
12.
FitzsimonsG. M.FinkelE. J. (2010). Interpersonal influences on self-regulation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(2), 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410364499
FitzsimonsG. M.FishbachA. (2010). Shifting closeness: Interpersonal effects of personal goal progress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018581
15.
FitzsimonsG. M.ShahJ. Y. (2008). How goal instrumentality shapes relationship evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(2), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.2.319
16.
FletcherG. J. (2015). Accuracy and bias of judgments in romantic relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(4), 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415571664
17.
FletcherG. J. O.KerrP. S. G. (2010). Through the eyes of love: Reality and illusion in intimate relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 627–658. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019792
GagnéF. M.LydonJ. E. (2004). Bias and accuracy in close relationships: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_1
GereJ.ImpettE. A. (2018). Shifting priorities: Effects of partners’ goal conflict on goal adjustment processes and relationship quality in developing romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(6), 793–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517698851
22.
GereJ.SchimmackU. (2013). When romantic partners’ goals conflict: Effects on relationship quality and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9314-2
23.
GereJ.SchimmackU.PinkusR. T.LockwoodP. (2011). The effects of romantic partners’ goal congruence on affective well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(6), 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.06.010
24.
GirmeY. U.ManiaciM. R.ReisH. T.McNultyJ. K.CarmichaelC. L.GableS. L.BakerL. R.OverallN. C. (2018). Does support need to be seen? Daily invisible support promotes next day relationship well-being. Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: Journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association, 32(7), 882–893. (Division 43). https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000453
25.
GötzF. M.GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J. (2022). Small effects: The indispensable foundation for a cumulative psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(1), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620984483
26.
GrayJ. S.OzerD. J.RosenthalR. (2017). Goal conflict and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 66, 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.12.003
27.
KennyD. A.AcitelliL. K. (2001). Accuracy and bias in the perception of the partner in a close relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 439–448. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.439
28.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2020). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Publications.
29.
KlineR. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th ed.). The Guilford Press.
30.
KlugH. J. P.MaierG. W. (2015). Linking goal progress and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(1), 37–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9493-0
31.
KurmanJ. (2003). Why is self-enhancement low in certain collectivist cultures? An investigation of two competing explanations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(5), 496–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022103256474
32.
LaBudaJ. E.GereJ. (2021). Perceptions of daily sacrifice motives: Accuracy, bias, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Research in Personality, 90, Article 104045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104045
33.
LaBudaJ. E.GereJ. (2023). A meta-analytic review of accuracy and bias in romantic partner perceptions. Psychological Bulletin, 149(9–10), 580–610. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000405
34.
LaBudaJ. E.KochendorferL. B.GereJ. (2023). Perceptions of partner social control: Accuracy, bias, and daily experience. Psychology and Health, 38(8), 949–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2021.2003798
35.
LaBudaJ. E.KochendorferL. B.GereJ. (2025). Daily perceptions of romantic partner autonomy support and undermining of health behavior. Psychology and Health, 40(7), 1063–1082. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2023.2296584
36.
Lemay JrE. P. (2014). Accuracy and bias in self-perceptions of responsive behavior: Implications for security in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(4), 638–656. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037298
37.
LyubomirskyS.SheldonK. M.SchkadeD. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.111
38.
MorryM. M.KitoM. I. E.OrtizL. (2011). The attraction–similarity model and dating couples: Projection, perceived similarity, and psychological benefits. Personal Relationships, 18(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01293.x
39.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.GriffinD. W. (1996a). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.79
40.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.GriffinD. W. (1996b). The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1155–1180. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1155
OrehekE.ForestA. L. (2016). When people serve as means to goals implications of a motivational account of close relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(2), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415623536
SchulY.VinokurA. D. (2000). Projection in person perception among spouses as a function of the similarity in their shared experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 987–1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672002610008
46.
SimpsonJ. A.IckesW.BlackstoneT. (1995). When the head protects the heart: Empathic accuracy in dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 629–641. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.629
47.
SimpsonJ. A.OriñaM. M.IckesW. (2003). When accuracy hurts, and when it helps: A test of the empathic accuracy model in marital interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 881893. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.881
48.
SnijdersT. A. (2005). Power and sample size in multilevel modeling. Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science, 3(157), 1570.
49.
SpielmannS. S.GereJ.CantarellaI. A.RobersonJ.BrindleyS. L. (2020). Relationship quality and accuracy of detecting a romantic partner's fear of being single. Journal of Research in Personality, 87, Article 103967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103967
50.
TisseraH.LydonJ. E. (2021). Seeing you, seeing me: Links between perceived commitment, metaperceptions, and relationship well‐being. Personal Relationships, 28(3), 521–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12376
51.
TomaA. M.RusuP. P.PodinaI. R. (2023). The role of goal interdependence in couples’ relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(6), 1740–1769. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221128994
52.
VorauerJ. D.QuesnelM. (2013). You don’t really love me, do you? Negative effects of imagine-other perspective-taking on lower self-esteem individuals’ relationship well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(11), 1428–1440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213495282
53.
WestT. V.KennyD. A. (2011). The truth and bias model of judgment. Psychological Review, 118(2), 357–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022936
54.
WilliamsonH. C.BornsteinJ. X.CantuV.CiftciO.FarnishK. A.SchouweilerM. T. (2022). How diverse are the samples used to study intimate relationships? A systematic review. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39(4), 1087–1109. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211053849
55.
ZeeK. S.BolgerN. (2019). Visible and invisible social support: How, why, and when. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(3), 314–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419835214
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
