The COVID-19 pandemic provided an extraordinarily unique opportunity to investigate how sudden, involuntary alterations to social routines influenced not just social relationships, but also parasocial relationships with fictional characters and celebrities. Results from a four-wave panel survey administered during the COVID-19 pandemic (N = 166) revealed that social relationships maintained their stability during social distancing, particularly among participants who increased mediated social engagement with friends and those low in attachment anxiety. Parasocial closeness with media personae increased over time, suggesting that favorite media personae became more meaningful as participants engaged in social distancing. Parasocial closeness increased with greater intensity among participants who increased parasocial engagement, reduced face-to-face social engagement with friends, increased mediated social engagement with friends, and those low in attachment anxiety. Results are discussed in terms of the potential influence of increased mediated social engagement with real-life friends on the parasocial processing of celebrities and fictional characters.
BeckerJ. A. H.JohnsonA. J.CraigE. A.GilchristE. S.HaighM. M.LaneL. T. (2009). Friendships are flexible, not fragile: Turning points in geographically-close and long-distance friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509344310
4.
BondB. J. (2018). Parasocial relationships with media personae: Why they matter and how they differ among heterosexual, lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents. Media Psychology, 21, 457–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1416295
CaughlinJ. P.SharabiL. L. (2013). A communicative interdependence perspective of close relationships: The connections between mediated and unmediated interactions matter. Journal of Communication, 63, 873–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12046
7.
ColeT.LeetsL. (1999). Attachment styles and intimate television viewing: Insecurely forming relationships in a parasocial way. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 495–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407599164005
8.
DerrickJ. L.GabrielS.HugenbergK. (2009). Social surrogacy: How favored television programs provide the experience of belonging. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 352–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.003
9.
DuncanT. E.DuncanS. C.StryckerL. A. (2006). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
EdenJ.VekslerA. E. (2016). Relational maintenance in the digital age: Implicit rules and multiple modalities. Communication Quarterly, 64, 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2015.1103279
11.
EyalK.DaileyR. M. (2012). Examining relational maintenance in parasocial relationships. Mass Communication and Society, 15, 758–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2011.616276
12.
FeeneyJ. A.NollerP. (1992). Attachment style and romantic love: Relationship dissolution. Australian Journal of Psychology, 44, 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049539208260145
13.
FehrB. (1996). Friendship processes. SAGE.
14.
FehrB. (1999). Stability and commitment in friendships. In AdamsJ. M.JonesW. H. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability (pp. 259–280). Kluwer Academic.
15.
HartmannT. (2008). Parasocial interactions and communication with new media characters. In KonijnE. A.UtzS.TanisM.BarnesS. B. (Eds.), Mediated interpersonal communication (pp. 177–199). Routledge.
16.
HartmannT. (2017). Parasocial interaction, parasocial relationships, and well-being. In ReineckeL.OliverM. B. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being (pp. 131–144). Routledge.
17.
HaythornthwaiteC. (2002). Strong, weak, and latent ties and the impact of new media. The Information Society, 18, 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240290108195
18.
HaythornthwaiteC.WellmanB. (1998). Work, friendship, and media use for information exchange in a networked organization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(12), 1101–1114. https://doi.org/10.1002/SICI1097-4571
19.
HazanC.ShaverP. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511
20.
HeathC.LuffP. (1991). Disembodied conduct: Communication through video in a multi-media office environment. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 99–103). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/108844.108859
21.
HortonD.WohlR. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19, 215–229.
22.
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. (2020). COVID-19 projections. University of Washington. https://covid19.healthdata.org
23.
JohnsonA. J.BeckerJ. A. H.CraigE. A.GilchristE. S.HaighM. M. (2009). Changes in friendship commitment: Comparing geographically close and long-distance young-adult friendships. Communication Quarterly, 57, 395–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370903313430
24.
JohnsonA. J.WittenbergE.VillagranM. M.MazurM.VillagranP. (2003). Relational progression as a dialectic: Examining turning points in communication among friends. Communication Monographs, 70, 230–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363775032000167415
25.
KlimmtC.HartmannT.SchrammH. (2006). Parasocial interactions and relationships. In BryantJ.VordererP. (Eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 291–313). Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
KornC. J.NicoteraA. M. (1993). Friend and mate relationship literature, empirical propositions, and methodology. In NicoteraA. M. (Ed.), Interpersonal communication in friend and mate relationships (pp. 13–42). SUNY Press.
27.
LedbetterA. M. (2009). Patterns of media use and multiplexity: Associations with sex, geographic distance and friendship interdependence. New Media & Society, 11, 1187–1208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342057
28.
LedbetterA. M.MeisnerC. (2021). Extending the personal branding affordances typology to parasocial interaction with public figures on social media: Social presence and media multiplexity as mediators. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106610
29.
MadisonT. P.PorterL. V.GreuleA. (2016). Parasocial compensation hypothesis: Predictors of using parasocial relationships to compensate for real-life interactions. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 35, 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236615595232
30.
MallinckrodtB.WeiM. (2005). Attachment, social competencies, social support, and psychological distress. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 358–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.358
31.
Nielsen (2020). Total audience report: Q4 2019 [white paper]. Author.
32.
O’BrienC. (2020, March26). Houseparty, discore, zoom, and Marco polo downloads explode amid coronavirus pandemic. https://venturebeat.com/2020/03/26/
33.
RamirezA.WangZ. (2008). When online meets offline: An expectancy violations theory perspective on modality switching. Journal of Communication, 58, 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00372.x
34.
ReevesB.NassC. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press.
35.
RosaenS. F.DibbleJ. L. (2016). Clarifying the role of attachment and social compensation on parasocial relationships with television characters. Communication Studies, 67, 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2015.1121898
36.
RubinA. M.PerseE. M.PowellR. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12, 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1985.tb00071.x
37.
SchiappaE.AllenM.GreggP. B. (2007). Parasocial relationships and television: A meta-analysis of the effects. In PreissR. W.BurrellN.AllenM.GayleB. M. (Eds.), Mass media effects research: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 301–314). Lawrence Erlbaum.
38.
TaylorS.LandryC. A.PaluszekM. M.FergusT. A.McKayD.AsmundsonG. J. (2020). COVID stress syndrome: Concept, structure, and correlates. Depression & Anxiety, 37, 706–714. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.23071
39.
TwengeJ. M.ZhangL.CataneseK. R.Dolan-PascoeB.LycheL. F.BaumeisterR. F. (2007). Replenishing connectedness: Reminders of social activity reduce aggression after social exclusion. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X90793
40.
VangelistiA. L.CaughlinJ. P. (1997). Revealing family secrets: The influence of topic, function, and relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 679–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407597145006
41.
VogtD. S.PlessA. P.KingL. A.KingD. W. (2005). Deployment stressors, gender, and mental health outcomes among Gulf War I veterans. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 18, 272–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20044
42.
WangQ.FinkE. L.CaiD. A. (2008). Loneliness, gender, and parasocial interaction: A uses and gratifications approach. Communication Quarterly, 56, 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370701839057
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
