This manuscript reports an empirical study integrating equity and media multiplexity approaches to relational maintenance via separation of medium- and content-specific components of behaviors. Results from confirmatory factor analysis demonstrate good fit for the decomposition model. The analysis also revealed that content- and medium-specific components differentially predict the strength and quality of friends’ influence. Specifically, positivity and social networks predict control mutuality, whereas medium-specific components predict interdependence. Although face-to-face maintenance indirectly predicts control mutuality, online maintenance exhibits no such association. Results did not differ significantly between local and long-distance friends. In addition to introducing a statistical tool for separating content- and medium-specific effects, these results suggest how theoretical understandings of relational maintenance behavior can be refined.
Aron, A., Aron, E.N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. ( 2004). Close relationships as including other in the self. In C. E. Rusbult & H. T. Reis (Eds.), Close relationships: Key readings (pp. 365-379). Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
2.
Baym, N.K., & Ledbetter, A.M. (2009). Tunes that bind?: Predicting friendship strength in a music-based social network. Information, Communication & Society, 12, 408-427.
3.
Baym, N.K., Zhang, Y.B., Kunkel, A., Ledbetter, A., & Lin, M.-C. (2007). Relational quality and media use in interpersonal relationships. New Media & Society, 9, 735-752.
4.
Baym, N.K., Zhang, Y.B., & Lin, M.-C. (2004). Social interactions across media: Interpersonal communication on the internet, telephone, and face-to-face . New Media & Society, 6, 299-318.
5.
Becker, J.A.H., Johnson, A.J., Craig, E.A., Gilchrist, E.S., Haigh, M.M., & Lane, L.T. ( 2009). Friendships are flexible, not fragile: Turning points in geographically-close and long-distance friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 347-369.
6.
Berscheid, E., Snyder, M., & Omoto, A.M. ( 1989). The relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 792-807.
7.
Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W. ( 1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
8.
Canary, D.J., & Stafford, L. ( 1992). Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage . Communication Monographs, 59, 239-267.
9.
Canary, D.J., Stafford, L., Hause, K.S., & Wallace, L.A. ( 1993). An inductive analysis of relational maintenance strategies: Comparisons among lovers, relatives, friends, and others. Communication Research Reports, 10, 5-14.
10.
Canary, D.J., Stafford, L., & Semic, B.A. ( 2002). A panel study of the associations between maintenance strategies and relational characteristics. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 395-406.
11.
Canary, D.J., Weger, H., & Stafford, L. ( 1991). Couples’ argument sequences and their associations with relational characteristics. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 55, 159-179.
12.
Chan, D.K.-S., & Cheng, G.H.-L. (2004). A comparison of offline and online friendship qualities at different stages of relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 305-320.
Cole, D.A., Ciesla, J.A., & Steiger, J.H. ( 2007). The insidious effects of failing to include design-driven correlated residuals in latent-variable covariance structure analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 381-398.
15.
Daft, R.L., & Lengel, R.H. ( 1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571.
16.
Duck, S. ( 1988). Relating to others. London: Open University Press.
17.
Hartup, W.W., & Stevens, N. ( 1997). Friendships and adaptation in the life course. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 355-370.
18.
Haythornthwaite, C. ( 2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication & Society, 8, 125-147.
19.
Hollingshead, A.B., & Brandon, D.P. ( 2003). Potential benefits of communication in transactive memory systems. Human Communication Research, 29, 607-615.
20.
Johnson, A.J. ( 2001). Examining the maintenance of friendships: Are there differences between geographically close and long-distance friends? Communication Quarterly, 49, 424-435.
21.
Johnson, A.J., Haigh, M.M., Becker, J.A.H., Craig, E.A., & Wigley, S. ( 2008). College students’ use of relational maintenance strategies in email in long-distance and geographically close relationships . Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 381-404.
22.
Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Cook, W.L. ( 2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford.
23.
Kline, R.B. ( 2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed). New York: Guilford.
24.
Ledbetter, A.M., Broeckelman-Post, M.A., & Krawsczyn, A.M. (in press). Modeling everyday talk: Differences across communication media and sex composition of friendship dyads. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.
25.
Ledbetter, A.M., Griffin, E., & Sparks, G.G. ( 2007). Forecasting ‘‘friends forever’’: A longitudinal investigation of sustained closeness between college best friends . Personal Relationships, 14, 343-350.
26.
Little, T.D. ( 1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 53-76.
27.
Little, T.D., Cunningham, W.A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K.F. ( 2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151-173.
28.
Little, T.D., Henrich, C.C., Jones, S.M., & Hawley, P.H. ( 2003). Disentangling the ‘‘whys’’ from the ‘‘whats’’ of aggressive behaviour. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 122-133.
29.
Messman, S.J., Canary, D.J., & Hause, K.S. ( 2000). Motives to remain platonic, equity, and the use of maintenance strategies in opposite-sex friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 67-94.
30.
Myers, S.A., & Members of COM 200. (2001). Relational maintenance behaviors in the sibling relationship. Communication Quarterly, 49, 19-34.
31.
Nie, N.H., Hillygus, D.S., & Erbring, L. ( 2002). Internet use, interpersonal relations, and sociability . In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 215-243). Malden, MA: Blackwell .
32.
Parks, M.R. ( 2006). Personal relationships and personal networks. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33.
Rabby, M.K. ( 2007). Relational maintenance and the influence of commitment in online and offline relationships. Communication Studies , 58, 315-337.
34.
Ramirez, A., Jr., & Broneck, K. ( 2009). ‘IM me’: Instant messaging as relational maintenance and everyday communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 291-314.
35.
Ramirez, A., Jr., & Zhang, S. ( 2007). When online meets offline: The effect of modality switching on relational communication. Communication Monographs, 74, 287-310.
36.
Rawlins, W.K. ( 1992). Friendship matters: Communication, dialectics, and the life course. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
37.
Repinski, D.J., & Zook, J.M. ( 2005). Three measures of closeness in adolescents’ relationships with parents and friends: Variations and developmental significance. Personal Relationships, 12, 79-102.
38.
Rohlfing, M.E. ( 1995). ‘‘Doesn’t anybody stay in one place anymore?’’: An exploration of the under-studied phenomenon of long-distance relationships. In J. T. Wood & S. Duck (Eds.), Under-studied relationships: Off the beaten track (pp. 173-196). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
Rusbult, C.E., Kumashiro, M., Coolsen, M.K., & Kirchner, J.L. (2004). Interdependence, closeness, and relationships. In D. J. Mashek & A. Aron (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
40.
Stafford, L. ( 2003). Maintaining romantic relationships: Summary and analysis of one research program. In D. J. Canary & M. Dainton (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations (pp. 51-77). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
41.
Stafford, L. (in press). Measuring relationship maintenance behaviors: Critique and development of a revised relationship maintenance behaviors scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.
42.
Stafford, L., & Canary, D.J. ( 1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender, and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 217-242.
43.
Stafford, L., & Canary, D.J. ( 2006). Equity and interdependence as predictors of relational maintenance strategies. Journal of Family Communication, 6, 227-254.
44.
Stafford, L., Dainton, M., & Haas, S. ( 2000). Measuring routine and strategic relational maintenance: Scale revision, sex versus gender roles, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs, 67, 306-323.
45.
Walther, J.B. ( 1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-90.
46.
Walther, J.B., & Parks, M.R. ( 2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529-563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
Weigel, D.J., & Ballard-Reisch, D.S. (1999). How couples maintain marriages: A closer look at self and spouse influences upon the use of maintenance behaviors in marriages. Family Relations, 48, 263-269.
48.
Wright, K.B. ( 2004). On-line relational maintenance strategies and perceptions of partners within exclusively Internet-based and primarily Internet-based relationships. Communication Studies, 55, 239-253.
