Adult sibling relationships and media multiplexity theory

Abstract

Sibling relationships are among the longest-lasting relationships in people’s lives. Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs), including voice calls, texting, and social media, help adult siblings keep in touch. The present study tests media multiplexity theory (MMT) in the context of adult sibling relationships. In the first study, a quota sample of American adults completed several name listing tasks to identify their most important relationship partners, ranging from 0 to 16 people, and 29% of participants listed at least one sibling. Multilevel modeling (MLM) results found that emotional closeness between siblings was positively associated with the frequency of phone calls and emails and negatively associated with the frequency of person-to-person media sharing. Showing mixed support for MMT, the number of ICTs used was negatively associated with emotional closeness, but the overall frequency of ICT use was positively associated with closeness. In the second study, a quota sample of American adults identified six of their closest friendships, and siblings constituted 2.9% of friends listed. MLM results found that the frequency of phone calls and text messages between siblings was positively associated with emotional closeness. The number of ICTs used was unrelated to emotional closeness, but the overall frequency of ICT use was positively associated with closeness, showing partial support for MMT. Both studies suggested that the frequency of communicating across ICTs was associated with greater life satisfaction, accounting for sibling closeness.

Keywords

Information and communication technologies life satisfaction media multiplexity theory siblings

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arnett

J. J.

(2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469

Balayar

Langlais

(2021). Technology makes the heart grow fonder? A test of media multiplexity theory for family closeness. Social Sciences, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10010025

Barakji

Maguire

K. C.

Reiss

Gaule

Smith

Pelliccio

Sellnow-Richmond

Jeon

Oshagan

(2019). Cultural and transnational influences on the use of information communication technologies in adult long-distance family relationships: An extension of media multiplexity theory. Journal of Family Communication, 19(1), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2018.1530675

Coyne

S. M.

Jensen

A. C.

Smith

N. J.

Erickson

D. H.

(2015). Super Mario brothers and sisters: Associations between co-playing video games and sibling conflict and affection. Journal of Adolescence, 47(1), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.12.001

Diener

Emmons

R. A.

Larsen

R. J.

Griffin

(1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13

Fowler

(2009). Motives for sibling communication across the lifespan. Communication Quarterly, 57(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370802662499

Gilligan

Stocker

C. M.

Jewsbury Conger

(2020). Sibling relationships in adulthood: Research findings and new frontiers. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 12(3), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12385

Hall

J. A.

Dominguez

Mihailova

(2022). Interpersonal media and face-to-face communication: Relationship with life satisfaction and loneliness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 24(1), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00581-8

Hall

J. A.

Miller

A. J.

(Nov. 2023). Interpersonal media among Americans’ sympathy groups: Theory of the niche and satisfying social needs. [Paper presentation]. National communication association conference in New Orleans, LA, USA. https://hdl.handle.net/1808/34616

10.

Hall

J. A.

Pennington

Merolla

A. J.

(2023). Which mediated social interactions satisfy the need to belong? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 28(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmac026

11.

Hampton

K. N.

Sessions

L. F.

Her

E. J.

(2011). Core networks, social isolation, and new media: How Internet and mobile phone use is related to network size and diversity. Information, Communication & Society, 14(1), 130–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2010.513417

12.

Hank

Steinbach

(2023). Sibling estrangement in adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(4), 1277–1287. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221127863

13.

Haythornthwaite

(2005). Social networks and internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication & Society, 8(2), 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180500146185

14.

Hill

M. S.

Jensen

A. C.

Coyne

S. M.

Yorgason

J. B.

(2021). Look who’s talking: Mediums of contact among mid-to-later-life siblings. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 92(4), 450–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415020912956

15.

Hughes

M. E.

Waite

L. J.

Hawkley

L. C.

Cacioppo

J. T.

(2004). A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: Results from two population-based studies. Research on Aging, 26(6), 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027504268574

16.

Jensen

A. C.

Killoren

S. E.

Campione-Barr

Padilla

Chen

B.-B.

(2023). Sibling relationships in adolescence and young adulthood in multiple contexts: A critical review. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(2), 384–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221104188

17.

Jensen

A. C.

Nielson

M. K.

Yorgason

J. B.

(2020). The longest-lasting relationship: Patterns of contact and well-being among mid- to later-life siblings. Journal Gerontology B Psychological Science Social Science, 75(10), 2240–2249. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbz083

18.

King

Ruggles

Alexander

J. T.

Flood

Genadek

Schroeder

M. B.

Trampe

Vick

(2010). Integrated public use micro-data series, current population survey: Version 3.0. University of Minnesota.

19.

LeBouef

Dworkin

(2021). Siblings as a context for positive development: Closeness, communication, and well-being. Adolescents, 1(3), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.3390/adolescents1030021

20.

Ledbetter

A. M.

(2009). Patterns of media use and multiplexity: Associations with sex, geographic distance, and friendship interdependence. New Media & Society, 11(7), 1187–1208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342057

21.

Ledbetter

A. M.

(2015). Media multiplexity theory: Technology use and interpersonal tie strength. In Braithwaite

D. O.

Schrodt

(Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 363–376). Sage.

22.

Lindell

A. K.

Campione-Barr

Killoren

S. E.

(2015). Technology-mediated communication with siblings during the transition to college: Associations with relationship positivity and self-disclosure. Family Relations, 64(4), 563–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12133

23.

Marsden

(1987). Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review, 52(1), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095397

24.

Matthews

R. A.

Pineault

Hong

Y. H.

(2022). Normalizing the use of single-item measures: Validation of the single-item compendium for organizational psychology. Journal of Business and Psychology, 37(4), 639–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-022-09813-3

25.

McNallie

Hall

E. D.

(2015). The role of perceptions of sibling maintenance behavior in ratings of relationship satisfaction. Communication Research Reports, 32(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2015.1016147

26.

Mikkelson

(2014). Adult sibling relationships. In Floyd

Morman

M. T.

(Eds.), Widening the family circle: New research on family communication (2nd ed., pp. 19–34). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483387956

27.

Mollenhorst

Volker

Flap

(2014). Changes in personal relationships: How social contexts affect the emergence and discontinuation of relationships. Social Networks, 37(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2013.12.003

28.

Muthen

L. K.

Muthen

B. O.

(2012-2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Muthen & Muthen.

29.

Myers

S. A.

Goodboy

A. K.

(2010). Relational maintenance behaviours and communication channel use among adult siblings. North American Journal of Psychology, 12(1), 103–116.

30.

Pearson

(2023, June 9). The lifelong gift of sibling friendship. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/05/well/family/sibling-friends-relationship

31.

Quan-Haase

Harper

M.-G.

Wellman

(2021). The role of communication technology across the life course: A field guide to social support in east York. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(12), 3497–3517. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211056898

32.

Segrin

Flora

(2019). Family communication (pp. 181–199). Routledge.

33.

Spitze

Trent

(2006). Gender differences in adult sibling relations in two-child families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(4), 977–992. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00308.x

34.

Stocker

C. M.

Gilligan

Klopack

E. T.

Conger

K. J.

Lanthier

R. P.

Neppl

T. K.

O’Neal

C. W.

Wickrama

K. A. S.

(2020). Sibling relationships in older adulthood: Links with loneliness and well-being. Journal of Family Psychology, 34(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000586

35.

Taylor

S. H.

Bazarova

N. N.

(2018). Revisiting media multiplexity: A longitudinal analysis of media use in romantic relationships. Journal of Communication, 68(6), 1104–1126. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy055

36.

Taylor

S. H.

Bazarova

N. N.

(2021). Always available, always attached: A relational perspective on the effects of mobile phones and social media on subjective well-being. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 26(4), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab004

37.

Taylor

S. H.

Ledbetter

A. M.

(2017). Extending media multiplexity theory to the extended family: Communication satisfaction and tie strength as moderators of violations of media use expectations. New Media & Society, 19(9), 1369–1387. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816638458

38.

Vaterlaus

J. M.

Dodson

Bock

S. H.

(2023). Young adults’ closest sibling relationships and interactive technology. Marriage & Family Review, 59(3), 203–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2022.2141943

39.

von Soest

Luhmann

Gerstorf

(2020). The development of loneliness through adolescence and young adulthood: Its nature, correlates, and midlife outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 56(10), 1919–1934. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001102

40.

White

L. K.

Riedmann

(1992). Ties among adult siblings. Social Forces, 71(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/71.1.85

41.

Williams

Polman

(2015). Is it me or her? How gender composition evokes interpersonally sensitive behaviour on collaborative cross-boundary projects. Organization Science, 26(2), 334–355. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0941

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.24 MB