The aim of this study is to explore the goals and strategies of self-regulation of the newlyweds in Taiwan. Through in-depth interviews with eight newlywed couples (N = 16), qualitative data were gathered and analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings revealed that, under the influence of their cultural values, the newlywed participants pursue the goals of genuine harmony and superficial harmony in their self-regulation for marital adjustment. Genuine harmony can be attained through people’s fulfillment of their role norms in in-law relationships and establishment of affiliations with spouses in marital relationships. On the other hand, superficial harmony can be maintained by people through keeping sketchy relationships with their in-laws and inhibiting anger to prevent open conflicts with their spouses. To achieve relational harmony, various strategies of self-regulation were used depending on the situations involved. Such strategies direct to the principle of zhong-yong (the Doctrine of Mean) involving holistic information processing and avoidance of extremities in implementation. Gender differences in self-regulation were found in both goals and strategies.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F. (2004). On the structure of behavior regulation. In BoekaertM.PintrichP. R.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 41–84). Academic Press.
3.
CaughlinJ. P. (2010). A Multiple goals theory of personal relationships: Conceptual integration and program overview. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(6), 824–848. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510373262
4.
ChangS. C.HsuS. C.LiW. H. (2018). “Good new men” and “good new women?” Role obligations in contemporary Chinese marital relationship [in Chinese]. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 50, 209–261.
5.
ChenP. H. (2009). A Counseling model for self-relation coordination for Chinese clients with interpersonal conflicts. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(7), 987–1009. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000009339975
6.
CheungT. S.ChanH. M.ChanK. M.KingA. Y. C.ChiuC. Y.YangC. F. (2003). On Zongyong rationality: The Confucian doctrine of the mean as a missing link between instrumental rationality and communicative rationality. Asian Journal of Social Science, 31(1), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853103764778559
7.
ChiuC. Y. (2000). Assessment of Chong-Yong (Dialectic) thinking: Preliminary findings from a cross-regional study [in Chinese]. Hong Kong Journal of Social Science, 18, 33–55.
8.
DillardJ. P. (2015). Goal-plans-action theory of message production: Making influence messages. In BraithwaiteD. O.SchrodtP. (Eds.), Engaging theories of interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 63–74). Sage.
9.
FinkelE. J.CampbellW. K. (2001). Self-control and accommodation in close relationships: An Interdependence analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.263
10.
FitzsimonsG. M.FinkelE. J. (2011). The effects of self-regulation on social relationships. In VohsK. D.BaumeisterR. F. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (2nd ed., pp. 407–421). Academic Press.
11.
GaoG. (1996). Self and other: A Chinese perspective on interpersonal relationship. In GudykunstW. B.Ting-ToomeyS.NishidaT. (Eds.), Communication in personal relationship across cultures (pp. 81–101). Sage.
12.
GilbertD. T.KrullD. S.PelhamB. W. (1988). Of thoughts unspoken: Social inference and the self-regulation of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(2), 685–694. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.5.685
HalfordW. K.LizzioA.WilsonK. L.OcchipintiS. (2007). Does working at your marriage help? Couple relationship self-regulation and satisfaction in the first 4 years of marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(2), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.185
HanK.-H.LiM.-C.HwangK.-K. (2005). Cognitive responses to favor requests from different social targets in a Confucian society. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(2), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505050952
17.
HsiaoY. L. (2012). The nature and predictors of changes in marital satisfaction over the first 3 years of marriage [in Chinese]. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 54(4), 433–450.
18.
HuangL. L. (2005). Interpersonal harmony and conflict [in Chinese]. In YangK. S.HwangK. K.YangC. F. (Eds.), Chinese indigenized psychology (pp. 521–566). Yuan-Liou Publishing.
19.
HwangK. K. (1997-8). Guanxi and Mientze: Conflict resolution in Chinese society. Intercultural Communication Studies, 1, 17–42.
KaoS. F.LuL. (2006). The relationship of congruence in psychological traditionality/modernity to marital adjustment [in Chinese]. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 25, 47–100.
KarremansJ. C.PronkT. M.van der WalR. C. (2015). Executive control and relationship maintenance processes: An empirical overview and theoretical integration. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(7), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12177
24.
OetzelJ. G.Ting-ToomeyS. (2003). Face concerns in interpersonal conflict: A cross-cultural empirical test of the face negotiation theory. Communication Research, 30(6), 599–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203257841
25.
PronkT. M.Buyukcan-TetikA.IliásM. M. A. H.FinkenauerC. (2019). Marriage as a training ground: Examining change in self-control and forgiveness over the first 4 years of marriage. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(1), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517721065
26.
PronkT. M.RighettiF. (2015). How executive control promotes happy relationships and a well-balanced life. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 14–17.
27.
RawnC. D.VohsK. (2006). The Importance of self-regulation for interpersonal functioning. In VohsK. D.FinkelE. J. (Eds.), Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes (pp. 15–31). Gilford.
28.
SandelowskiM. (2000). What happen to qualitative description. Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 334–340.
29.
SeeleyE. A.GardnerW. L. (2003). The “selfless” and self-regulation: The role of chronic other-orientation in averting self-regulatory depletion. Self and Identity, 2(2), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309034
30.
ShahJ. Y.KruglanskiA. W. (2000). Aspects of goal networks: Implications for self-regulation. In BoekaertsM.PintrichP. R.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 85–110). Academic Press.
31.
ShapiroS. L.SchwartzG. E. (2000). The role of intention in self-regulation. In BoekaertsM.PintrichP. R.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 253–273). Academic Press.
32.
ShenJ. J.CheahC. S. L.YuJ. (2018). Asian American and European American emerging adults’ perceived parenting styles and self-regulation ability. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 9(2), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/aap0000099
33.
SolomonD. H.DillardJ. P.AndersonJ. W. (2002). Episode type, attachment orientation, and frame silence: Evidence for a theory of relational framing. Human Communication Research, 28(1), 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00801.x
34.
TrommsdorffG. (2012). Development of “agentic” regulation in cultural context: The role of self and world views. Child Development Perspectives, 6(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00224.x
35.
VohsK. D.CiaroccoN. J. (2004). Interpersonal functioning requires self-regulation. In BaumeisterB. F.VohsK. D. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 392–407). Gilford.
36.
WilsonK. L.CharkerJ.LizzioA. J.HalfordW. K.KimlinS. (2005). Assessing how much couples work at their relationships: The behavioral self-regulation for effective relationships scale. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(3), 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.3.385
37.
WorleyT. R.SampJ. A. (2019). Dyadic power, marital status, face concerns, and politeness in the context of relational complaining. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(4), 1367–1391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518765988
38.
WuT. F.YehK. H.CrossS. E.LarsonL. M.WangY. C.TsaiY. L. (2010). Conflict with mother-in-law and Taiwanese women’s marital satisfaction: The moderating role of husband support. The counseling Psychologist, 38(4), 497–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000009353071
39.
YangK. S. (1996). The psychological transformation of the Chinese people as a result of societal modernization. In BondM. H. (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 479–498). Oxford University Press.
