This manuscript examines the ways collegiate women perceive media portrayals of princess cultural scripts and how this impacts their constructions of romantic relationships. Drawing on 30 in-depth interviews with college-aged women, we explore how these women negotiated media portrayals of romantic love by (1) distancing from images they defined as unrealistic expectations and (2) selectively embracing media portrayals as revealing intimate relational ideals. We argue that their selective accounting for how they developed their definitions of “realities” of love exposes tensions in concurrently hegemonic conceptions of love: idealist (fantastical and emotional love) and realist (rational and practical love) needed to sustain long-term relationships. We suggest that these negotiations reveal an association of idealist love with youth and realist love with maturity, reflecting an ongoing privileging of realist love. We conclude by considering interconnections between late capitalistic ideologies and maturation.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480.
2.
ArnettJ. J. (2001). Conceptions of the transition to adulthood: Perspectives from adolescence through midlife. Journal of Adult Development, 8(2), 133–143.
3.
BalrajB. M.GopalK. (2013). The construction of family in selected Disney animated films. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3, 119–121.
4.
BareldsD. P.Barelds-DijkstraP. (2007). Love at first sight or friends first? Ties among partner personality trait similarity, relationship onset, relationship quality, and love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 479–496.
5.
BeckU. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
6.
BergB. L. (2009). Qualitative research methods. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
CancianF. M. (1986). The feminization of love. Signs, 11, 692–709.
8.
CancianF. M. (1987). Love in America: Gender and self-development. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
9.
CeruloK. A. (1997). Identity construction: New issues, new directions. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 385–409.
10.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
11.
DiPirroD. M. (2007). From biting the apple to breaking the spell: Analyzing love in the Disney princess collection (M.A. thesis, California State University, Fullerton, CA).
12.
DugganL. (2003). The twilight of equality? Neoliberalism, cultural politics, and the attack on democracy. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
13.
FearonJ. D.LaitinD. D. (2000). Violence and the social construction of ethnic identity. International Organization, 54, 845–877.
14.
GallowayL.EngstromE.Emmers-SommerT. M. (2015). Does movie viewing cultivate young people’s unrealistic expectations about love and marriage?Marriage & Family Review, 51, 687–712.
15.
GiddensA. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16.
GiddensA. (1993). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Oxford: Polity Press.
17.
GillisJ. (1996). A world of their own making: Myth, ritual and the quest for family values. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
19.
HainsR. (2014). The princess problem. Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks, Inc.
20.
HarrisA. (2004). Future girl: Young women in the 21st century. New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
HartsteinJ. L. (2012a). Princess recovery: A how-to guide to raising strong, empowered girls who can create their own happily ever afters. Avon, MA: Adams Media.
HechtJ. (2011). Happily ever after: Construction of family in Disney princess collection films. [Master’s Theses, Paper 4094]. San Jose State University, San Jose, CA.
24.
HefnerV.WilsonB. J.2013. From love at first sight to soul mate: The influence of romantic ideals in popular films on young people’s beliefs about relationships. Communication Monographs, 80, 150–175.
HendrickC.HendrickS. S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 392–402.
27.
HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. F. (1995). The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
IllouzE. (1997). Consuming the romantic utopia: Love and the cultural contradictions of capitalism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
29.
IllouzE. (1991). Reason within passion: Love in women’s magazines. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 8, 231–248.
30.
JunnE. N. (1997). Media portrayals of love, marriage & sexuality for child audiences: A select content analysis of Walt Disney animated family films. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting, Society for Research in Child Development, Washington, DC.
31.
LeeJ. A. (1973). The colors of love: An exploration of the ways of loving. Don Mills, ON: New Press. (Popular Edition, 1976).
32.
MartinK.KazyakE. (2009). Hetero-romantic love and heterosexiness in children’s g-rated films. Gender & Society, 23, 315–336.
OrensteinP. (2012). Cinderella ate my daughter: Dispatches from the front lines of the new girlie-girl culture. New York, NY: Harper.
35.
OspalT. D. (2011). Women disrupting a marginalized identity: Subverting the parolee identity through narrative. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 40, 135–167.
36.
PiorkowskiG. K. (2008). Adult children of divorce: Confused love seekers. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
37.
RadwayJ. A. (1984). Reading the romance. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
38.
RidgewayC. L.CorrellS. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18, 510–531.
39.
RossT.KenaG.RathbunA.RamaniK.ZhangJ.KristapovichP.ManningE. (2012). Higher education: Gaps in access and persistence study (NCES 2012–046). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
40.
SchutzA. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
41.
SchwalbeM. L.Mason-SchrockD. (1996). Identity work as group process. In MarkovskyB.LovagliaM.SimonR. (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 13, pp. 13–47). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
42.
SimonR. W.EderD.EvansC. (1992). The development of feeling norms underlying romantic love among adolescent females. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 29–46.
43.
StoneK. (1975). Things Walt Disney never told us. The Journal of American Folklore, 88, 42–50.
44.
SwartE.SayagoN. (2014). Still pretty in pink? A survey of college women’s attitudes toward princess culture. Under Review.
45.
SwidlerA. (1980). Love and adulthood in American culture. In SmelserN. J.EriksonE. H. (Eds.), Themes of work and love in American culture (pp. 120–147). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
SwidlerA. (2001). Talk of love: How culture matters. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
47.
TannerL.ReneeS. A.HaddockT. S. Z.Lund, L. K. (2003). Images of couples and families in Disney feature-length animated films. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 355–373.
48.
TurnerJ. H.StetsJ. E. (2005). The sociology of emotions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
