How accurately do romantic partners perceive each other’s sexual advances? Two preregistered studies investigated whether perceivers over- or underestimate the specific behaviors their partner uses to indicate sexual interest (directional bias), as well as correctly detect the particular pattern of those behaviors (tracking accuracy). We also tested if biased and accurate perceptions were moderated by gender and explored how bias and accuracy predicted relational outcomes. Results revealed strong evidence for tracking accuracy in judgments of sexual advances overall, and mixed results for directional bias. Gender moderated only directional bias, such that women consistently overestimated their partner’s sexual advances, whereas men underestimated or showed no bias. Finally, biased sexual advance perceptions were associated with sexual satisfaction and love for both perceivers and partners. Implications for relationship functioning are discussed.
AbbeyA. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females’ friendliness?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 830–838. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.5.830
2.
AttneaveF. (1953). Psychological probability as a function of experienced frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 81–86. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0057955
3.
BarrantiM.CarlsonE. N.CôtéS. (2017). How to test questions about similarity in personality and social psychology research: Description and empirical demonstration of response surface analysis. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 465–475. doi:10.1177/1948550617698204
4.
BersaminM. M.WalkerS.WaitersE. D.FisherD. A.GrubeJ. W. (2005). Promising to wait: Virginity pledges and adolescent sexual behavior. Journal of Adolescent Health, 36, 428–436. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.09.016
5.
BirnbaumG. E. (2003). The meaning of heterosexual intercourse among women with female orgasmic disorder. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 61–71. doi:10.1023/A:1021845513448
6.
BirnbaumG. E.FinkelE. J. (2015). The magnetism that holds us together: Sexuality and relationship maintenance across relationship development. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 29–33. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.11.009
7.
BirnbaumG. E.GillathO. (2006). Measuring subgoals of the sexual behavioral system: What is sex good for?Journal of Social Personal Relationships, 23, 675–701. doi:10.1177/0265407506065992
8.
ByersE. S.HeinleinL. (1989). Predicting initiations and refusals of sexual activities in married and cohabiting heterosexual couples. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 210–231. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224498909551507
9.
CostaR. M.BrodyS. (2007). Women’s relationship quality is associated with specifically penile-vaginal intercourse orgasm and frequency. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 33, 319–327. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230701385548
10.
DiamondL. M. (2013). Sexuality in relationships. In SimpsonJ. A.CampbellL. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 589–614). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11.
DobsonK. (2016). Are you coming on to me? Accuracy and bias in couples’ perceptions of sexual advances. Retrieved from Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. (3826)http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/3826
12.
DobsonK.CampbellL. (2015, 917). Accuracy in perceptions of sexual advances in romantic relationships. Retrieved fromosf.io/5x47y
13.
DobsonK.CampbellL. (2017, 712). Sexual advances in romantic relationships. Retrieved fromosf.io/s9ten
14.
DobsonK.CampbellL.StantonS. C. E. (2017a, 928). Sample A - Exploratory analyses. Retrieved fromosf.io/7dvyw
15.
DobsonK.CampbellL.StantonS. C. E. (2017b, 928). Sample B - Confirmatory analyses. Retrieved fromosf.io/fhbiy
16.
DodrillW. (2007). Sexual initiation in ongoing heterosexual dating relationships (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (Dissertation No. 3243475).
EdwardsJ. R. (2002). Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology. In DrasgowF.SchmittN. W. (Eds.), Advances in measurement and data analysis (pp. 350–400). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19.
EdwardsJ. N.BoothA. (1994). Sexuality, marriage, and well-being: The middle years. In RossiA. S. (Ed.), Sexuality across the life course (pp. 233–259). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20.
EldesoukyL.EnglishT.GrossJ. J. (2017). Out of sight, out of mind? Accuracy and bias in emotion regulation trait judgments. Journal of Personality, 85, 543–552. doi:10.1111/jopy.12259
21.
ErbilN. (2013). The relationships between sexual function, body image, and body mass index among women. Sexuality and Disability, 31, 63–70. doi:10.1007/s11195-012-9258-4
22.
FletcherG. J. O.KerrP. S. G. (2010). Through the eyes of love: Reality and illusion in intimate relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 627–658. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019792
23.
FletcherG. J. O.KerrP. S. G. (2013). Love, reality, and illusion in intimate relationships. In SimpsonJ. A.CampbellL. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 306–320). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24.
GalperinA.HaseltonM. G. (2012). Error management and the evolution of cognitive bias. In ForgasJ. P.FiedlerK.SedikidesC. (Eds.), Social thinking and interpersonal behavior (pp. 45–64). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
25.
GrauerholzE.SerpeR. T. (1985). Initiation and response: The dynamics of sexual interaction. Sex Roles, 12, 1041–1059. doi:10.1007/BF00288104
HaseltonM. G.BussD. M. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 81–91.
28.
HickmanS. E.MuehlenhardC. L. (1999). “By the semi-mystical appearance of a condom”: How young women and men communicate sexual consent in heterosexual situations. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 258–272. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224499909551996
29.
HudsonW. W.HarrisonD. F.CrosscupP. C. (1981). A short-form scale to measure sexual discord in dyadic relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 11, 157–174. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224498109551110
KaestleC. E.HalpernC. T. (2007). What’s love got to do with it? Sexual behaviors of opposite-sex couples through emerging adulthood. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39, 134–140. doi: 10.1363/3913407
32.
LackenbauerS. D.CampbellL.RubinH.FletcherG. J.TroisterT. (2010). The unique and combined benefits of accuracy and positive bias in relationships. Personal Relationships, 17, 475–493. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01282.x
33.
LaumannE. O.GagnonJ. H.MichaelR. T.MichaelsF. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34.
LearyM. R.SpringerC.NegelL.AnsellE.EvansK. (1998). The causes, phenomenology, and consequences of hurt feelings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1225–1237. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1225
35.
LeB.DoveN. L.AgnewC. R.KornM. S.MutsoA. A. (2010). Predicting nonmarital romantic relationship dissolution: A meta-analytic synthesis. Personal Relationships, 17, 377–390. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01285.x
36.
McCormickN. B. (1979). Come-ons and put-offs: Unmarried students’ strategies for having and avoiding sexual intercourse. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 4, 194–211. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1979.tb00708.x
37.
MeltzerA. L.MakhanovaA.HicksL. L.FrenchJ. E.McNultyJ. K.BradburyT. N. (2017). Quantifying the sexual afterglow: The lingering benefits of sex and their implications for pair-bonded relationships. Psychological Science. Advance online publication, 1-12. doi:10.1177/0956797617691361
38.
MestonC. M.BussD. M. (2007). Why humans have sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 477–507. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9175-2
39.
MuiseA.KimJ. J.McNultyJ. K.ImpettE. A. (2016). The positive implications of sex for relationships. In KneeC. R.ReisH. T. (Eds.), Positive approaches to optimal relationship development (pp. 124–147). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
40.
MuiseA.StantonS. C.KimJ. J.ImpettE. A. (2016). Not in the mood? Men under- (not over-) perceive their partner’s sexual desire in established intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 725–742. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000046
41.
MurrayS. L.DerrickJ. L.LederS.HolmesJ. G. (2008). Balancing connectedness and self-protection goals in close relationships: A levels-of-processing perspective on risk regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 429–459. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.429
42.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.BellaviaG.GriffinD. W.DoldermanD. (2002). Kindred spirits? The benefits of egocentrism in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 563–581. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.563
43.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.CollinsN. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 641–666. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.641
44.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.GriffinD. W. (1996). The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1155–1180. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1155
45.
Ortiz-TorresB.WilliamsS. P.EhrhardtA. A. (2003). Urban women’s gender scripts: Implications for HIV prevention. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 5, 1–17. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713804639
46.
OverallN. C.FletcherG. J.KennyD. A. (2012). When bias and insecurity promote accuracy mean-level bias and tracking accuracy in couples’ conflict discussions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 642–655. doi:10.1177/0146167211432764
47.
OverallN. C.HammondM. D. (2013). Biased and accurate depressive symptoms and daily perceptions within intimate relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 636–650. doi:10.1177/0146167213480188
48.
PeaseL. J. (2013). What did you do last night?: How sharing hookup narratives impacts friendships and displays status among college women (Thesis). Retrieved from Dickinson Scholar Honors Theses(Paper 64).
49.
RobbinsA. R. (2017). Beauty in the eye of the holder: The contribution of body appreciation to sexual health in adult women (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Université d'Ottawa/University of Ottawa uO Research(Dissertation No. 35814). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-12822
50.
RosenthalR.RosnowR. L. (2007). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
51.
RubinH.CampbellL. (2012). Day-to-day changes in intimacy predict heightened relationship passion, sexual occurrence, and sexual satisfaction: A dyadic diary analysis. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 224–231. doi:10.1177/1948550611416520
52.
SchoenfeldE. A.LovingT. J.PopeM. T.HustonT. L.ŠtulhoferA. (2017). Does sex really matter? Examining the connections between spouses’ nonsexual behaviors, sexual frequency, sexual satisfaction, and marital satisfaction. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 489–501.
SchwartzP.YoungL. (2009). Sexual satisfaction in committed relationships. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 6, 1–17. doi:10.1525/srsp.2009.6.1.1
55.
ShanockL. R.BaranB. E.GentryW. A.PattisonS. C.HeggestadE. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 543–554. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9183-4
56.
ShotlandR. L.CraigJ. M. (1988). Can men and women differentiate between friendly and sexually interested behavior?. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 66–73. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/2786985
57.
SimonW.GagnonJ. H. (1984). Sexual scripts. Society, 22, 53–60. doi:10.1007/BF02701260
58.
SimonW.GagnonJ. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 97–120. doi:10.1007/BF01542219
59.
SimonW.GagnonJ. H. (1987). A sexual scripts approach. In GreerJ. H.O’DonohueW. T. (Eds.), Theories of human sexuality (pp. 363–383). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
60.
SimonW.GagnonJ. H. (2003). Sexual scripts: Origins, influences and changes. Qualitative Sociology, 26, 491–497. doi:10.1023/B: QUAS.0000005053.99846.e5
61.
SprecherS.ReganP. C. (1988). Passionate and companionate love in courting and young married couples. Sociological Inquiry, 68, 163–185. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1998.tb00459.x
62.
SternbergR. J. (1997). Construct validation of a triangular love scale. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 313–335.
63.
TolmanD. L. (2002). Dilemma of desire: Teenage girls and sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
64.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
65.
VannierS. A.O’SullivanL. F. (2011). Communicating interest in sex: Verbal and nonverbal initiation of sexual activity in young adults’ romantic dating relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 961–969. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9663-7
66.
WardL. M. (1995). Talking about sex: Common themes about sexuality in the prime-time television programs children and adolescents view most. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 595–615. doi:10.1007/BF01537058
67.
WestT. V.DovidioJ. F.PearsonA. R. (2014). Accuracy and bias in perceptions of relationship interest for intergroup and intragroup roommates. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 235–242. doi:10.1177/1948550613490966
68.
WestT. V.KennyD. A. (2011). The truth and bias model of judgment. Psychological Review, 118, 357–378. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0022936
