Why do people defend the institution of marriage and related beliefs about committed romantic relationships? Why do they sometimes stereotype and discriminate against single people? In this article, I review research that provides some answers. I center on the role of a set of commonly held beliefs about romantic relationships—committed relationship ideology. In particular, I focus on how system and individual-level factors can help explain people’s motivated defense of these consequential beliefs.
AntonovicsK.TownR. (2004). Are all the good men married? Uncovering the sources of the marital wage premium. American Economic Review, 94, 317–321.
2.
BerscheidE.ReganP. (2005). The psychology of interpersonal relationships. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
3.
CarganL. (1981). Singles: An examination of two stereotypes. Family Relations, 30, 377–385.
4.
ConleyT. D.CollinsB. E. (2002). Gender, relationship status, and stereotyping about sexual risk. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1483–1494.
5.
ConleyT. D.ZieglerA.MoorsA. C.MatsickJ. L.ValentineB. (2013). A critical examination of popular assumptions about the benefits and outcomes of monogamous relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 124–141.
6.
CrossS. E.BaconP. L.MorrisM. L. (2000). The relational interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 791–808.
7.
DayM. V. (2013). Stigma, halo effects, and threats to ideology: Comment on the fewer the merrier. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13, 49–51.
8.
DayM. V.KayA. C.HolmesJ. G.NapierJ. L. (2011). System justification and the defense of committed relationship ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 291–306.
9.
DePauloB. M. (2006). Singled out: How singles are stereotyped, stigmatized, and ignored, and still live happily ever after. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
10.
DePauloB. M. (2014). A singles studies perspective on mount marriage. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 64–68.
11.
DePauloB. M.MorrisW. L. (2005). Singles in society and in science. Psychological Inquiry, 16, 57–83.
12.
DePauloB. M.MorrisW. L. (2006). The unrecognized stereotyping and discrimination against singles. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 251–254.
13.
EibachR. P.MockS. E. (2012). System justifying functions of myths that exaggerate the emotional rewards of parenthood. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1310–1315.
14.
EtaughC.BirdoesL. N. (1991). Effects of age, sex, and marital status on person perception. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 72, 491–497.
15.
EtaughC.MalstromJ. (1981). The effect of marital status on person perception. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 801–805.
16.
EtaughC.SternJ. (1984). Person perception: Effects of sex, marital status, and sex-typed occupation. Sex Roles, 11, 413–424.
17.
FeinS.SpencerS. J., (1997). Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 31–44.
18.
GreitemeyerT. (2009). Stereotypes of singles: Are singles what we think?European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 368–383.
19.
HertelJ.SchützA.DePauloB. M.MorrisW. L.StuckeT. S. (2007). She’s single, so what? How are singles perceived compared with people who are married?Journal of Family Research, 19, 139–158.
20.
KahngL. (2010). One is the loneliest number: The single taxpayer in a joint return world. Hastings Law Journal, 61, 651–686.
21.
KayA. C.FriesenJ. (2011). On social stability and social change: Understanding when system justification does and does not occur. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 360–364.
22.
KayA. C.GaucherD.NapierJ. L.CallanM. J.LaurinK. (2008). God and the government: Testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 18–35.
23.
KayA. C.GaucherD.PeachJ. M.LaurinK.FriesenJ.ZannaM. P.SpencerS. J. (2009). Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to see the way things are as the way they should be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 421–434.
24.
KayA. C.JostJ. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837.
25.
KayA. C.JostJ. T.YoungS. (2005). Victim derogation and victim enhancement as alternative routes to system justification. Psychological Science, 16, 240–246.
26.
KayA. C.ShepherdS.BlatzC. W.ChuaS. N.GalinskyA. (2010). For god (or) country: The hydraulic relation between government instability and belief in religious sources of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 725–739.
27.
KlinenbergE. (2012). Going solo: The extraordinary rise and surprising appeal of living alone. New York, NY: The Penguin Press.
28.
JackmanM. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
29.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.
30.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919.
31.
JostJ. T.van der ToornJ. (2012). System justification theory. In van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 313–343). London, England: Sage.
32.
MilkmanK. L.ChughD.BazermanM. (2009). How can decision making be improved?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 379–383.
33.
MorrisW. L.DePauloB. M.HertelJ.TaylorL. C. (2008). Singlism – another problem that has no name: prejudice, stereotypes, and discrimination against singles. In MorrisonT. G.MorrisonM. A. (Eds.), The psychology of modern prejudice (pp. 165–194). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
34.
MorrisW. L.SinclairS.DePauloB. M. (2006). No shelter for singles: The perceived legitimacy of marital status discrimination. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10, 457–470.
35.
PillsworthE. G.HaseltonM. G. (2005). The evolution of coupling. Psychological Inquiry, 16, 98–104.
36.
SidaniusJ.LevinS.LiuJ.PrattoF. (2000). Social dominance orientation, anti-egalitarianism, and the political psychology of gender: An extension and cross-cultural replication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 41–67.
37.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
38.
SpencerS. J.FeinS.WolfeC. T.FongC.DunnM. A. (1998). Automatic activation of stereotypes: The role of self-image threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1139–1152.
39.
ThalerR. H.SunsteinC. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New York, NY: Yale University Press.
van der ToornJ.JostJ. T. (2014). Twenty years of system justification theory: Introduction to the special issue on “Ideology and system justification processes.”Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 17, 413–419.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
