This study examines patterns of interpersonal media use in same-sex friendships. Using a refined version of Scott and Timmerman’s media use scale, participants reported the extent to which they used eight different communication media and the level of interdependence in the friendship. The results revealed four distinct factors of media use: asynchronous public communication, asynchronous private communication, social networking communication and synchronous offline communication. Both sex and geographic distance differences emerged on these factors and all factors except asynchronous private communication predicted friendship interdependence. These findings clarify underlying patterns of media use and suggest that both privacy and orality are salient properties delineating media types.
Ahearn, L.M. ( 2003) ‘Writing Desire in Nepali Love Letters’, Language & Communication23(2): 107-22.
2.
Aukett, R., J. Ritchie and K. Mill ( 1988) ‘Gender Differences in Friendship Patterns’ , Sex Roles19(1): 57-66.
3.
Baron, R.M. and D.A. Kenny ( 1986) ‘The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations’ , Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6): 1173-82.
4.
Baym, N.K., Y.B. Zhang and M.-C. Lin ( 2004) ‘Social Interactions across Media: Interpersonal Communication on the Internet, Face-to-face and Telephone’, New Media & Society6(3): 299-318.
5.
Baym, N.K., Y.B. Zhang, A. Kunkel, M.-C. Lin and A. Ledbetter ( 2007) ‘Relational Quality and Media Use in Interpersonal Relationships’, New Media & Society9(4): 735-52.
6.
Beebe, T.J., S.E. Asche, P.A. Harrison and K.B. Quinlan ( 2004) ‘Heightened Vulnerability and Increased Risk-taking among Adolescent Chat Room Users: Results from a Statewide School Survey’ , Journal of Adolescent Health35(2): 116-23.
7.
Berscheid, E., M. Synder and A.M. Omoto ( 1989) ‘The Relationship Closeness Inventory: Assessing the Closeness of Interpersonal Relationships’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology57(5): 792-807.
8.
Canary, D.J. and L. Stafford ( 1992) ‘Relational Maintenance Strategies and Equity in Marriage’, Communication Monographs59(3): 239-67.
9.
Chung, D. and C.S. Nam ( 2007) ‘An Analysis of the Variables Predicting Instant Messenger Use’, New Media & Society9(2): 212-34.
10.
Cohen, J., P. Cohen, S.G. West and L.S. Aiken ( 2003) Applied Multiple Regression/ Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (3rd edn). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Copher, J.I., A.G. Kanfer and M.B. Walker ( 2002) ‘Everyday Communication Patterns of Heavy and Light Email Users’, in B. Wellman and C. Haythornthwaite (eds) The Internet in Everyday Life, pp. 263-88. Malden, MA: Blackwell .
12.
Cummings, J., J. Lee and R.E. Kraut ( 2006) ‘Communication Technology and Friends during the Transition from High School to College’, in R. Kraut, M. Brynin and S. Kiesler (eds) Computers, Phones and the Internet: Domesticating Information Technology, pp. 3-20. New York : Oxford University Press.
13.
Dainton, M. and B. Aylor ( 2002) ‘Patterns of Communication Channel Use in the Maintenance of Long-distance Relationships’, Communication Research Reports19(2): 118-29.
14.
Dimmick, J., S. Kline and L. Stafford ( 2000) ‘The Gratification Niches of Personal Email and the Telephone: Competition, Displacement and Complementarity’, Communication Research27(2): 227-48.
15.
Duck, S., D.J. Rutt, M.H. Hurst and H. Strejc ( 1991) ‘Some Evident Truths about Conversations in Everyday Relationships: All Communications Are Not Created Equal’, Human Communication Research18(2): 228-67.
16.
Ellison, N.B., C. Steinfield and C. Lampe ( 2007) ‘The Benefits of Facebook "Friends": Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12(4), URL (consulted October 2007): http://jcmc. indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/ellison.html
17.
Finchum, T.D. ( 2005) ‘Keeping the Ball in the Air: Contact in Long-distance Friendships’, Journal of Women & Aging17(3): 91-106.
18.
Fischer, C.S. ( 1992) America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940. Berkeley: University of California .
19.
Fox, S. and M. Madden ( 2006) ‘Generations Online’, Pew Internet & American Life Project, URL (consulted July 2008): http://www.pewInternet.org/report_display.asp?r=170
20.
Granovetter, M.S. ( 1973) ‘The Strength of Weak Ties’, American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360-80.
21.
Gross, E.F. ( 2004) ‘Adolescent Internet Use: What We Expect, What Teens Report’, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology25(6): 633-49.
22.
Hampton, K.N. and B. Wellman ( 2002) ‘The Not So Global Village of Netville’, in B. Wellman and C. Haythornthwaite (eds) The Internet in Everyday Life, pp. 345-71. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
23.
Haythornthwaite, C. ( 2005) ‘Social Networks and Internet Connectivity Effects’ , Information, Communication & Society8(2): 125-47.
24.
Kelley, H.H. and J.W. Thibaut ( 1978) Interpersonal Relationships. New York : John Wiley.
25.
Kelly, L. and J.A. Keaten ( 2007) ‘Development of the Affect for Communication Channels Scale’, Journal of Communication57(2): 349-65.
26.
Kline, R.B. ( 2005) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd edn). New York: Guilford.
27.
Kopalle, P.K. and D.R. Lehmann ( 1997) ‘Alpha Inflation? The Impact of Eliminating Scale Items on Cronbach’s Alpha’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes70(3): 189-97.
28.
Kraut, R., M. Patterson, V. Lundmark, S. Kiesler, T. Mukhopadhyay and W. Scherlis ( 1998) ‘Internet Paradox: A Social Technology that Reduces Social Involvement and Psychological Well-being?’, American Psychologist53(9): 1017-31.
29.
Kraut, R., S. Kiesler, B. Boneva, J. Cummings, V. Helgeson and A. Crawford ( 2002) ‘Internet Paradox Revisited’, Journal of Social Issues58(1): 49-74.
30.
Leach, M. and D.O. Braithwaite ( 1996) ‘A Binding Tie: Supportive Communication of Family Kinkeepers’, Journal of Applied Communication Research24(3): 200-16.
31.
Ledbetter, A.M. ( 2008) ‘Media Use and Relational Closeness in Long-term Friendships: Interpreting Patterns of Multimodality’, New Media & Society10(4): 547-64.
32.
Ledbetter, A.M. (in press) ‘Measuring Online Communication Attitude: Instrument Development and Validation’, Communication Monographs.
33.
Ledbetter, A.M., E.M. Griffin and G.G. Sparks ( 2007) ‘Forecasting "Friends Forever": A Longitudinal Investigation of Sustained Closeness between Best Friends’, Personal Relationships14(2): 343-50.
34.
Lenhart, A. and M. Madden ( 2007) ‘Social Networking Websites and Teens: An Overview’ , Pew Internet & American Life Project, URL (consulted October 2007): http://www.pewInternet.org/PPF/r/198/report_display.asp
35.
Ling, R. and B. Yttri ( 2002) ‘Nobody Sits at Home and Waits for the Telephone to Ring: Micro and Hyper-coordination through the Use of the Mobile Telephone’ , in J. Katz and M. Aakhus (eds) Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance, pp. 139-69. New York: Cambridge University.
36.
Little, T.D. ( 1997) ‘Mean and Covariance Structures (MACS) Analyses of Cross-cultural Data: Practical and Theoretical Issues’, Multivariate Behavioral Research32(1): 53-76.
37.
Little, T.D., U. Lindenberger and J.R. Nesselroade ( 1999) ‘On Selecting Indicators for Multivariate Measurement and Modeling with Latent Variables: When "Good" Indicators are Bad and "Bad" Indicators are Good’, Psychological Methods4(2): 192-211.
38.
McCroskey, J.C. and T.J. Young ( 1979) ‘The Use and Abuse of Factor Analysis in Communication Research’, Human Communication Research5(4): 375-82.
39.
Maxwell, S.E. and H.D. Delaney ( 1993) ‘Bivariate Median Splits and Spurious Statistical Significance’, Psychological Bulletin113(1): 181-90.
40.
Nie, N.H. and D.S. Hillygus ( 2002) ‘The Impact of Internet Use on Sociability: Time-diary Findings’, IT & Society1(1): 1-20.
41.
Rawlins, W.K. ( 1992) Friendship Matters: Communication, Dialectics and the Life Course. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
42.
Rohlfing, M.E. ( 1995) ‘"Doesn’t Anybody Stay in One Place Anymore?" An Exploration of the Under-studied Phenomenon of Long-distance Relationships’ , in J.T. Wood and S. Duck (eds) Under-studied Relationships: Off the Beaten Track, pp. 173-96. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
Schmidt, J. ( 2007) ‘Blogging Practices: An Analytical Framework’ , Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12(4), URL (consulted October 2007): http://jcmc.indiana. edu/vol12/issue4/schmidt.html
44.
Scott, C.R. and C.E. Timmerman ( 2005) ‘Relating Computer, Communication and Computer-mediated Communication Apprehensions to New Communication Technology Use in the Workplace’ , Communication Research32(6): 683-725.
45.
Sproull, L. and S. Kiesler ( 1986) ‘Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communications’, Management Science32(11): 1492-512.
46.
Stafford, L. and A.J. Merolla ( 2007) ‘Idealization, Reunions and Stability in Long-distance Dating Relationships’, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships24(1): 37-54.
47.
Stafford, L., S.L. Kline and J. Dimmick ( 1999) ‘Home Email: Relational Maintenance and Gratification Opportunities’, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media43(4): 659-69.
48.
Stefanone, M.A. and C.-Y. Jang ( 2007) ‘Writing for Friends and Family: The Interpersonal Nature of Blogs’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13(1), URL (consulted July 2008): http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/stefanone.html
49.
Straub, D. and E. Karahanna ( 1998) ‘Knowledge Worker Communications and Recipient Availability: Toward a Task Closure Explanation of Media Choice’, Organization Science9(2): 160-75.
50.
Valente, T.W. and W.P. Saba ( 1998) ‘Mass Media and Interpersonal Influence in a Reproductive Health Communication Campaign in Bolivia’, Communication Research25(1): 96-124.
51.
Valente, T.W., P.R. Poppe and A.P. Merritt ( 1996) ‘Mass-media-generated Interpersonal Communication as Sources of Information about Family Planning’, Journal of Health Communication1(3): 247-65.
52.
Walther, J.B. ( 1994) ‘Anticipated Ongoing Interaction Versus Channel Effects on Relational Communication in Computer Mediated Interaction’ , Communication Research20(4): 473-501.
53.
Walther, J.B. ( 1996) ‘Computer-mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal and Hyperpersonal Interaction’, Communication Research23(1): 3-43.
54.
Walther, J.B. and S. Boyd ( 2002) ‘Attraction to Computer-mediated Social Support’ , in C.A. Lin and D. Atkin (eds) Communication Technology and Society: Audience Adoption and Uses, pp. 153-88. Cresskill, NJ : Hampton Press.
55.
Walther, J.B. and J.K. Burgoon ( 1992) ‘Relational Communication in Computermediated Interaction’ , Human Communication Research19(1): 50-88.
56.
Walther, J.B. and M.R. Parks ( 2002) ‘Cues Filtered Out, Cues Filtered in: Computermediated Communication and Relationships’, in M.L. Knapp and J.A. Daly (eds) Handbook of Interpersonal Communication (3rd edn), pp. 529-63. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57.
Wright, K.B. ( 2005) ‘Researching Internet-based Populations: Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Survey Research, Online Questionnaire Authoring Software Packages and Web Survey Services’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication10(3), URL (consulted October 2007): http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/wright.html
