Self-disclosure mediates the effects of gender orientation and homophobia on the relationship quality of male same-sex friendships

Abstract

This study tested the degree to which self-disclosure mediates the effects of gender orientation and homophobia on relational satisfaction, closeness, and commitment in men’s same-sex friendships. Participants included 211 men from the southwest region of the US, who reported on either geographically close (n = 107) or long distance same-sex friendships (n = 104). Results indicated that self-disclosure mediates the positive effect of femininity on satisfaction, closeness, and commitment in men’s same-sex friendships. Self-disclosure also mediates the negative, indirect effects of homophobia on all three relational outcomes. Tests of structural invariance provided no evidence to suggest that the indirect effects of femininity and homophobia on all three relational outcomes vary as a function of geographic distance.

Keywords

Same-sex friendship long-distance friendship self-disclosure closeness satisfaction commitment gender homophobia

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

R. G.

(1998). The demise of territorial determinism: Online friendships. In Adams

R. G.

Allan

(Eds.), Placing friendship in context (pp. 153–182). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Aron

E. N.

Smollan

(1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.

Aron

Fraley

(1999). Relationship closeness as including other in the self: Cognitive underpinnings and measures. Social Cognition, 17, 140–160.

Aukett

Ritchie

Mill

(1988). Gender differences in friendship patterns. Sex Roles, 19, 57–66.

Aylor

Dainton

(2004). Biological sex and psychological gender as predictors of routine and strategic relational maintenance. Sex Roles, 50, 689–697.

Bank

B. J.

(1995). Friendships in Australia and the United States: From feminization to a more heroic image. Gender & Society, 9, 79–98.

Bank

B. J.

Hansford

S. L.

(2000). Gender and friendship: Why are men’s best same-sex friendships less intimate and supportive? Personal Relationships, 7, 63–78.

Baumgarte

Nelson

D. W.

(2009). Preference for same- versus cross-sex friendships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 901–917.

Becker

J. A. H.

Johnson

A. J.

Craig

E. A.

Gilchrist

E. S.

Haigh

M. M.

Lane

L. T.

(2009). Friendships are flexible, not fragile: Turning points in geographically close and long-distance friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 347–369.

10.

Bem

S. L.

(1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.

11.

Blieszner

Adams

(1992). Adult friendships. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

12.

Bowman

J. M.

(2008). Gender role orientation and relational closeness: Self-disclosive behavior in same-sex male friendships. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 16, 316–330.

13.

Bowman

J. M.

(2009). The influences of attribution, context, and heterosexual self-presentation on perceived appropriateness of self-disclosure in same-sex male friendships. Communication Research Reports, 26, 215–227.

14.

Browne

M. W.

Cudeck

(1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen

K. A.

Long

J. S.

(Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

15.

Brunch

M. A.

(2002). Shyness and toughness: Unique and moderated relations with men’s emotional inexpression. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 28–34.

16.

Buote

V. M.

Pancer

S. M.

Pratt

M. W.

Adams

Lefcovitch

S. B.

Polivy

Wintre

M. G.

(2007). The importance of friends: Friendship and adjustment among 1st year university students. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22, 665–689.

17.

Burleson

B. R.

Holmstrom

A. J.

Gilstrap

C. M.

(2005). “Guys can’t say that to guys”: Four experiments assessing the normative motivation account for deficiencies in the emotional support provided by men. Communication Monographs, 72, 468–501.

18.

Coates

(2003). Men talk: Stories in the making of masculinities. London, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

19.

Demir

Ozen

Dogan

Bilyk

N. A.

Tyrell

F. A.

(2011). I matter to my friend, therefore I am happy: Friendship, mattering, and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 983–1005.

20.

Devlin

P. K.

Cowan

G. A.

(1985). Homophobia, perceived fathering, and male intimate relationships. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 467–473.

21.

Duck

Pittman

(1994). Social and personal relationships. In Knapp

M. L.

Miller

(Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 676–695). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

22.

Duran

R. L.

Kelly

(1985). An investigation into the cognitive domain of communicative competence. Communication Research Reports, 2, 112–119.

23.

Eagly

A. H.

(1987). Sex differences in social behaviors: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

24.

Eagly

A. H.

Wood

Diekman

A. B.

(2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In Eckes

Trautner

H. M.

(Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

25.

Eisler

R. M.

(1995). The relationship between masculine gender role stress and men’s health risk. In Levant

R. F.

Pollack

W. S.

(Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 207–225). New York: Basic Books.

26.

Fehr

(1996). Friendship processes. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

27.

Fehr

(2004). Intimacy expectations in same-sex friendships: A prototype interaction-pattern model. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 86, 265–284.

28.

Floyd

(1995). Gender and closeness among friends and siblings. The Journal of Psychology, 129, 193–202.

29.

Floyd

(2000). Affectionate same-sex touch: The influence of homophobia on observers’ perceptions. The Journal of Social Psychology, 140, 774–778.

30.

Floyd

Morman

M. T.

(1997). Affectionate communication in nonromantic relationships: Influences of communicator, relational, and contextual factors. Western Journal of Communication, 61, 279–298.

31.

Floyd

Morman

M. T.

(2000). Affection received from fathers as a predictor of men’s affection with their own sons: Tests of the modeling and compensation hypotheses. Communication Monographs, 67, 347–361.

32.

Fuehrer

Childs

(1980). Gender differences in self-disclosure to various target persons. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 27, 192–198.

33.

Granovetter

(1976). Network sampling: Some first steps. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 1287–1303.

34.

Grief

G. L.

(2006). Male friendships: Implications from research for family therapy. Family Therapy, 33, 1–15.

35.

Grief

G. L.

(2009). Buddy system: Understanding male friendships. New York: Oxford University Press.

36.

Gormley

Lopez

F. G.

(2010). Authoritarian and homophobic attitudes: Gender and adult attachment style differences. Journal of Homosexuality, 57, 525–538.

37.

Hall

J. A.

(2011). Sex differences in friendship expectations: A meta-analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 723–747.

38.

Hayes

A. F.

(2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420. doi:10.1080/03637750903310360

39.

Holmstrom

A. J.

(2009). Sex and gender similarities and differences in communication values in same-sex and cross-sex friendships. Communication Quarterly, 57, 224–238.

40.

Holt-Lunstad

Smith

T. B.

Layton

J. B.

(2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. Public Library of Science Medicine, 7, 2–19.

41.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118

42.

Inman

(1996). Friendships between men: Closeness in the doing. In Wood

J. T.

(Ed.), Gendered relationships (pp. 95–110). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Co.

43.

Johnson

A. J.

(2001). Examining the maintenance of friendships: Are there differences between geographically close and long-distance friends? Communication Quarterly, 49, 424–435.

44.

Johnson

A. J.

Haigh

M. M.

Craig

E. A.

Becker

J. A. H.

(2009). Relational closeness: Comparing undergraduate college students’ geographically close and long-distance friendships. Personal Relationships, 16, 631–646.

45.

Johnston

G. D.

(1989). An examination of the psychological and sociocultural deterrents to intimacy between male friends (Doctoral dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology, Berkeley/Alameda). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51 (04–B), 2103.

46.

Jones

D. C.

(1991). Friendship satisfaction and gender: An examination of sex differences in contributions to friendship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 167–185.

47.

Jones

T. S.

Brunner

C. C.

(1984). The effects of self-disclosure and sex on perceptions of interpersonal communication competence. Women’s Studies in Communication, 7, 23–37.

48.

Kline

R. B.

(2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

49.

Lewis

R. A.

(1978). Emotional intimacy among men. Journal of Social Issues, 34, 109–121.

50.

Little

T. D.

(1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 53–76. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3201_3

51.

Little

T. D.

Card

N. A.

Slegers

D. W.

Ledford

E. C.

(2007). Representing contextual effects in multiple-group MACS models. In Little

T. D.

Bovaird

J. A.

Card

N. A.

(Eds.), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp. 121–147). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

52.

Little

T. D.

Cunningham

W. A.

Shahar

Widaman

K. F.

(2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1

53.

Little

T. D.

Slegers

D. W.

Card

N. A.

(2006). A non-arbitrary method of identifying and scaling latent variables in SEM and MACS models. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 59–72. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1301_3

54.

Meeks

B. S.

Hendrick

S. S.

Hendrick

(1998). Communication, love, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 755–773.

55.

Monroe

Baker

R. C.

Roll

(1997). The relationship of homophobia to intimacy in heterosexual men. Journal of Homosexuality, 33, 23–37.

56.

Oswald

D. L.

Clark

E. M.

Kelly

C. M.

(2004). Friendship maintenance: An analysis of individual and dyad behaviors. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 413–441.

57.

Perissinotto

C. M.

Cenzer

I. S.

Covinsky

K. E.

(2012). Loneliness in older persons: A predictor of functional decline and death. Achieves of Internal Medicine. Published online June 18, 2012. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1993

58.

Preacher

K. J.

Kelley

(2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16, 93–115. doi:10.1037/a0022658.supp

59.

Reis

H. T.

(1998). Sex differences in intimacy and related behaviors: Contexts and process. In Canary

D. J.

Dindia

(Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication (pp. 203–231). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

60.

Reisman

J. M.

(1990). Intimacy in same-sex friendships. Sex Roles, 23, 65–82.

61.

Rohlfing

(1995). “Doesn’t anybody stay in one place anymore?” An exploration of the understudied phenomenon of long-distance relationships. In Wood

J. T.

Duck

(Eds.), Understanding personal relationships, 6: Understudied relationships: Off the beaten track (pp. 173–196). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

62.

Rusbult

C. E.

Martz

J. M.

Agnew

C. R.

(1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391.

63.

Sanderson

C. A.

Rahm

K. B.

Beigbeder

S. A.

(2005). The link between the pursuit of intimacy goals and satisfaction in close same-sex friendships: An examination of the underlying processes. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 75–98.

64.

Smith

C. J.

Noll

J. A.

Bryant

J. B.

(1999). The effect of social context on gender self-concept. Sex Roles, 40, 499–512.

65.

Snell

W. E.

Belk

S. S.

Flowers

Warren

(1988). Women and men’s willingness to self-disclose to therapists and friends: The moderating influence of instrumental, expressive, masculine, and feminine topics. Sex Roles, 18, 769–776.

66.

Sprecher

(1987). The effects of self disclosure given and received on affection for an intimate partner and stability of the relationship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 115–127.

67.

Sprecher

Hendrick

S. S.

(2004). Self-disclosure in intimate relationships: Associations with individual and relationship characteristics over time. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 857–877.

68.

Stafford

(2005). Maintaining long distance and cross-residential relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

69.

Stafford

Dainton

Haas

(2000). Measuring routine and strategic relational maintenance: Scale revision, sex versus gender roles, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs, 67, 306–323.

70.

Stephenson

M. T.

Holbert

R. L.

(2003). A Monte Carlo simulation of observable versus latent variable structural equation modeling techniques. Communication Research, 30, 332–354. doi:10.1177/0093650203252410

71.

Stokes

Fuehrer

Childs

(1980). Gender differences in self-disclosure to various target persons. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 27, 192–198.

72.

Swain

(1989). Covert intimacy: Closeness in men’s friendships. In Risman

B. J.

Schwartz

(Eds.), Gender in intimate relationships (pp. 71–86). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.

73.

Waldrip

A. M.

Malcolm

K. T.

Campbell

L. A.

(2008). With a little help from your friends: The importance of high-quality friendships on early adolescent adjustment. Social Development, 17, 832–852.

74.

Wheeless

Grotz

(1977). The measurement of trust and its relationship to self-disclosure. Human Communication Research, 3, 250–257.

75.

Wheeless

V. E.

Dierks-Stewart

(1981). The psychometric properties of the Bem sex-role inventory: Questions concerning reliability and validity. Communication Quarterly, 28, 173–186.

76.

Williams

D. G.

(1985). Gender, masculinity-femininity, and emotional intimacy in same-sex friendship. Sex Roles, 12, 587–600.

77.

Winstead

B. A.

Derlega

V. J.

(1985). Benefits of same-sex friendships in a stressful situation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 3, 378–384.

78.

Wood

J. T.

(1993). Engendered relations: Interaction, caring, power, and responsibility in intimacy. In Duck

(Ed.), Social Context and relationships (pp. 26–54). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

79.

Wood

J. T.

(2001). Gendered close relationships. In Wood

J. T.

(Ed.), Gendered lives: Communication, gender, and culture (pp. 193–219). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.

80.

Wood

J. T.

(2013). Gendered lives: Communication, gender, & culture. 10th ed. Boston, MA: Wadsworth.

81.

Wood

J. T.

Inman

C. C.

(1993). In a different mode: Masculine styles of communicating closeness. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 21, 279–295.

82.

Wright

P. H.

(2006). Toward an expanded orientation to the comparative study of women’s and men’s same-sex friendships. In Dindia

Canary

D. J.

(Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication (2nd ed., pp. 37–58). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

83.

Wright

P. H.

Scanlon

M. B.

(1991). Gender role orientations and friendship: Some attenuation, but gender differences abound. Sex Roles, 24, 551–566.