Although middleborn college students commonly report worse family relationships than other birth orders, it is unknown whether this effect persists into adulthood. Therefore, we investigated the effect of birth order on self-reported family and friend relationships among a large sample of Dutch adults (n = 794). Middleborns did not differ from other birth orders in relationships with their father, mother, sibling or close friend. Middleborns do not prefer a friend over their father, mother or sibling more than other birth orders. Evidence for a “neglected middleborn effect” appeared only in a within-family design for siblings. Firstborns were more likely to report very good sibling relationships and preferred a sibling over a friend. The results are discussed in terms of kin competition and inclusive fitness.
Borgerhoff Mulder, M. ( 2007). Hamilton’s rule and kin competition: The Kipsigis case. Evolution and Human Behavior28, 299-312.
2.
Bromberg, E.A. ( 1983). Mother-daughter relationships in later life: The effect of quality of relationship upon mutual aid. Journal of Social Gerontological Work, 6, 75-92.
3.
Cicirelli, V.G. ( 1983). Adult children’s attachment and helping behavior to elderly parents: A path model. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 815-825.
4.
Dykstra, P.A., Kalmijn, M., Knijn, T.C.M., Komter, A.E., Liefbroer, A.C., & Mulder, C.H. ( 2004). Codebook of the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study, a multi-actor, multi-method panel study on solidarity in family relationships, Wave 1. NKPS Working Paper No. 1. The Hague: Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute. (Version of July 2005).
5.
Essock-Vitale, S.M., & McGuire, M.T. ( 1985). Women’s lives viewed from an evolutionary perspective. II. Patterns of helping. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 155-173.
6.
Euler, H.A., & Michalski, R.L. (2007). Grandparental and extended kin relationships. In C. Salmon, & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Family Relationships: An evolutionary perspective (pp. 230-256). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
Freese, J., Powell, B., & Steelman, L.C. (1999). Rebel without a cause or effect: Birth order and social attitudes. American Sociological Review, 64, 207-231.
8.
Hamilton, W.D. ( 1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour, parts I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1-52.
9.
Hardman, D., Villiers C., & Roby, S. ( 2007). Another look at birth order and familial sentiment: Are middleborns really different? Journal of Evolutionary Psychology , 5, 197-211.
10.
Healey, M.D., & Ellis, B.J. ( 2007). Birth order, conscientiousness, and openness to experience: Tests of the family-niche model of personality using a within-family methodology . Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 55-59.
11.
Hosmer, D., & Lemeshow, S. ( 1989). Applied Logistic Regression. New York : Wiley & Sons.
12.
House, J.S., Umberson, D., & Landis, K.R. ( 1988). Structures and processes of social support. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 293-318.
13.
Hughes, A.L. ( 1988). Evolution and Human Kinship. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
14.
Kennedy, G.E. ( 1989). Middleborns’ perceptions of family relationships . Psychological Reports, 64, 755-760.
15.
Kidwell, J.S. ( 1981). Number of siblings, sibling spacing, sex and birth order: Their effects on perceived parent-adolescent relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 315-332.
16.
Kidwell, J.S. ( 1982). The neglected birth order: Middleborns. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 225-235.
17.
Marsden, P.V., & Campbell, K.E. (1984). Measuring tie strength . Social Forces, 63, 482-501.
18.
Menard, S. ( 1995). Applied Logistic Analysis, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series #106. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
19.
Michalski, R.L., & Shackelford, T.K. (2002). An attempted replication of the relationships between birth order and personality. Journal for Research on Personality, 36, 182-188.
20.
Nagelkerke, N.J.D. ( 1991). A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 78, 691-692.
21.
Pampel, F.C. ( 2000). Logistic regression: A primer, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series #132. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
22.
Paulhus, D.L., Trapnell, P.D., & Chen, D. ( 1999). Birth order effects on personality and achievement within families. Psychological Science, 10, 482-488.
23.
Peng, C.-Y.J., Lee, K.L., & Ingersoll, G.M. (2002). An introduction to logistic regression analysis and reporting. Journal of Educational Research, 96, 1-14.
24.
Pollet, T.V. ( 2005). Childlessness and genetic relatedness: their influence on sibling ties in a Post-Industrial society. Unpublished MSc thesis. Liverpool: University of Liverpool.
25.
Pollet, T.V. ( 2007). Genetic relatedness and sibling relationship characteristics in a modern society. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 176-185.
26.
Pollet, T.V., & Dunbar, R.I.M. (2008). Childlessness predicts helping of nieces and nephews in United States, 1910. Journal of Biosocial Science, 40, 761-770.
27.
Pollet, T.V., Kuppens, T., & Dunbar, R.I.M. (2006). When nieces and nephews become important: Differences between childless women and mothers in relationships with nieces and nephews. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 83-93.
28.
Pollet, T.V., & Nettle, D. ( 2007). Birth order and face-to-face contact with a sibling: Firstborns have more contact than laterborns. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1796-1806.
29.
Powell, B., & Steelman, L.C. (1990). Beyond sibship size: Sibling density, sex composition, and educational outcomes. Social Forces, 69, 181-206.
30.
Rohde, P.A., Atzwanger, K., Butovskaya, M., Lampert, A., Mysterud, I., Sanchez-Andres, A., & Sulloway, F.J. (2003). Perceived parental favoritism, closeness to kin, and the rebel of the family: The effects of birth order and sex. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 261-276.
31.
Rosenthal, C.J. ( 1985). Kinkeeping and the familial division of labor. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 965-974.
32.
Rossi, A.S., & Rossi, P.H. ( 1990). Of human bonding: Parent-child relations across the life course. New York: Aldine.
33.
Salmon, C.A. ( 1999). On the impact of sex and birth order on contact with kin. Human Nature, 10, 183-197.
34.
Salmon, C.A. ( 2003). Birth order and relationships: friends, family, sexual partners. Human Nature, 14, 73-81.
35.
Salmon, C.A., & Daly, M. ( 1998). Birth order and familial sentiment: middleborns are different . Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 299-312.
36.
Steelman, L.C. ( 1985). A tale of two variables: A review of the intellectual consequences of sibship size and birth order. Review of Educational Research, 55, 353-386.
37.
Steelman, L.C., & Powell, B. ( 1985). The social and academic consequences of birth order: Real, artifactual, or both?Journal of Marriage and the Family , 47, 117-124.
38.
Steelman, L.C., Powell, B., Werum, R., & Carter, S. ( 2002). Reconsidering the effects of sibling configuration: Recent advances and challenges. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 243-269.
39.
Suitor, J.J., & Pillemer, K. ( 2007). Mothers’ favoritism in later life: The role of children’s birth order. Research on Aging, 29, 32-55.
40.
Sulloway, F. ( 1996). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York: Pantheon.
41.
Sulloway, F. ( 2001). Birth order, sibling competition, and human behaviour . In P. S. Davies, & H. R. Holcomb (Eds.), Conceptual challenges in evolutionary psychology: Innovative research strategies (pp. 39-83). Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Umberson, D. ( 1992). Relationships between adult children and their parents: Psychological consequences for both generations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 664-674.
44.
Zvoch, K. ( 1999). Family type and investment in education: A comparison of genetic and step-parent families. Evolution and Human Behavior , 20, 453-464.
