The purpose of the study was to identify the educational, social and leisure activities and issues that matter to school children and young people with a visual impairment and to compare their lifestyle with fully sighted counterparts. Thirteen focus groups were conducted and the groups were stratified by age, gender, visual status and school location (urban and non-urban). The sessions were audio taped, transcribed verbatim, coded using NVivo software and a qualitative data analysis was carried out to identify the main themes. Eighty-one children and young people aged between 5–18 years participated in the focus groups; 34 were visually impaired (22 boys) and 47 were fully sighted (24 boys). In total, 121 different daily living activities important to children and young people were discussed in the focus groups. Results suggested that children and young people with a visual impairment have similar lifestyles to their fully sighted counterparts but are more restricted in some specific activities. The children and young people also reported that sometimes these restrictions were imposed by those supporting them rather than their own abilities. This information provided an in-depth understanding of the impact of visual impairment in school-aged children and young people.
BowenJ. (2010). Visual impairment and its impact on self-esteem. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 28(1), 47–56.
2.
CavetJ.SloperP. (2004). Participation of disabled children in individual decisions about their lives and in public decisions about service development. Children & Society, 18(4), 278–290.
3.
CochraneG.LamoureuxE.KeeffeJ. (2008). Defining the content for a new quality of life questionnaire for students with low vision (the Impact of Vision Impairment on Children: IVI_C). Ophthalmic Epidemiology, 15(2), 114–120.
4.
CornA. L.WallR. S.JoseR. T.WilcoxK.PerezA. (2002). An intial study of reading and comprehension rates for students who received optical devices. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 96(5), 322–334.
5.
CrockerA. D.OrrR. R. (1996). Social behaviours of children with visual impairments enrolled in preschool programs. Exceptional Children, 62, 451–462.
6.
DaviesA.JonesJ. (1996). Environmental constraints on health: Listening to children’s views. Health Education Journal, 55, 363–374.
7.
GreenbaumT. L. (1998). The handbook for focus group research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
8.
GrimB. J.HarmonA. H.GromisJ. C. (2006). Focused group interviews as an innovative Quanti-Qualitative Methodology (QQM): Integrating quantitative elements into a qualitative methodology. Qualitative Report, 11(3), 516–537.
9.
HearyC. M.HennessyE. (2002). The use of focus group interviews in pediatric health care research. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 27(1), 47–57.
10.
HillM. (2006). Children’s voices on ways of having a voice. Childhood, 13(1), 69–89.
11.
HoppeM. J.GrahamL.WilsdonA.WellsE. A.NahomD.MorrisonD. M. (2004). Teens speak out about HIV/AIDS: Focus group discussions about risk and decision-making. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35(4), 345.e327–335.
12.
HumphreyN.LewisS. (2008). “Make me normal”. Autism, 12(1), 23–46.
13.
HuurreT.AroH. (2000). The psychological well-being of Finnish adolescents with visual impairments versus those with chronic conditions and those with no disabilities. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 94(10), 625–637.
KhadkaJ.RyanB.MargrainT. H.CourtH.WoodhouseJ. M. (2010). Development of the 25-item Cardiff Visual Ability Questionnaire for Children (CVAQC). The British Journal of Ophthalmology, 94(6), 730–735.
16.
KoenigA. J.HolbrookM. C. (1995). Learning media assessment of students with visual impairment (2nd ed.). Texas: Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired.
17.
KoutantosD. (2000). A survey of children with VIMI in special schools in Crete. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 18(2), 73–77.
18.
KruegerR. A.CaseyM. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Thousands Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
19.
LifshitzH.HenI.WeisserI. (2007). Self-concept, adjustment to blindness, and quality of friendship among adolescents with visual impairment. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 101(2), 1–20.
20.
LightfootJ.SloperP. (2003). Having a say in health: Involving young people with a chronic illness or physical disability in local health services development. Children and Society, 17(4), 277–290.
21.
MasonH. L. (1999). Blurred vision: A study of the use of low vision aids by visually impaired secondary school pupils. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 17(3), 94–97.
22.
McKeeverP.MillerK. L. (2004). Mothering children who have disabilities: A Bourdieusian interpretation of maternal practices. Social Science & Medicine, 59(6), 1177–1191.
23.
MitchellW.SloperP. (2001). Quality in services for disabled children and their families: What can theory, practice and research in children’s and parents’ views tell us?Children & Society, 15(4), 237–252.
24.
MonolescuD.SchifterC. (1999). Online Focus Group: A tool to evaluate online students’ course experience. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 171–176.
25.
NelsonL. J.RubinK. H.FoxN. A. (2005). Social withdrawal, observed peer acceptance, and the development of self-perceptions in children ages 4 to 7 years. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20(2), 185–200.
26.
NindM. (2008). Learning difficulties and social class: Exploring the intersection through family narratives. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 18(2), 87–98.
27.
OchsE.Kremer-SadlikT.SolomonO.SirotaK. G. (2001). Inclusion as social practice: Views of children with autism. Social Development, 10(3), 399–419.
28.
PeaveyK. O.LeffD. (2002). Social acceptance of adolescent mainstreamed students with visual impairment. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 96(11), 808–811.
29.
Peterson-SweeneyK. (2005). The use of focus groups in pediatric and adolescent research. [Review]. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 19(2), 104–110.
30.
RonenG. M.RosenbaumP.LawM.StreinerD. L. (2001). Health-related quality of life in childhood disorders: A modified focus group technique to involve children. Quality of Life Research, 10(1), 71–79.
31.
SacksS. Z.WolffeK. E. (1992). The importance of social skills in the transition process for students with visual impairments. Journal of Vocational Rehabiliation, 2, 46–55.
32.
WalshT. R.IrwinD. E.MeierA.VarniJ. W.DeWaltD. A. (2008). The use of focus groups in the development of the PROMIS pediatrics item bank. [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural]. Quality of Life Research, 17(5), 725–735.
33.
WatsonN.RobertsonA. (1996). A qualitative evaluation of HIV and AIDS education to senior school children in Lothian region, Scotland. Health Promotional International, 11(4), 291–298.
34.
WeihL. M.HassellJ. B.KeeffeJ. (2002). Assessment of the impact of vision impairment. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 43(4), 927–935.
35.
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (2008) Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.
