Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Mobile communication technology is an essential part of life of adolescents nowadays, and those with visual impairments are no exception. In focus group interviews with students from a school for the blind and the visually impaired in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, we found that, despite the visual nature of social media, they use and enjoy these resources as much as their sighted peers. These students are aware of the possibilities and constraints that social media might bring to them but, with the help of assistive technology, make the most of it. After listening to their voices, we noticed that it is high time we incorporate social media in our pedagogical practice, in order to develop their learning process and life skills.

Keywords

Facebook focus group mobile devices social media visual impairment WhatsApp

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ashaye

Ajuwon

A. J.

Adeoti

(2006). Perception of blindness and blinding eye conditions in rural communities. Journal of the National Medical Association, 98, 887–893. Retrieved from http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2569369&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract

Asuncion

Budd

Fichten

C. S.

Nguyen

Barile

Amsel

(2012). Social media use by students with disabilities. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 16, 30–35. Retrieved from http://www.adaptech.org/migrated_publications/pubs/AEQSocialMediaUse.pdf

Benitez

Devaux

Dausset

(2002). Audiovisual documentation of oral consent: A new method of informed consent for illiterate populations. The Lancet, 359, 1406–1407. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08361-7

Bradley

Poppen

(2003). Assistive technology, computers and Internet may decrease sense of isolation for homebound elderly and disabled persons. Technology and Disability, 15, 19–25. Retrieved from http://iospress.metapress.com/index/142vnadejaj5e9up.pdf

Brady

E. L.

Zhong

Morris

M. R.

Bigham

J. P.

(2013). Investigating the appropriateness of social network question asking as a resource for blind users. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 1225–1236). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2441776.2441915

Campbell

Park

Y. J.

(2008). Social implications of mobile telephony: The rise of personal communication society. Sociology Compass, 2, 371–387. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00080.x

Castells

Fernandez-Ardevol

Qiu

J. L.

Sey

(2007). Mobile communication and society: A global perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chlebowy

D. O.

Hood

LaJoie

A. S.

(2010). Facilitators and barriers to self-management of type 2 diabetes among urban African American adults: Focus group findings. The Diabetes Educator, 36, 897–905. doi:10.1177/0145721710385579

Decreto No 3.298, de 20 de Dezembro de 1999 (1999). Retrieved from http://www2.camara.leg.br/legin/fed/decret/1999/decreto-3298–20-dezembro-1999–367725-normaatualizada-pe.pdf

10.

Decreto No 5.296 de 2 de Dezembro de 2004 (2004). Retrieved from https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2004-2006/2004/Decreto/D5296.htm

11.

Dobransky

Hargittai

(2006). The disability divide in internet access and use. Information, Communication & Society, 9, 313–334. doi:10.1080/13691180600751298

12.

Duckett

Pratt

(2001). The researched opinions on research: Visually impaired people and visual impairment research. Disability & Society, 16, 815–835. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590120083976

13.

Ebner

Nagler

Schon

(2015). Why Facebook swallowed WhatsApp! In World conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications (pp. 1383–1392). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Martin_Ebner2/publication/279753355_Why_Facebook_Swallowed_WhatsApp!/links/559a09c308ae5d8f393649b7.pdf

14.

Enjolras

Steen-Johnsen

Wollebaek

(2013). Social media and mobilization to offline demonstrations: Transcending participatory divides? New Media & Society, 15, 890–908. doi:10.1177/1461444812462844

15.

França

D. N. O.

(2013). Sexualidade da pessoa com cegueira: da percepção à expressão. Revista Brasileira De Educação Especial, 19, 583–596. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbee/v19n4/v19n4a08.pdf

16.

Fuglerud

K. S.

Tjostheim

Gunnarsson

B. R.

Tollefsen

(2012). Use of social media by people with visual impairments: Usage levels, attitudes and barriers. In SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 565–572). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31522-0_85

17.

Gil

A. C.

(2008). Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social [Methods and techniques for social research] (6^a). São Paulo, Brazil: Editora Atlas.

18.

Gohn

M. G.

(2014). A sociedade brasileira em movimento: vozes das ruas e seus ecos políticos e sociais [Brazilian society in movement: voices from the streets and their social and political echoes]. Caderno CRH, 27, 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-49792014000200013

19.

Guy

(2010). Preface. In Guy

(Ed.), Mobile learning: Pilot projects and initiatives (p. xi). Santa Rosa, CA: Informing Science Press.

20.

IBGE – Coordenação de Trabalho e Rendimento. (2015). Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2013: Ciclos de vida: Brasil e grandes regiões [National Health Research 2013: Life Cycles: Brazil and its macro regions]. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: IBGE. Retrieved from http://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv94522.pdf

21.

Jarvenpaa

S. L.

Lang

K. R.

(2005). Managing the paradoxes of mobile technology. Information Systems Management, 22(4), 7–23. doi:10.1201/1078.10580530/45520.22.4.20050901/90026.2

22.

Kane

S. K.

Jayant

Wobbrock

J. O.

Ladner

R. E.

(2009). Freedom to roam: A study of mobile device adoption and accessibility for people with visual and motor disabilities. In Proceedings of the 11th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 115–122). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1639642.1639663

23.

Katz

J. E.

(2008). Introduction. In Katz

J. E.

(Ed.), Handbook of mobile communication studies (pp. 1–11). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.1201/9781420053890

24.

Kaye

H. S.

(2000). Computer and internet use among people with disabilities. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED439579

25.

Khadka

Ryan

Margrain

T. H.

Woodhouse

J. M.

Davies

(2012). Listening to voices of children with a visual impairment: A focus group study. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 30, 182–196. doi:10.1177/0264619612453105

26.

Laabidi

Jemni

Ayed

L. J.

Brahim

H. B.

Jemaa

A. B.

(2014). Learning technologies for people with disabilities. Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, 26, 29–45. doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2013.10.005

27.

Laplane

A. L. F.

De Batista

C. G.

(2008). Ver, não ver e aprender: a participação de crianças com baixa visão e cegueira na escola [To see, not to see and to learn: participation of children with low vision and blindness at school]. Cadernos CEDES, 28, 209–227. doi:10.1590/S0101-32622008000200005

28.

Maddox

Esposito

(2011). Sufficiency re-examined: A capabilities perspective on the assessment of functional adult literacy. Journal of Development Studies, 47, 1315–1331. doi:10.1080/00220388.2010.509788

29.

Martiniello

Budd

Nguyen

M. N.

Tibbs

Asuncion

Barile

. . .Fichten

(2012). Accessibility of social media for students who are blind or have low vision. Canadian Blind Monitor, 32. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

30.

Masrom

Ismail

(2010). Benefits and barriers to the use of mobile learning in education: Review of literature. In Guy

(Ed.), Mobile learning: Pilot projects and initiatives (pp. 9–26). Santa Rosa, CA: Informing Science Press.

31.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

Saldaña

(2014). Qualitative data analysis (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

32.

Morgado

F. F. R.

Campana

A. N. N. B.

Tavares

M. C. G. C. F

. (2012). Aplicabilidade do Grupo Focal com Pessoas Cegas [Applicability of focus groups with blind people] . Revista Benjamin Constant, 1–12. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259480206_Aplicabilidade_do_Grupo_Focal_com_Pessoas_Cegas

33.

Murphy

Kuber

McAllister

Strain

(2008). An empirical investigation into the difficulties experienced by visually impaired internet users. Universal Access in the Information Society, 7, 79–91. doi:10.1007/s10209-007-0098-4

34.

Presidência da República, Secretaria de Comunicação Social. (2015). Pesquisa Brasileira de Mídia 2015: hábitos de consumo de mídia pela população brasileira [Brazilian Media Research 2015: media consumption habits of the Brazilian population]. Brasília, Brazil: Secom. Retrieved from http://www.secom.gov.br/atuacao/pesquisa/lista-de-pesquisas-quantitativas-e-qualitativas-de-contratos-atuais/pesquisa-brasileira-de-midia-pbm-2015.pdf

35.

Qiu

Rauterberg

(2015). Mobile social media for the blind: Preliminary observations. In International Conference on Enabling Access for Persons with Visual Impairment (pp. 152–156). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272789786

36.

Seymour

Lupton

(2004). Holding the line online: Exploring wired relationships for people with disabilities. Disability & Society, 19, 291–305. doi:10.1080/09687590410001689421

37.

Smedema

S. M.

McKenzie

A. R.

(2010). The relationship among frequency and type of internet use, perceived social support, and sense of well-being in individuals with visual impairments. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32, 317–325. doi:10.3109/09638280903095908

38.

Tjostheim

Solheim

Fuglerud

K. S.

(2011). The importance of peers for visually impaired users of social media. In Proceedings of the 6th IASTED International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 23–30). doi:10.2316/P.2011.747-015

39.

Tollefsen

Dale

Ø.

Berg

Nordby

(2011). Connected! A paper about the disabled and the use of social media. Retrieved from http://www.medialt.no/dokumenter/956.aspx

40.

Vanden Abeele

. (2016). Mobile youth culture: A conceptual development. Mobile Media & Communication, 4, 85–101. doi:10.1177/2050157915601455

41.

Vashistha

Cutrell

Dell

Anderson

(2015). Social media platforms for low-income blind people in India. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (pp. 259–272). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2700648.2809858

42.

Vicente

M. R.

López

A. J.

(2010). A multidimensional analysis of the disability digital divide: Some evidence for Internet use. The Information Society, 26, 48–64. doi:10.1080/01615440903423245

43.

Wilkinson

(1998). Focus group methodology: A review. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1, 181–203. doi:10.1080/13645579.1998.10846874

44.

Wong

M. E.

Cohen

L. G.

(2016). Access and challenges of assistive technology application: Experience of teachers of students with visual impairments in Singapore. Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development, 26, 138–154. doi:10.5463/dcid.v26i4.450

45.

Wong

M. E.

Tan

S. S. K.

(2012). Teaching the benefit of smartphone technology to blind consumers: Exploring the potential of the iPhone. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 106, 646–650.

46.

Adamic

(2014). Visually impaired users on an online social network. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3133–3142). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2556288.2557415

Teenagers with visual impairment and new media: A world without barriers

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References