This paper analyzes the relationship between market concentration in the private segment of the water industry and water prices with a sample of municipalities located in the Southern Spanish region of Andalusia. In doing so, several Heckman sample selection models are estimated with the main finding being that market concentration increases the price of water for residential use charged by private companies. The main policy recommendation is that urban water service privatization must be accompanied by the appropriate regulatory and institutional frameworks to promote competition among businesses and monitor water pricing.
BakkerK (2010) Privatizing Water: Governance Failure and the World's Water Crisis, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
2.
BelGCostasA (2006) “Do public sector reforms get rusty? Local privatization in Spain”. Journal of Policy Reform9(1): 1–24
3.
BelGFagedaX (2007) “Why do local governments privatize public services? A survey of empirical studies”. Local Government Studies33(4): 517–534
4.
BelGFagedaX (2009) “Factors explaining local privatization: a meta-regression analysis”. Public Choice139(1): 105–119
5.
BelGFagedaX (2010) “Partial privatization in local services delivery: an empirical analysis on the choice of mixed firms”. Local Government Studies36(1): 129–149
6.
BelGFagedaXWarnerM E (2010) “Is private production of public services cheaper than public production? A meta-regression analysis of solid waste and water services”. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management29(3): 553–577
7.
BelGGonzález-GómezFPicazo-TadeoA J (2013) “The dynamics of privatization and regulation of water services: a comparative study of two Spanish regions”. International Journal of Water Resources Development29(3): 373–384
8.
BelGWarnerM E (2008) “Challenging issues in local privatization”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26(1): 104–109
9.
BelleflammePPeitzM (2010) Industrial Organization. Markets and Strategies, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
10.
BottassoAContiM (2009) “Scale economies, technology and technical change in the water industry: evidence from the English water only sector”. Regional Science and Urban Economics39(2): 138–147
11.
BrownTPotoskiM (2005) “Transaction costs and contracting: the practitioner perspective”. Public Performance and Management Review28(3): 326–351
12.
CarpentierANaugesCReynaudAThomasA (2006) “Effets de la délégation sur le prix de l'eau potable en France: Une analyse à partir de la littérature sur les effets de traitement”. Economie et Prévision174(3): 1–20
13.
Castillo-ManzanoJ ILopez-ValpuestaLMarchena-GómezMPedregalD (2013) “How much does water consumption drop when each household takes charge of its own consumption? The case of the city of Seville”. Applied Economics45(32): 4465–4473
14.
ChongEHuetFSaussierSSteinerF (2006a) “Public-private partnerships and prices: evidence from water distribution in France”. Review of Industrial Organization29(1/2): 149–169
15.
ChongEHuetFSaussierS (2006b) “Auctions, ex post competition and prices: the efficiency of public-private partnerships”. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics77(4): 521–554
16.
CruzNMarquesR (2012) “Mixed companies and local governance: no man can serve two masters”. Public Administration90(3): 737–758
17.
DijkgraafEGradusR H J M (2008) “Institutional developments in the Dutch waste-collection market”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26(1): 110–126
18.
European Commission EC (2004) “Guidelines on the assessment of horizontal mergers under the Council Regulation on the control on concentrations between undertakings”. Official Journal C31: 5–18
19.
FurlongKBakkerK (2010) “The contradictions in ‘alternative’ service delivery: governance, business models, and sustainability in municipal water supply”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy28(2): 349–368
20.
GarciaSGuérin-SchneiderLFauquertG (2005) “Analysis of water price determinants in France: cost recovery, competition for the market and operator's strategy”. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply5(6): 173–181
21.
García-ValiñasM AGonzález-GómezFPicazo-TadeoA J (2012) “Is the price of water for residential use related to provider ownership? Empirical evidence from Spain”. Utilities Policy24(1): 59–69
22.
García-ValiñasM AMartínez-EspiñeiraRGonzález-GómezF (2010) “Measuring water affordability: a proposal for urban centres in developed countries”. International Journal of Water Resources Development26(3): 441–458
23.
González-GómezFGarcía-RubioM A (2008) “Efficiency in the management of urban water services. What have we learned after four decades of research?”. Hacienda Pública Española. Revista de Economía Pública185(2): 39–67
24.
González-GómezFGarcía-RubioM AGuardiolaJ (2012) “Urban water service policies and management in Spain: pending issues”. International Journal of Water Resources Development28(1): 89–106
25.
González-GómezFGuardiolaJ (2009) “A duration model for the estimation of the contracting-out of urban water management in Southern Spain”. Urban Affairs Review44(6): 886–906
26.
González-GómezFGuardiolaJRuiz-VillaverdeA (2009) Reconsidering privatization in the governance of water in Spain. Municipal Engineer162(3): 159–164
27.
González-GómezFPicazo-TadeoA JGuardiola Wanden-BergheJ (2011) “Why do local governments privatize the provision of water services? Empirical evidence from Spain”. Public Administration89(2): 471–492
28.
HallDLobinaE (2012) Water Companies and Trends in Europe, Brussels: European Federation of Public Service Unions
29.
HeckmanJ (1976) “The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models”. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement5: 475–492
30.
HeckmanJ (1979) “Sample selection bias as a specification error”. Econometrica47(1): 153–162
31.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE) (2011) Encuesta sobre el suministro y saneamiento del agua. Año 2009, Madrid, Spain: Instituto Nacional de Estadística
32.
KimH YClarkR M (1988) “Economies of scale and scope in water supply”. Regional Science and Urban Economics18(4): 479–502
33.
KuenneR E (1989) “Uncertainty, spatial proximity, and the stability of oligopoly pricing”. Environment and Planning A21(8): 1001–1013
34.
Martinez-EspiñeiraRGarcía-ValiñasM AGonzález-GómezF (2009) “Does private management of water supply services really increase prices? An empirical analysis”. Urban Studies46(4): 923–945
35.
MirallesA (2008) “The link between service privatization and price distribution among consumer types: municipal water services in the Spanish region of Catalonia”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26(1): 159–172
36.
Olmos-GiupponiB (2013) “Water governance in Spain. A dynamic system in transition”. In: GunawansaABhullarL (eds) Water Governance. An Evaluation of Alternative Architectures, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., pp. 139–163
37.
PérardE (2009) “Water supply: public or private? An approach based on cost of funds, transaction costs, efficiency and political costs”. Policy and Society27(3): 193–219
38.
Picazo-TadeoA JGonzález-GómezFGuardiolaJRuiz-VillaverdeA (2012) “Do ideological and political motives really matter in the public choice of local services management? Evidence from urban water services in Spain”. Public Choice151: 215–228
39.
RuesterSZschilleM (2010) “The impact of governance structure on firm performance: an application to the German water distribution sector”. Utilities Policy18(3): 154–162
40.
Ruiz-VillaverdeAGarcía-RubioM AGonzález-GómezF (2010) “An analysis of urban water management in historical perspective: evidence for the Spanish case”. International Journal of Water Resources Development26(4): 653–674
41.
ThorstenR EEskafSHughesJ (2009) “Cost plus: estimating real determinants of water and sewer bills”. Public Works Management and Policy13(3): 224–238
42.
USDJ&FTC (2010) Horizontal Merger Guidelines, Washington DC: US Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission
43.
WarnerMBelG (2008) “Competition or monopoly? Comparing privatization of local public services in the US and Spain”. Public Administration86(3): 723–735
44.
WooldridgeJ M (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
