Public–private partnerships have been widely identified as key drivers of innovation in large public infrastructure projects such as hospitals, courthouses, bridges, highways, and transit lines. Yet to date, there is little empirical evidence documenting how much or what types of innovation are realized through the public–private partnership procurement process. Based on an examination of public–private partnership project delivery in Ontario, Canada over the past decade, this study shows that the innovations realized through the public–private partnership process tend to be a series of design, construction method, and material selection choices primarily aimed at lowering project cost and risk. Conversely, more revolutionary innovations in terms of iconic architecture or substantial rethinking of the approach to public service delivery are not typically achieved through the public–private partnership process. The paper concludes by reflecting on the meaning of innovation in the infrastructure sector, and identifies the specific public–private partnership procurement processes that incentivize cost-saving ingenuities over more transformational innovations.
BarlowJKöberle-GaiserM (2008) The private finance initiative, project form and design innovation. Research Policy37(8): 1392–1402.
5.
CaloffiAGambarottoF (2016) Cognitive distance in public procurement and public-private partnerships: An analysis of the construction sector. Environment and Planning C.
EatonDAkbiyikliRDickinsonM (2006) An evaluation of the stimulants and impediments to innovation within PFI/PPP projects. Construction Innovation6(2): 63–77.
8.
EdelenbosJTiesmanGR (2008) Public-private partnerships on the edge of project and process management: Insights from Dutch practice. Environment and Planning C26: 614–626.
9.
EdlerJGeorghiouL (2007) Public procurement and innovation – Resurrecting the demand side. Research Policy36(7): 949–963.
10.
FayekARHaasCManseauA (2008) Initial metrics and pilot program results for measuring the performance of the Canadian construction industry. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering35(9): 894–907.
11.
FlyvbjergB (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry12(2): 219–245.
12.
GannDMWangYHawkinsR (1998) Do regulations encourage innovation? The case of energy efficiency in housing. Building Research and Information26(5): 280–296.
13.
GilNMiozzoMMassiniS (2012) The innovation potential of new infrastructure development: An empirical study of Heathrow airport’s T5 project. Research Policy41(2): 452–466.
14.
HM Treasury (2012) A New Approach to Public Private Partnerships, London: Queen’s Press.
15.
HoppeESchmitzP (2013) Public-private partnerships versus traditional procurement: Innovation incentives and information gathering. RAND Journal of Economics44(1): 56–74.
Kline S and Rosenberg N (1986) An overview of innovation. In: Landau R and Rosenberg N (eds) The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, pp. 275–306.
20.
LeiringerR (2006) Technological innovation in PPPs: Incentives, opportunities and actions. Construction Management & Economics24(3): 301–308.
21.
MiozzoMDewickP (2002) Building competitive advantage: Innovation and corporate governance in European construction. Research Policy31(6): 989–1008.
22.
NamCHTatumCB (1997) Leaders and champions for construction innovation. Construction Management and Economics15(3): 259–270.
RobertsDSiemiatyckiM (2015) Fostering meaningful partnerships in public-private partnerships: Innovations in partnership design and process management to create value. Environment and Planning C33(4): 780–793.
27.
RoumboutsosASaussierS (2014) Public-private partnerships and investments in innovation: The influence of the contractual arrangement. Construction Management and Economics32(4): 349–361.
28.
RussellADTawiahPZoysaSD (2006) Project innovation – A function of procurement mode?Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering33(12): 1519–1537.
29.
SchumpeterJ (1939) Business Cycles, London: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
30.
SiemiatyckiM (2006) Implications of private-public partnerships on the development of urban public transit infrastructure: The case of Vancouver, Canada. Journal of Planning Education and Research26(2): 137–151.
31.
SiemiatyckiM (2015) Public-private partnerships in Canada: Reflections on twenty years of practice. Canadian Public Administration58(3): 343–362.
32.
SlaughterES (2000) Implementation of construction innovations. Building Research and Information28(1): 2–17.
33.
Van den HurkM (2016) Bundling the procurement of sports infrastructure projects: How neither public nor private actors really benefit. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy34(8): 1369–1386.
34.
WinchG (1998) Zephyrs of creative destruction: Understanding the management of innovation in construction. Building Research and Information26(5): 268–279.
35.
Winch GM (2012) Thirty years of private finance in the United Kingdom. In: Winch GM, Onishi M and Schmidt S (eds) Taking stock of PPP and PFI around the world. Summary of Research Report 126. The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants.
