Recent scholarship has called for widening investigations of cities through the analysis of everyday practices that shape urban life. Critical water studies have contributed to this emerging debate by using an everyday lens to document the diversity of practices of accessing and distributing water. Thus far, little attention has been given to the everyday practices of setting water prices and how these shape access. We contribute to this gap by investigating the practices of setting prices in two distinct service modalities within Lilongwe’s water supply network. Our study reveals the hybrid and dynamic arrangements that shape pricing regimes, formed through the formal and informal negotiations on subsidies, incentives, tariff increases and distribution of profits. In these negotiations, the decision makers opportunistically mobilise their different and at times conflicting mandates (business and social) and guiding principles (equity versus cost-recovery). We conclude that pricing regimes are the outcome of intertwined structural processes and everyday practices that exacerbate uneven water flows in the city.
AdamsEABoatengGO (2018)
Are urban informal communities capable of co-production? The influence of community–public partnerships on water access in Lilongwe, Malawi. Environment and Urbanization30(2): 461–480.
2.
AdamsEALukeJIdowuA (2018)
Spaces of exclusion’ in community water governance: A feminist political ecology of gender and participation in Malawi’s Urban Water User Associations. Geoforum95: 133–142.
3.
AdamsEAZuluLC (2015)
Participants or customers in water governance? Community-public partnerships for peri-urban water supply. Geoforum65: 112–124.
4.
Alda-VidalCKooyMRuscaM (2018)
Mapping operation and maintenance: An everyday urbanism analysis of inequalities within piped water supply in Lilongwe, Malawi. Urban Geography39(1): 104–121.
5.
Allen A, Dávila JD and Hofmann P (2006) The peri-urban water poor: citizens or consumers? Environment and Urbanization 18(2): 333–351.
6.
AnandN (2011)
Pressure: The politechnics of water supply in Mumbai. Cultural Anthropology: Journal of the Society for Cultural Anthropology26(4): 542–564.
7.
AnandN (2017) Hydraulic City: Water and the Infrastructures of Citizenship in Mumbai.
Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
8.
BaiettiAKingdomWvan GinnekenM (2006) Characteristics of Well-Performing Public Water Utilities.
Washington, DC:
Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Board.
9.
BakkerK (2003)
Archipelagos and networks: Urbanization and water privatization in the South. The Geographical Journal169(4): 328–341.
10.
BakkerK (2007)
The commons versus the commodity: ‘Alter’-globalization, privatization, and the human right to water in the global South. Antipode39(3): 430e455.
11.
BakkerK (2010) Governance Failure: Reframing the Urban Water Supply Crisis.
New York:
Cornell University Press, pp.19–51.
12.
BakkerK (2011) Commons versus commodities: Political ecologies of water privatization. In: Peet R, Robbins P and Watts M (eds) Global Political Ecology. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, pp.347–370.
13.
BakkerK (2013)
Neoliberal versus postneoliberal water: Geographies of privatization and resistance. Annals of the Association of American Geographers103(2): 253–260.
14.
BanerjeeSFosterYYing SkillingH, et al. (2010) Cost recovery, equity, and efficiency in water tariffs. Evidence from water utilities. The World Bank Africa Region, Sustainable Development Division WPS5384.
15.
BaptistaI (2015)
‘We live on estimates’: Everyday practices of prepaid electricity and the urban condition in Maputo, Mozambique. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research39(5): 1004–1019.
BirkenholtzT (2010) ‘
Full-cost recovery’: Producing differentiated water collection practices and responses to centralized water networks in Jaipur, India. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space42: 2238–2253.
18.
BjörkmanL (2015) Pipe Politics, Contested Waters: Embedded Infrastructures of Millennial Mumbai.
Durham, NC:
Duke University Press, p.xi, 281.
19.
BjörkmanL (2018)
The engineer and the plumber: Mediating Mumbai’s conflicting infrastructural imaginaries. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research42(2): 276–294.
20.
Boakye-AnsahAFerreroGRuscaM, et al. (2016)
Inequalities in microbial contamination of drinking water, supplies in urban areas: The case of Lilongwe, Malawi. Journal of Water and Health14(5): 851–863.
21.
BrennerNMaddenDJWachsmuthD (2011)
Assemblage urbanism and the challenges of critical urban theory. City15(2): 225–240.
22.
BrooksALoftusA (2016)
Africa’s passive revolution: Crisis in Malawi. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers41(3): 258–272.
23.
CamdessusMWinpennyJ (2003) Financing water for all. Report of the World Panel on Financing Water Infrastructure.
CastroJE (2008)
Neoliberal water and sanitation policies as a failed development strategy: Lessons from developing countries. Progress in Development Studies 2008; 8(1): 63–83.
26.
CorneaNLVéronRZimmerA (2017)
Everyday governance and urban environments: Towards a more interdisciplinary urban political ecology. Geography Compass11(4): 1–12.
27.
ECA, PEM Consult and TM Associates (2014) Lilongwe Water Board tariff review and willingness to pay study. Affordability and willingness to pay report. Lilongwe: PEM Consult and TM Associates.
28.
EggenØ (2011)
Chiefs and everyday governance: Parallel state organisations in Malawi. Journal of Southern African Studies37(2): 313–331.
29.
EkersMLoftusA (2008)
The power of water: Developing dialogues between Foucault and Gramsci. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space26(4): 698–718.
30.
Franceys R and Gerlach E (2008) Economic Regulation. Regulating Water and Sanitation for the Poor. Economic Regulation for Public and Private Partnerships. London: Earthscan, p.320
31.
FurlongK (2014)
STS beyond the ‘modern infrastructure ideal’: Extending theory by engaging with infrastructure challenges in the South. Technology in Society38: 139–147.
32.
GerlachEFranceysR (2010)
Regulating water services for all in developing economies. World Development38(9): 1229–1240.
33.
GopakumarG (2014)
Experiments and counter‐experiments in the urban laboratory of water‐supply partnerships in India. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research38(2): 393–412.
34.
Graham S and McFarlane C (eds) (2014) Infrastructural lives: Urban infrastructure in context. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
HarrisLRoa-GarcíaMC (2013)
Recent waves of water governance: Constitutional reform and resistance to neoliberalization in Latin America (1990–2012). Geoforum2013;
50: 20–30.
37.
HarrisLMGoldinJASneddonC (eds) (2015) Contemporary Water Governance in the Global South: Scarcity, Marketization and Participation.
New York:
Routledge.
38.
HerreraVPostA (2014)
Can developing countries both decentralize and depoliticize urban water services? Evaluating the legacy of the 1990s reform wave. World Development64: 621–2.
39.
HofmannP (2017) Multi-layered trajectories of water and sanitation poverty in Dar es Salaam. In: Bell S (ed) Urban Water Trajectories. Vol. 6. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.103–118.
40.
KayuniHM (2011)
Malawi’s economic and development policy choices from 1964 to 1980: An epitome of “pragmatic inilateral capitalism”. Nordic Journal of African Studies20(2): 112–131.
41.
KessidesIN (2004) Reforming Infrastructure: Privatization, Regulation, and Competition.
Whittington, DC:
World Bank Publications.
42.
LawhonMErnstsonHSilverJ (2014)
Provincializing urban political ecology: Towards a situated UPE through African Urbanism. Antipode46(2): 497–516.
Lilongwe Water Works? (2017) [video] Directed by M. Rusca.
London:
Vimeo. Available at: https://vimeo.com/240647554 (accessed 24 June 2019).
45.
LoftusA (2006)
Reification and the dictatorship of the water meter. Antipode38: 1023–1045.
46.
LoftusA (2012) Everyday Environmentalism: Creating an Urban Political Ecology.
Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
47.
McDonald D (2002) The Theory and Practice of Cost Recovery in South Africa. In: McDonald D and Pape J (eds) Cost Recovery and the Crisis of Service Delivery in South Africa. HSRC Press: Cape Town.
48.
McDonald D (2012) Remunicipalisation works!. In: Pigeon M, McDonald D, Hoedeman O, et al. (eds) Remunicipalisation: Putting Water Back into Public Hands. Transnational Institute: Amsterdam.
49.
McDonald DA and Ruiters G (eds) (2012) Alternatives to Privatization: Public Options for Essential Services in the Global South. New York: Routledge.
50.
McFarlaneC (2011)
Assemblage and critical urbanism. City15(2): 204–224.
51.
McFarlaneCSilverJ (2017)
Navigating the city: Dialectics of everyday urbanism. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers42(3): 458–471.
52.
OngA (2007)
Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers32: 3–8.
53.
OpryszkoMHuangHSoderlundK, et al. (2009)
Data gaps in evidence-based research on small water enterprises in developing countries. Journal of Water and Health7(4): 609–622.
54.
O’ReillyKDhanjuR (2012)
Hybrid drinking water governance: Community participation and ongoing neoliberal reforms in rural Rajasthan, India. Geoforum43(3): 623–633.
55.
Parsons Brinckerhoff Consortium (2013) Mid term review of the Malawi peri-urban water and sanitation project under the EU water facility. Final Report.
PelosoMMorinvilleC (2014)
‘Chasing for water’: Everyday practices of water access in Peri-Urban Ashaiman, Ghana. Water Alternatives7(1): 121–139.
58.
RanganathanM (2014)
Paying for pipes, claiming citizenship: Political agency and water reforms at the urban periphery. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research38(2): 590–608.
59.
RanganathanMBalazsC (2015)
Water marginalization at the urban fringe: Environmental justice and urban political ecology across the North–South divide. Urban Geography36(3): 403–423.
60.
Roa-GarcíaMC (2014)
Equity, efficiency and sustainability in water allocation in the Andes: Trade-offs in a full world.Water Alternatives7(2): 298–2.
61.
RogersPde SilvaRBhatiaR (2002)
Water is an economic good: How to use prices to promote equity, efficiency, and sustainability. Water Policy4(1): 1e17.
62.
Rusca M, Schwartz K, Hadzovic L, et al. (2015) Adapting generic models through bricolage: Elite capture of water users associations in peri-urban Lilongwe. The European Journal of Development Research 27(5): 777–792.
63.
RuscaMAlda VidalCHordijkM, et al. (2017)
Bathing without water, and other stories of everyday hygiene practices and risk perception in urban low-income areas: The case of Lilongwe, Malawi. Environment and Urbanisation29(2): 533–550.
64.
RuscaMBoakye-AnsahASLoftusA, et al. (2017)
An interdisciplinary political ecology of drinking water quality. Exploring socio-ecological inequalities in Lilongwe’s water supply network. Geoforum84: 138–146.
65.
RuscaMSchwartzK (2018)
The paradox of cost recovery in heterogeneous municipal water supply systems: Ensuring inclusiveness or exacerbating inequalities?Habitat International73: 101–108.
66.
SchrammSWright-ContrerasL (2017)
Beyond passive consumption: Dis/ordering water supply and sanitation at Hanoi’s urban edge. Geoforum85(August): 299–310.
67.
SheppardELeitnerHMaringantiA (2013)
Provincializing global urbanism: A manifesto. Urban Geography34(7): 37–41.
68.
SmithLHansonS (2003)
Access to water for the urban poor in Cape Town: Where equity meets cost recovery. Urban Studies40(8): 1517–2.
69.
SultanaF (2009)
Fluid lives: Subjectivities, gender and water in rural Bangladesh. Gender, Place & Culture16(4): 427–444.
70.
SwyngedouwE (2004) Social Power and the Urbanization of Water: Flows of Power.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
71.
SwyngedouwE (2005)
Dispossessing H2O: The contested terrain of water privatization. Capitalism and Socialism16(1): 81–98.
72.
TchuwaI (2018)
The ‘poisoned chalice’ of state ownership of water infrastructure in contemporary Blantyre, Malawi. Journal of Contemporary African Studies36(1): 1–22.
73.
TiwaleSRuscaMZwarteveenM (2018)
The power of pipes: Mapping urban water inequities through the material properties of networked water infrastructures. The case of Lilongwe, Malawi. Water Alternatives11(2): 314–335.
74.
TrueloveY (2016)
Incongruent waterworlds: Situating the everyday practices and power of water in Delhi. South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal14: 1–25.
75.
Velzeboer L, Hordijk M and Schwartz K (2018) Water is life in a life without water: Power and everyday water practices in Lilongwe, Malawi. Habitat International 73: 119–128.
Whittington D (2003) Municipal water pricing and tariff design: A reform agenda for South Asia. Water Policy 5: 61–76.
78.
World Bank (1982) Report and recommendation of the president to the executive directors on a proposed credit to the republic of Malawi for a Lilongwe water supply engineering project. Malawi: The World Bank.
79.
World Bank (1986) Report and recommendation of the president to the executive directors on a proposed credit to the republic of Malawi for a Second Lilongwe Water Supply Project. Malawi: The World Bank.
80.
World Bank (2017) Lilongwe Water and Sanitation Project (P163794): Project Appraisal Document. Malawi: The World Bank.
81.
WUA Chinsapo (2012) Service contract agreement between Lilongwe Water Board and WUA Chinsapo 2012. Lilongwe.
82.
ZetlandDGassonC (2013)
A global survey of urban water tariffs: Are they sustainable, efficient and fair?International Journal of Water Resources Development29(3): 327–342.
83.
ZugSGraefeO (2014)
The gift of water. Social redistribution of water among neighbours in Khartoum. Water Alternatives7(1): 140–159.
