This article explores the role of large-scale water infrastructure in the formation of states in sub-Saharan Africa. We examine this through a focus on government agents and their shifting hydro-developmental visions of the state in colonial and post-colonial Mozambique. Over time, the focus, underlying principles and goals of the hydraulic mission shifted, triggered by contextual factors and historical developments within and outside the country. We identify the making of three hydraulic paradigms, fostering different imaginaries of ‘the state’ and social and spatial engineering of the territory: the ‘Estado Novo’ (1930–1974), the socialist post-independence state-space (1974–1987) and the neoliberal state (1987–present). We then conclude by discussing how the shifting discursive justifications for infrastructure projects consolidate different state projects and link these to material re-patterning of hydrosocial territories. Whilst promoted as a rupture with the past, emerging projects tend to reaffirm, rather than redistribute, power and water within the country.
AbramsP (1988)
Notes on the difficulty of studying the state. Journal of Historical Sociology1(1): 58–89.
2.
AhlersRGuidaVPRuscaMet al. (2013)
Unleashing entrepreneurs or controlling unruly providers? The formalisation of small scale water providers in Greater Maputo, Mozambique. Journal of Development Studies49(4): 470–482.
3.
AllanT (2003) IWRM/IWRAM: A new sanctioned discourse? SOAS/KCL Occasional Paper 50 SOAS Water Issues Study Group. School of Oriental and African Studies/King’s College London University of London, UK.
4.
AndersonB (1991) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism.
New York:
Verso.
5.
AtaídeC (1970) Vale di Incomáti: Esquematização geral dos Aproveitamentos hidráulicos. Report Direcção dos Serviços Hidraúlicos, Lourenço Marques, Mozambique.
6.
AtkinsE (2018) Building a dam, constructing a nation: The ‘drowning’ of Capel Celyn. Journal of Historical Sociology, 31(4): 455–468.
7.
BakkerK (2007)
The commons versus the commodity: ‘Alter’-globalization, privatization, and the human right to water in the global South. Antipode39(3): 430–455.
8.
BakkerK (2010) Privatizing Water: Governance Failure and the World's Urban Water Crisis.
Cornell:
Cornell University Press.
9.
BarrosCChivangueASamagaioA (2014)
Urban dynamics in Maputo, Mozambique. Cities36: 74–82.
10.
BoelensRHoogestegerJSwyngedouwEet al. (2016)
Hydrosocial territories: A political ecology perspective. Water International41(1): 1–14.
11.
BrennerNEldenS (2009)
Henry Lefebvre on state, space, territory. International Political Sociology3: 353–377.
12.
BrennerNJessopBJonesMet al. (2003) State/Space: A Reader.
Oxford:
Blackwell Publishing.
13.
BridgeG (2013)
Resource geographies II: The resource-state nexus. Progress in Human Geography38(1): 118–130.
14.
BussottiLDe MuttiA (2013)
Italy and Mozambique: Science, economy and society within a history an anomalous cooperation. Advances in Historical Studies2: 185–193.
15.
CastreeN (2005)
The epistemology of particulars: Human geography, case studies, and “context”. Geoforum36(5): 541–666.
16.
Crow-MillerBWebberMMolleF (2017)
The (Re)turn to infrastructure for water management?Water Alternatives10(2): 195–207.
17.
Direção Nacional de Águas – DNA (1980) Plano Básico o Desenvolvimento Hidroagrícola Do Vale Do Incomáti.
Maputo:
BUREP.
FantiniEMulunehTSmitH (2018) Big projects, strong states? Large scale investments in irrigation and state formation in the Beles valley, Ethiopia. In: MengaFSwyngedouwE (eds) Water, Technology and the Nation-State.
London:
Routledge Earthscan.
20.
FosterR (2013)
Tabula imperii europae: A cartographic approach to the current debate on the European Union as empire. Geopolitics18(2): 371–402.
21.
FriedmannJ (1980)
The territorial approach to rural development in the People's Republic of Mozambique: Six discussion papers. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research4(1): 97–111.
22.
FurlongK (2015) Rethinking universality and disrepair: Seeking infrastructure coexistence in Quibdò, Colombia. In: CoutardORutherfordJ (eds) Beyond the Networked City: Infrastructure Reconfigurations and Urban Change in the North and South.
New York:
Routledge, pp.94–113.
HarrisL (2012)
State as socionatural effect: Variable and emergent geographies of the state in southeastern Turkey. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East32(1): 25–39.
25.
HarrisLAlatoutS (2010)
Negotiating hydro-scales, forging states: Comparison of the upper Tigris/Euphrates and Jordan River basins. Political Geography29: 148–156.
26.
IsaacmanAFIsaacmanB (2013) Dams, Displacement and the Delusion of Development. Cahora Bassa and Its Legacies in Mozambique (New African Histories).
Athens:
Ohio University Press.
27.
JenkinsP (2000)
City profile: Maputo. Cities17(3): 207–218.
28.
KaikaM (2006)
Dams as symbols of modernization: The urbanization of nature between geographical imagination and materiality. Annals, Association of American Geographers96(2): 276–301.
29.
KirchherrJ (2018)
Strategies of successful anti-dam movements: Evidence from Myanmar and Thailand. Society & Natural Resources31(2): 166–182.
30.
LefebvreH (1991) The Production of Space.
Oxford:
Blackwell Publishing.
31.
LintonJ (2010) What is Water? the History of a Modern Abstraction.
Vancouver:
UBC Press.
32.
LintonJDelayE (2018) Death by certainty: The Vinça dam, the French state, and the changing social relations of irrigation the Têt basin of the Eastern French Pyrénées. In: MengaFSwyngedouwE (eds) Water, Technology and the Nation-State.
London:
Routledge Earthscan.
33.
MacagnoL (2009)
Fragmentos de uma imaginação nacional. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais24(70): 17–35.
34.
McCullyP (1996) Silenced Rivers: The Ecology and Politics of Large Dams.
London:
Zed Books Ltd.
35.
MeehanKM (2014)
Tool-power: Water infrastructures as wellsprings of state power. Geoforum57: 215–224.
36.
MengaF (2015)
Building a nation through a dam: The case of Rogun in Tajikistan. Nationalities Papers43(3): 479–494.
37.
MengaFSwyngedouwE (2018) Water, Technology and the Nation-State.
London:
Routledge Earthscan.
38.
MermeVAhlersRGuptaJ (2014)
Private equity, public affair: Hydropower financing in the Mekong Basin. Global Environmental Change24: 20–29.
39.
Ministério das Obras Públicas e Habitação – MOPH and Fundo de Investimento e Património do Abastecimento de Água – FIPAG (2011) Master Plan for the Greater Maputo Water Supply System. Master Plan Main Report. C. Lotti & Associati S.p.A.; SIM S.p.A. GICO Branch.
40.
MirumachiN (2015) Transboundary Water Politics in the Developing World.
London and New York:
Routledge.
41.
MitchellT (2002) Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity.
Berkeley:
University of California Press.
42.
MitchellT (2006) Society, economy and state effect. In: SharmaAGuptaA (eds) The Anthropology of the State: A Reader.
Oxford:
Blackwell Publishing, pp.169–187.
43.
MolleFMollingaPWesterP (2009)
Hydraulic bureaucracies and the hydraulic mission: Flows of water, flows of power. Water Alternatives2(3): 328–349.
44.
MooreDDoreJGyawaliD (2010)
The World Commission on Dams +10: Revisiting the large dam controversy. Water Alternatives3(2): 3–13.
45.
NeumannRP (1996) Nature-state-territory: Toward a critical theorization of conservation enclosures. In: PeetRWattsM (eds) Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements.
London:
Routledge.
46.
PainterJ (2006)
Prosaic geographies of stateness. Political Geography25(7): 752–774.
47.
PainterJJeffreyA (2009) Political Geography. 2nd ed.
Los Angeles:
SAGE.
48.
PitcherM (2006)
Forgetting from above and memory from below: Strategies of legitimation and struggle in postsocialist Mozambique. Africa76(1): 88–112.
49.
PowerMKirshnerJ (2019)
Powering the state: The political geographies of electrification in Mozambique. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 37(3): 498–518.
50.
RadcliffeS (2001) Imagining the state as a space: Territoriality and the formation of the state in Ecuador. In: HansenTBStepputatF (eds) States of Imagination: Ethnographic Explorations of the Post-Colonial State.
Durham and London:
Duke University Press, pp.123–149.
51.
RobbinsP (2008) The state in political ecology: A postcard to political geography from the field. In: CoxKRLowMRobinsonJ (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Political Geography.
London:
SAGE, pp.205–218.
52.
RodgersDO'NeillB (2012)
Infrastructural violence: Introduction to the special issue. Ethnography13(4): 401–412.
53.
RuscaMSchwartzK (2018)
The paradox of cost recovery in heterogeneous municipal water supply systems: Ensuring inclusiveness or exacerbating inequalities?Habitat International73: 101–108.
54.
SabaratnamM (2013) History repeating? Colonial, socialist and liberal statebuilding in Mozambique. In: ChandlerDSiskT (eds) The Routledge Handbook of International Statebuilding.
London:
Routledge, pp.106–117.
55.
ScottJ (1999) Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed.
New Haven and London:
Yale University Press.
56.
ShapiroM (2003) Nation-states. In: AgnewJMitchellKToalG (eds) A Companion to Political Geography.
Oxford:
Blackwell Publishing, pp.271–289.
57.
ShoveE (2015) Infrastructures and practices: Networks beyond the city. In: CoutardORutherfordJ (eds) Beyond the Networked City: Infrastructure Reconfigurations and Urban Change in the North and South.
New York:
Routledge, pp.242–257.
58.
SidawayJ (1992)
Mozambique: Destabilization, state, society and space. Political Geography11(3): 239–258.
59.
SidawayJ (1993)
Urban and regional planning in post-independence Mozambique. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research17(2): 241–259.
60.
SimpsonM (1993)
Foreign and domestic factors in the transformation of Frelimo. The Journal of Modern African Studies31(2): 309–337.
61.
SumichJ (2010) Nationalism, urban poverty and identity in Maputo, Mozambique. Crisis States Research Centre – Working paper 68: Cities and Fragile States, London School of Economics.
62.
SwyngedouwE (2004) Social Power and the Urbanisation of Water: Flows of Power.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
63.
TiwaleSRuscaMZwarteveenM (2018)
The power of pipes: Mapping urban water inequities through the material properties of networked water infrastructures – The case of Lilongwe, Malawi. Water Alternatives11(2): 314–335.
64.
UN-HABITAT (2016) World Cities Report 2016: Urbanization and Development – Emerging Futures.
New York:
United Nations.
65.
Water at the margins. (2018). [video] Directed by M. Rusca. London, UK: Vimeo. Available at: https://vimeo.com/280547807
66.
WesterPRapEVargas‐VelázquezS (2009)
The hydraulic mission and the Mexican hydrocracy: Regulating and reforming the flows of water and power. Water Alternatives2(3): 395–415.
67.
WittfogelKA (1957) Oriental Despotism: A Comparative Study of Total Power.
New Haven:
Yale University Press.
68.
World Bank (1987) Report and Recommendations of the President of the International Development Association to the Executive Directors on a Proposed IDA Credit of SDR 54.5 Million and a Proposed a African Facility Credit of SDR 14.5 Million to the People’s Republic of Mozambique for a Second Rehabilitation Credit, Report No. P-4608-Moz. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
69.
World Bank (2007) Mozambique Country Water Resources Assistance Strategy: Making Water Work for Sustainable Growth and Poverty Reduction.
Washington, DC:
The World Bank.
70.
World Bank (2011) Project Appraisal Document on a Proposed Credit in the Amount of SDR 43.8 Million to the Republic of Mozambique for the Water Resources Development Project.
Washington D.C.:
The World Bank.
71.
World Bank (2013) Project Appraisal Document on a Proposed Credit in the Amount of SDR 118.8 Million to the Republic of Mozambique for a Greater Maputo Water Supply Expansion Project.
Washington, DC:
The World Bank.
72.
World Commission on Dams (WCD) (2000) Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-Making. The Report of the World Commission on Dams.
London and Sterling, VA:
Earthscan.
73.
WorsterD (1985) Rivers of Empire: Water, Aridity, and the Growth of the American West.New York:
Oxford University Press.
